If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Bobby" wrote in message
... Tony - Great post. One to save I think. Cheers. Bobby "Tony Hill" wrote in message ... On 12 Sep 2004 19:08:38 -0700, (No spam) wrote: Hello everyone. I am looking to buy a new desktop PC. I currently have a Compaq Pentium 3 733 MHz desktop and a Dell 2.0 GHz Celeron laptop. [snip] Now I am looking to buy a new desktop and I am looking for the best new technology. I am very interested in 64 bit technology. I know Intel has had Itanium and Itanium II but as I understand it those are not for consumers. You can safely ignore the Itanium line, it's definitely NOT what you're going to be looking for. First off, it's not software compatible with existing applications, requiring emulation to run all your current code. What's probably more important though is that you'll have a heck of a time finding an Itanium system for less than $20,000. [snip] Just to bring that $20K back to reality...entry-level HP Integrity rx1600's can be gotten for $2800+/- from HP. Ken ____________________________________ Ken Farmer LinuxHPC.org. http://www.LinuxHPC.org |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
HI, definatly go for amd 64 bit, Start with a 3200xp 64 bit cpu. I jumped up
from a powerfull 2200 xp. The difference startled me. Long live amd. Down with intel. Anne "Kenneth Farmer" wrote in message om... "Bobby" wrote in message ... Tony - Great post. One to save I think. Cheers. Bobby "Tony Hill" wrote in message ... On 12 Sep 2004 19:08:38 -0700, (No spam) wrote: Hello everyone. I am looking to buy a new desktop PC. I currently have a Compaq Pentium 3 733 MHz desktop and a Dell 2.0 GHz Celeron laptop. [snip] Now I am looking to buy a new desktop and I am looking for the best new technology. I am very interested in 64 bit technology. I know Intel has had Itanium and Itanium II but as I understand it those are not for consumers. You can safely ignore the Itanium line, it's definitely NOT what you're going to be looking for. First off, it's not software compatible with existing applications, requiring emulation to run all your current code. What's probably more important though is that you'll have a heck of a time finding an Itanium system for less than $20,000. [snip] Just to bring that $20K back to reality...entry-level HP Integrity rx1600's can be gotten for $2800+/- from HP. Ken ____________________________________ Ken Farmer LinuxHPC.org. http://www.LinuxHPC.org |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Yes i changed to the x64.
Just as soon as i could work out if Intel were Or were not going to have a x64 at a reasonable price. That would run the new Windows x64 OS but after they opted not to go ahead with the Prescott and its apparent x64 extensions I went AMD for the first time and am far from disappointed. I used the Gigabyte GA - K8VNXP MOBO and a socket 754 3700+ and it is a gem of a computer So that i have nothing slowing the machine down I also installed a GeCube ATI x800 Platinum. The machine feels bullet proof and I have had no compatibilities problems I run it as a media centre with 2 x 200GB SATA 7200 A Leadtek Digital TV Tuner And 2 X 120GB Seagate ATE 7200 for the OS Samsung 8x DVD Burner Dual layer & 52XDVD Combo drive for copying DVD's direct and the system has yet to falter no lockups no BSOD boots super fast and loads all software on demand. I say "and i am not being bias" Definately go 64 BIT Go AMD x64. "Kenneth Farmer" wrote in message om... "Bobby" wrote in message ... Tony - Great post. One to save I think. Cheers. Bobby "Tony Hill" wrote in message ... On 12 Sep 2004 19:08:38 -0700, (No spam) wrote: Hello everyone. I am looking to buy a new desktop PC. I currently have a Compaq Pentium 3 733 MHz desktop and a Dell 2.0 GHz Celeron laptop. [snip] Now I am looking to buy a new desktop and I am looking for the best new technology. I am very interested in 64 bit technology. I know Intel has had Itanium and Itanium II but as I understand it those are not for consumers. You can safely ignore the Itanium line, it's definitely NOT what you're going to be looking for. First off, it's not software compatible with existing applications, requiring emulation to run all your current code. What's probably more important though is that you'll have a heck of a time finding an Itanium system for less than $20,000. [snip] Just to bring that $20K back to reality...entry-level HP Integrity rx1600's can be gotten for $2800+/- from HP. Ken ____________________________________ Ken Farmer LinuxHPC.org. http://www.LinuxHPC.org |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Just to bring that $20K back to reality...entry-level HP Integrity rx1600's
can be gotten for $2800+/- from HP. no '-' there, you're talking about a ridiculously stripped machine with a single, extremely low-end processor (much slower than an entry-level AMD, for instance). and 512M for crying out loud! no hard drive at all, no management card that anyone buying a server would demand. frigging 1-year warranty! configure it up to a sane if slow server (8GB ram, 3-yr, second cpu, pair of disks) and you're up to $15K. again, this winds up being a machine which will not hold a candle to a similarly configured opteron for less than half the price. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark Hahn" wrote in message
... Just to bring that $20K back to reality...entry-level HP Integrity rx1600's can be gotten for $2800+/- from HP. no '-' there, you're talking about a ridiculously stripped machine with a single, extremely low-end processor (much slower than an entry-level AMD, for instance). and 512M for crying out loud! no hard drive at all, no management card that anyone buying a server would demand. frigging 1-year warranty! configure it up to a sane if slow server (8GB ram, 3-yr, second cpu, pair of disks) and you're up to $15K. again, this winds up being a machine which will not hold a candle to a similarly configured opteron for less than half the price. Mark, I've obviously hit a nerve. Certainly not intended. The mentioned price was just a bit overboard. Once again... rx1600's start at $2800+/-. I'm not any recommendations, I'm just pointing out that $20K is a stretch. Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ghost speed differerent in AMD & Intel | Zotin Khuma | General | 7 | November 17th 04 06:56 AM |
intel board, fans on during standby. intel d875PBZ. | JohnJ | General | 0 | January 13th 04 05:14 PM |
intel is all for looks | matthew utt | Overclocking AMD Processors | 6 | January 11th 04 06:47 PM |
AMD compared to Intel | Tod | Overclocking AMD Processors | 60 | December 4th 03 03:43 PM |
WD360 + Intel 875PBZ + XP Problem | @drian | General | 0 | November 6th 03 11:10 AM |