Heads up for fraudster

DME wrote:
Recent fraud attempt - Not isolated so check your records:


snipped

Speaking of fraudsters, could any expert on email headers please look peruse
the following sets of headers from posts over the last couple of months and
advise whether

a) there is a strong possibility the posts all originated from the same
source

b) there is insufficient evidence to draw a conclusion.

I'm sure DME and Dr Zoidberg will see where this is going.. I've provided
some links at the end of the list.

Opinions welcomed..

==========
From: "..."
Newsgroups: alt.support.incest,alt.test,uk.people.bdsm
Subject: Please Read... This is Important. Thanks
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 11:09:00 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Lines: 117
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: host217-43-225-130.range217-43.btcentralplus.com
X-Trace: hercules.btinternet.com 1085915340 17391 217.43.225.130 (30 May
2004 11:09:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 11:09:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106


Feel free to sign these emal addresses up for any mailing lists on the
internet.
These people are known con artists and likes to mess about with young boys
under 10 years old. Do your worst!
.....

======
From: "Flexi"
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: testing.....
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 18:31:59 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Lines: 3
Message-ID:
Reply-To: "Flexi"
NNTP-Posting-Host: host217-43-225-130.range217-43.btcentralplus.com
X-Trace: hercules.btinternet.com 1085941919 9957 217.43.225.130 (30 May 2004
18:31:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 18:31:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

.....
=======
From: "in complete control"
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: BT Voyager 200 Router
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 17:09:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Lines: 19
Message-ID:
References:

NNTP-Posting-Host: host217-43-225-130.range217-43.btcentralplus.com
X-Trace: hercules.btinternet.com 1085677742 2757 217.43.225.130 (27 May 2004
17:09:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 17:09:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

.....
=========
From: "Flexi"
Newsgroups: uk.adverts.computer
Subject: Laptops
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 11:57:39 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Lines: 20
Message-ID:
Reply-To: "Flexi"
NNTP-Posting-Host: host217-43-225-130.range217-43.btcentralplus.com
X-Trace: hercules.btinternet.com 1085918259 23347 217.43.225.130 (30 May
2004 11:57:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 11:57:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106


Hi there,

Im looking to get a new laptop with these following specs:

AMD Ath XP 2.2GHz Processor
256Mb DDR RAM maybe 512 DDR RAM
20Gb Hard Drive
DVD

14.1 Screen
64Mb Graphics
1 x USB

Any ideas?

Thanks,

David Ginger.
================

The background to all this is covered in the threads:

http://tinyurl.com/5lr83

and

http://tinyurl.com/4k5r8

For the record I haven't seen the CPU or my do$h but of course you all knew
that

--
Peter X-Files Fan
Please Note: Emailed replies cc'd / bcc'd , containing HTML or attachments
auto-binned as spam

"DME" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote:

The original post was childish and stupid, i personally hope somebody
isnt
happy with your service and posts your personal details all over the
place.

My details are already 'all over the place' SFB.

the post was still a bit silly IMO

"Niel Humphreys" wrote in message
...
"DME" wrote in message
...
"g 0 0 s e" wrote:


"DME" wrote in message
.. .
Recent fraud attempt - Not isolated so check your records:

Thanks for the heads up

Did you send any gear to him? If you did, hope you get it back!


Hi.

Thanks to you, Mike and Malev.

No - It was pretty apparent by the other details we had that the
transaction was going to charged back. The Name, Email account, False
telephone number, electoral search, etc. Also another surname was
used -
I
didn't post it as it's more than likely the proper card holders name.

As far as I'm concerned it's a legitimate thing to do - post details
that
are relevant to a transaction that failed because funds were used
fraudulently. Other retailers can search the last few days to make sure
they haven't shipped to that postcode, surname, email address, etc.

As for being called arrogant .... Most people who have been called
arrogant
here are long standing regulars who I have the upmost respect for - I'm
quite happy to be arrogant if that's what it takes to get on.

Thanks also to Paul B. This may not be an issue that we are going to
agree
on but at least I get an adult conversation.


The 'great unwashed' often interpret confidence that you know what you're
talking about as arrogance - primarily because they haven't got a clue
about
the subject matter and it's an easy insult.
--

ahh another great company man speaks

says...

"DME" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote:

The original post was childish and stupid, i personally hope somebody
isnt
happy with your service and posts your personal details all over the
place.

My details are already 'all over the place' SFB.

the post was still a bit silly IMO

Then your opinion is wrong.

--
AndyT.

Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional!

