If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Antec power supply
Here's the situation. I was moving my pc and I dropped the surge protector on
the floor and broke it. So I've been plugging the computer directly into the wall and switching on the power supply switch on the back of the case and then switching it off again and unplugging it when I'm done. I don't like leaving it plugged in all day when I'm at work. You never know when an afternoon thunderstorm is going to pop up. I've noticed a couple times the power didn't want to come on when I flipped the switch. Is it safe to unplug the computer without turning off the power supply switch first? Is the switch a basic on/off switch or does it also contain other circuits that protect the power supply and computer components from a sudden jolt of electricity? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"DJS0302" wrote in message
... Here's the situation. I was moving my pc and I dropped the surge protector on the floor and broke it. So I've been plugging the computer directly into the wall and switching on the power supply switch on the back of the case and then switching it off again and unplugging it when I'm done. I don't like leaving it plugged in all day when I'm at work. You never know when an afternoon thunderstorm is going to pop up. I've noticed a couple times the power didn't want to come on when I flipped the switch. Is it safe to unplug the computer without turning off the power supply switch first? Is the switch a basic on/off switch or does it also contain other circuits that protect the power supply and computer components from a sudden jolt of electricity? In all the PSUs I've worked on (and there've been 3 or 4 - I haven't seen an Antec yet though), the power switch (where fitted) is wired into the circuit as a simple way of isolating the mains (before anything else in the circuit) so switching that off has the same effect as pulling out the mains plug. Its well worth buying another surge suppressor though or better still a UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply) with built in surge suppression - that includes a battery in it and it will allow you to keep using the machine for a few minutes (to save your work/close down applications and windows etc) in the event of a mains outage. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
You fear damage so you disconnect daily. Well, if the power
strip is a surge protector type, then it may even contribute to damage of the adjacent computer. It can complete a circuit so that a surge finds a path from cloud to earth via the computer. This is how damage occurs. The appliance becomes part of a connection between earth and the cloud. If you want a disconnect switch, the superior solution is the $3 power strip that must also have the 15 amp circuit breaker. For hardware protection from surges, the incoming utility wire must connect to earth ground. IOW a 'whole house' protector on AC electric service is required. Your telco provides same on phone line for free. Cable must be properly earthed before entering the building. Earthing - and not a surge protector - is protection. The surge protector is only effective when connected 'less than 10 feet' to earth ground. Get the $3 power strip that includes something important - a circuit breaker. $15 or $50 protector is very expensive for just a power strip. Effective surge protection costs about $1 per appliance and must complete a less than 10 foot connection to earth. A plug-in power strip provides no such connection and forgets to mention they don't protect from that typically destructive type of surge. DJS0302 wrote: Here's the situation. I was moving my pc and I dropped the surge protector on the floor and broke it. So I've been plugging the computer directly into the wall and switching on the power supply switch on the back of the case and then switching it off again and unplugging it when I'm done. I don't like leaving it plugged in all day when I'm at work. You never know when an afternoon thunderstorm is going to pop up. I've noticed a couple times the power didn't want to come on when I flipped the switch. Is it safe to unplug the computer without turning off the power supply switch first? Is the switch a basic on/off switch or does it also contain other circuits that protect the power supply and computer components from a sudden jolt of electricity? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"w_tom" wrote in message
... You fear damage so you disconnect daily. Well, if the power strip is a surge protector type, then it may even contribute to damage of the adjacent computer. It can complete a circuit so that a surge finds a path from cloud to earth via the computer. This is how damage occurs. The appliance becomes part of a connection between earth and the cloud. You fail to mention that this will occurr with any connection directly to mains (in otherwords unless its through an isolating transformer or via certain types of UPS devices). The "proper" solution is a UPS with surge suppression built in and that will aleviate the above concern. If you want a disconnect switch, the superior solution is the $3 power strip that must also have the 15 amp circuit breaker. For hardware protection from surges, the incoming utility wire must connect to earth ground. IOW a 'whole house' protector on AC electric service is required. Your telco provides same on phone line for free. Cable must be properly earthed before entering the building. Earthing - and not a surge protector - is protection. The surge protector is only effective when connected 'less than 10 feet' to earth ground. Your right in that earthing of mains offers some protection (at least from the line thats earthed - I don't know how they do it where where you are but in the UK and New Zealand its Neutral thats earthed). Only problem with this is that if you