A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage & Hardrives
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NAS device for a small office - Recommendations requested



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 14th 04, 01:50 AM
Neil Whitman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default NAS device for a small office - Recommendations requested

I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a network
storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offers the speed we
want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. We also tried a
Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed the database
problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the device.
Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as a basic
drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice.

Neil Whitman



  #2  
Old September 14th 04, 03:07 PM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Neil Whitman" wrote in message
t...
I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a

network
storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offers the speed

we
want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. We also tried

a
Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed the database
problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the

device.
Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as a basic
drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice.

Neil,

Need to know more about this "database problem"... what software is it?
Is it a file locking problem?

Snapserver's don't normally cause a problem, it is usually the software
settings for file locking and quite often the db software is not truely
multiuser!

Mark


  #3  
Old September 15th 04, 10:29 PM
Neil G. Whitman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark,

The database is by Resumate a recruiting software vendor. It shares fine on
a Windows 98 box or the Maxtor drive with the Linksys adapter. I've spoken
with Snapserver and we disabled opportunistic file locking with no change in
results. Their conclusion is the Samba O/S doesn't like working in a diverse
culture i.e. Windows 98, Windows XP pro and home. Have you had any
experience with the Linksys EFG 120 NAS?

Neil
"Mark" wrote in message
. net...
"Neil Whitman" wrote in message
t...
I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a

network
storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offers the

speed
we
want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. We also

tried
a
Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed the database
problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the

device.
Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as a basic
drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice.

Neil,

Need to know more about this "database problem"... what software is it?
Is it a file locking problem?

Snapserver's don't normally cause a problem, it is usually the software
settings for file locking and quite often the db software is not truely
multiuser!

Mark




  #4  
Old September 16th 04, 10:55 AM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Neil G. Whitman" wrote in message
...
Mark,

The database is by Resumate a recruiting software vendor. It shares fine

on
a Windows 98 box or the Maxtor drive with the Linksys adapter. I've spoken
with Snapserver and we disabled opportunistic file locking with no change

in
results. Their conclusion is the Samba O/S doesn't like working in a

diverse
culture i.e. Windows 98, Windows XP pro and home. Have you had any
experience with the Linksys EFG 120 NAS?


Neil,

I would contact the Resumate support and find out if there are any problems
with
multi o/s file locking. Also what are their recommendations on multiuser
usage.

I've not used linksys adapters , but have been using snap servers for a
while.
Snap server are ok for basic file storage, but I would not trust one for a
database.

Also the mixing of 98 and XP could well be a problem. I've had file locking
problems with 98 and XP which sent away when we stopped using 98. This was
using a Sourcesafe database over Samba Filesharing on Solaris. ( different
samba to the one on snapserver ).

My best recommendation would be to share from a PC.
If you need lots of space then PC hard disks go up to 250GB +

Mark


  #5  
Old September 16th 04, 10:06 PM
Neil G. Whitman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark,

The database vendor couldn't share new light on the subject. I think the
best thing is to move the database and other files to a cheap PC and move
away from the Snapserver. Thanks for your input and help.

Neil
"Mark" wrote in message
. net...
"Neil G. Whitman" wrote in message
...
Mark,

The database is by Resumate a recruiting software vendor. It shares fine

on
a Windows 98 box or the Maxtor drive with the Linksys adapter. I've

spoken
with Snapserver and we disabled opportunistic file locking with no

change
in
results. Their conclusion is the Samba O/S doesn't like working in a

diverse
culture i.e. Windows 98, Windows XP pro and home. Have you had any
experience with the Linksys EFG 120 NAS?


Neil,

I would contact the Resumate support and find out if there are any

problems
with
multi o/s file locking. Also what are their recommendations on multiuser
usage.

I've not used linksys adapters , but have been using snap servers for a
while.
Snap server are ok for basic file storage, but I would not trust one for a
database.

Also the mixing of 98 and XP could well be a problem. I've had file

locking
problems with 98 and XP which sent away when we stopped using 98. This was
using a Sourcesafe database over Samba Filesharing on Solaris. ( different
samba to the one on snapserver ).

My best recommendation would be to share from a PC.
If you need lots of space then PC hard disks go up to 250GB +

Mark




  #6  
Old September 25th 04, 04:26 AM
Monte Oates
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have used the Fastora product with great success. They have a Windows
(SAK) version and a Linux version. If you have unix clients it has an
embedded Samba client. It does support MAC OSX as well (NFS)
"Neil Whitman" wrote in message
t...
I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a

network
storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offers the speed

we
want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. We also tried

a
Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed the database
problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the

device.
Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as a basic
drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice.

Neil Whitman





  #7  
Old October 25th 04, 09:18 PM
Ed Zachary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You may want to consider a newer Snap Server, one that supports iSCSI.
That would host your database as if it were on a local drive, and the
iSCSI software is free download from Microsoft. Of course, their low
end GuardianOS products start at about $3K...

Ed

"Monte Oates" wrote in message news:Kz55d.512601$gE.258704@pd7tw3no...
I have used the Fastora product with great success. They have a Windows
(SAK) version and a Linux version. If you have unix clients it has an
embedded Samba client. It does support MAC OSX as well (NFS)
"Neil Whitman" wrote in message
t...
I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a

network
storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offers the speed

we
want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. We also tried

a
Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed the database
problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the

device.
Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as a basic
drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice.

Neil Whitman



  #8  
Old December 11th 04, 02:36 PM
Robert Cullmann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


FYI, I've had similar file locking problems with the Linksys EFG 120 NA
with a FoxPro based application running through 98 clients.

-Robert

Neil G. Whitman Wrote:
Mark,

The database is by Resumate a recruiting software vendor. It share
fine on
a Windows 98 box or the Maxtor drive with the Linksys adapter. I'v
spoken
with Snapserver and we disabled opportunistic file locking with n
change in
results. Their conclusion is the Samba O/S doesn't like working in
diverse
culture i.e. Windows 98, Windows XP pro and home. Have you had any
experience with the Linksys EFG 120 NAS?

Neil
"Mark" wrote in message
. net...-
"Neil Whitman"
wrote in message
t...-
I have a 4 user peer to peer network in our office and am seeking a-
network-
storage solution. We've tried the Snapserver 1100 and it offer
the--
speed-
we-
want but it's OS interferes with a data file we're storing. W
also--
tried-
a-
Maxtor 160gb with the Linksys Storage Adapter and it fixed th
database
problem but responds very slowly when all 4 users are accessing the-
device.-
Can anyone recommend an NAS that offers fast access and runs as
basic
drive on my network. Thanks in advance for any advice.
-
Neil,

Need to know more about this "database problem"... what software i
it?
Is it a file locking problem?

Snapserver's don't normally cause a problem, it is usually th
software
settings for file locking and quite often the db software is no
truely
multiuser!

Mark



--
Robert Cullmann
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Update on Athlon 2600 Ghz discrepancy David Simmons Overclocking AMD Processors 7 August 27th 04 08:56 PM
my new mobo o/c's great rockerrock Overclocking AMD Processors 9 June 30th 04 08:17 PM
Radeon 7500 Saphire Windows ME Problem Pamela and Howard Signa Gateway Computers 5 February 17th 04 10:07 PM
Happy Birthday America SST Overclocking AMD Processors 326 November 27th 03 07:54 PM
Backup Small Office Data Jim Turner General 6 August 17th 03 09:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.