Core 2 Duo - can I tell the difference

Rod Speed wrote:

kony wrote

Rod Speed wrote

Nick wrote


That's what happened with XP. In the beginning nobody wanted it.
Now how many Windows users would be without it?


haha, I think all the people who suffered through the dibacle
known as windows ME were PRAYING for XP to come out.


'think' again, plenty had enough of a clue to be able to use ME effectively.


Essentially the issue was whether one had better than
average ability to tweak (and restrain) Windows or not.


Wrong, as always. No need to tweak it at all.


With WinME it could run acceptibly (in the context of Win9x
running acceptibly, not NT), but you had to make changes


Wrong, as always. My installations all ran better
than SE did with no tweaking what so ever.


which is something many are hesitant to do.


Not even necessary.


You don't really think you have enough credibility for anyone to believe
you, do you?

"Merrill P. L. Worthington" wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:

.... snip ...

Not even necessary.

You don't really think you have enough credibility for anyone to
believe you, do you?

It's all in the sig.

--

+-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:.
| PLEASE DO NOT F :.:\:\:/:/:.:
| FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=:
| | '=(\ 9 9 /)='
| Thank you, | ( (_) )
| Management | /`-vvv-'\
+-------------------+ / \
| | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \
| | @@@ /_// /^\ \\_\
@x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW
\||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__
\||/ | | | jgs (______Y______)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
================================================== ============

fix (vb.): 1. to paper over, obscure, hide from public view; 2.
to work around, in a way that produces unintended consequences
that are worse than the original problem. Usage: "Windows ME
fixes many of the shortcomings of Windows 98 SE". - Hutchison

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:10:05 GMT, "Fishface"
? wrote:


The only way to directly combat the sluggishness of the CD
or other slow storage is to use faster storage. "Sometimes"
the file format can matter, some types of multimedia for
example has shell support for determining resolutions and
other parameters read from the file, in which case if you
don't need these additional details you can look into
disabling the shell support for the features you don't need,
then the files will be treated as generic files with no
special abilities, beyond those of the application used to
actually open them in the traditional manner.

Oh, I'd like to do that. I Tried to fine out how, once, but
could not.



It depends on the files, but to get an idea, look at what
shows up as additional information in the folder view,
columns available (you may need to customize the view
columns to see them all but the info is still extracted
either way), and right-click on the files to see the context
menu, and IF you are often looking at file properties, also
go into those and look at any further info provided beyond
the basics on every file (General and version tabs).

Sometimes a video driver adds things, other times a video or
audio player. You'll have to investigate those on a
case-by-case basis. Other things directly added by Windows
can be disabled on a item-by-item basic, for example video
file info extraction,
http://www.winguides.com/registry/display.php/1209/

A more generic approach would be to look at several at once
and disable anything you don't know you need, re-enabling
items again if you loose some important functionality,
though if you're going to do this wide-scale and on items
with functions you can't determine as "safe" to disable, it
would be prudent to first make a backup of the OS partition,
registry, or whatever method you felt most comfortable or
able to restore should you run into problems.... though with
the following utility example, anything you disable can be
re-enabled simply by running the program again.

http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/shexview.html

While these examples will help with files the OS is treating
specially, and possibly dramatically increase the
responsiveness of a CDR with video files on it (for
example), it still won't do anything about speeding up the
slow drives themselves. If you find you are frequently
accessing certain slow volumes you might consider putting
them on a HDD instead. Sometimes just copying off files is
enough, though other times you may need to rip an ISO and
use a disc emulator program such as Alcohol 120% or Daemon
Tools. These topics are beyond the scope of a usenet post
and Google searches should help to do that.

......

That's what happened with XP. In the beginning nobody wanted it. Now how
many Windows users would be without it?
I remember when Win95 came out. There were a lot of people who thought it
was crap and said they were going back to Win 3.1. I wouder how many of them
are still using Win 3.1?

"altcomphardware" wrote in message
ups.com...

Merrill P. L. Worthington wrote:
Being an average computer user and not a heavy gamer (only MS Flight Sim
2004 and soon X-Plane), will I be able to notice much of a difference
between my current Athlon 64 3700 (1gb CAS2 RAM) and 3800 machines (2gb
CAS2 RAM)?

I agree with Kony that most users don't benefit from cutting edge CPUs
these days.

I'm not trying to brag or anything, but I have access to the following
computers:
1) 200 Dual core Intel Xeon 3.6GHz
2) 180 Quad core Intel Xeons (not sure about these specs yet)
3) SGI Altix
4) Pentium 4 2.5GHz

(1) - (4) are part of my university's cluster, which will be upgraded
with 1600 new nodes soon.

5) AMD64 754-pin 3400+
6) AMD XP 2500+ (temporarily offline due to CPU malfunction)
7) Intel D 805 2x3.33GHz
8) Pentium 4 1.7GHz
9) Pentium 3 866MHz

(5) is my work PC at college and (6) - (9) are part of my home parallel
cluster.

No wonder college tuition is so high!

What are the disposition plans for the "old" PC's?

On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:25:34 -0700, "Kent_Diego"
wrote:

.....