Trust No One® wrote:

The background to all this is covered in the threads:

http://tinyurl.com/5lr83

and

http://tinyurl.com/4k5r8


Sorry about the duff links folks, try

http://tinyurl.com/3qmb2

and

http://tinyurl.com/44kdn

and click on view thread in both cases.

Brgds,

--
Peter X-Files Fan
Please Note: Emailed replies cc'd / bcc'd , containing HTML or attachments
auto-binned as spam

"Dave" wrote in message
...

"Niel Humphreys" wrote in message
...
"DME" wrote in message
...
"g 0 0 s e" wrote:


"DME" wrote in message
.. .
Recent fraud attempt - Not isolated so check your records:

Thanks for the heads up

Did you send any gear to him? If you did, hope you get it back!


Hi.

Thanks to you, Mike and Malev.

No - It was pretty apparent by the other details we had that the
transaction was going to charged back. The Name, Email account, False
telephone number, electoral search, etc. Also another surname was
used -
I
didn't post it as it's more than likely the proper card holders name.

As far as I'm concerned it's a legitimate thing to do - post details
that
are relevant to a transaction that failed because funds were used
fraudulently. Other retailers can search the last few days to make
sure
they haven't shipped to that postcode, surname, email address, etc.

As for being called arrogant .... Most people who have been called
arrogant
here are long standing regulars who I have the upmost respect for -
I'm
quite happy to be arrogant if that's what it takes to get on.

Thanks also to Paul B. This may not be an issue that we are going to
agree
on but at least I get an adult conversation.


The 'great unwashed' often interpret confidence that you know what
you're
talking about as arrogance - primarily because they haven't got a clue
about
the subject matter and it's an easy insult.
--

ahh another great company man speaks


Aha sarcasm - that's more like it.
--

Niel Humphreys

Trust No One® wrote:
|| Trust No One® wrote:
|||
||| The background to all this is covered in the threads:
|||
||| http://tinyurl.com/5lr83
|||
||| and
|||
||| http://tinyurl.com/4k5r8
|||
||
|| Sorry about the duff links folks, try
||
|| http://tinyurl.com/3qmb2
||
|| and
||
|| http://tinyurl.com/44kdn
||
|| and click on view thread in both cases.
||
|| Brgds,
||
|| --
|| Peter X-Files Fan
|| Please Note: Emailed replies cc'd / bcc'd , containing HTML or
attachments
|| auto-binned as spam

Just out of interest, wouldn't the OP be breaking the law as far as Data
Protection Act?

"Andy Tillbrook" wrote in message
...
says...

"DME" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote:

The original post was childish and stupid, i personally hope somebody
isnt
happy with your service and posts your personal details all over the
place.

My details are already 'all over the place' SFB.

the post was still a bit silly IMO

Then your opinion is wrong.

Your obviously dont know what the word "opinion" actually means

"Niel Humphreys" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...

"Niel Humphreys" wrote in message
...
"DME" wrote in message
...
"g 0 0 s e" wrote:


"DME" wrote in message
.. .
Recent fraud attempt - Not isolated so check your records:

Thanks for the heads up

Did you send any gear to him? If you did, hope you get it back!


Hi.

Thanks to you, Mike and Malev.

No - It was pretty apparent by the other details we had that the
transaction was going to charged back. The Name, Email account,
False
telephone number, electoral search, etc. Also another surname was
used -
I
didn't post it as it's more than likely the proper card holders
name.

As far as I'm concerned it's a legitimate thing to do - post details
that
are relevant to a transaction that failed because funds were used
fraudulently. Other retailers can search the last few days to make
sure
they haven't shipped to that postcode, surname, email address, etc.

As for being called arrogant .... Most people who have been called
arrogant
here are long standing regulars who I have the upmost respect for -
I'm
quite happy to be arrogant if that's what it takes to get on.

Thanks also to Paul B. This may not be an issue that we are going
to
agree
on but at least I get an adult conversation.


The 'great unwashed' often interpret confidence that you know what
you're
talking about as arrogance - primarily because they haven't got a clue
about
the subject matter and it's an easy insult.
--

ahh another great company man speaks


Aha sarcasm - that's more like it.

Trouble is the time it took for you to realise

"^^artnada^^" wrote:

Just out of interest, wouldn't the OP be breaking the law as far as Data
Protection Act?

For false details?

Lol.


It does make you wonder what agenda people like you have - would be
fraudsters perhaps? What a ****ed up World we live in.

Regards.
--
DME Computing Solutions

Laptops: www.dme.co.uk
CD & DVD Duplicators: www.smartcopy.co.uk