If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
@drian wrote:
"Strontium" wrote in message ... You just love starting flamewars, don't you? LOL! I could have asked "Shall I go for an Intel or AMD?". No, I'm just after some opinions on each person's experience with each brand of drive. I have a couple of Seagates in one of my PCs and they run slightly hot. In that case, I'll share my experience. I bought a Maxtor almost a year ago. 80GB, one of the first FDB drives from Maxtor. Failed in a month or so. Got a replacement drive from Maxtor and it had two big '?' marks written in pen on the drive. I set it aside for a while since I didn't trust it with anything mission critical. This summer I built a PVR machine with it. It failed after about 2 months of use. Got another replacement from Maxtor. Again, clearly used as it had scratches on the sides and top. This one failed within one month. I'm waiting to get drive #4 from Maxtor in the mail. The drive was adequately cooled, and the PSU is fine in both systems that I've used Maxtor in. So personally, I'll never touch or recommend Maxtor again. No problems with Seagate. They run slightly warm, but I keep them in an area with good airflow. -WD |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Allen_L" wrote in message
.. . This thread is hopeless, as all kinds of different opinions will be posted about *each* drive. They are all good, but will all fail at some point I personally have had good luck with all three, never had a failure with any...knock on wood. Seagate has a reputation for running a little hotter than the others, and heat is a problem with any drive...so in a raid situation you may need a hard drive cooler for the Seagates. That's funny you mention that, as said, the Seagates I have run hot too. In fact, they run as hot as SCSI drives I had a while ago. @drian. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Strontium" wrote in message
... Well, I was being 'slightly' sarcastic. But, you know as well as I do that there are fanboys for every brand/make/model of everything....or do you lol. Oh yeah, I know. I'm hoping to hear from more civil people who don't stoop to criticizing others for their choice of drive. Maybe I'm asking too much. @drian. I, personally, would choose WD. But, that's just my experience with them as a whole. I don't do RAID. But, if I did...that's who I'd use. And, now I will duck from all the anti WD freaks coming out of the woodworks...perhaps they won't just to make me look paranoid ....they're out to get me, I swear! haha! LOL! @drian. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Ilya Dan" wrote in message
... I forgot to mention that now I have 2 Quantum and 1 Maxtor drive: 4GB, 20GB, 120GB, the oldest 4GB drive is more then 5 years old, if I remember right. NEVER had even ONE problem with any of them. Interesting. Of course, you probably bought those when you could actually buy a Quantum. I just wondered why the WD is slightly more expensive than Maxtor or Seagate, you know, going on the phrase "you get what you pay for". One thing I like about Maxtor is they actually do an 80GB drive, WD doesn't, not from what I see. @drian. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Larc" wrote in message
... I'd choose WD hands down based on my experience with them. But you may want to check around for a better price. The 120GB Special Edition is less than $118 at Newegg and even locally at Best Buy (it's $110 including shipping at Newegg now and is currently advertised for $79.99 at Best Buy stores in my area, but a rebate is probably involved in getting to that BB price). Less than $118 at Newegg? That's where I got my price! LOL! OK, I'll need to re-check. I noticed they changed prices on a few things recently, within the last day. I'll need to check the local Best Buy here in California, I always assumed brick and mortar shops were more expensive, but like you say, it's probably more up front then you are refunded via a rebate. Thanks. @drian. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob Davis" wrote in message