That's what happened with XP. In the beginning nobody wanted it. Now how
many Windows users would be without it?
I remember when Win95 came out. There were a lot of people who thought it
was crap and said they were going back to Win 3.1. I wouder how many of them
are still using Win 3.1?



Obviously we're in a different situation today, the number
of Win98 and Win2K systems combined still running today,
exceeds WinXP systems.

kony wrote:
"Kent_Diego" wrote:

.....

That's what happened with XP. In the beginning nobody wanted it.
Now how many Windows users would be without it?

I remember when Win95 came out. There were a lot of people who
thought it was crap and said they were going back to Win 3.1. I
wouder how many of them are still using Win 3.1?

Obviously we're in a different situation today, the number
of Win98 and Win2K systems combined still running today,
exceeds WinXP systems.

That is affected, IMNSHO, by the foul EULA and excessive hardware
requirements of XP (and W2K when upgraded). For most purposes
anything past W98 is foolish, with Linux available in various
incarnations.

--
Chuck F ) )
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
http://cbfalconer.home.att.net USE maineline address!

General Schvantzkoph wrote:
I was also wondering when I might see benefit from the dual core.
I get annoying
waits when I insert a CD and when I click on a floppy in Windows
Explorer (the
system tries to extract an icon from every single file). I guess
it's mostly device
drivers tying up the system for me. Hate that...

How much RAM do you have in your system? I'm guessing not enough. Add
a gigabyte an I bet you'll see a huge improvement.

Sorry, I beg to differ.

I have 2GB in dual channel in this machine and it still locks up for 5 to 10
seconds when I insert an optical disc. Same with every machine I've ever
seen running XP.
--
Shaun.

Merrill
I went from an Athlon 2200+ to a 3800+ dual core AM2 socket last
week...I consider myself an average user only using the internet to
download music, search DIY projects for the new house and eBay, not
much gaming only unreal tornament 2004 and age of empires and I havent
really noticed the difference from an A scoket jumping to the latest
AM2 socket.
Should personal applications arise your 3700+ should be able to perform
different needs be it an interest in photos or movies, may I suggest
you may find more benefit in upgrading your graphics card to make more
of a difference in your gaming, eBay is not always the best for price
points check out the specials at the likes of MSY.com.au
Hope this helps but I feel you wont notice the difference between the
3700 and the dual core 3800.
Merrill P. L. Worthington wrote:
Being an average computer user and not a heavy gamer (only MS Flight Sim
2004 and soon X-Plane), will I be able to notice much of a difference
between my current Athlon 64 3700 (1gb CAS2 RAM) and 3800 machines (2gb
CAS2 RAM)?

Win98 is fine if your using older hardware, but from my experience of using
every operating system and changing some of my hardware yearly, WinXp is
certainly the best operating system to date. People would never be able to
create dvd quality video without it. The only time I've ever had problems
was with older/bad written drivers. The only way to find out which drivers
are best is to try them out. When I installed XP MCE, it took me a week to
find out the best hardware/software combination that worked best. And this
time with the hardware and software I use, its the latest drivers and
software from ati, msi and creative(6.18 drivers and 9.15 MMC(mmc is crap
but MCE uses tuners great.). With my 9600, it was 5.10 and 9.04mmc that
would only work well with XP Pro. I agree with the statement that its the
wrong or not the latest drivers installed that cause crashes( mostly). What
also seems to help is setting your "virtual memory" to work in a different
hard drive that isn't used during gaming or other intensive tasks(preferably
a high quality sata drive. I'm getting sick of IDE. Trick from Max PC or CPU
mag). I set my virt mem to 0 on my C drive and then right after a fresh
format, alocated 4092mb in my secondary 320 gig drive.(R click My computer,
Advanced, Performance Settings, Advanced, Virtual Memory-Change). For C
drive set "No Paging File" and press "Set". Then click on your secondary
drive and click "custom size". I have my mins and max at 4092.(press set)
Careful. If you don't have 512mb ram or higher, might screw your computer
and have to reformat. If this is not done on a fresh formatted HD, the
virtual memory will work further to the back of your hard drive, instead of
right at the front.(slower response)

--
Love and Teach, Not Yell and Beat
Stop Violence and Child Abuse.
Friends don't turn friends on to drugs.
The path often thought about and sometimes chosen by abused children as
adults is Suicide. Be a real friend.

A64 3500+, Gigabyte GA-K8NSC-939,AIW 9800 128mb
MSI 550 Pro, X-Fi,Pioneer 110D, 111D, Liteon 1693
Antec 550 watt,Thermaltake Lanfire,2 Gb Dual Channel OCZ
2XSATA 320gb Raid Edition, PATA 120Gb
XP Media Centre Edition 2005
19 in Viewsonic A91f+,BenchMark 2001 SE- 19074
Games I'm Playing- Falcon 4, SP:WAW



"kony" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:25:34 -0700, "Kent_Diego"
wrote:

.....

That's what happened with XP. In the beginning nobody wanted it. Now
how
many Windows users would be without it?
I remember when Win95 came out. There were a lot of people who thought it
was crap and said they were going back to Win 3.1. I wouder how many of
them
are still using Win 3.1?



Obviously we're in a different situation today, the number
of Win98 and Win2K systems combined still running today,
exceeds WinXP systems.