If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New U.S. Visa Fees Would Hit Indian Firms
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...13011107101860
..html?mod=googlenews_wsj NEW DELHI—Legislation that passed the U.S. Senate late Thursday would significantly increase fees for skilled-worker visas, a move that would deal a financial blow to Indian technology-outsourcing companies that send thousands of employees to the U.S. each year. The measure, which was attached to a $600 million border-security spending bill that senators passed just before leaving for their August recess, would require all companies with U.S. staff that have more than half their U.S.-based employees on H1-B or L-1 visas to pay thousands of dollars in special new fees for each worker. Som Mittal, president of Indian technology industry trade group Nasscom, said Indian companies could face $200 million to $250 million in increased human-resources costs annually if the bill becomes law. The measure now awaits action in the U.S. House, and Indian companies plan to mount a fierce lobbying campaign against it. All of the biggest Indian tech companies would be affected by the fee increases, Mr. Mittal said, including giants such as Wipro Ltd., Infosys Technologies Ltd. and Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Big U.S. tech companies such as Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp. would almost certainly avoid the fees because their foreign workers make up less than 50% of their overall U.S. work force. An Intel spokesman said Friday, "We are aware of the legislation, we did not take a position on it and are not impacted by it." Mr. Mittal said, "The way they've done this, the majority of the impact is on the Indian companies." He said Nasscom has asked India's external affairs and commerce ministries to look into whether the measure would violate World Trade Organization rules. "It seems like indirect protectionism," he said. Infosys, India's second-largest outsourcing company by sales, said in a statement, "It is unfortunate that this tax is being levied on a discriminatory basis when the need is to open markets to make companies more competitive in the global marketplace." Representatives of Wipro and Tata Consultancy didn't respond to requests for comment. A spokesman for India's external affairs ministry didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The visa issue threatens to become a wedge between India and the U.S. as the countries prepare for President Barack Obama's planned visit to New Delhi in November. Experience WSJ professionalEditors' Deep Dive: Reinventing Outsourcing FINANCIAL EXPRESS (INDIA) Outsourcing Gets More Specialized ..Economist Intelligence Unit - Executive Briefing The Growth of Legal Outsourcing ..Mint BPO Segment Leads Growth in IT Contracts. Access thousands of business sources not available on the free web. Learn More.Indian software services and outsourcing companies generate about 60% of their combined $50 billion in annual revenue from the U.S. The Indian industry has enjoyed explosive growth over the past decade, fueled by an army of skilled, low-cost, English-speaking workers in Bangalore and other Indian cities. More India Real Time: Sen. Schumer's Word Choice Complete Coverage: Outsourcing ..But Indian companies also have tens of thousands of employees in the U.S. and other countries, where they work at the sites of clients such as big banks and insurance companies. Indian companies account for about 12% of new H1-B visas issued each year, Nasscom said. The Indian trade group didn't have a figure for the total number of Indian tech workers in the U.S., but said on average roughly 70% to 80% of Indian companies' U.S. labor forces are on temporary work visas. As the U.S. backlash over outsourcing has intensified in recent years, some critics have zeroed in on the skilled-worker visa programs, arguing that they give foreign companies a beachhead to facilitate deals with U.S. companies that ultimately transfer American jobs abroad. Sen. Charles Schumer, the New York Democrat who co-sponsored the legislation raising visa fees with Claire McCaskill (D.-Missouri), has been a critic of outsourcing. Sen. Schumer praised the new visa rules, which enable the bill to be funded without dipping into stimulus money. He said that forcing Indian companies to hire more American workers "is a good thing," and that the new fees would apply only to a "handful" of foreign companies. Indian tech companies have long feared that the U.S. would impose curbs on outsourcing. Last year, Wipro Chairman Azim Premji lobbied White House officials on the issue during a visit to Washington. According to a summary of the Senate bill, the new charges would increase visa fees paid by affected companies by roughly $2,000 per visa application. But Mr. Mittal says the increase would actually be about $4,500 more per worker for new visas and $4,000 more for renewals. Currently, most visa applicants also face additional fees; in most cases, the H1-B visa fees amount to about $2,320. "The question is how much of the costs they will be able to pass on to clients," said Avinash Vashistha, chief executive of Bangalore-based outsourcing industry consultancy Tholons. Mr. Vashistha said the new visa costs would accelerate Indian companies' plans to hire more American-born workers in the U.S. Already, big firms such as Wipro and Tata have been beefing up U.S. hiring over the past two years. The Indian industry faces a fight as it tries to beat back the visa legislation. The increase in fees is supposedly how Congress will pay for the $600 million in spending on increased border personnel, unmanned aerial drones, and other initiatives to help stop illegal immigration to the U.S. —Keith Johnson in Washington contributed to this article. -- Obama's black racist USAG appointee. Eric Holder, racist black United States Attorney General drops voter intimidation charges against the Black Panthers, "You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!" Eric Holder, prejudiced black United States Attorney General settles the hate crime debate, "Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws." Nancy Pelosi, Democrat criminal, accessory before and after the fact, to former House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel of New York's million dollar tax evasion. On December 3, 2010, Congress voted to censure Rangel for 11 ethics violations. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi fought removal of Charles B. Rangel from the House Ways and Means Committee. Felony President. 18 USC, Sec. 600. Promise of employment or other benefit for political activity Obama violated the law by trying to buy Joe Sestak off with a political appointment in exchange for not pursuing an election bid to replace Arlen Specter. Obama violated the law by trying to buy former Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff off last fall to see if he'd be interested in an administration job -- instead of running against Sen. Michael Bennet. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
