If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:13:24 GMT, "Augustus"
wrote: "noname" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:31 GMT, (John Lewis) wrote: I give up what is a "longer-term early-failure"?? The OP I was just passing along the Anandtech blog as a friendly warning for those far less knowledgeable about 45nm technology than yourself. You do work for one of Intel's process-evaluation group no doubt? John Lewis |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
I was just passing along the Anandtech blog as a friendly warning for
those far less knowledgeable about 45nm technology than yourself. You do work for one of Intel's process-evaluation group no doubt? John Lewis You delusions about your vast and far reaching knowledge regarding "45nm technology" is of no consequence to me. You don't know me, or anyone else who posts here on a regular basis. So don't presume to. I don't give a **** if you invented the internet along with your unique ability to "discern technical competence". I put you in the same league as Skybuck and DaveW. Actually, I take that back. They do have some redeeming humour qualities they are unaware of. You are a just a puffed up, self styled "expert" with zero credibilty. A usenet search of your postings speaks volumes about your expertise, sources and knowledge base. Like the one back in Feb where you told First of One that the 8800GTX was an "archaic" technology. Of course, since you're a long time regular, unlike me who's just a passing newbie and and have just discovered usenet. You still haven't figured out how to post to just one group either. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:42:09 -0400, noname wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:31 GMT, (John Lewis) wrote: I give up what is a "longer-term early-failure"?? That would imply that you would reach the parts Mean Time Before Failure, but still might have a servicable life. Might be an acceptable risk for a gamer... Just as an example using random numbers: Suppose the part has a MTBF of 10,000 hours. A gamer wants some extra speed, knows he's not going to use that CPU for more than a couple years and overclocks it, lessening the CPU's life to 7000 hours. That would be a longer term early failure. Tim |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
"John Lewis" wrote in message ... On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:42:09 -0400, noname wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:31 GMT, (John Lewis) wrote: I give up what is a "longer-term early-failure"?? ... in the context of the time to failure in the Anandtech article.... next question? Here's a tip. If you use zero volts the CPU will last a lot longer than the estimated MTBF! g |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
In alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus ztwoeight wrote:
"John Lewis" wrote in message ... On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:42:09 -0400, noname wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:31 GMT, (John Lewis) wrote: I give up what is a "longer-term early-failure"?? ... in the context of the time to failure in the Anandtech article.... next question? Here's a tip. If you use zero volts the CPU will last a lot longer than the estimated MTBF! g MTBF is not a lifetime measure. MTBF is a failure probability during the lifetime period. For example HDDs have a lifetime of 5 years, and during that time the MTBF holds. Arno |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !!
"Augustus" wrote in message news:Tk9Rj.2769$XI1.2024@edtnps91... You do leap to the wrong conclusions rather fast, don't you? Been very long in these newsgroups or are you just a passing newbie? John Lewis Passing newbie?....lol....Who's the clown who's never heard of alt.comp.hardware.overclocking? Or Phil Weldon, for that matter. How could anyone who claims an interest in overclocking not know of an established resource like Phil Weldon? Luck; Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Overclockers - beware of voltages in excess of Intel recommended max on Penryn (45nm) processors !! | John Lewis | Asus Motherboards | 21 | May 12th 08 10:12 AM |
Will Sriker Extreme 680i SLI support upcoming Wolfdale and Yorkfield 45nm processors? | slipknot | Asus Motherboards | 6 | January 11th 08 03:20 PM |
45nm Penryn (Core2Quad) hit by erratum too | Yousuf Khan | General | 1 | December 25th 07 12:00 PM |
45nm Penryn (Core2Quad) hit by erratum too | Yousuf Khan | Intel | 1 | December 25th 07 12:00 PM |