If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
advice on gigabyte MB
good morning, all. i'm in the market for a custom built pc. the shop
that i am dealing with has suggested a gigabyte GA-8SG800 main board. this board meets my requirement in that there are no integrated components such as NIC, sound, video, etc. but i am not a hardware man and was hoping to receive some advice here regarding both the quality and reliability of gigbayte main boards/chip sets in general, this specific board as well as any alternative main boards and/or chip sets. as i mentioned i prefer to not have any integrated components on the main board. thanks in advance. rich |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Rich put me in my place by writing
good morning, all. i'm in the market for a custom built pc. the shop that i am dealing with has suggested a gigabyte GA-8SG800 main board. this board meets my requirement in that there are no integrated components such as NIC, sound, video, etc. but i am not a hardware man and was hoping to receive some advice here regarding both the quality and reliability of gigbayte main boards/chip sets in general, this specific board as well as any alternative main boards and/or chip sets. as i mentioned i prefer to not have any integrated components on the main board. thanks in advance. rich All I have used on my personal equipment and those I build is Gigabyte (a couple MSI here and there) and I have never had a problem. Gigabyte boards are stable and reliable, although do not (as of my last attempt) take too well to overclocking, so be aware of that. They advertise that they can be OC'd, and even include software to do so through the desktop-not the BIOS and jumpers. I prefer the VIA chipset, but others may have their own preferences. Although I have no specific experience with this particular mainboard, I think you will be satisfied with the purchase. -- Wheaty... Just one moment please...the mother ship is calling me on my microwave. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich" wrote in message
... good morning, all. i'm in the market for a custom built pc. the shop that i am dealing with has suggested a gigabyte GA-8SG800 main board. this board meets my requirement in that there are no integrated components such as NIC, sound, video, etc. but i am not a hardware man and was hoping to receive some advice here regarding both the quality and reliability of gigbayte main boards/chip sets in general, this specific board as well as any alternative main boards and/or chip sets. as i mentioned i prefer to not have any integrated components on the main board. I use over 200 a year. My favourite mobos, never fail to work on first switch-on. Prefer Intel chipsets for Intel CPUs and Nforce2 for AMD. All good boards nowadays tend to have on-board sound, NIC, USB2, IEEE1394. Don't like ALC600 sound chip though, it fails if you o/c the PCI bus even slightly. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:03:18 +0100, "Alien Zord"
wrote: I use over 200 a year. My favourite mobos, never fail to work on first switch-on. Prefer Intel chipsets for Intel CPUs and Nforce2 for AMD. All good boards nowadays tend to have on-board sound, NIC, USB2, IEEE1394. Don't like ALC600 sound chip though, it fails if you o/c the PCI bus even slightly. i keep running into that....many integrated components on MB's. i'm guessing it lowers their cost. i've never liked that preferring a cleaner, less kludged solution. maybe i'm wrong about integration but all my pc's have been configured like that and i've had little to no trouble...hardware wise. i appreciate your thoughts. thanks. rich |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:28:00 GMT, Rich
wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:03:18 +0100, "Alien Zord" wrote: I use over 200 a year. My favourite mobos, never fail to work on first switch-on. Prefer Intel chipsets for Intel CPUs and Nforce2 for AMD. All good boards nowadays tend to have on-board sound, NIC, USB2, IEEE1394. Don't like ALC600 sound chip though, it fails if you o/c the PCI bus even slightly. i keep running into that....many integrated components on MB's. i'm guessing it lowers their cost. i've never liked that preferring a cleaner, less kludged solution. maybe i'm wrong about integration but all my pc's have been configured like that and i've had little to no trouble...hardware wise. i appreciate your thoughts. thanks. rich It certainly does not lower the cost, but what it does is make the board more marketable. Onboard features like the network adapter are often about as good as the $5-20 NICs are, so unless you alway use Intel or 3Com you'll probably get little benefit from avoiding the onboard networking. Sound is a different matter, can vary from poor to good, and from low to higher CPU utilization, but it can be disabled, and you're no worse off than if there wasn't any integrated audio. Many people are quite happy with onboard audio, even the worst onboard audio, because they never use anything better than cheap computer speakers or don't mind potentially losing a few FPS in games, since the savings in using the onboard sound can buy a better video card, which usually more than makes up for it... to each his own. Of course integrated video is no competition to high-end cards for gaming and you may find quirks with compatibility, but so long as the board also has the AGP slot it's not that big of an issue either. The main thing to do if you'll be wanting to add your own cards is to get a full ATX instead of mATX form-factor. Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Rich put me in my place by writing
