If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation
Torbjorn Lindgren wrote:
Steve Cousins wrote: That's "odd" -- FC3 should be pretty close to centos-4 kernel wise. What's the MPT driver version? Mine reports 3.02.18. [...] obviously to update the mpt driver. Maybe the kernel too I guess. Maybe I should upgrade to FC4 since FC3 is frozen at this kernel. I wonder if yum can update from FC3 to FC4 for me. It never stops! I'll start with the driver. yum upgrade (not update) can to some extent be used to upgrade between some versions of Fedora Core, but it's quirky and complicated. Not really recommended, I've done the easier FC2 to FC3 upgrade that way but not FC3 to FC4 which is apparently quite a bit quirkier. Fedora Legacy will release new kernels for FC3, but that's likely to only be security related fixes as compared to the last FC3 kernel. Also, I haven't tested this but a FC4 or even FC5t2 kernel plus a few other RPMs (kernel-utils+?) *MAY* work (I've seen FC2 kernels on FC3 machines *and* vice-versa, not sure if anyone tried it with FC4+ kernels on FC3). But really, you would probably be best of with either upgrading (to FC4 or something else) or respinning a FC3 kernel with a newer MPT driver (rebuilding from SRPM with new driver), but the last alternative requires a bit of know-how. http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq ???????? And the Linux community are trying to persuade everyone that Linux is easier to install, manage, and use, than Windows? The mind truly boggles. Odie -- Retrodata www.retrodata.co.uk Globally Local Data Recovery Experts |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|