If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Accurate CPU temp monitor?
Hi.
Up until today I've always considered CoreTemp to be the most accurate for reading my E4500's currently) temperature. It agrees with Intel's TAT on temps across the range from idle to 100% load, give or take a degree. However, while working on a mate's Phenom I downloaded CPUID's HWMonitor to check his temps. I've just run it on my machine. It's reporting core temps ~15°C *higher* than I previously thought I had. Slightly disconcerting. CT 43°, TAT 42°, HWM 58° at 100% load. Tt Mini-Typhoon lapped and CPU IHS lapped. AS5. *Extremely* well ventilated case, ambient 15°C. (Yeah, I'm cold!) While those temps are fine, when summer comes to these parts the ambient can rise another 20°C on a hot day reaching mid 30's at times. So, what's the consensus? Have others noticed this discrepancy? What utility are you inclined to believe? Thanks. -- Shaun. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Accurate CPU temp monitor?
I don't think any one of them can be considered truly accurate. I used to
get ridiculously low temps using CoreTemp on my E6600 @3GHz, of about 18 deg C on each core. That was on MSI 975X board, but with an X48 board, I now see approx 50 deg C at the same speed. "~misfit~" wrote in message ... Hi. Up until today I've always considered CoreTemp to be the most accurate for reading my E4500's currently) temperature. It agrees with Intel's TAT on temps across the range from idle to 100% load, give or take a degree. However, while working on a mate's Phenom I downloaded CPUID's HWMonitor to check his temps. I've just run it on my machine. It's reporting core temps ~15°C *higher* than I previously thought I had. Slightly disconcerting. CT 43°, TAT 42°, HWM 58° at 100% load. Tt Mini-Typhoon lapped and CPU IHS lapped. AS5. *Extremely* well ventilated case, ambient 15°C. (Yeah, I'm cold!) While those temps are fine, when summer comes to these parts the ambient can rise another 20°C on a hot day reaching mid 30's at times. So, what's the consensus? Have others noticed this discrepancy? What utility are you inclined to believe? Thanks. -- Shaun. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Accurate CPU temp monitor?
Somewhere on teh intarweb "John Whitworth" typed:
I don't think any one of them can be considered truly accurate. I used to get ridiculously low temps using CoreTemp on my E6600 @3GHz, of about 18 deg C on each core. That was on MSI 975X board, but with an X48 board, I now see approx 50 deg C at the same speed. Thanks for the reply John, point taken. :-) -- Shaun. "~misfit~" wrote in message ... Hi. Up until today I've always considered CoreTemp to be the most accurate for reading my E4500's currently) temperature. It agrees with Intel's TAT on temps across the range from idle to 100% load, give or take a degree. However, while working on a mate's Phenom I downloaded CPUID's HWMonitor to check his temps. I've just run it on my machine. It's reporting core temps ~15°C *higher* than I previously thought I had. Slightly disconcerting. CT 43°, TAT 42°, HWM 58° at 100% load. Tt Mini-Typhoon lapped and CPU IHS lapped. AS5. *Extremely* well ventilated case, ambient 15°C. (Yeah, I'm cold!) While those temps are fine, when summer comes to these parts the ambient can rise another 20°C on a hot day reaching mid 30's at times. So, what's the consensus? Have others noticed this discrepancy? What utility are you inclined to believe? Thanks. -- Shaun. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Accurate CPU temp monitor?
"~misfit~" wrote in message ... Somewhere on teh intarweb "John Whitworth" typed: I don't think any one of them can be considered truly accurate. I used to get ridiculously low temps using CoreTemp on my E6600 @3GHz, of about 18 deg C on each core. That was on MSI 975X board, but with an X48 board, I now see approx 50 deg C at the same speed. Thanks for the reply John, point taken. :-) -- Shaun. I have been using CoreTemp too Shaun and I went from an E6600 to a Q6600 and using the same water cooling system temps at 3.2ghz on the Q6600 read a good 15+degs higher than the E6600. My bios on this Striker Extreme reads 27-29degs idle and CoreTemp is giving me 40-43degs across the 4 cores. The bios readings 'should' be about right with my current setup and are about where my E6600 idled at. I don't know of any temp app that I can trust to be accurate anymore. Ed |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Accurate CPU temp monitor?
