If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
intel e1300 vs amd 4400+
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
intel e1300 vs amd 4400+
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:20:38 +0200, Jure Sah
wrote: Hello, I convinced a friend of mine to get an AMD 4400+ instead of an Intel e1300. Now I want to proove it to him that the cpu is better. Alas, I cannot find any comparable benchmarks between the two CPUs or even standalone Intel e1300 benchmarks. When I google up "Intel e1300", it says 0 results. Can someone help? Did you check out Tom's Hardware web site? They have comparisons of all the AMD & Intel cpus. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
intel e1300 vs amd 4400+
Hi, Jure Sah.
Very few experienced Usenet readers will open an attachment from a stranger, especially if there is no text at all in the message body. You'll have a much better chance of finding help if you will just type your question into your message. I've copied it for you from your Message Source: paste Hello, I convinced a friend of mine to get an AMD 4400+ instead of an Intel e130= 0. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
intel e1300 vs amd 4400+
* R. C. White:
Very few experienced Usenet readers will open an attachment from a stranger, especially if there is no text at all in the message body. There is no attachment and there is text in the message body. It's just your crap newsreader (Windows Mail aka Outlook Express) that doesn't show any text and shows an attachment when there is none. You should really get a better news client. Benjamin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
intel e1300 vs amd 4400+
Benjamin Gawert pravi:
* R. C. White: Very few experienced Usenet readers will open an attachment from a stranger, especially if there is no text at all in the message body. There is no attachment and there is text in the message body. It's just your crap newsreader (Windows Mail aka Outlook Express) that doesn't show any text and shows an attachment when there is none. You should really get a better news client. I have to agree. What you see is not an attachment, it's just a PGP signed message (a certificate that makes sure that my content has not been tampered with after I sent it and prooving that I sent it). I suggest you use Thunderbird. It works a lot better and it's free. The Enigmail addon for it will also verify the PGP signature. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIhlcIB6mNZXe93qgRAn0QAJ95AXZnRBCJT9lG+jw/3QhveMbcBQCghoWB cfU9jYq0f9Uflp6D3R9KdNk= =Ipdy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
intel e1300 vs amd 4400+
Rich Billionaire pravi:
Did you check out Tom's Hardware web site? They have comparisons of all the AMD & Intel cpus. Yup. They have no benchmark for the E1300 either. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIhlgfB6mNZXe93qgRAlfmAJ0UBM/rCMW5e1xtNRnfRXZf/yP5/wCeN3z3 NKzxUZFWwozXhcvOD7AnWRY= =yzPp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
intel e1300 vs amd 4400+
Jure Sah pravi:
Rich Billionaire pravi: Did you check out Tom's Hardware web site? They have comparisons of all the AMD & Intel cpus. Yup. They have no benchmark for the E1300 either. I just find it suspicious how nobody ever reviews ****ty Intel CPUs. Tom's hardware has reviews of even the AMD Sempron 3200+, but no mention whatsoever of the E1300, or even the slightly less sucky E1400 (which seems to exist on Google unlike the E1300). No wonder so many people are convinced AMDs suck. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIhlpXB6mNZXe93qgRAlTwAJ4zMVPTEMdT5LaOYSbX0h bOeiMYUwCgoX8Q IrlJQq46zYM4D9EAktQh6DE= =GHeN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
intel e1300 vs amd 4400+
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:20:38 +0200, Jure Sah
wrote: Hello, I convinced a friend of mine to get an AMD 4400+ instead of an Intel e1300. Now I want to proove it to him that the cpu is better. Alas, I cannot find any comparable benchmarks between the two CPUs or even standalone Intel e1300 benchmarks. When I google up "Intel e1300", it says 0 results. Can someone help? You're talking about a processor that exists (AMD 4400+) to one that does not exist (Intel E1300). It's no contest; the processor that exists beats the one that doesn't. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
intel e1300 vs amd 4400+
Andy pravi:
You're talking about a processor that exists (AMD 4400+) to one that does not exist (Intel E1300). It's no contest; the processor that exists beats the one that doesn't. Funny how something I can buy in the local store for 50 € doesn't exist. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIhxPJB6mNZXe93qgRAvTCAKCSb9CqBGjSfZEPDm3ArA V8sLuiEQCbBelC jSvtgQd0t7GXyUTWpx36shg= =aYGR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
intel e1300 vs amd 4400+
Jure Sah pravi:
Andy pravi: You're talking about a processor that exists (AMD 4400+) to one that does not exist (Intel E1300). It's no contest; the processor that exists beats the one that doesn't. Funny how something I can buy in the local store for 50 € doesn't exist. From: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/...e-updated-2008 --- Begin quote --- Intel Celeron E1200* Speed: 1.6GHz Number of Cores: 2 Cache: 512KB FSB: 800MHZ Supported features: SpeedStep, 64bit computing, and NX disable bit. Not supported features: Virtualization eSpec: SLAQW/Stepping: M0 * This processor has 2 revisions: L2 and M0 E1300 Speed: 1.8GHz Cores: 2 Cache: 512KB FSB: 800MHz Supported Features: N/A Not supported Featurs: N/A Rev: M0 eSpec: N/A E1400 Speed: 2GHz Cores: 2 Cache: 512KB FSB: 800MHz Supported Features: N/A Not supported Featurs: N/A Rev: L2 eSpec: N/A ---- End quote ---- How's that. Specs for a non-existent CPU! The wonders of internet. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIhxUZB6mNZXe93qgRAlzBAJ9TMLObRnyupBFe7NROFa KCzLM4uACgidID 3y/azVYHCwVDKjQDoNBcU7A= =DEur -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New System: AMD X2 4400+ (@2.2G) or Intel P4 D 940 (@3.2G) ? | Melandre | General | 4 | August 1st 06 01:35 AM |
New System: AMD X2 4400+ (@2.2G) or Intel P4 D 940 (@3.2G) ? | Melandre | AMD x86-64 Processors | 2 | July 31st 06 11:16 AM |
FX-55 OR FX-57 VS X2 4400 | Bubble Head | AMD x86-64 Processors | 5 | September 7th 05 12:10 AM |
Dimension 4400 and 4550 and their Intel counterparts | Olaf Zaplinski | Dell Computers | 10 | April 2nd 05 03:25 AM |
Can I run a 4400 without a fan ? | hb | Nvidia Videocards | 3 | June 25th 03 01:28 AM |