touch the other "Live" wire, you will get a full on zap because its that much easier to travel through the earth back to neutral and complete the circuit. Get the $3 power strip that includes something important - a circuit breaker. $15 or $50 protector is very expensive for just a power strip. Effective surge protection costs about $1 per appliance and must complete a less than 10 foot connection to earth. A plug-in power strip provides no such connection and forgets to mention they don't protect from that typically destructive type of surge. A standard old circuit breaker is going to take way to long to trip and even if it did trip after say lightning hit the mains wires, it would still likely arc across the contacts with nothing to dissipate that energy. I still say a UPS is the best way to go. You'll find that industry swears by them because its just too risky to connect very expensive server equipment (with valauable data) up to anything less. They also offer the protection of an orderly shutdown to prevent or at least minimise data loss across an organisation. You tell me of a bank that has a "$3 power strip that must also have the 15 amp circuit breaker" powering its servers and you will have found a very ill prepared bank. Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Paul Murphy wrote:
.... snip ... A standard old circuit breaker is going to take way to long to trip and even if it did trip after say lightning hit the mains wires, it would still likely arc across the contacts with nothing to dissipate that energy. I still say a UPS is the best way to go. You'll find that industry swears by them because its just too risky to connect very expensive server equipment (with valauable data) up to anything less. They also offer the protection of an orderly shutdown to prevent or at least minimise data loss across an organisation. You tell me of a bank that has a "$3 power strip that must also have the 15 amp circuit breaker" powering its servers and you will have found a very ill prepared bank. Not too long ago installation of a 'main frame', worth about a half million, and with a fraction of the power of todays PCs, specified the power source in great detail. Among other things it wanted an independent drop from the power company, followed by a toroidal isolation transformer, and independent earth grounds. -- Chuck F ) ) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. http://cbfalconer.home.att.net USE worldnet address! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
If you are recommending a plug-in UPS for anything other
than data protection, then you don't know how that UPS works. The protection claimed is for a type of surge that does not typically exist. It does not even claim to protect from surges that typically damage computers. BTW, the surge protector circuit inside a plug-in UPS is same as that in the power strip protector. How do we know? The same circuits are even rated by the same parameter - joules. There is no difference between the protector circuit inside the plug-in UPS and power strip protector. The purpose of that circuit breaker inside a $3 power strip is not for surge protection. I never stated same and assumed that was common knowledge. Again, basic electrical principles. Surges do destruction in microseconds. Circuit breakers take milliseconds to trip. Circuit breakers and fuses have only one purpose - to protect human life. Fuses and circuit breakers blow after hardware damage has occurred, so that the damage does not kill a human in a house fire. An isolation transformer or certain types of UPSes will somehow stop these surges? You actually think they will stop or dissipate energy that even 4 kilometers of air could not stop? IOW you think these will stop, block, or absorb a surge? Again, it helps to understand some basic electrical principles such as breakdown voltages and ideal current sources. There is no surge protector that effectively stops, blocks, filters, or absorbs destructive surges. Even a circuit breaker is not for that function. The manufacturer does not even claim this to be true: The "proper" solution is a UPS with surge suppression built in and that will aleviate the above concern. There is no surge protection inside the plug-in UPS that will alleviate the destructive surge problem. Even its manufacturer does not make that claim. Where in their long list of numerical specs do they make that claim - if you can even find a long list of specs. Why provide information - detailed numerical specs - that would undermine myth purveyors? If you can claim that plug-in UPS provides protection, then you can provide numerical documentation that says same. Subtle hint - you will not find any such documentation because the manufacturer does not make that claim. And now for technical jargon. Paul is confusing transverse and longitudinal transients as if they were same. Paul. Notice that the plug-in UPS avoids making specific claims for each type of surge. Why? It only claims to protect from the one transient that does not typically exist. They know many computer users will then *assume* this means protection from all types of surges. The jargon is even taught to first year EE students. IOW that plug-in manufacturer knows most who recommend their product do not even have a first year training AND will promote the myths. No earth ground means no effective protection. This is a damning fact. Where for that plug-in UPS is there any dedicated connection, from each wire, less than 3 meters, to earth ground? Where is the discussion about earthing? Neither exist which means the plug-in UPS is not effective. If you don't understand the EE concepts, then you will probably confuse safety ground (wall receptacle ground) with earth ground. I kept emphasizing a specific phrase: 'less than 10 feet'. That phrase summarizes why a wall receptacle is not earth ground - in