If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How much slower is the Live 24 in games, compared with an Audigy 2?
Hi.
I know the Live 5.1, Audigys and X-Fi have hardware acceleration for EAX, but the Live 24 7.1 do not (emu10k/emu20k vs ca0106-dat). But how much slower would the Live 24 be in games when EAX3 or EAX HD are used, compared to an Audigy 2? Are we talking about 3% or 30% lower framerates than with an Audigy 2, when EAX3+ is used? Finally, i use headphones only. Does EAX3+ make any real difference when used with headphones as opposed to 5.1 or 7.1 speakers? My specs: Athlon 2000+ (1.67 Ghz - Via KT133a chipset) 640MB PC133 RAM Radeon 9600XT Thanks in advance. DT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Celeron 2.4 Ghz -- any good with 3D games? | Ted Kerin | General | 9 | August 4th 05 08:43 PM |
New hardrive affecting games | Chris | Ati Videocards | 4 | June 28th 04 10:27 PM |
New hardrive affecting games | Chris | Nvidia Videocards | 2 | June 27th 04 11:10 AM |
FX5200 Runs Old Games Slower... Anybody else experience this? | PW | Nvidia Videocards | 6 | June 24th 04 11:48 PM |
What I think of the FX 5600 compared to the Ti4200 I had... | Bruce Tyler | Nvidia Videocards | 10 | February 28th 04 09:44 AM |