If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
This is a bit puzzling: I have two 160G ATA drives is soft RAID0
under Windows XP with 4k stipe. Both have SMART enabled, and both report 0 reallocated sectors. But chkdsk /r/x found and reported 4k in bad blocks. Do ATA drives reallocate bad sectors automatically, or do I need to scan both with manufacturer's (Samsung) utility? Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
IronFelix wrote
This is a bit puzzling: I have two 160G ATA drives is soft RAID0 under Windows XP with 4k stipe. Both have SMART enabled, and both report 0 reallocated sectors. What is the full SMART report ? There aint just reallocated sectors with bads. Show the Everest report http://www.majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4181 But chkdsk /r/x found and reported 4k in bad blocks. That's likely just one bad sector. Do ATA drives reallocate bad sectors automatically, Yes, but only in specific situations, where the data can be retrieved to put in the reallocated sector. or do I need to scan both with manufacturer's (Samsung) utility? Yes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
"IronFelix" wrote in message
This is a bit puzzling: I have two 160G ATA drives is soft RAID0 under Windows XP with 4k stipe. Both have SMART enabled, and both report 0 reallocated sectors. But No, that is why. chkdsk /r/x found and reported 4k in bad blocks. (actually that is badblocks in 4k ) So they aren't reallocated yet. If they were, chkdsk obviously wouldn't be able to find them. Do ATA drives reallocate bad sectors automatically, Only on writes. Only not yet bad sectors are automatically reassigned on reads. or do I need to scan both with manufacturer's (Samsung) utility? Depends on how smart it is. If it can single out only the bad sectors and write over them, then sure. Thanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
In article ,
IronFelix wrote: :This is a bit puzzling: I have two 160G ATA drives is soft RAID0 :under Windows XP with 4k stipe. Both have SMART enabled, and both :report 0 reallocated sectors. But chkdsk /r/x found and reported 4k in :bad blocks. Do ATA drives reallocate bad sectors automatically, or do :I need to scan both with manufacturer's (Samsung) utility? Thanks. Does SMART report any "pending" sectors? Those are sectors that the drive has found to be unreadable and will be reallocated the next time they are written. Of course, since the OS has flagged that area of the disk as "bad" it will never _be_ rewritten, and thus the drive will never reallocate the bad sectors. Any utility that performs a surface analysis by writing to every sector will trigger the reallocation, and thereafter the OS will see a disk with no bad blocks. -- Bob Nichols AT comcast.net I am "RNichols42" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:24:16 +1100, "Rod Speed"
wrote: IronFelix wrote This is a bit puzzling: I have two 160G ATA drives is soft RAID0 under Windows XP with 4k stipe. Both have SMART enabled, and both report 0 reallocated sectors. What is the full SMART report ? There aint just reallocated sectors with bads. Show the Everest report http://www.majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4181 But chkdsk /r/x found and reported 4k in bad blocks. That's likely just one bad sector. Do ATA drives reallocate bad sectors automatically, Yes, but only in specific situations, where the data can be retrieved to put in the reallocated sector. or do I need to scan both with manufacturer's (Samsung) utility? Yes. Thanks for all replies. Here's the full SMART report: the 1st-4th data fields are "threshold", "Value","Worst" and "Data", respectively. --------[ EVEREST Home Edition (c) 2003-2005 Lavalys, Inc. ]------------------------------------------------------------ Version EVEREST v2.01.347 Homepage http://www.lavalys.com/ Report Type Quick Report Computer CARCASS (CARCASS) Generator vlad Operating System Microsoft Windows XP Professional 5.1.2600 (WinXP Retail) Date 2006-01-27 Time 21:02 --------[ SMART ]------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ SAMSUNG SP1604N (0651J1FW513334) ] 01 Raw Read Error Rate 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal 03 Spin Up Time 0 59 48 6912 OK: Always passing 04 Start/Stop Count 0 96 96 4249 OK: Always passing 05 Reallocated Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal 07 Seek Error Rate 51 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal 08 Seek Time Performance 0 253 253 0 OK: Always passing 09 Power-On Time Count 0 98 98 1407531 OK: Always passing 0A Spin Retry Count 49 100 100 1 OK: Value is normal 0C Power Cycle Count 0 100 100 519 OK: Always passing C2 Temperature 0 163 112 25 OK: Always passing C3 Hardware ECC Recovered 0 100 100 411199259 OK: Always passing C4 Reallocation Event Count 0 253 253 0 OK: Always passing C5 Current Pending Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal C6 Off-Line Uncorrectable Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal C7 Ultra ATA CRC Error Rate 0 100 100 0 OK: Always passing C8 Write Error Rate 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal C9 vendor-specific 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal [ SAMSUNG SV1604N (S01FJ10W401594) ] 01 Raw Read Error Rate 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal 04 Start/Stop Count 0 97 97 3912 OK: Always passing 05 Reallocated Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal 