If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Trying to improve 35mm slide scans w/1200 dpi scanner
".." wrote in message
... "Stan" wrote in message .. . Doc wrote: I've been experimenting with scanning slides using an Epson Stylus CX5200 rated at 1200 dpi. Running Win98SE, PIII 550, 384 megs ram. I've been using one of these multi-tube fluorescent bulbs and experimenting with various diffuser materials and the light at different distances from the diffuser. I tried a homemade 90-degree slide-scanning gadget that uses the reflected light of the scanner bar and a couple of battery powered fluorescent lights but seem to get the best results with the multi-bulb extended horizontally over the slide. Gives well lit scans with minimal need for enhancing the contrast/brightness. I have the slides sitting on a sheet of black construction paper with a slot cut that's the same size as the photo portion of the slide, with the diffuser over that. I've been able to get scans that I would describe as okay after scanning with the Epson scan software and tweaking with Paintshop Pro ver 7, the color is actually pretty decent but they fall way short of the super sharpness of the slides. Here's an example of scans make with a Plustek OpticPro 9636T which is also a 1200 dpi scanner, on someone's website that look far better than mine. http://www.krausehouse.com/plustek.htm Is it that the scanner is just better or perhaps there's something I could be doing differently? Am I swimming upstream using a 1200 dpi scanner to begin with? Any input will be appreciated. If you are going to scan slides, you should be using a film scanner, not a flatbed scanner, and you should have an optical resolution of at least 2000 dpi to start (unless you will be satisfied with small scans for use on the web). Actually, I would aim for something around 4000 dpi optical resolution, if possible. If you have 35mm negatives, the same applies. When I have negatives, I prefer to scan the negative over scanning a print. -- * * * To reply, remove numbers from address. Stan, New Orleans http://www.neworleansphotographs.com http://www.atneworleans.com http://www.sbeckart.com/sbeck Hi, You mean that's scanner for negatives? As it will scan the negatives into color jpg? If this is possible, where can I find such scanners? Cos it will be much cheaper for me than shooting on slide. thanks yewyee Most film scanners and even many flatbed scanners have software that allows you to scan negatives. If you have a scanner then check the options in the twain driver setup screen (not auto scan). Film best, me |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
`me` said, and I quote directly -
"Most film scanners.. have software that allows you to scan negatives." Note the word MOST. Well, I never. I thought ALL film scanners allowed negative scanning, but `me` would certainly know, so I must be wrong. `me`, could you please name a film scanner that won't scan negatives? And then I will admit my error. Otherwise...... Just keeping you on the straight and narrow, 'coz you wouldn't want to post a mistake, Chrlz. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
`me` said, and I quote directly - "Most film scanners.. have software that allows you to scan negatives." Note the word MOST. Well, I never. I thought ALL film scanners allowed negative scanning, but `me` would certainly know, so I must be wrong. `me`, could you please name a film scanner that won't scan negatives? And then I will admit my error. Otherwise...... Just keeping you on the straight and narrow, 'coz you wouldn't want to post a mistake, Chrlz. Hey dude, I'm bored with your feud, So it would be cool to stop actin' the fool, Next time I read back, just give me your feedback, On the important questions that are asked in all seriousness. P.S. I am crap at rap, but I ain't no pap (arazzi) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:37:29 GMT, Unspam wrote:
`me` said, and I quote directly - "Most film scanners.. have software that allows you to scan negatives." Note the word MOST. Well, I never. I thought ALL film scanners allowed negative scanning, but `me` would certainly know, so I must be wrong. `me`, could you please name a film scanner that won't scan negatives? And then I will admit my error. Otherwise...... Just keeping you on the straight and narrow, 'coz you wouldn't want to post a mistake, Chrlz. Hey dude, I'm bored with your feud, So it would be cool to stop actin' the fool, Next time I read back, just give me your feedback, On the important questions that are asked in all seriousness. P.S. I am crap at rap, but I ain't no pap (arazzi) ...terrible. Did I see you on American Idle last week? -- Owamanga! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
oups.com... `me` said, and I quote directly - "Most film scanners.. have software that allows you to scan negatives." Note the word MOST. Well, I never. I thought ALL film scanners allowed negative scanning, but `me` would certainly know, so I must be wrong. `me`, could you please name a film scanner that won't scan negatives? And then I will admit my error. Otherwise...... Just keeping you on the straight and narrow, 'coz you wouldn't want to post a mistake, Chrlz. [chomp] My dear pet chrlz: Can a dog spell pedantic? You can't be serious. I give you food, shelter, clean newspaper and this is how you repay me? What kind of a life could you possibly have without the solace and succor I prove you? Your Loving Master me |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Kohary" wrote in message
... wrote: `me` said, and I quote directly - "Most film scanners.. have software that allows you to scan negatives." Note the word MOST. Well, I never. I thought ALL film scanners allowed negative scanning, but `me` would certainly know, so I must be wrong. `me`, could you please name a film scanner that won't scan negatives? And then I will admit my error. Otherwise...... He's actually right, you know. I mean, all scanners will literally scan a negative (they'll scan any damned thing you put on the glass), but many of them weren't designed to scan negatives and won't do it very well if you force the issue, especially the ones without a backlight to shine through the negative. Mike Kohary My name is *me* and I officially endorse Mike's message. Film best, me PS: Dear Mike, chrlz is my loyal and faithful pet, please let me feed him otherwise he may become confused and go off his feed. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Please don't waste bandwidth with new posts.