On Tue, 6 May 2008 11:53:32 -0500, "Ed Medlin" ed@ edmedlin.com
wrote: "~misfit~" wrote in message ... Somewhere on teh intarweb "John Whitworth" typed: I don't think any one of them can be considered truly accurate. I used to get ridiculously low temps using CoreTemp on my E6600 @3GHz, of about 18 deg C on each core. That was on MSI 975X board, but with an X48 board, I now see approx 50 deg C at the same speed. Thanks for the reply John, point taken. :-) -- Shaun. I have been using CoreTemp too Shaun and I went from an E6600 to a Q6600 and using the same water cooling system temps at 3.2ghz on the Q6600 read a good 15+degs higher than the E6600. My bios on this Striker Extreme reads 27-29degs idle and CoreTemp is giving me 40-43degs across the 4 cores. The bios readings 'should' be about right with my current setup and are about where my E6600 idled at. I don't know of any temp app that I can trust to be accurate anymore. Ed I'm using the Asus probe II, which is probably not very accurate, but it gives me similar numbers. Case ambient (one of the sensors included with the MB) is 27, MB temp is 35-37 under almost any conditions, and the Q6600 is 27 under no-load and as high as 42 running Prime95 on all four cores, but usually under 37. On the other hand, I've gone rather extreme on cooling since I decided to stay with air cooled. The case is a Thermaltake Armor full tower with 3x14cm, 1x25cm, and 2x(80 or 90) cm fans. The MB is a Striker Extreme with the thermal pipes and massive radiators, and the CPU cooler is the Zalman (sp?) 9500. The fans are currently all running at high and it's almost unnoticeably quite, so I haven't bothered with fan speed control. Jim |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Accurate CPU temp monitor?
If your Q6600 is a G0 stepping, your current version of coretemp is
assuming the wrong Tjunction max. Make sure you have the latest version of coretemp, which accounts for the new higher Tjunction max. your readings should then be correct. Tjunction max for E6600 = 85C " " Q6600 (GO stepping) = 105C " " " (B3 stepping) = 85C That's why your current readings are ~20C off. On Tue, 6 May 2008 11:53:32 -0500, "Ed Medlin" ed@ edmedlin.com wrote: "~misfit~" wrote in message ... Somewhere on teh intarweb "John Whitworth" typed: I don't think any one of them can be considered truly accurate. I used to get ridiculously low temps using CoreTemp on my E6600 @3GHz, of about 18 deg C on each core. That was on MSI 975X board, but with an X48 board, I now see approx 50 deg C at the same speed. Thanks for the reply John, point taken. :-) -- Shaun. I have been using CoreTemp too Shaun and I went from an E6600 to a Q6600 and using the same water cooling system temps at 3.2ghz on the Q6600 read a good 15+degs higher than the E6600. My bios on this Striker Extreme reads 27-29degs idle and CoreTemp is giving me 40-43degs across the 4 cores. The bios readings 'should' be about right with my current setup and are about where my E6600 idled at. I don't know of any temp app that I can trust to be accurate anymore. Ed |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Accurate CPU temp monitor?
