If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#341
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:42:02 +0200, Jure Sah
wrote: kony pravi: If you have a lot running at incorrect (per user's needs) process priority, then it's somewhat true, and mostly false, because gen-purpose OS can easily be very snappy. Win9x Lite, Win2k, even WinXP if you whittle away at it for awhile. I don't set process priorities on a desktop machine, nor do I recommend that anyone else do so. Sure, but the apps themselves can. Actually it can be a benefit, if for example you wanted to apply some filters and capture to MPEG4 while using a system, it'll be good to give that enough priority. Nearly all modern OSs are rather unsuitable for signal processing. Nonsense. They may be sub-optimal, but we're not doing one hardcoded task on a PC, the versatility is important too. Unsuitable in this context would not apply as they certainly can and do get the job done. Their internal system for sharing CPU time amongst programs is inefficient when you run processes that need a lot of CPU in a fluid manner alongside those who need little. That's why today you have buffers everywhere you look. Yes they're not "as" efficient as they could be, but that is the nature of a multipurpose system. It couldn't work any other way and be versatile enough, and inexpensive enough, to do so many jobs. Your 5 settings of Windows priority will simply not let you OR your system provide all programs with the optimal share of CPU power. You'd need the OS doing that for you automatically if you wanted it to work. Sure it will, most programs don't need more than a *normal* priority level, they can sit in the background. If the workload is so high that multiple realtime activities can't be done, this is a case that would be a problem for any type of hardware design, not just a PC. |
#342
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
kony spam spam.com wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:53:06 GMT, John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote: My guess is your "experience" is fantasy, or you bought a cheap fan, or maybe you tried to lubricate it before your problems started, or maybe you just couldn't find one with a blue LED. Whatever. Fluid bearing fans are usually very low quality junk. Says who? A very few manufacturers make decent ones, like Panasonic, Papst, Comair, a few Sunons and Deltas are passible. Any serious design needing longest fan life uses dual ball bearing fans if at all possible. That's backwards. Fluid dynamic bearings last many times longer than ball bearings. Path: newssvr27.news.prodigy.net!newsdbm04.news.prodigy. com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!newscon 06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.g iganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.gig anews.com!nntp.insightbb.com!news.insightbb.com.PO STED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:10:18 -0500 From: kony spam spam.com Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.computer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.ch ips Subject: Why Pentium? Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:11:22 -0400 Reply-To: spam spam.com Message-ID: qod0c29i4eqs0t0gtffi4kei8orb2rvqma 4ax.com References: 432ua2pjl8hi3avm66u8joi9lkdeu8g1ri 4ax.com 4h8nviF1or785U1 individual.net f2m0b2ljvsk60a26gtvfk72phlc9m7d0fv 4ax.com 4hb9hrF1qpn08U1 individual.net a361b21d9h02olr8bbispuosrh9jodrfim 4ax.com 4hbl1aF1qlql5U1 individual.net icq9b2ldci81q6es9jupvemokrrhprshee 4ax.com 4hkr8hF2bseU1 individual.net kHNvg.4362$oj5.1511399 news.siol.net Xns9806854A4F3580123456789 207.115.17.102 2jSvg.4371$oj5.1512740 news.siol.net Xns9806ABC3D3F3B0123456789 207.115.17.102 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 74.129.166.247 X-Trace: sv3-wg5y9z3P4f+r/s7/bmp1/iW72b60Fw7CPPthVR1TqGa703wfkQ5yoWY6xRlHC84ChRZWl55 jeY9U9IT!kyOTXpLbp1Krjz+wsbzXqo5Okf+y5bwyqnHYkeWNs i/VYUSY+LH4H6ecsYPl2UYtH0RbhOcGwUqu!/KbG+/NHqniK+g== X-Complaints-To: abuse insightbb.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse insightbb.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: prodigy.net alt.comp.hardwa314542 alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt:223682 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:471524 alt.computer:270333 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips:460727 |
#343
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
A troll who needs to provide citations instead of babbling.