UK, NZ, AU, US, CH, FR, DE, etc. Furthermore in NZ and UK, only one AC electric wire is earthed. Not good enough. All incoming wires must be earthed to provide effective protection. The effective surge protector connects 'less than 3 meters' to single point earth ground - which means the only effective protector is at the service entrance - and distant from the computer. Plug-in protectors can even contribute to damage of powered off and adjacent electronics. Earth ground affords all the protection - other than protection that already exists inside appliances. Internal protection that an adjacent plug-in protector can even compromise. But you tell me. What happens during a surge - in terms of voltage and current? What does the adjacent plug-in protector do during this surge? If you recommend a plug-in protector - UPS or power strip - then you must be able to answer this question. Please tell us the details of how the power strip or UPS protector operates during the transient. Paul Murphy wrote: "w_tom" wrote in message ... You fear damage so you disconnect daily. Well, if the power strip is a surge protector type, then it may even contribute to damage of the adjacent computer. It can complete a circuit so that a surge finds a path from cloud to earth via the computer. This is how damage occurs. The appliance becomes part of a connection between earth and the cloud. You fail to mention that this will occurr with any connection directly to mains (in otherwords unless its through an isolating transformer or via certain types of UPS devices). The "proper" solution is a UPS with surge suppression built in and that will aleviate the above concern. If you want a disconnect switch, the superior solution is the $3 power strip that must also have the 15 amp circuit breaker. For hardware protection from surges, the incoming utility wire must connect to earth ground. IOW a 'whole house' protector on AC electric service is required. Your telco provides same on phone line for free. Cable must be properly earthed before entering the building. Earthing - and not a surge protector - is protection. The surge protector is only effective when connected 'less than 10 feet' to earth ground. Your right in that earthing of mains offers some protection (at least from the line thats earthed - I don't know how they do it where where you are but in the UK and New Zealand its Neutral thats earthed). Only problem with this is that if you touch the other "Live" wire, you will get a full on zap because its that much easier to travel through the earth back to neutral and complete the circuit. Get the $3 power strip that includes something important - a circuit breaker. $15 or $50 protector is very expensive for just a power strip. Effective surge protection costs about $1 per appliance and must complete a less than 10 foot connection to earth. A plug-in power strip provides no such connection and forgets to mention they don't protect from that typically destructive type of surge. A standard old circuit breaker is going to take way to long to trip and even if it did trip after say lightning hit the mains wires, it would still likely arc across the contacts with nothing to dissipate that energy. I still say a UPS is the best way to go. You'll find that industry swears by them because its just too risky to connect very expensive server equipment (with valauable data) up to anything less. They also offer the protection of an orderly shutdown to prevent or at least minimise data loss across an organisation. You tell me of a bank that has a "$3 power strip that must also have the 15 amp circuit breaker" powering its servers and you will have found a very ill prepared bank. Paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
More care in reading my post would have made things clearer to w_tom but to
the OP if he/she reads the details for this UPS (as an example of many) http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProdu...duct_Id=171876 its clear that the warranty and offer of compensation is there to "alleviate the concern" - note that I didn't say it would stop all possibility of any damage occurring - nothing will do that but a good UPS is the best step in the right direction (along with a regular back-up regime). Paul "w_tom" wrote in message ... If you are recommending a plug-in UPS for anything other than data protection, then you don't know how that UPS works. The protection claimed is for a type of surge that does not typically exist. It does not even claim to protect from surges that typically damage computers. BTW, the surge protector circuit inside a plug-in UPS is same as that in the power strip protector. How do we know? The same circuits are even rated by the same parameter - joules. There is no difference between the protector circuit inside the plug-in UPS and power strip protector. The purpose of that circuit breaker inside a $3 power strip is not for surge protection. I never stated same and assumed that was common knowledge. Again, basic electrical principles. Surges do destruction in microseconds. Circuit breakers take milliseconds to trip. Circuit breakers and fuses have only one purpose - to protect human life. Fuses and circuit breakers blow after hardware damage has occurred, so that the damage does not kill a human in a house fire. An isolation transformer or certain types of UPSes will somehow stop these surges? You actually think they will stop or dissipate energy that even 4 kilometers of air could not stop? IOW you think these will stop, block, or absorb a surge? Again, it helps to understand some basic electrical principles such as breakdown voltages and ideal current sources. There is no surge protector that effectively stops, blocks, filters, or absorbs destructive surges. Even a circuit breaker is not for that function. The manufacturer does not even claim this to be true: The "proper" solution is a UPS with