Somewhere on teh intarweb "Ed Medlin" typed:
"~misfit~" wrote in message ... Somewhere on teh intarweb "John Whitworth" typed: I don't think any one of them can be considered truly accurate. I used to get ridiculously low temps using CoreTemp on my E6600 @3GHz, of about 18 deg C on each core. That was on MSI 975X board, but with an X48 board, I now see approx 50 deg C at the same speed. Thanks for the reply John, point taken. :-) I have been using CoreTemp too Shaun and I went from an E6600 to a Q6600 and using the same water cooling system temps at 3.2ghz on the Q6600 read a good 15+degs higher than the E6600. My bios on this Striker Extreme reads 27-29degs idle and CoreTemp is giving me 40-43degs across the 4 cores. The bios readings 'should' be about right with my current setup and are about where my E6600 idled at. I don't know of any temp app that I can trust to be accurate anymore. Thanks for that Ed. I do know that CoreTemp (and TAT) reads higher for quads as I've built a machine on a similar board to mine with a similar cooler for a mate, only using a Q6600 and the temps at idle were ~15° higher too. I just figured it was due to there being twice the number of cores requiring twice the energy in a similarly sized package and figured CoreTemp was about right. I guess I'll just make sure everything is cooled as well as I can and rely on Intel's thermal safeguards when summer comes back to these parts. Cheers, -- Shaun. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Accurate CPU temp monitor?
Somewhere on teh intarweb " typed:
On Tue, 6 May 2008 11:53:32 -0500, "Ed Medlin" ed@ edmedlin.com wrote: "~misfit~" wrote in message ... Somewhere on teh intarweb "John Whitworth" typed: I don't think any one of them can be considered truly accurate. I used to get ridiculously low temps using CoreTemp on my E6600 @3GHz, of about 18 deg C on each core. That was on MSI 975X board, but with an X48 board, I now see approx 50 deg C at the same speed. Thanks for the reply John, point taken. :-) I have been using CoreTemp too Shaun and I went from an E6600 to a Q6600 and using the same water cooling system temps at 3.2ghz on the Q6600 read a good 15+degs higher than the E6600. My bios on this Striker Extreme reads 27-29degs idle and CoreTemp is giving me 40-43degs across the 4 cores. The bios readings 'should' be about right with my current setup and are about where my E6600 idled at. I don't know of any temp app that I can trust to be accurate anymore. I'm using the Asus probe II, which is probably not very accurate, but it gives me similar numbers. Case ambient (one of the sensors included with the MB) is 27, MB temp is 35-37 under almost any conditions, and the Q6600 is 27 under no-load and as high as 42 running Prime95 on all four cores, but usually under 37. I'm not that keen on Asus Probe II. I've used checks download location 9 different BIOS's with this mobo as updates have come out since I got it and there have been some *huge* changes at times with AP II's readings after a BIOS upgrade. There is obviously an offset built into the BIOS and I assume that they're getting more accurate with each BIOS release but you can never be sure.... On the other hand, I've gone rather extreme on cooling since I decided to stay with air cooled. The case is a Thermaltake Armor full tower with 3x14cm, 1x25cm, and 2x(80 or 90) cm fans. The MB is a Striker Extreme with the thermal pipes and massive radiators, and the CPU cooler is the Zalman (sp?) 9500. The fans are currently all running at high and it's almost unnoticeably quite, so I haven't bothered with fan speed control. My case is similarly cooled with 1x25cm and 3x12cm case fans. AP II gives me 24°C for "MB" which I figure has to be northbridge as a thermocouple put into the case reads around ambient +2°C and the "MB" temp climbs rapidly when Prime95 is started. (Ambient's currently 19°, it's a balmy autumn day.) Thanks for the replies to this query. I guess the upshot of it is, as Ed said, there isn't a definitive temp app for Core CPUs. Up until recently I assumed that TAT was that app (which largely agrees wth CT which runs nicely minimised in my systray..) but it would seem that it's not the case. Cheers, -- Shaun. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is Temp Reported by Speedfan Accurate? | KlausK | Homebuilt PC's | 4 | January 22nd 08 09:33 PM |
GA-7VAXP How Accurate is Temp Sensor? | Ian James | Gigabyte Motherboards | 1 | February 13th 06 09:32 PM |
How accurate are the Asus temp sensors? | Alex Devlin | Asus Motherboards | 5 | March 26th 05 06:18 PM |
Looking for A7V400-MX owners (µATX), is the CPU temp probe accurate ? | Chris | Asus Motherboards | 1 | August 27th 04 04:11 PM |
What's More Accurate - Temp | Mista Fadedglory | Homebuilt PC's | 16 | November 23rd 03 10:56 PM |