|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
March 31st 04, 12:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
2500+ M
So whats the verdict on these fellas then? Are they the new celeron 750's or
just another case of AMD making one good batch a la 1700+ JIHUB's? 
|
|
#2
March 31st 04, 01:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
They are pretty good overclockers. The desktop 2500+ were hitting the wall
about 2.3ghz and the new mobile ones are hitting 2.5-2.6ghz at the same voltages. "Scrumpyman" wrote in message ... So whats the verdict on these fellas then? Are they the new celeron 750's or just another case of AMD making one good batch a la 1700+ JIHUB's?
|
|
#3
March 31st 04, 06:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
They're the new celeron 750's alright.
About 100-200 MHz faster than their desktop cousins. "Scrumpyman" wrote in message ... So whats the verdict on these fellas then? Are they the new celeron 750's or just another case of AMD making one good batch a la 1700+ JIHUB's?
|
|
#4
March 31st 04, 06:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are you smoking crack?
http://forums.amdmb.com/showthread.p...hreadid=297449 "QBall" wrote in message ... They're the new celeron 750's alright. About 100-200 MHz faster than their desktop cousins. "Scrumpyman" wrote in message ... So whats the verdict on these fellas then? Are they the new celeron 750's or just another case of AMD making one good batch a la 1700+ JIHUB's?
|
|
#5
March 31st 04, 08:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I could run my desktop 2500 at 2.49 GHz.
I run my mobile 2400 at 2.58 GHz ..... a diff of about 100 MHz. What are you on about crack for ? Mobiles are good from 2.55 to 2.65 GHz on air. I'd be sceptical about claims of 2.7 GHz stable on air. Water-cooled maybe, but not on air. The mobiles "Kill Bill" wrote in message ... Are you smoking crack? http://forums.amdmb.com/showthread.p...hreadid=297449 "QBall" wrote in message ... They're the new celeron 750's alright. About 100-200 MHz faster than their desktop cousins. "Scrumpyman" wrote in message ... So whats the verdict on these fellas then? Are they the new celeron 750's or just another case of AMD making one good batch a la 1700+ JIHUB's?
|
|
#6
March 31st 04, 11:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"QBall" wrote in message ... I could run my desktop 2500 at 2.49 GHz. I run my mobile 2400 at 2.58 GHz ..... a diff of about 100 MHz. What are you on about crack for ? Mobiles are good from 2.55 to 2.65 GHz on air. I'd be sceptical about claims of 2.7 GHz stable on air. Water-cooled maybe, but not on air. The mobiles Looking at the 2 screen shots you find that the NF7 table on the left doesnt jive with the cpuid table on the right.. I dont know if that's Pr00f that it's alter'd.. or if he decided to just paste a "un updated" screenshot of the software..
|
|
#7
March 31st 04, 11:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is all good news i must say, i think its time to place that order after
all... "rstlne" wrote in message ... "QBall" wrote in message ... I could run my desktop 2500 at 2.49 GHz. I run my mobile 2400 at 2.58 GHz ..... a diff of about 100 MHz. What are you on about crack for ? Mobiles are good from 2.55 to 2.65 GHz on air. I'd be sceptical about claims of 2.7 GHz stable on air. Water-cooled maybe, but not on air. The mobiles Looking at the 2 screen shots you find that the NF7 table on the left doesnt jive with the cpuid table on the right.. I dont know if that's Pr00f that it's alter'd.. or if he decided to just paste a "un updated" screenshot of the software..
|
|
#8
March 31st 04, 12:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
His sig shows it's watercooled.
That's perfectly credible. "rstlne" wrote in message ... "QBall" wrote in message ... I could run my desktop 2500 at 2.49 GHz. I run my mobile 2400 at 2.58 GHz ..... a diff of about 100 MHz. What are you on about crack for ? Mobiles are good from 2.55 to 2.65 GHz on air. I'd be sceptical about claims of 2.7 GHz stable on air. Water-cooled maybe, but not on air. The mobiles Looking at the 2 screen shots you find that the NF7 table on the left doesnt jive with the cpuid table on the right.. I dont know if that's Pr00f that it's alter'd.. or if he decided to just paste a "un updated" screenshot of the software..
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Worth getting Barton 2500 now that Athlon64 is here? | Steve Wolfe | General | 22 | August 23rd 04 11:30 PM |
| Overclocked 2500 Barton to 3200 using my old Crucial 2100 DDR | [email protected] | General | 5 | January 18th 04 09:01 AM |
| 2500 AQXEA vs 2600 AIUCB | Kris Rawlison | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | January 16th 04 04:40 AM |
| One last question before I spend my cash - 2500 vs 2800 | ZigZag Master | Overclocking AMD Processors | 6 | November 14th 03 04:11 AM |
| ASUS A7V266 + AMD 2500 | Rick Sweeney | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | August 12th 03 07:36 AM |
Linear Mode