Path: newssvr27.news.prodigy.net!newsdbm04.news.prodigy. com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!newscon 06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed.cw.net!cw .net!news-FFM2.ecrc.de!news.germany.com!newsfeed.utanet.at!n ews-hub.siol.net!news.siol.net!not-for-mail From: Jure Sah admin thought-beacon.net Organization: MesonAI User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.computer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.ch ips Subject: Why Pentium? References: 4gusksF1p657fU1 individual.net pbhsa21cjiqivcam6mpqnsqvhph40rnkb9 4ax.com 6mjsa2h1li63b92ae46qtpppeh4135kcvf 4ax.com 74osa2tdjivbnlfecp2d3vnce99065folt 4ax.com qvnta2prmvkn5s62kq0i7vgo56uhvcgr3n 4ax.com 4h862mF1qdbajU1 individual.net 432ua2pjl8hi3avm66u8joi9lkdeu8g1ri 4ax.com 4h8nviF1or785U1 individual.net f2m0b2ljvsk60a26gtvfk72phlc9m7d0fv 4ax.com 4hb9hrF1qpn08U1 individual.net a361b21d9h02olr8bbispuosrh9jodrfim 4ax.com 4hbl1aF1qlql5U1 individual.net icq9b2ldci81q6es9jupvemokrrhprshee 4ax.com 4hkr8hF2bseU1 individual.net kHNvg.4362$oj5.1511399 news.siol.net Xns9806854A4F3580123456789 207.115.17.102 2jSvg.4371$oj5.1512740 news.siol.net Xns9806ABC3D3F3B0123456789 207.115.17.102 In-Reply-To: Xns9806ABC3D3F3B0123456789 207.115.17.102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 82 Message-ID: UkTvg.4375$oj5.1513262 news.siol.net Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:20:35 +0200 NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.77.182.145 X-Complaints-To: abuse siol.net X-Trace: news.siol.net 1153434036 193.77.182.145 (Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:20:36 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:20:36 MET DST Xref: prodigy.net alt.comp.hardwa314510 alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt:223679 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:471501 alt.computer:270315 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips:460716 John Doe pravi: kony pravi: ALL P3s BOXED FANS DEVELOP BEARING WHINE IN MONTHS. Buy the cooler fans that have double bearings. Those purr smoothly even after years of use. So do fluid dynamic bearing fans, but longer. Are those those that don't really have a bearing but only a pocket of fluid taped in? Sounds like a troll, Tell me, is everything that you disagree with a troll to you? considering you pretend to have experience with them. They are called "fluid bearings" or "fluid dynamic bearings". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_bearing Sounds like quite what I had in mind. They last about a month as far as my experience goes. The upper side of the bearing is unprotected, which means that surrounding dust (attracted by the electric charge of the fan engine) can have direct contact with the fluid. Once there, the dust turns the fluid glue-solid and the fan comes to a sticky stop, until you remove the fluid with some kind of ethanol-based solution. Then it spins again, but with no real bearing. My guess is your "experience" is fantasy, or you bought a cheap fan, or maybe you tried to lubricate it before your problems started, or maybe you just couldn't find one with a blue LED. Or maybe you're looking for valid excuses to proove yourself right. All I'm saying is that the fluid bearing is unsuitable for a microchip cooling fan and thus do not last long. I have both the experience and the theory to proove it. I have seen these fluid bearings in many CPU fans, graphic card fans and some slot fans. The general characteristics are always the same: The tiny circular circuit board that manages the magnets that keep the fan spinning is set directly atop the bearing, the axis is led trough a hole in the circuit board, the fluid bearing being located inside the plastic casing supporting the tiny circuit board. The underside of this plastic casing is taped over with a factory sticker to seal the fluid inside the bearing. The axis is terminated on this side with a small metal ring embedded in a shallow gap near the end of the axis, which is floating in the fluid and is there to prevent the axis from being pulled out of the bearing vertically. The upper side of the bearing is thus not sealed shut, as that would be impossible given the point that the axis needs to be able to rotate freely. Air travels along the fan and at any point along the fan's construction where the airflow is slowed down, dust accumulates. The tiny circuit board's electrical contacts are bare, exposed and charged with a ~12V electric charge, which is powering the fan. Dust is attracted by the ionization and tiny dust particles find their way right to the axis. Very slowly, over time, enough dust accumulates there and along with the effects of the heat, the fluid turns into a glue-like substance, preventing the axis from moving. At this point it is very hard to rotate the fan even with your fingers and sometimes when it cools off it becomes stuck solid. Sometimes, you don't even need that as the glue on the back sticker no longer seals it completely shut and that combined with the heat of the cooling apparatus causes the fluid to leave the bearing. -- Primary function: Coprocessor Secondary function: Cluster commander http://www.thought-beacon.net Pay once per lifetime webhosting: http://farcomm-it.com/?ref=jsah We are the paragon of humanity. You may worship us. From afar. 01010010 01100101 01110011 01101001 01100100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01000010 01000001 01010011 01001001 01000011 |
#344
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
A troll who doesn't know what a fluid dynamic bearing is.