surge suppression built in and that will aleviate the above concern. There is no surge protection inside the plug-in UPS that will alleviate the destructive surge problem. Even its manufacturer does not make that claim. Where in their long list of numerical specs do they make that claim - if you can even find a long list of specs. Why provide information - detailed numerical specs - that would undermine myth purveyors? If you can claim that plug-in UPS provides protection, then you can provide numerical documentation that says same. Subtle hint - you will not find any such documentation because the manufacturer does not make that claim. And now for technical jargon. Paul is confusing transverse and longitudinal transients as if they were same. Paul. Notice that the plug-in UPS avoids making specific claims for each type of surge. Why? It only claims to protect from the one transient that does not typically exist. They know many computer users will then *assume* this means protection from all types of surges. The jargon is even taught to first year EE students. IOW that plug-in manufacturer knows most who recommend their product do not even have a first year training AND will promote the myths. No earth ground means no effective protection. This is a damning fact. Where for that plug-in UPS is there any dedicated connection, from each wire, less than 3 meters, to earth ground? Where is the discussion about earthing? Neither exist which means the plug-in UPS is not effective. If you don't understand the EE concepts, then you will probably confuse safety ground (wall receptacle ground) with earth ground. I kept emphasizing a specific phrase: 'less than 10 feet'. That phrase summarizes why a wall receptacle is not earth ground - in UK, NZ, AU, US, CH, FR, DE, etc. Furthermore in NZ and UK, only one AC electric wire is earthed. Not good enough. All incoming wires must be earthed to provide effective protection. The effective surge protector connects 'less than 3 meters' to single point earth ground - which means the only effective protector is at the service entrance - and distant from the computer. Plug-in protectors can even contribute to damage of powered off and adjacent electronics. Earth ground affords all the protection - other than protection that already exists inside appliances. Internal protection that an adjacent plug-in protector can even compromise. But you tell me. What happens during a surge - in terms of voltage and current? What does the adjacent plug-in protector do during this surge? If you recommend a plug-in protector - UPS or power strip - then you must be able to answer this question. Please tell us the details of how the power strip or UPS protector operates during the transient. Paul Murphy wrote: "w_tom" wrote in message ... You fear damage so you disconnect daily. Well, if the power strip is a surge protector type, then it may even contribute to damage of the adjacent computer. It can complete a circuit so that a surge finds a path from cloud to earth via the computer. This is how damage occurs. The appliance becomes part of a connection between earth and the cloud. You fail to mention that this will occurr with any connection directly to mains (in otherwords unless its through an isolating transformer or via certain types of UPS devices). The "proper" solution is a UPS with surge suppression built in and that will aleviate the above concern. If you want a disconnect switch, the superior solution is the $3 power strip that must also have the 15 amp circuit breaker. For hardware protection from surges, the incoming utility wire must connect to earth ground. IOW a 'whole house' protector on AC electric service is required. Your telco provides same on phone line for free. Cable must be properly earthed before entering the building. Earthing - and not a surge protector - is protection. The surge protector is only effective when connected 'less than 10 feet' to earth ground. Your right in that earthing of mains offers some protection (at least from the line thats earthed - I don't know how they do it where where you are but in the UK and New Zealand its Neutral thats earthed). Only problem with this is that if you touch the other "Live" wire, you will get a full on zap because its that much easier to travel through the earth back to neutral and complete the circuit. Get the $3 power strip that includes something important - a circuit breaker. $15 or $50 protector is very expensive for just a power strip. Effective surge protection costs about $1 per appliance and must complete a less than 10 foot connection to earth. A plug-in power strip provides no such connection and forgets to mention they don't protect from that typically destructive type of surge. A standard old circuit breaker is going to take way to long to trip and even if it did trip after say lightning hit the mains wires, it would still likely arc across the contacts with nothing to dissipate that energy. I still say a UPS is the best way to go. You'll find that industry swears by them because its just too risky to connect very expensive server equipment (with valauable data) up to anything less. They also offer the protection of an orderly shutdown to prevent or at least minimise data loss across an organisation. You tell me of a bank that has a "$3 power strip that must also have the 15 amp circuit breaker" powering its servers and you will have found a very ill prepared bank. Paul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Paul's recommendations are promoted just like Geritol. Not
