If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bang for your Buck - Athlon 64 pin count
Is there a compelling reason (yet?) to go with the larger pin'd Socket 939 over the Socket 754 version of the Athlon 64s? My current AMD chip is running 900MHz and doing ok for most things but I'm getting together speck for the next one so I can give this one over to server duties her at home. I'll be wanting performance for A/V stuff like full screen video and of course games from Id from time to time, does the FX version make it's case in these arenas? I'm TBerk & I'm not the noob I've made myself out to be. Thx in advance. ;]) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bang for your Buck - Athlon 64 pin count
Here is an interesting article...Made me go out and get an Athlon 64
2800.. http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=33&type=expert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bang for your Buck - Athlon 64 pin count
T wrote:
Is there a compelling reason (yet?) to go with the larger pin'd Socket 939 over the Socket 754 version of the Athlon 64s? My current AMD chip is running 900MHz and doing ok for most things but I'm getting together speck for the next one so I can give this one over to server duties her at home. I'll be wanting performance for A/V stuff like full screen video and of course games from Id from time to time, does the FX version make it's case in these arenas? I'm TBerk & I'm not the noob I've made myself out to be. Thx in advance. ;]) Your main question involves the pin configurations. Socket 754 will be be stopped by most manufacturers as socket 939 models come into play. For future proofing and upgrades go with the socket 939. The socket 939 uses a different memory configuration and this article is very good at explaining this: http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040601/ regards B |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bang for your Buck - Athlon 64 pin count
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:55:14 +0000, T wrote:
Is there a compelling reason (yet?) to go with the larger pin'd Socket 939 over the Socket 754 version of the Athlon 64s? Not imo. One advantage is dual channel ram which only provides about a 3% performance increase. The only other advantage would be if you need a faster cpu than the 3700+. The best performance for the money is the A64 socket 754 3400+ at 2.4GHz which is the same clockspeed as the 939 4000+ which is more than 4 times the price. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bang for your Buck - Athlon 64 pin count
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:48:45 +0100, b wrote:
Your main question involves the pin configurations. Socket 754 will be be stopped by most manufacturers as socket 939 models come into play. For future proofing and upgrades go with the socket 939. Socket 754 is by no means anywhere close to being stopped at this time. AMD's latest roadmap show new cpu's for both 754 and 939 for release Q106. Do you really think there won't be any boards for for the newer 754 cpu's. There are also several new 754 boards in the works now just as there are 939. And since they both use the same chipsets, the 754 boards will have the same capabilities as the 939 boards, less dual channel ram, which is cpu conditional. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.htm |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bang for your Buck - Athlon 64 pin count
Wes Newell wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:55:14 +0000, T wrote: Is there a compelling reason (yet?) to go with the larger pin'd Socket 939 over the Socket 754 version of the Athlon 64s? Not imo. One advantage is dual channel ram which only provides about a 3% performance increase. The only other advantage would be if you need a faster cpu than the 3700+. The best performance for the money is the A64 socket 754 3400+ at 2.4GHz which is the same clockspeed as the 939 4000+ which is more than 4 times the price. In that case I'd rather have the AMD Athlon 3500 with the winchester core and a 939 pin motherboard Once again it boils down to price and what you can or can not afford. I believe that anyone with an Athlon 64 CPU regardless of pin size will be a winner. Of course to take full advantage of this chip we are all waiting on the 64 bit version of windows and hopefully manufacturers will follow with 64 bit drivers and software |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good, quiet bang for buck graphics card? | Jeff Conescu | Nvidia Videocards | 0 | February 21st 05 09:52 AM |
Bang for your Buck - Athlon 64 pin count | T | Overclocking AMD Processors | 5 | January 23rd 05 06:07 PM |
Best bang for the buck PCI Nvidia card? | JaegerNH | Nvidia Videocards | 1 | October 29th 04 09:09 PM |
Biggest bang for buck amd processor. | Post Replies Here Please | Overclocking AMD Processors | 6 | April 19th 04 12:53 PM |
Slowest Athlon 64 humbles fastest P4 in gaming | Tone-EQ | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | December 15th 03 04:09 PM |