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:34:22 -0000, Wheat Muncher wrote: All I have used on my personal equipment and those I build is Gigabyte (a couple MSI here and there) and I have never had a problem. Gigabyte boards are stable and reliable, although do not (as of my last attempt) take too well to overclocking, so be aware of that. They advertise that they can be OC'd, and even include software to do so through the desktop-not the BIOS and jumpers. I prefer the VIA chipset, but others may have their own preferences. Although I have no specific experience with this particular mainboard, I think you will be satisfied with the purchase. thanks for the reply. i'm not interested in OC so that's not a worry. as i said i'm not a hardware guy and my primary concern is for stability and reliability. i tend to keep pc's for several years before upgrading or buying new. for this pc i'm planning on running WinXP pro with an intel CPU. the GB homepage lists the following chipsets for the board i'm considering: Northbridge: SiS648 HMAC Host & Memory & AGP Controller Southbridge: SiS963 MuTIOL® Media I/O Super I/O: ITE 8705 chip REALTEK ALC650 codec chip another poster stated that he prefers an intel chipset with an intel CPU. that's the way i've always had my main boards configured but is it really THAT important? opinions on the chipsets listed above? thanks again. rich Well, the chipsets really come into play when you are driving some serious gaming hardware IMO, but it may just be me. They are getting so generic now that I don't think you would know one from the other by performance unless you were a real hardware junkie. I like VIA because I have always run with them and trust their chipsets. I have never really had problems with SiS on the ones I have built either though. If I wanted a board, I wouldn't let the chipset be the make or break factor, unless one is far inferior to the other in terms of support. If you like the board (I looked at it, it's a fairly decent looking board) I would get it. SiS has been around for a long time now, so I am sure you can trust their product. If the next board I want only comes with an SiS, I will be getting it I suppose. The SiS chipset you are looking at right now seems to be fairly upgradeable, it will handle the 2GB of DDR 400 and the 8X AGP, and is capable of handling ATA133. I can't ever see you needing more than 2GB of RAM. The only thing missing off of it that I would maybe look for on another board is the Serial ATA. This might be a viable option for upgrading you hard drive to a faster one in the future, and it might not be. Better to have it and not need it, than to want it and not have it. The onboard sound is something that has come quite a long way now. I have always disabled it previously and replaced it with a good soundblaster, but many of the new ones (onboard) are crystal clear and powerful enough to maintain the signal through longer wires. I would go with the ALC650 and run it, I think you might be impressed. If you don't like it, it is simple and cheap to toss in a soundblaster in it's place. It looks like you have chosen a fairly solid board, although I was quite dissappointed to see Gigabyte sway away from the dual BIOS. It saved my bacon a couple of times. I hope this helps you out. It is not really a "technical" rundown, I could get into that and ramble on and on, but it is how I judge things when I build my systems. Numbers look great on paper, but sometimes they are just there to make things look fancy. I like to take a real world look at it. ;-) -- Wheaty... Just one moment please...the mother ship is calling me on my microwave. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Wheat Muncher wrote:
Rich put me in my place by writing for this pc i'm planning on running WinXP pro with an intel CPU. the GB homepage lists the following chipsets for the board i'm considering: Northbridge: SiS648 HMAC Host & Memory & AGP Controller Southbridge: SiS963 MuTIOL® Media I/O Super I/O: ITE 8705 chip REALTEK ALC650 codec chip http://www.anandtech.com/chipsets/showdoc.html?i=1660 http://www.tomshardware.com/motherbo...sis648-07.html This is a chipset that's almost a year old, has no dual DRR support but ran as well as an 850E (last fall) which was pretty good. Personally I'd be looking at a springdale/800FSB setup if I was buying a P4 system right now and for your uses (gaming?) an AMD/nforce might be a better performance for the price than this setup is going to cost? I'm using a gigabyte 845G board (they had DDR333 support before the PE boards came out) and had been ultra stable even running the FSB at 150 instead of 133. I do like an Intel chipset with an intel chip but like the SIS chipsets I've used with AMD's so this might be a winner? -- Stacey |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Rich wrote:
good morning, all. i'm in the market for a custom built pc. the shop that i am dealing with has suggested a gigabyte GA-8SG800 main board. this board meets my requirement in that there are no integrated components such as NIC, sound, video, etc. but i am not a hardware man and was hoping to receive some advice here regarding both the quality and reliability of gigbayte main boards/chip sets in general, this specific board as well as any alternative main boards and/or chip sets. as i mentioned i prefer to not have any integrated components on the main board. thanks in advance. rich Gigabyte is one of three brands I use and recommend. They make a huge array of boards for the Pentium 4. If you plan to buy a P4 800MHz processor, you'll want a board based on the newer SiS 648FX chipset or the Intel 865PE/875P. Especially in the case of the latter chipsets, the boards are fully featured. This one does have audio, but it looks to fit the bill in every other way. http://tw.giga-byte.com/MotherBoard/...GA-8S648FX.htm -- Winerr 00B - Push Error; Removing Files to Make Room for Advertisement |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
advice one laptop or handheld | dan braithwaite | General | 10 | July 23rd 03 07:25 PM |
Stability problem with Chaintech 7NIF2 MB and Athlon XP 2000/266. Need advice!! | Wuahn | General | 2 | July 22nd 03 01:47 PM |
Help / Advice needed / How irritating is this!!! | ck26 | General | 6 | July 18th 03 02:39 PM |
Dell Dimension XPS T450 - Upgrade advice sought. | Mod | General | 1 | July 7th 03 10:42 PM |
Video card advice | grendel | General | 10 | June 30th 03 02:07 PM |