New U.S. Visa Fees Would Hit Indian Firms
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:11:39 +0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro"
wrote: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...13011107101860 .html?mod=googlenews_wsj NEW DELHI—Legislation that passed the U.S. Senate late Thursday would significantly increase fees for skilled-worker visas, a move that would deal a financial blow to Indian technology-outsourcing companies that send thousands of employees to the U.S. each year. The measure, which was attached to a $600 million border-security spending bill that senators passed just before leaving for their August recess, would require all companies with U.S. staff that have more than half their U.S.-based employees on H1-B or L-1 visas to pay thousands of dollars in special new fees for each worker. Som Mittal, president of Indian technology industry trade group Nasscom, said Indian companies could face $200 million to $250 million in increased human-resources costs annually if the bill becomes law. The measure now awaits action in the U.S. House, and Indian companies plan to mount a fierce lobbying campaign against it. All of the biggest Indian tech companies would be affected by the fee increases, Mr. Mittal said, including giants such as Wipro Ltd., Infosys Technologies Ltd. and Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Big U.S. tech companies such as Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp. would almost certainly avoid the fees because their foreign workers make up less than 50% of their overall U.S. work force. An Intel spokesman said Friday, "We are aware of the legislation, we did not take a position on it and are not impacted by it." Mr. Mittal said, "The way they've done this, the majority of the impact is on the Indian companies." He said Nasscom has asked India's external affairs and commerce ministries to look into whether the measure would violate World Trade Organization rules. "It seems like indirect protectionism," he said. Infosys, India's second-largest outsourcing company by sales, said in a statement, "It is unfortunate that this tax is being levied on a discriminatory basis when the need is to open markets to make companies more competitive in the global marketplace." Representatives of Wipro and Tata Consultancy didn't respond to requests for comment. A spokesman for India's external affairs ministry didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The visa issue threatens to become a wedge between India and the U.S. as the countries prepare for President Barack Obama's planned visit to New Delhi in November. Experience WSJ professionalEditors' Deep Dive: Reinventing Outsourcing FINANCIAL EXPRESS (INDIA) Outsourcing Gets More Specialized .Economist Intelligence Unit - Executive Briefing The Growth of Legal Outsourcing .Mint BPO Segment Leads Growth in IT Contracts. Access thousands of business sources not available on the free web. Learn More.Indian software services and outsourcing companies generate about 60% of their combined $50 billion in annual revenue from the U.S. The Indian industry has enjoyed explosive growth over the past decade, fueled by an army of skilled, low-cost, English-speaking workers in Bangalore and other Indian cities. More India Real Time: Sen. Schumer's Word Choice Complete Coverage: Outsourcing .But Indian companies also have tens of thousands of employees in the U.S. and other countries, where they work at the sites of clients such as big banks and insurance companies. Indian companies account for about 12% of new H1-B visas issued each year, Nasscom said. The Indian trade group didn't have a figure for the total number of Indian tech workers in the U.S., but said on average roughly 70% to 80% of Indian companies' U.S. labor forces are on temporary work visas. As the U.S. backlash over outsourcing has intensified in recent years, some critics have zeroed in on the skilled-worker visa programs, arguing that they give foreign companies a beachhead to facilitate deals with U.S. companies that ultimately transfer American jobs abroad. Sen. Charles Schumer, the New York Democrat who co-sponsored the legislation raising visa fees with Claire McCaskill (D.-Missouri), has been a critic of outsourcing. Sen. Schumer praised the new visa rules, which enable the bill to be funded without dipping into stimulus money. He said that forcing Indian companies to hire more American workers "is a good thing," and that the new fees would apply only to a "handful" of foreign companies. Indian tech companies have long feared that the U.S. would impose curbs on outsourcing. Last year, Wipro Chairman Azim Premji lobbied White House officials on the issue during a visit to Washington. According to a summary of the Senate bill, the new charges would increase visa fees paid by affected companies by roughly $2,000 per visa application. But Mr. Mittal says the increase would actually be about $4,500 more per worker for new visas and $4,000 more for renewals. Currently, most visa applicants also face additional fees; in most cases, the H1-B visa fees amount to about $2,320. "The question is how much of the costs they will be able to pass on to clients," said Avinash Vashistha, chief executive of Bangalore-based outsourcing industry consultancy Tholons. Mr. Vashistha said the new visa costs would accelerate Indian companies' plans to hire more American-born workers in the U.S. Already, big firms such as Wipro and Tata have been beefing up U.S. hiring over the past two years. The Indian industry faces a fight as it tries to beat back the visa legislation. The increase in fees is supposedly how Congress will pay for the $600 million in spending on increased border personnel, unmanned aerial drones, and other initiatives to help stop illegal immigration to the U.S. —Keith Johnson in Washington contributed to this article. they should stop the visa take away from Americans plan anyway .We have plenty of tech people and would have lots more if they knew they could actually get a job . but with tax breaks for companies to hire foreigners there is not much of a market for an American citizen to work in the tech field . You can bet these companies get a big break for every visa worker they hire . |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OT] Sony, Cable Firms Agree To Eliminate Set-Top Boxes | Tony Harding | Dell Computers | 2 | May 28th 08 06:59 PM |
NOW WATCH Satellite TV on your PC without Paying Monthly FEES | Jimmy[_3_] | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | August 22nd 07 08:33 PM |
NOW WATCH Satellite TV on your PC without Paying Monthly FEES | Jimmy[_3_] | Printers | 0 | August 22nd 07 08:31 PM |
CompUSA cheating on restocking fees, violating posted refund policies | Robert Tolliver | Homebuilt PC's | 25 | July 12th 04 12:00 AM |
Visa Electron | Doug Ellison | UK Computer Vendors | 1 | August 3rd 03 09:10 PM |