If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Standard or Widescreen monitor?
In article , Agamemnon wrote:
16:9 is a horrid ratio to watch TV on because the screen ratio feels completely wrong. It's too wide for the golden ratio and its too narrow for Panavision so films cropped to fit into it look odd. As far as I know, nobody makes any programme material, film or electronic, designed for "golden ratio". Rod. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Standard or Widescreen monitor?
In article . com,
wrote: Why are so many laptops in Currys/Dixons/Comet etc widescreen? The dork in Comet told me internet pages are designed for widescreen... Yes, films fit it better but for everything else it's just the loss of height, which you need for web pages and documents. It allows them to specify the screen size with an impressively big number, even though the screen is actually slightly smaller in area than a conventionally shaped one would be on a similarly sized laptop. One possible advantage on a laptop is that a shorter screen is a little more mechanically stable so won't flap about so much. Rod. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Standard or Widescreen monitor?
"Agamemnon" wrote in message ... (LCD's only go up to 1600x1200 which is not big enough.) ???? the Dell 30" does 2560 x 1600 http://tinyurl.com/hozec Slurp |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Standard or Widescreen monitor?
Pressing F11 on most browser set ups will remove the 2 to 3 toolbars at the
top of the screen and also the main bar at the bottom. A second press will bring them back again. It is also possible to drag the bars to display vertically at either side of the screen. I have not tried the effect of F 11 in this configuration. Richard. wrote in message oups.com... Bazzer Smith wrote: I am probably thinking a big standard shape monitor would be best? I incidently I have a Freecom DTTV stick so I sometime watch TV on my PC, but the monitor shape is not really a problem as you watch in a nicely framed box, you don't get black ugly bars wasteing space as you do on a proper TV. If you watch a reasonable amount of TV on it then i'd go for a widescreen. 17" is usable but doesn't have a huge amount of vertical space - for a desk a 19 or 20" widesceen is nice and will let you work two docs side by side (or a document and email say). You can move the windows bar to the side to maximise the amount of vertical workspace. It also depends on how much you're going to spend - w/s monitors tend to cost more and i'd go for a really good 4:3 over a 'budget' w/s Widescreens on laptops are a terrible idea as theres just not enough vertical height on a 15" screen (above that and they're not really portable). I think a 12" 4:3 screen for a laptop you regularly carry and a 15" for one you carry less often. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Standard or Widescreen monitor?
Hawkins wrote: Pressing F11 on most browser set ups will remove the 2 to 3 toolbars at the top of the screen and also the main bar at the bottom. A second press will bring them back again. It is also possible to drag the bars to display vertically at either side of the screen. I have not tried the effect of F 11 in this configuration. Indeed - f11 is the IE shortcut for fullscreen, presumably copied by Firefox and others for compatibility. Has various different functions in M$ desktop apps. Now a quick shortcut to hide all toolbars in Word, and then get them back again, would be useful but F11 isn't it. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Standard or Widescreen monitor?
"Slurp" wrote in message ... "Agamemnon" wrote in message ... (LCD's only go up to 1600x1200 which is not big enough.) ???? the Dell 30" does 2560 x 1600 It needs a dual link DVI graphics card so I can't use it on my present computer which would need a new motherboard as well as a new graphics card. http://tinyurl.com/hozec Its only 16:10. If its not 16:9 I can't see any advantage for it over a 4:3 display at 1920x1440. Slurp |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Standard or Widescreen monitor?
"Agamemnon" wrote in message
Get a 19 inch or larger CRT that can display up to 1920x1440 resolution or over. Then you will be able to watch HD movies at 1920x1080 and tile 4 wordprocessor or internet explorer windows on the screen at the same time and have no problems with loss of usable area. (LCD's only go up to 1600x1200 which is not big enough.) LOL!! have you any idea how small the 4 open windows on screen at the same time would be? -- ThePunisher |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Standard or Widescreen monitor?
On 2006-07-21, ThePunisher wrote:
"Agamemnon" wrote in message Get a 19 inch or larger CRT that can display up to 1920x1440 resolution or over. Then you will be able to watch HD movies at 1920x1080 and tile 4 wordprocessor or internet explorer windows on the screen at the same time and have no problems with loss of usable area. (LCD's only go up to 1600x1200 which is not big enough.) LOL!! have you any idea how small the 4 open windows on screen at the same time would be? A quarter the size of said 19 inch or larger CRT. Have you any idea how silly that question was? -- David Taylor |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Standard or Widescreen monitor?
"ThePunisher" wrote in message ... "Agamemnon" wrote in message Get a 19 inch or larger CRT that can display up to 1920x1440 resolution or over. Then you will be able to watch HD movies at 1920x1080 and tile 4 wordprocessor or internet explorer windows on the screen at the same time and have no problems with loss of usable area. (LCD's only go up to 1600x1200 which is not big enough.) LOL!! have you any idea how small the 4 open windows on screen at the same time would be? Since I am using 1920x1440 resolution right now the answer is yes. The size of each of the windows would be 93% of the window size when expanded to full screen if you were using 1024x768 resolution. If you overlap the top and bottom borders of each window and the side scroll bars then you'd be able to see the same work area you would see at 1024x768 in each quadrant and anyway there is not need to overlap. You can tile 4 instances of Word with A4 documents selected at 100% and still be able to see the whole of the page within the standard margins. For most web pages 4 instances of Internet explorer tiled will display the whole width of the page since most pages are set to 800 pixels wide. If you want more you could always use 2048x1536 resolution by my monitor isn't really designed for that resolution although it can go up to it. Useful for editing lots of images side by side though or very large spread sheets where the fonts are not too small. -- ThePunisher |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Standard or Widescreen monitor?
"ThePunisher" wrote in message ... "Agamemnon" wrote in message Get a 19 inch or larger CRT that can display up to 1920x1440 resolution or over. Then you will be able to watch HD movies at 1920x1080 and tile 4 wordprocessor or internet explorer windows on the screen at the same time and have no problems with loss of usable area. (LCD's only go up to 1600x1200 which is not big enough.) LOL!! have you any idea how small the 4 open windows on screen at the same time would be? 960X720 bigger than the 800X600 I have been using for the last 10 years. -- ThePunisher |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Beware of LG | Yugo | Printers | 31 | July 12th 06 08:06 PM |
Widescreen LCD Monitor HP L2335 has some motion blur in Quake 3. | Michael Hawes | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | March 31st 06 10:20 PM |
Can't use higher resolution with Topcon 10" monitor | emil_lam | Nvidia Videocards | 20 | December 7th 05 11:57 PM |
Is Dell P1110 21" monitor the same as Liyama S102GT 21" monitor? | private person | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | February 25th 04 04:56 PM |
Matching print colors to Monitor screen | David Chien | Printers | 8 | January 25th 04 01:58 PM |