If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Overclocking a Pentium 4 3.4GHz
I'm going to be buying a new computer soon and am looking to buy parts
that will allow for a lot of overclocking (hopefully). I've been thinking about the Pentium 3.4.(I'm guessing after the new Intel pentium releases on the 21st the price on these should drop enough that I will buy it) My question is can I expect a lot of overclocking on this? Also, what would be the better one to buy, the Prescott or Northwood? Also, any ideas on good memory or motherboard to go with that would also be helpful. Thanks in advance to any advice. DavidR. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"DavidR." wrote in message
om... I'm going to be buying a new computer soon and am looking to buy parts that will allow for a lot of overclocking (hopefully). I've been thinking about the Pentium 3.4.(I'm guessing after the new Intel pentium releases on the 21st the price on these should drop enough that I will buy it) My question is can I expect a lot of overclocking on this? Also, what would be the better one to buy, the Prescott or Northwood? Also, any ideas on good memory or motherboard to go with that would also be helpful. Thanks in advance to any advice. DavidR. 3.6 GHz if your lucky. I asked the same thing a while back, and I was told that's about all I'll get. I would say go for a 3.06 or a 2.8 Reason is, it uses a much higher multiplier to get to that speed. If I remember right, and seems to sound right, you'll be lucky to hit a FSB of 220 = 3740 I can almost hit 3.4 with my 2.8C (Northwood Core.) I can get 700 MHz out of this, without too much extra on the vcore. 500 MHz over, I don't need to do a thing with vcore. One more time, I'd get a 3.06 GHz CPU if I were you. Memory, Kingmax PC2700 (DDR333) or PC3200 (DDR400) Video (AIW) 9600 Radeon or better Is what I would get. Power = Antec or Enermax, either way, I would say get a 500 or 550. Case,, ThermalTake makes some really nice one's. Some with a little more room for HD's then others. MB??????????????????? MSI Makes some Very good boards. But, so does Asus & Gigabyte, abit is good too. Anyway, I suggest against getting a 3.4 GHz CPU I think you may have better luck with something slower... Good Luck to you. Denny. :-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dennis E Strausser Jr wrote:
I would say go for a 3.06 or a 2.8 Reason is, it uses a much higher multiplier to get to that speed. If I remember right, and seems to sound right, you'll be lucky to hit a FSB of 220 = 3740 I can almost hit 3.4 with my 2.8C (Northwood Core.) I can get 700 MHz out of this, without too much extra on the vcore. 500 MHz over, I don't need to do a thing with vcore. One more time, I'd get a 3.06 GHz CPU if I were you. I hope to God you mean the 3.0C, not the 3.06!!!!!!!!!!!! This is an OLD processor, running at 533 MHz FSB, and already VERY close to it's maximum clock! Thomas |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie question - what's the (important) difference between a 3.0 and a
3.0C? What's the 'C' for? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ok, thanks for the advice.
David Reynolds "Thomas" wrote in message news:h%Szc.220$%27.14997@zonnet-reader-1... Dennis E Strausser Jr wrote: I would say go for a 3.06 or a 2.8 Reason is, it uses a much higher multiplier to get to that speed. If I remember right, and seems to sound right, you'll be lucky to hit a FSB of 220 = 3740 I can almost hit 3.4 with my 2.8C (Northwood Core.) I can get 700 MHz out of this, without too much extra on the vcore. 500 MHz over, I don't need to do a thing with vcore. One more time, I'd get a 3.06 GHz CPU if I were you. I hope to God you mean the 3.0C, not the 3.06!!!!!!!!!!!! This is an OLD processor, running at 533 MHz FSB, and already VERY close to it's maximum clock! Thomas |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Slacker wrote:
Newbie question - what's the (important) difference between a 3.0 and a 3.0C? What's the 'C' for? Okay; the P4 history in a nutshell: - P4 (1.4-2.0 GHz?) Willamette core, .18 core, 256 kbyte cache. Slow, not O/Cable, ****ty thing ;-) - P4(A) (1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 2.6 GHz) Nortwood core, .13 core, 512 kbyte cache - P4 (B) same, with 533 MHz FSB. This runs from 2.23 GHz to 3.06 GHz. Only the last one, the 3.06, has Hyper threading. Because it's at the top oof this family, it's barely overclockeble. - P4 (C) same, with 800 MHz FSB. Starts at 2.4, runt to 3.2? I have the 2.6, overclocks to 3.2. - P4 (E) Prescott co 90 nanometer core. 1 MB cache, but longer pipeline. This is the latest version, has it's advantages and disadvantages. It's a hothead, consumes an enormous amount of power, and at best performs on par with the previous generation, clock for clock. My advice, a 2.8C or 3.0C... These overclock (very) nicely.... Thomas |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Slacker" wrote in message