It looks like you are attention seeking. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
me wrote:
".." wrote in message ... "Stan" wrote in message ... Doc wrote: I've been experimenting with scanning slides using an Epson Stylus CX5200 rated at 1200 dpi. Running Win98SE, PIII 550, 384 megs ram. I've been using one of these multi-tube fluorescent bulbs and experimenting with various diffuser materials and the light at different distances from the diffuser. I tried a homemade 90-degree slide-scanning gadget that uses the reflected light of the scanner bar and a couple of battery powered fluorescent lights but seem to get the best results with the multi-bulb extended horizontally over the slide. Gives well lit scans with minimal need for enhancing the contrast/brightness. I have the slides sitting on a sheet of black construction paper with a slot cut that's the same size as the photo portion of the slide, with the diffuser over that. I've been able to get scans that I would describe as okay after scanning with the Epson scan software and tweaking with Paintshop Pro ver 7, the color is actually pretty decent but they fall way short of the super sharpness of the slides. Here's an example of scans make with a Plustek OpticPro 9636T which is also a 1200 dpi scanner, on someone's website that look far better than mine. http://www.krausehouse.com/plustek.htm Is it that the scanner is just better or perhaps there's something I could be doing differently? Am I swimming upstream using a 1200 dpi scanner to begin with? Any input will be appreciated. If you are going to scan slides, you should be using a film scanner, not a flatbed scanner, and you should have an optical resolution of at least 2000 dpi to start (unless you will be satisfied with small scans for use on the web). Actually, I would aim for something around 4000 dpi optical resolution, if possible. If you have 35mm negatives, the same applies. When I have negatives, I prefer to scan the negative over scanning a print. -- * * * To reply, remove numbers from address. Stan, New Orleans http://www.neworleansphotographs.com http://www.atneworleans.com http://www.sbeckart.com/sbeck Hi, You mean that's scanner for negatives? As it will scan the negatives into color jpg? If this is possible, where can I find such scanners? Cos it will be much cheaper for me than shooting on slide. thanks yewyee Most film scanners and even many flatbed scanners have software that allows you to scan negatives. If you have a scanner then check the options in the twain driver setup screen (not auto scan). Film best, me i will start testing plustek optic pro st-64, its 5x7(13x18cm). i will use it with a special wet-scan kit called holder(from julio). i will compare it with epson perfection 4990. i will buy the pro-version with silverfast ai6. there is no better scanner/software-combination around for small and large negatives for so little money. epson f-3200 filmscanner is another option. or any other higher priced 24x36 or larger filmscanner. forget all the combinations you mentioned. you will only loose your spare time. on the minolta-scanners there is a special holder. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
oups.com... Please don't waste bandwidth with new posts. Did you say please? Does that mean you're considering my offer? Look I even removed my comment from the title of this post. What do you say to my truce? It looks like you are attention seeking. The OP cross posted and I replied to a recent poster. Sign, me |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buy Advice - 35mm Slide Scanner | FRP | Scanners | 3 | March 2nd 05 05:23 PM |
Shopping for 35MM slide scanner | Skip Allison | Scanners | 3 | January 20th 05 10:24 PM |
What am I doing wroing? DVD-R | Sean Winterberg | Cdr | 5 | June 8th 04 05:28 AM |
flatbed slide scans vs digital cameras | Paul Gilsdorf | Scanners | 3 | September 20th 03 06:26 AM |