news:JSbjb.10094$iq3.7842@okepread01... All my drives are PATA's. I have a Maxtor 160 DM+9 as C: and a WD1000JB as D:, with four more WD's and three IBM's (!) used as firewire drives and clones. The C: and D: drives run 12 hrs/day and the others only as needed. The Maxtor is faster and quieter spinning, but the head movement is noisier. It is my first Maxtor since the ESDI days (circa early 90's), but it has been doing well for four months, and the WD's are all over a year old. The only drive I've had fail in the past 15 years is an IBM 75GXP last year (knock on wood), replaced in warranty with a 60GXP which is still running (clone, run only for 15 minutes per month). Wow, you have them all! I don't mind a noisey drive, believe it or not. I like to know it's working. The rest of my PC is quiet so a slightly noisey drive isn't a problem for me. I loved my old SCSI drives that clicked and whined, I knew they were working. Just curious, where are your Maxtor's and WD's made? Are they still made in Japan or is it Malaysia now? Thanks for your post, interesting. @drian. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Craig" wrote in message
news:yWbjb.89818$k74.55004@lakeread05... Does your locatation have a OfficeMax? If so checkout the Sunday newspaper for Office Max sales paper. I recently purchased a WD 120GB hard drive, after rebates it was $80.00 Yes, I have an OfficeMax in Lake Forest, CA - a few cities from me. I'll check the paper, thanks. This is especially useful, as I need to buy two of them. Thanks again. @drian. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:30:39 GMT, "@drian" wrote:
For a spare PC, I'm considering setting up a RAID 0 array. Which make of drive would be best for the array? I'm looking at 120GB, Serial ATA, 8MB cache drives. The makes I'm considering a o Seagate / $108.00 o Maxtor / $110.00 o Western Digital / $118.00 Is any one make better for the RAID 0 array than the other? There would be two identical makes on the array. Also, I'm wondering if Western Digital is that much better than Maxtor or Seagate, for the slightly price increase they command. @drian. Generally there are two groups of HDD users... those who have a drive fail and swear off the brand, thinking another is better, and those who've had several drives fail of different brands and realize that, beyond certain drives with particular defects (like the Deathstars), the rest are all having pretty low failure rates. Buy whatever you can find a good price on, these are just now being offered on sale, with rebates, etc. For $110-120 ea. you might be abel to get 160GB drives instead of 120, if you keep an eye-out for sales & rebates. Generally the WD drives have better performance when there are multiple read requests, would be better for something like an IDE-implementation of a webserver. The Maxtors have higher sustained throughput, IIRC, so would be better for large files. It's splitting hairs though, in use you'd likely never notice the difference except that the WD drives are significantly louder. I haven't been using the newer Seagates so can't comment on them, but I wouldn't worry about the heat difference too much because you should have a solid cooling plan that could handle the Seagates even if you were using one of the other alternatives. Dave |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Check out their warranties, which tells you how long they expect them to
last. Only the WD comes with a 3 year warranty; the others have 1 year. -- DaveW "@drian" wrote in message ... For a spare PC, I'm considering setting up a RAID 0 array. Which make of drive would be best for the array? I'm looking at 120GB, Serial ATA, 8MB cache drives. The makes I'm considering a o Seagate / $108.00 o Maxtor / $110.00 o Western Digital / $118.00 Is any one make better for the RAID 0 array than the other? There would be two identical makes on the array. Also, I'm wondering if Western Digital is that much better than Maxtor or Seagate, for the slightly price increase they command. @drian. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 23:16:00 GMT, "DaveW" wrote:
Check out their warranties, which tells you how long they expect them to last. Only the WD comes with a 3 year warranty; the others have 1 year. Not all WD have 3 year, some have 1, and likewise, Maxtor also has 3 year on some, 1 yr on the others... I very much doubt it has anything to do with expected lifespan, but rather just another way the large corps. squeeze another few cents profit, or rather, retain it. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Western Digital SATA WD800JD and Windows 98? | Machine Messiah | General | 6 | May 19th 04 05:04 AM |
Western Digital 2000 | BeeFarmer | General | 9 | April 30th 04 08:58 PM |
Adaptec vs. Western Digital. Who is DEGRADED? Who is FOS? | Brian | General | 0 | January 13th 04 05:16 PM |
Western Digital, Maxtor or Seagate | @drian | General | 25 | October 20th 03 06:24 PM |
Western Digital, Maxtor, Seagate - guess who spams? | tiburón | Homebuilt PC's | 7 | September 29th 03 11:19 PM |