If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic wrote:
David Maynard writes: It 'works', though, and you can tell that an incredible amount of engineering and design effort went into the thing. It's just that a plain metal box would have been infintely superior from just about any standpoint. The accountants probably told the engineers that a plastic case was mandatory for cost reasons, and then ignored the engineers when they explained all the additional work that would be required to make the case compliant. Well, accountants do some strange things from time to time but specifying hardware design isn't usually one of them. Their approach is generally much simpler, such as explaining you have a 1 lb budget for a 10 lb box and the rest is your problem. Manufacturing then tells you they ain't got tools to make 10 lb boxes, R&D tells you it's not technologically possible to make 10 lb boxes, marketing says 10 lbs ain't big enough because the competition has 12 lb boxes, with bells, the buyer says lead time for the one indispensable part with no substitute is 200 years but contract admin has forbidden purchasing from them anyway, Q&A suddenly announces a new standard requiring 10 lb boxes survive a nuclear blast with the mega-tonnage TBD, which generally means some time significantly after your scheduled delivery, and the board doesn't know what a 'lb' is but wants the arbitrary schedule you couldn't make to begin with cut in half. None of which you can find in the conceptual drawings, statement of work, or specifications for the 5 lb box you were asked to design. Other than that it's a piece of cake |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
They were very easy systems to assemble, because the case was big and
open. IIRC, the motherboard in the 486 based system used a UMC chipset, and a separate card for the SuperIO functions (serial/parallel/game port). |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
There have been instances of all of those types of PCs. They fail
because while everyone says how great they would be, no one wants to pay a big premium. Adding interconnect cables, separate power supplies, etc, adds cost. I.e., you used to be able to buy a PC with the CD-ROM and floppy drives in a separate desktop cabinet, since there was no need for the whole PC to be easily accessible. But this involved two cases, two power supplies, a host of cables, etc. The trend now is to not have a gazillion pieces strewn around the room, connected by cables. So stuff like integral media readers, removable drive bays, etc., are becoming more common. One way to achieve what you want is to set up a client-server environment, with a separate server. But thin clients have traditionally been rather low performance, and not cheap because they require specialized thermal solutions, and low power processors (10 watts or so) to be able to be silent and to fit into small cases. I worked on one high performance thin client at my last job, and the demand was very high (we could not manufacture components fast enough for the customer). When I go to my local library, and use their extremely slow thin clients, it makes me wish that they would buy the higher performance machines, but they were very expensive (as well as being fanless). |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:18:07 -0500, Bob Adkins
wrote: On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:43:49 -0500, David Maynard wrote: Yes. I've got an old 486 system made by Compudyne, I think it is, and it's a plastic case with metal sheets all over the place inside for EMI shielding. Did you ever see an old Kaypro "portable" case? Now THAT was some "engineering"! It was an ancient precursor to the laptop. It was huge, with built-in ~9" CRT, all made from heavy gage aluminum, all aircraft-looking rivnuts and fasteners. Weighed about 30 pounds. Just the case must have cost more than a modern computer. I tore one down and salvaged the aluminum sheet metal, brackets, heavy fiberglass braces, rivnuts, and high quality SS fasteners. I still use the aluminum for building home made brackets and trays. Found a nice picture of it he http://oldcomputers.net/kayproii.html Even the keyboard was mounted in a heavy gage aluminum tray, which I use for a shelf in my shop. Wasn't it working? That might've been worth some $$$$ to a collector, certainly more than the cost of that much sheet metal if you merely needed materials. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Adkins writes:
Did you ever see an old Kaypro "portable" case? Now THAT was some "engineering"! It was an ancient precursor to the laptop. It was huge, with built-in ~9" CRT, all made from heavy gage aluminum, all aircraft-looking rivnuts and fasteners. Weighed about 30 pounds. Just the case must have cost more than a modern computer. I tore one down and salvaged the aluminum sheet metal, brackets, heavy fiberglass braces, rivnuts, and high quality SS fasteners. I still use the aluminum for building home made brackets and trays. Found a nice picture of it he http://oldcomputers.net/kayproii.html Even the keyboard was mounted in a heavy gage aluminum tray, which I use for a shelf in my shop. It's interesting to note that the main reason these first portable computers were so bulky and heavy was that they had to contain large diskette drives and a CRT. Remove the floppies and the CRT and they'd nearly fit into a modern laptop. The development of inexpensive, high-quality, reliable hard disk drives and flat-panel screens is what made laptops really practical; unfortunately, that didn't happen until many years after the PC itself was invented. I remember seeing people lugging those large Osbornes and what-not around occasionally and thinking that they didn't seem very practical. However, I did like the old IBM 5100 from a style standpoint, although it was twice as heavy as the Osbornes and had less horsepower. It had a nice cartridge tape drive, which I found superior to floppy disks, and the fit and finish were excellent. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Adkins wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:43:49 -0500, David Maynard wrote: Yes. I've got an old 486 system made by Compudyne, I think it is, and it's a plastic case with metal sheets all over the place inside for EMI shielding. Did you ever see an old Kaypro "portable" case? Now THAT was some "engineering"! Sure, I remember them. And the Osborne. And, of course, making 'portables' is how Compaq got started. It's certainly engineered but not in the same way as the Compudyne case I was talking about. The Kaypro is primarily bend sheet metal, a simpler and less costly solution than making molds with the attached shielding bits. It was an ancient precursor to the laptop. It was huge, with built-in ~9" CRT, all made from heavy gage aluminum, all aircraft-looking rivnuts and fasteners. Weighed about 30 pounds. Just the case must have cost more than a modern computer. I tore one down and salvaged the aluminum sheet metal, brackets, heavy fiberglass braces, rivnuts, and high quality SS fasteners. I still use the aluminum for building home made brackets and trays. Found a nice picture of it he http://oldcomputers.net/kayproii.html Even the keyboard was mounted in a heavy gage aluminum tray, which I use for a shelf in my shop. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Adkins writes:
I was in awe of the HDD. It was a 5mb unit, and was very large and heavy. I should have kept it. I recall a $3000 Corvus drive in a blue plastic case that held about 3 megabytes. Even at the time, they were gouging customers on price; the drives didn't cost _that_ much to make. When one looks at the prices of things back in those days, one must remember that a lot of hardware had very generous margins built into the sale price. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic wrote:
Bob Adkins writes: I was in awe of the HDD. It was a 5mb unit, and was very large and heavy. I should have kept it. I recall a $3000 Corvus drive in a blue plastic case that held about 3 megabytes. Even at the time, they were gouging customers on price; the drives didn't cost _that_ much to make. When one looks at the prices of things back in those days, one must remember that a lot of hardware had very generous margins built into the sale price. Which, no doubt, explains why so many of them are no longer in the business. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
David Maynard writes:
Which, no doubt, explains why so many of them are no longer in the business. No doubt ... although Apple is still in business. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Building new system, asking for input (& have some questions) | Daniel | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | February 22nd 05 08:40 PM |
building an htpc - what do you wish you had known? | Waz | Homebuilt PC's | 1 | February 6th 05 10:49 PM |
Opnion about buying vs building desktop system | Joseph | General | 3 | August 29th 03 02:45 AM |
Building your Own PC? | GC \(BuildYourOwn\) | General | 0 | August 2nd 03 05:14 PM |
Building an IBM-PC compatible laptop. | xby | Homebuilt PC's | 1 | July 1st 03 08:00 PM |