07 Seek Error Rate 51 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal 08 Seek Time Performance 0 253 253 0 OK: Always passing 09 Power-On Time Count 0 98 98 1636365 OK: Always passing 0C Power Cycle Count 0 100 100 539 OK: Always passing C2 Temperature 0 160 106 26 OK: Always passing C5 Current Pending Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal C6 Off-Line Uncorrectable Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal C7 Ultra ATA CRC Error Rate 0 100 100 0 OK: Always passing C8 Write Error Rate 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal C9 vendor-specific 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal So reallocation is triggered under a narrow set of circumstances, and I suppose running chkdsk isn't one of them? I guess running a manufacturer's utility should help. Both of these disks are nearly 4 years old with very heavy use history, so they should be nearing their EOL. Thanks again! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
IronFelix wrote
Rod Speed wrote IronFelix wrote This is a bit puzzling: I have two 160G ATA drives is soft RAID0 under Windows XP with 4k stipe. Both have SMART enabled, and both report 0 reallocated sectors. What is the full SMART report ? There aint just reallocated sectors with bads. Show the Everest report http://www.majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4181 But chkdsk /r/x found and reported 4k in bad blocks. That's likely just one bad sector. Do ATA drives reallocate bad sectors automatically, Yes, but only in specific situations, where the data can be retrieved to put in the reallocated sector. or do I need to scan both with manufacturer's (Samsung) utility? Yes. Thanks for all replies. Here's the full SMART report: the 1st-4th data fields are "threshold", "Value","Worst" and "Data", respectively. --------[ EVEREST Home Edition (c) 2003-2005 Lavalys, Inc. ]------------------------------------------------------------ Version EVEREST v2.01.347 Homepage http://www.lavalys.com/ Report Type Quick Report Computer CARCASS (CARCASS) Generator vlad Operating System Microsoft Windows XP Professional 5.1.2600 (WinXP Retail) Date 2006-01-27 Time 21:02 --------[ SMART ]------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ SAMSUNG SP1604N (0651J1FW513334) ] 01 Raw Read Error Rate 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal 03 Spin Up Time 0 59 48 6912 OK: Always passing 04 Start/Stop Count 0 96 96 4249 OK: Always passing 05 Reallocated Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal 07 Seek Error Rate 51 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal 08 Seek Time Performance 0 253 253 0 OK: Always passing 09 Power-On Time Count 0 98 98 1407531 OK: Always passing 0A Spin Retry Count 49 100 100 1 OK: Value is normal 0C Power Cycle Count 0 100 100 519 OK: Always passing C2 Temperature 0 163 112 25 OK: Always passing C3 Hardware ECC Recovered 0 100 100 411199259 OK: Always passing C4 Reallocation Event Count 0 253 253 0 OK: Always passing C5 Current Pending Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal C6 Off-Line Uncorrectable Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal C7 Ultra ATA CRC Error Rate 0 100 100 0 OK: Always passing C8 Write Error Rate 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal C9 vendor-specific 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal [ SAMSUNG SV1604N (S01FJ10W401594) ] 01 Raw Read Error Rate 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal 04 Start/Stop Count 0 97 97 3912 OK: Always passing 05 Reallocated Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal 07 Seek Error Rate 51 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal 08 Seek Time Performance 0 253 253 0 OK: Always passing 09 Power-On Time Count 0 98 98 1636365 OK: Always passing 0C Power Cycle Count 0 100 100 539 OK: Always passing C2 Temperature 0 160 106 26 OK: Always passing C5 Current Pending Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal C6 Off-Line Uncorrectable Sector Count 10 253 253 0 OK: Value is normal C7 Ultra ATA CRC Error Rate 0 100 100 0 OK: Always passing C8 Write Error Rate 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal C9 vendor-specific 51 100 100 0 OK: Value is normal No sign of any bad sector on either drive. Looks like chkdsk has decided that there is are bad blocks at the data level, nothing to do with the drives. So reallocation is triggered under a narrow set of circumstances, Yes. and I suppose running chkdsk isn't one of them? Yes, particularly when its just bad data, not a bad sector. I guess running a manufacturer's utility should help. It should show both drives as fine. Both of these disks are nearly 4 years old with very heavy use history, so they should be nearing their EOL. No evidence of any problem with either drive. Thanks again! No problem. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Catalyst 5.8 out | LostSoul | Ati Videocards | 16 | August 20th 05 02:31 AM |
Bad sectors found on a RAID 0 two HD array, what to do? | someone92 | Storage (alternative) | 8 | August 20th 04 02:09 PM |
Critical errors? ATA Error Count | Al Bogner | Storage (alternative) | 0 | June 13th 04 12:14 PM |
Windows XP fails to boot after Drive Image 7 restore | Milleniumaire | Storage (alternative) | 11 | February 28th 04 08:26 PM |
Help! - The dreaded buffer underrun | XPG | Cdr | 5 | August 31st 03 06:27 PM |