even any numbers nor which type of surges are protected from. He provides not one science fact. Geritol added decades to our life expectancy - if we were to believe propaganda. Paul's total knowledge of surge protection is also based upon sales brochures and urban myths - and some kind of idea that a warranty will even be honored. In this discussion and in another, Paul Murphy does not demonstrate basic electrical knowledge. Therefore he is easily deceived by half truths in his Belkin citation. He even thinks a warranty is scientific proof. Again, how to identify ineffective protectors - 1) no dedicated connection to earth ground AND 2) avoids all discussion about earthing. His Belkin recommendation violates both. We know what lightning seeks. Earth ground. We know that a protector is not going to stop, block, or absorb (dissipate energy as Paul would have us believe) what miles of air could not. We know that Ben Franklin demonstrated effective protection in 1752. He did not try to stop or absorb lightning. Franklin simply gave lightning an electrically shorter path to earth. What makes the Franklin air terminal (lightning rod) effective? Earth ground. How do we make the Franklin air terminal more effective? Enhance that earth ground. Same applies to surge protectors. A surge protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Polyphaser is a benchmark in surge protection. Those who never learned how surge protection works (and Paul never even tried to answer that 'how surge protector works' question) typically have never heard of Polyphaser. But those who know surge protection know Polyphaser as a Cadillac of protectors. This would probably be the first time Paul has ever heard of Polyphaser. Their products are not promoted on retail shelves. So what does Polyphaser discuss in their legendary application notes? Their product line? Of course not. Polyphaser is about effective protection; not about having Paul promote myths. Polyphaser discusses earthing, extensively: http://www.polyphaser.com/ppc_technical.asp A surge protector is only as effective as its earth ground. After all, it only does same as Ben Franklin's 1752 air terminals. Idea is to earth the direct strike before it can enter a building or can find a destructive path through household appliances. Those Polyphaser application notes demonstrate same. An industry professional, Erico, demonstrates how the most critical component of a surge protection system must be wired. Even buried wires must connect to a single point earth ground before entering a building. Again, more facts from industry professionals: http://www.erico.com/public/library/...es/tncr002.pdf Even the National Institute of Science and Technology discusses earthing. An example, using an NIST figure, demonstrates the concept of protecting a fax machine using the all so important single point earth ground: http://www.epri-peac.com/tutorials/sol01tut.html But Paul cannot be bothered to learn any of this. Instead he cites half truths (propaganda) from color glossy brochures as if that were science. The brochure does not even provide a numerical specification. Belkin loves people like Paul who post urban myths without even knowing basic functions inside a power supply (the other discussion entitled Power Supply test). Even in that other discussion, Paul posts personal insults because he cannot challenge the science. Paul Murphy was asked this simple question that he cannot answer. It required basic electrical knowledge: But you tell me. What happens during a surge - in terms of voltage and current? What does the adjacent plug-in protector do during this surge? If you recommend a plug-in protector - UPS or power strip - then you must be able to answer this question. Please tell us the details of how the power strip or UPS protector operates during the transient. A surge protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Recommended solutions by Paul Murphy have all but no earth ground - and do not even claim to protect from the typically destructive surge. What kind of protection is that? Ineffective. A surge protector is only as effective as its earth ground. No wonder both the Belkin example and Paul Murphy avoid discussing earth ground. Paul cannot even say what a surge protector does nor define how it works. It is a surge protector - therefore it must be surge protection? Where is the science in word association? Its called junk science reasoning. How does an effective protector work? Just like Ben Franklin demonstrated in 1752 - protector earths before destructive surges can enter the building. Provided above are but a few professionals who say same - with supporting technical facts and numbers. The original poster is advised to replace the broken power strip protector with a typical $3 power strip (plug mole) that includes the 15 amp circuit breaker. Then he is advised to upgrade his building earth ground to post 1990 NEC requirements AND install a 'whole house' protector - to provide transistor safety. These recommendation costs tens of times less money per protected appliance, is effective, provides then necessary human safety device (15A CB), and provides a power switch. Paul Murphy wrote: More care in reading my post would have made things clearer to w_tom but to the OP if he/she reads the details for this UPS (as an example of many) http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProdu...duct_Id=171876 its clear that the warranty and offer of compensation is there to "alleviate the concern" - note that I didn't say it would stop all possibility of any damage occurring - nothing will do that but a good UPS is the best step in the right direction (along with a regular back-up regime). Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Antec Sonata Power Supply | Bob Schmidt | General | 0 | June 17th 04 02:53 PM |
help, please, with Compaq Presario power supply problem | Jacques Clouseau | General | 6 | June 9th 04 06:44 PM |
power supply, or ...? | ynotssor | General | 10 | June 1st 04 01:19 AM |
How can I make motherboard to restart after power loss automatically? | Amiran | General | 1 | September 24th 03 11:35 PM |
Power Supply on its way out? | w_tom | General | 5 | July 31st 03 03:43 PM |