A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Ati Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

3D Test results seem low



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 13th 03, 07:04 PM
Rev Marc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 3D Test results seem low

Any opinions?
====================
3DMark Score 4895 3DMarks

CPU Score 523.0 CPUMarks

Feature Tests

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1469.4 MTexels/s

Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2279.3 MTexels/s

Vertex Shader 15.7 fps

Pixel Shader 2.0 44.5 fps

Ragtroll 21.0 fps

--------------------------------------

System Configuration

Operating System Microsoft Windows XP

DirectX Version 9.0b

Mobo Manufacturer MICRO-STAR INC.

Mobo Model MS-6742

AGP Rates (Current/Available) 8x / 4x, 8x

CPU Intel Pentium 4 2400 MHz

FSB 200 MHz

Memory 512 MB

Display Information

Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON 9800 PRO

Driver Name RADEON 9800 PRO

Driver Version 6.14.10.6387

Driver WHQL Certified Yes

Video Memory 128 MB

Core Clock 324 MHz

Memory Clock 290 MHz

Sound Information

Sound Adapter Driver Name C-Media Wave Device

Sound Adapter Driver Version 5.12.1.29

Benchmark Settings

Program Version 3DMark03 Revision 2 Build 0

Resolution 1024x768@32 bit

Texture Filtering Optimal

Pixel Processing / Antialiasing None

Post Processing false

Vertex Shaders Optimal



  #2  
Old October 13th 03, 07:07 PM
spamtrap@localhost
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:04:58 -0500, "Rev Marc" Rev@Kingdomof Heaven
wrote:

Any opinions?


You should use the online result browser.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
  #3  
Old October 13th 03, 07:24 PM
Rev Marc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Isnt there a fee for that?

thx

spamtrap@localhost wrote in message
news
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:04:58 -0500, "Rev Marc" Rev@Kingdomof Heaven
wrote:

Any opinions?


You should use the online result browser.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.



  #4  
Old October 13th 03, 07:43 PM
Rev Marc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

*For some unkown reasons, windows and various utilities identify the VC Card
as a 9800 Pro when it is only the 9800 model (not Pro). See asterisks for
corrections!

3DMark Score 4895 3DMarks

CPU Score 523.0 CPUMarks

Feature Tests

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1469.4 MTexels/s

Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2279.3 MTexels/s

Vertex Shader 15.7 fps

Pixel Shader 2.0 44.5 fps

Ragtroll 21.0 fps

--------------------------------------

System Configuration

Operating System Microsoft Windows XP; *SP1

DirectX Version 9.0b

Mobo Manufacturer MICRO-STAR INC.

Mobo Model MS-6; 742; *800 FSB

AGP Rates (Current/Available) 8x / 4x, 8x

CPU Intel Pentium 4 2400 MHz; *800 mhz

FSB 200 MHz; total 800 FSB

Memory 512 MB; *dual 400 DDR sticks

Display Information

Graphics Chipset *ATI RADEON 9800

Driver Name RADEON 9800

Driver Version 6.14.10.6387

Driver WHQL Certified Yes

Video Memory 128 MB

Core Clock 324 MHz

Memory Clock 290 MHz

Sound Information

Sound Adapter Driver Name C-Media Wave Device

Sound Adapter Driver Version 5.12.1.29

Benchmark Settings

Program Version 3DMark03 Revision 2 Build 0

Resolution 1024x768@32 bit

Texture Filtering Optimal

Pixel Processing / Antialiasing None

Post Processing false

Vertex Shaders Optimal





  #5  
Old October 13th 03, 08:29 PM
Skid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No fee, but understand when you compare that most of the really high scores
for systems like yours will have the video card overclocked close to
meltdown levels. At 324/290, yours is a 9800 non-pro.

Your scores are exactly where I would expect them to be.

"Rev Marc" Rev@Kingdomof Heaven wrote in message
...
Isnt there a fee for that?

thx

spamtrap@localhost wrote in message
news
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:04:58 -0500, "Rev Marc" Rev@Kingdomof Heaven
wrote:

Any opinions?


You should use the online result browser.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
my new mobo o/c's great rockerrock Overclocking AMD Processors 9 June 30th 04 08:17 PM
64 benches Ed Light AMD x86-64 Processors 2 April 4th 04 08:16 PM
Can't install any OS (hardware fault?) Paul Richard Homebuilt PC's 4 September 27th 03 12:55 PM
Promise Ultra100 TX2 on P3B-F Test Results Steve Homebuilt PC's 3 September 1st 03 11:37 PM
Benchmark test results? Ryan Ati Videocards 0 August 1st 03 10:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.