If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NAS device for a small office - Recommendations requested
I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a network
storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offers the speed we want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. We also tried a Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed the database problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the device. Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as a basic drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice. Neil Whitman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Neil Whitman" wrote in message
t... I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a network storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offers the speed we want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. We also tried a Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed the database problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the device. Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as a basic drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice. Neil, Need to know more about this "database problem"... what software is it? Is it a file locking problem? Snapserver's don't normally cause a problem, it is usually the software settings for file locking and quite often the db software is not truely multiuser! Mark |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mark,
The database is by Resumate a recruiting software vendor. It shares fine on a Windows 98 box or the Maxtor drive with the Linksys adapter. I've spoken with Snapserver and we disabled opportunistic file locking with no change in results. Their conclusion is the Samba O/S doesn't like working in a diverse culture i.e. Windows 98, Windows XP pro and home. Have you had any experience with the Linksys EFG 120 NAS? Neil "Mark" wrote in message . net... "Neil Whitman" wrote in message t... I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a network storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offers the speed we want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. We also tried a Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed the database problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the device. Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as a basic drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice. Neil, Need to know more about this "database problem"... what software is it? Is it a file locking problem? Snapserver's don't normally cause a problem, it is usually the software settings for file locking and quite often the db software is not truely multiuser! Mark |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Neil G. Whitman" wrote in message
... Mark, The database is by Resumate a recruiting software vendor. It shares fine on a Windows 98 box or the Maxtor drive with the Linksys adapter. I've spoken with Snapserver and we disabled opportunistic file locking with no change in results. Their conclusion is the Samba O/S doesn't like working in a diverse culture i.e. Windows 98, Windows XP pro and home. Have you had any experience with the Linksys EFG 120 NAS? Neil, I would contact the Resumate support and find out if there are any problems with multi o/s file locking. Also what are their recommendations on multiuser usage. I've not used linksys adapters , but have been using snap servers for a while. Snap server are ok for basic file storage, but I would not trust one for a database. Also the mixing of 98 and XP could well be a problem. I've had file locking problems with 98 and XP which sent away when we stopped using 98. This was using a Sourcesafe database over Samba Filesharing on Solaris. ( different samba to the one on snapserver ). My best recommendation would be to share from a PC. If you need lots of space then PC hard disks go up to 250GB + Mark |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Mark,
The database vendor couldn't share new light on the subject. I think the best thing is to move the database and other files to a cheap PC and move away from the Snapserver. Thanks for your input and help. Neil "Mark" wrote in message . net... "Neil G. Whitman" wrote in message ... Mark, The database is by Resumate a recruiting software vendor. It shares fine on a Windows 98 box or the Maxtor drive with the Linksys adapter. I've spoken with Snapserver and we disabled opportunistic file locking with no change in results. Their conclusion is the Samba O/S doesn't like working in a diverse culture i.e. Windows 98, Windows XP pro and home. Have you had any experience with the Linksys EFG 120 NAS? Neil, I would contact the Resumate support and find out if there are any problems with multi o/s file locking. Also what are their recommendations on multiuser usage. I've not used linksys adapters , but have been using snap servers for a while. Snap server are ok for basic file storage, but I would not trust one for a database. Also the mixing of 98 and XP could well be a problem. I've had file locking problems with 98 and XP which sent away when we stopped using 98. This was using a Sourcesafe database over Samba Filesharing on Solaris. ( different samba to the one on snapserver ). My best recommendation would be to share from a PC. If you need lots of space then PC hard disks go up to 250GB + Mark |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have used the Fastora product with great success. They have a Windows
(SAK) version and a Linux version. If you have unix clients it has an embedded Samba client. It does support MAC OSX as well (NFS) "Neil Whitman" wrote in message t... I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a network storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offers the speed we want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. We also tried a Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed the database problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the device. Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as a basic drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice. Neil Whitman |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
You may want to consider a newer Snap Server, one that supports iSCSI.
That would host your database as if it were on a local drive, and the iSCSI software is free download from Microsoft. Of course, their low end GuardianOS products start at about $3K... Ed "Monte Oates" wrote in message news:Kz55d.512601$gE.258704@pd7tw3no... I have used the Fastora product with great success. They have a Windows (SAK) version and a Linux version. If you have unix clients it has an embedded Samba client. It does support MAC OSX as well (NFS) "Neil Whitman" wrote in message t... I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a network storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offers the speed we want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. We also tried a Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed the database problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the device. Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as a basic drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice. Neil Whitman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Update on Athlon 2600 Ghz discrepancy | David Simmons | Overclocking AMD Processors | 7 | August 27th 04 08:56 PM |
my new mobo o/c's great | rockerrock | Overclocking AMD Processors | 9 | June 30th 04 08:17 PM |
Radeon 7500 Saphire Windows ME Problem | Pamela and Howard Signa | Gateway Computers | 5 | February 17th 04 10:07 PM |
Happy Birthday America | SST | Overclocking AMD Processors | 326 | November 27th 03 07:54 PM |
Backup Small Office Data | Jim Turner | General | 6 | August 17th 03 09:31 PM |