If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I have both the Seagate driver and the WD drive that you mention. The
Seagate has benchmarked about 10% better in all of the benchmarks I've put the drives through. In everyday use there is barely a noticeable difference, if at all, besides the fact that the Seagate drive is quieter. Dave "@drian" wrote in message ... For a spare PC, I'm considering setting up a RAID 0 array. Which make of drive would be best for the array? I'm looking at 120GB, Serial ATA, 8MB cache drives. The makes I'm considering a o Seagate / $108.00 o Maxtor / $110.00 o Western Digital / $118.00 Is any one make better for the RAID 0 array than the other? There would be two identical makes on the array. Also, I'm wondering if Western Digital is that much better than Maxtor or Seagate, for the slightly price increase they command. @drian. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"DaveW" wrote in message
news:Qykjb.564946$Oz4.526836@rwcrnsc54... Check out their warranties, which tells you how long they expect them to last. Only the WD comes with a 3 year warranty; the others have 1 year. Yes, I already did that. They are as follows: Seagate - 1 year Maxtor - 3 years WD - 3 years Good idea though. The above is for Serial ATA drives. @drian. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:43:55 GMT, kony wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 23:16:00 GMT, "DaveW" wrote: Check out their warranties, which tells you how long they expect them to last. Only the WD comes with a 3 year warranty; the others have 1 year. Not all WD have 3 year, some have 1, and likewise, Maxtor also has 3 year on some, 1 yr on the others... I very much doubt it has anything to do with expected lifespan, but rather just another way the large corps. squeeze another few cents profit, or rather, retain it. Dave Hmmmm. WD seems to have just dropped 3 year warranties on their retail Special Edition drives... if you want a 3 yr warranty on one, you better buy it now, while those with 3 yr. warranties are still in-stock at your favorite store. http://support.wdc.com/warranty/policy.asp |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:18:26 GMT, kony pondered exceedingly, then took quill in
hand and carefully composed... | WD seems to have just dropped 3 year warranties on their retail | Special Edition drives... if you want a 3 yr warranty on one, you | better buy it now, while those with 3 yr. warranties are still | in-stock at your favorite store. | | http://support.wdc.com/warranty/policy.asp It sounds as if OEM Special Edition drives would still have the three-year warranty. That's what I usually buy anyway when I need another hard drive since OEMs usually cost less than retail packages. Larc §§§ - Please raise temperature of mail to reply by e-mail - §§§ |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"DaveW" wrote in message news:Qykjb.564946$Oz4.526836@rwcrnsc54... Check out their warranties, which tells you how long they expect them to last. Only the WD comes with a 3 year warranty; the others have 1 year. The Maxtor 6Y160P0 (160gb, 8mb buffer) I purchased last May has a 3-year warranty. From what I understand, all WD 8mb-buffer drives are 3-year, the rest 1-year. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:59:19 +0200, "Ilya Dan"
wrote: o Seagate / $108.00 o Maxtor / $110.00 o Western Digital / $118.00 Is any one make better for the RAID 0 array than the other? There would be two identical makes on the array. It's my personal experience, but I didn't see WD hard drive that succeeded to work longer then 4 month without falling apart. I've always replaced twice, and then had to replace to Maxtor (Quantum), which is by the way 5$ more expensive here for some reason. Making a hard drive that will live for years, seems to be greatest WD problem. Anyway in RAID, you will be able to replace the faulty drives forever without loosing any data, so this will be less problem for you No redundancy with RAID 0. Lose 1 drive and all your data. ___________ Best Regards, Ilya Dan. It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word. -- Andrew Jackson |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
i`ve had experience with all the drives you mention.
seagate PATAsingle- 3 years ago maxtor PATA single- 1.5yrs ago westerndigital SATA in raid0 array- 3 week ago. i`ve had NO problems with any drives (WD SATA's not been tested long enough for a reliable answer) tim "@drian" wrote in message ... For a spare PC, I'm considering setting up a RAID 0 array. Which make of drive would be best for the array? I'm looking at 120GB, Serial ATA, 8MB cache drives. The makes I'm considering a o Seagate / $108.00 o Maxtor / $110.00 o Western Digital / $118.00 Is any one make better for the RAID 0 array than the other? There would be two identical makes on the array. Also, I'm wondering if Western Digital is that much better than Maxtor or Seagate, for the slightly price increase they command. @drian. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Western Digital SATA WD800JD and Windows 98? | Machine Messiah | General | 6 | May 19th 04 05:04 AM |
Western Digital 2000 | BeeFarmer | General | 9 | April 30th 04 08:58 PM |
Adaptec vs. Western Digital. Who is DEGRADED? Who is FOS? | Brian | General | 0 | January 13th 04 05:16 PM |
Western Digital, Maxtor or Seagate | @drian | General | 25 | October 20th 03 06:24 PM |
Western Digital, Maxtor, Seagate - guess who spams? | tiburón | Homebuilt PC's | 7 | September 29th 03 11:19 PM |