... Newbie question - what's the (important) difference between a 3.0 and a 3.0C? What's the 'C' for? Oops, I goofed... Pentium 4A = 400 MHz Bus Speed FSB = 100 MHz Per Clock Cycle X 4 = 400 MHz Some of the PIII's were better then the first P4's Pentium 4B = 533 MHz Bus Speed FSB = 133.25 MHz Per Clock Cycle X 4 = 533 MHz (This one gets a little Odd.) Cause the Multiplier would be so high, you wouldn't be able to Overclock this one much better then the P4C 3.4GHz,, My bad. Pentium 4C = 800 MHz Bus Speed FSB = 200 MHz Per Clock Cycle X 4 = 800 MHz The Multiplier would still be low enough to get a really nice Overclock. 15x200=3000 or 3.0GHz my guess is you shound be able to do around 240. 240x15=3600 or 3.6GHz with a little more on Vcore, I would guess you could get a 700MHz Overclock. Might even get lucky to get a little more. I don't know man, I think I would rather something more simple like 133x2=266 133x the Multiplier 13.5 1795.5? I didn't know it didn't total to 1800 or 1.8GHz.... 161MHz x 2 = 322 or 161x13.5=2173.5 Oops, sorry for that, this is more of an Intel Group. And I messed up, P4C 3.0GHz Denny. :-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
So what your saying is that the P4 that I have below is no better than a P3? Just to clear up. Spence Processor Properties Manufacturer Intel Version Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4A Processor External Clock 144 MHz Maximum Clock 4000 MHz Current Clock 3024 MHz Type Central Processor Voltage 3.3 V, 2.9 V Status Enabled Socket Designation FC-478 "Dennis E Strausser Jr" wrote in message ... "Slacker" wrote in message ... Newbie question - what's the (important) difference between a 3.0 and a 3.0C? What's the 'C' for? Oops, I goofed... Pentium 4A = 400 MHz Bus Speed FSB = 100 MHz Per Clock Cycle X 4 = 400 MHz Some of the PIII's were better then the first P4's Pentium 4B = 533 MHz Bus Speed FSB = 133.25 MHz Per Clock Cycle X 4 = 533 MHz (This one gets a little Odd.) Cause the Multiplier would be so high, you wouldn't be able to Overclock this one much better then the P4C 3.4GHz,, My bad. Pentium 4C = 800 MHz Bus Speed FSB = 200 MHz Per Clock Cycle X 4 = 800 MHz The Multiplier would still be low enough to get a really nice Overclock. 15x200=3000 or 3.0GHz my guess is you shound be able to do around 240. 240x15=3600 or 3.6GHz with a little more on Vcore, I would guess you could get a 700MHz Overclock. Might even get lucky to get a little more. I don't know man, I think I would rather something more simple like 133x2=266 133x the Multiplier 13.5 1795.5? I didn't know it didn't total to 1800 or 1.8GHz.... 161MHz x 2 = 322 or 161x13.5=2173.5 Oops, sorry for that, this is more of an Intel Group. And I messed up, P4C 3.0GHz Denny. :-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Spencer wrote:
So what your saying is that the P4 that I have below is no better than a P3? Just to clear up. snip Though he makes a mistake by calling it the P4A, he's referring to the FIRST P4's, with the Willamette core. Like I said before, these were not Intel's finest invention ever. The P4A set everything straight. Thomas |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Thomas" wrote in message
news:vwJAc.2093$%27.79519@zonnet-reader-1... Spencer wrote: So what your saying is that the P4 that I have below is no better than a P3? Just to clear up. snip Though he makes a mistake by calling it the P4A, he's referring to the FIRST P4's, with the Willamette core. Like I said before, these were not Intel's finest invention ever. The P4A set everything straight. Thomas Right, the socket 423 (PGA423) If I got the pin count right. Then they moved to the socket 478 & 603/604 for Xeon's Case & PSU, me hopes it will only be a few weeks yet. 2.66 GHz CPU's (PGA604) Need HSF setups too, I'm sure I'll have em. Might just get them by the same ppl as my case Tt. X1000 one of em. Denny. :-) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Overclocking Pentium 3.2C | Email Invalid | Overclocking | 0 | June 7th 04 06:25 AM |
Pentium 4 3ghz overclocking | Sean Black | Overclocking | 7 | March 9th 04 10:17 PM |
OverClocking Guides | Phil Weldon | Overclocking | 0 | August 15th 03 05:41 AM |
Pentium 4 overclocking | Dennis Strausser Jr | Overclocking | 3 | July 29th 03 09:02 AM |
Pentium II CPU upgrading to Pentium III ??? | Hans Huber | General | 14 | July 18th 03 02:11 PM |