Path: newssvr27.news.prodigy.net!newsdbm04.news.prodigy. com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!newscon 06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.g iganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.gig anews.com!nntp.insightbb.com!news.insightbb.com.PO STED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:06:50 -0500 From: kony spam spam.com Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.computer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.ch ips Subject: Why Pentium? Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:07:53 -0400 Reply-To: spam spam.com Message-ID: 6id0c25a3gbdc36fc2m5s349f1sg78kp2d 4ax.com References: qvnta2prmvkn5s62kq0i7vgo56uhvcgr3n 4ax.com 4h862mF1qdbajU1 individual.net 432ua2pjl8hi3avm66u8joi9lkdeu8g1ri 4ax.com 4h8nviF1or785U1 individual.net f2m0b2ljvsk60a26gtvfk72phlc9m7d0fv 4ax.com 4hb9hrF1qpn08U1 individual.net a361b21d9h02olr8bbispuosrh9jodrfim 4ax.com 4hbl1aF1qlql5U1 individual.net icq9b2ldci81q6es9jupvemokrrhprshee 4ax.com 4hkr8hF2bseU1 individual.net kHNvg.4362$oj5.1511399 news.siol.net Xns9806854A4F3580123456789 207.115.17.102 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 74.129.166.247 X-Trace: sv3-jNSaqENM9z60jKNi7G8UjAtTJdw49JkiWFPeF2HXCwvIhaKgFC TGtZBTA6mD8fcU7cnjM/6/auZjYaX!heqAPkJ66Pqkz611rFlMhciYt/+oqbVSu7W0Tb3u5y8sMqeW/nxpvH8Yq5/APtxxbUCJreXDRojF!6zVs+L0LIeEOgQ== X-Complaints-To: abuse insightbb.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse insightbb.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: prodigy.net alt.comp.hardwa314541 alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt:223681 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:471523 alt.computer:270332 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips:460726 On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:06:10 GMT, John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote: Jure Sah admin thought-beacon.net wrote: kony pravi: ALL P3s BOXED FANS DEVELOP BEARING WHINE IN MONTHS. Buy the cooler fans that have double bearings. Those purr smoothly even after years of use. So do fluid dynamic bearing fans, but longer. "Fluid dynamic bearing" is in itself just a nonsense marketing term. They all fall into one of two categories, ball bearing or sleeve. We can further divide into dual ball, ball + sleeve, and certain types of sleeve designs but overall the type of fluid bearings used in PC fans is low quality rather than the high quality sealed bearings used in hard drives. |
#345
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
I knew this troll was going to have a tough time with my simple
correction. Path: newssvr27.news.prodigy.net!newsdbm04.news.prodigy. com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!newscon 06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!kanaga.switch.ch!switch.ch!newsfe ed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.t-com.hr!news-hub.siol.net!news.siol.net!not-for-mail From: Jure Sah admin thought-beacon.net Organization: MesonAI User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt. comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.computer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.ch ips Subject: Why Pentium? References: icola2h0lp4fgk07iesgssutsje3bgp1ot 4ax.com 4h0alnF1ocnf4U1 individual.net qo2ma21va6e60oj3rq3ptaec4v9i6gomks 4ax.com 3cisa29nrsvn4tfa0095u50g50hqcsqr1k 4ax.com 1rata2h3jltsj1pr0n9fc85r0r4cdhj33a 4ax.com 1olta29uos0r2d078pfhag46umbu0naep1 4ax.com 5dota2t45mh3pbjm3afa9428as13sm8vtu 4ax.com ojoua2559khkqvetbhcas1b3lq4ub7vi0o 4ax.com 65n0b2l57goe2jmcc0ptfmrnlvunmcssr9 4ax.com 3hk1b25be3b159d7vjfk65csdk38nufh25 4ax.com rcr9b2h54lfp3ukl4nhq0vn7dgnov85ken 4ax.com KMSvg.4373$oj5.1513161 news.siol.net Xns9806AE68B15C0123456789 207.115.17.102 In-Reply-To: Xns9806AE68B15C0123456789 207.115.17.102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 37 Message-ID: bzTvg.4376$oj5.1513513 news.siol.net Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:35:52 +0200 NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.77.182.145 X-Complaints-To: abuse siol.net X-Trace: news.siol.net 1153434951 193.77.182.145 (Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:35:51 MET DST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:35:51 MET DST Xref: prodigy.net alt.comp.hardwa314511 alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt:223680 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:471502 alt.computer:270317 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips:460718 John Doe pravi: Jure Sah admin thought-beacon.net wrote: kony pravi: If you have a lot running at incorrect (per user's needs) process priority, then it's somewhat true, and mostly false, because gen-purpose OS can easily be very snappy. Win9x Lite, Win2k, even WinXP if you whittle away at it for awhile. I don't set process priorities on a desktop machine, nor do I recommend that anyone else do so. Sure, but the apps themselves can. Actually it can be a benefit, if for example you wanted to apply some filters and capture to MPEG4 while using a system, it'll be good to give that enough priority. Your 5 settings of Windows priority In Windows XP, it's 6 settings. In any Linux or UNIX it is 20 settings (it's called "Nice", not "Priority" tho). And in any real-time OS there are no settings as the OS fine-tunes the priorities automatically at the precision of the CPU clock. -- Primary function: Coprocessor Secondary function: Cluster commander http://www.thought-beacon.net Pay once per lifetime webhosting: http://farcomm-it.com/?ref=jsah We are the paragon of humanity. You may worship us. From afar. 01010010 01100101 01110011 01101001 01100100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01000010 01000001 01010011 01001001 01000011 |
#346
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:12:38 GMT, John Doe
wrote: kony spam spam.com wrote: On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:53:06 GMT, John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote: My guess is your "experience" is fantasy, or you bought a cheap fan, or maybe you tried to lubricate it before your problems started, or maybe you just couldn't find one with a blue LED. Whatever. Fluid bearing fans are usually very low quality junk. Says who? Anyone that's had a few years experience dealing with failed fans. A very few manufacturers make decent ones, like Panasonic, Papst, Comair, a few Sunons and Deltas are passible. Any serious design needing longest fan life uses dual ball bearing fans if at all possible. That's backwards. Fluid dynamic bearings last many times longer than ball bearings. There is no reputable source to back up your claim. Even the premium fan manufacturers themselves acknowledge otherwise so you're either quite ignorant and stupid for drawing a conclusion while ignorant, or just trolling. |
#347
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
John Doe pravi:
I knew this troll was going to have a tough time with my simple correction. What exactly makes me a troll here? -- Primary function: Coprocessor Secondary function: Cluster commander http://www.thought-beacon.net Pay once per lifetime webhosting: http://farcomm-it.com/?ref=jsah We are the paragon of humanity. You may worship us. From afar. 01010010 01100101 01110011 01101001 01100100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01000010 01000001 01010011 01001001 01000011 |
#348
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
kony pravi:
Nearly all modern OSs are rather unsuitable for signal processing. Nonsense. They may be sub-optimal, but we're not doing one hardcoded task on a PC, the versatility is important too. Unsuitable in this context would not apply as they certainly can and do get the job done. You might want to read up on the fact that 9600 baud on computers is no longer 9600 baud and not only in multitasking systems. It has to do with the point that all modern OS's CPU time scheduling mechanisms are incompetent. It's not like 9600 baud is something the hardware could not manage, it's the point that the software's triggers and events misfire by design. Their internal system for sharing CPU time amongst programs is inefficient when you run processes that need a lot of CPU in a fluid manner alongside those who need little. That's why today you have buffers everywhere you look. Yes they're not "as" efficient as they could be, but that is the nature of a multipurpose system. It couldn't work any other way and be versatile enough, and inexpensive enough, to do so many jobs. Yes, it could. The theory was tested and the result prooven. Read the "Sythesis OS" whitepaper for details. In short, it is possible to make an OS's CPU time scheduler automatically detect how much CPU time and when a generic program needs to process it's input signal at the actual data rate. Your 5 settings of Windows priority will simply not let you OR your system provide all programs with the optimal share of CPU power. You'd need the OS doing that for you automatically if you wanted it to work. Sure it will, most programs don't need more than a *normal* priority level, they can sit in the background. If the workload is so high that multiple realtime activities can't be done, this is a case that would be a problem for any type of hardware design, not just a PC. Modern computers have more than enough CPU power to provide for all the needs simultaneously, it's all about the OS not doing things flexibly enough. If you want a good example of the catastrophic state that that CPU time scheduler in Windows is in, use a program that counts how much CPU time it gets, run only it and Windows, then wiggle your mouse around the Start button area and see the user program suddenly getting way more CPU time than before. -- Primary function: Coprocessor Secondary function: Cluster commander http://www.thought-beacon.net Pay once per lifetime webhosting: http://farcomm-it.com/?ref=jsah We are the paragon of humanity. You may worship us. From afar. 01010010 01100101 01110011 01101001 01100100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01000010 01000001 01010011 01001001 01000011 |
#349
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
John Doe pravi:
A troll who needs to provide citations instead of babbling. Citations? -- Primary function: Coprocessor Secondary function: Cluster commander http://www.thought-beacon.net Pay once per lifetime webhosting: http://farcomm-it.com/?ref=jsah We are the paragon of humanity. You may worship us. From afar. 01010010 01100101 01110011 01101001 01100100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01000010 01000001 01010011 01001001 01000011 |
#350
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
kony pravi:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:53:06 GMT, John Doe wrote: My guess is your "experience" is fantasy, or you bought a cheap fan, or maybe you tried to lubricate it before your problems started, or maybe you just couldn't find one with a blue LED. Whatever. Fluid bearing fans are usually very low quality junk. I second that. The packaging for fans usually comes with preprinted text in the following sequence: [ ] Fluid bearing [ ] Sleeve bearing [ ] Ball bearing ....the sequence is always used to indicate worst to best. Fluid bearings die soon, Sleeve bearings sometimes develop rattling, Ball bearings are the best choice. At work, I service very high quality high pressure pumps. They contain only the best everything and they use double ball bearings everywhere. -- Primary function: Coprocessor Secondary function: Cluster commander http://www.thought-beacon.net Pay once per lifetime webhosting: http://farcomm-it.com/?ref=jsah We are the paragon of humanity. You may worship us. From afar. 01010010 01100101 01110011 01101001 01100100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01000010 01000001 01010011 01001001 01000011 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CAD and Pentium 4 vs Pentium M | Matt Roberts | Intel | 2 | June 30th 05 03:33 PM |
Pentium 2 512 MB limitation ? | Peter Perlsų | Intel | 4 | December 24th 03 05:21 AM |
New PC with W2K? | Rob | UK Computer Vendors | 5 | August 29th 03 12:32 PM |
Pentium II CPU upgrading to Pentium III ??? | Hans Huber | General | 14 | July 18th 03 02:11 PM |
Pentium II CPU upgrading to Pentium III ??? | Hans Huber | Homebuilt PC's | 6 | July 13th 03 12:55 PM |