If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Japan preps super supercomputer 10 quadrillion instructions each
Japan preps super supercomputer 10 quadrillion instructions each
second outdated http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Quantum_AI/ The world's fastest transistor has been developed with a speed of 604 GHz thats 604 billion operations every second by a pair of US researchers, possibly paving the way for a new generation of super- charged electronic chips combined with "Magnetic logic" within individual layers, developed is devolping particular type of component known as a bipolar junction transistor, which consists of three material layers, laid on top of one another. The current is controlled by the way it passes through three layers - the base, emitter and collector layers. Varying the current which passes through the base to the emitter can control the flow of the current between the emitter and collector. This can amplify the current at that terminal or be used to switch the current on or off. To make their transistor layers, the researchers carefully blended together two different crystalline semiconducting materials: indium phosphide and indium gallium arsenide. Critically, they controlled the blend found in the "collector" layer to affect its crystalline structure in a way which made it easier for electrons to pass through - this was a crucial step in making the transistor so efficient. Journal reference: Applied Physics Letters (vol 86, 152101) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Morphware Magnetic logic may usher in an era in which computing devices can change instantly from one type of hardware to another By Reinhold Koch deka deci hecto centi kilo milli mega micro giga nano tera pico peta femto exa atto zetta zepto yotta yocto Flexibility or performance? That choice is a constant trade-off for microprocessor designers. General-purpose processors in personal computers execute a broad set of software commands that can cope with any task from graphics to complex calculations. But their flexibility comes at the expense of speed. In contrast, application- specific integrated circuits (ASICs), optimized for a given task, such as the computing required in graphics or sound cards, are very fast but lack adaptability. Some processors fit a niche between these two types of hardware. Called morphware, they can be reconfigured and optimized for any task. One example--the commercially available field-programmable gate array (FPGA)--consists of large blocks of transistors that perform logic operations and that can be "rewired" by the software. Customization enables FPGAs to accelerate data encryption, automatic military target recognition or data compression by a factor of 10 to 100--enabling, for instance, dramatically enhanced security or faster target acquisition times as compared with a general-purpose CPU (central processing unit)....continued at Scientific American Digital http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm? chanID=sa006&colID=1&articleID=0002CE79-C967-12DB-882283414B7F0000 deka deci hecto centi kilo milli mega micro giga nano tera pico peta femto exa atto zetta zepto yotta yocto http://www.npl.washington.edu/ Supercomputer and encryption and compression @ rate of 96% Take a document then or a 3D matrix document change it two random or binary code or just a program for 0's and 1's and fold it over and over like a piece of paper then having the 1 and 0 add each other or the 0,1's canceling each other out 1+0=0 and 0+1=1 1+1=1 0+0=0 if you gave the folds addresses like on a spread sheet there would be no math. First A 1-24 would fold to k 1-24 down.(See Example A ) Then at F1-24 down two k 1-24 ( See example B ) If you written a very long letter and then change it two binary code it would look like this. 123456789.............24 a.01010101010101010101010 b.10010101010101010101010 c.01010101001010101010010 e.00010101000101010101010 f.10010101010100101010101 First A 24 would fold to k 24 down g.01010101010100001100101 See Example A h.01001010101010101010111 I.11110111001101010101010 j.01010101010101010101010 k.10101010101010101010101 See Example A 123456789.............24 f.10010101010100101010101 g.01010101010100001100101 h.01001010101010101010111 Then at F1-24 down two k 1-24 I.11110111001101010101010 j.01010101010101010101010 k.10101010101010101010101 See example B 123456789.............24 I.11110111001101010101010 j.01010101010101010101010 Then from I 1-24 to K 1-24 k.10101010101010101010101 123456789.............24 j.01010101010101010101010 Then from j-24 to j-1 123456789... j.010101010101 Then from j-12 to j-1 123456 j.010101 Then from j-6 to j1 123 j.010 Then from j-3 to j1 12 j.01 Then from j-2 to j1 j.0 Then you would have 1 bit to transfer over the Internet The bit sent would be 0 and the key code would be F1-24,k 1-24, I 1-24,K 1-24,j24,j1,j12,j1,j6,j1,j3,j1,j2,j1 and would unzip or be new encryption you could encrypt or compress 100 terabits down to 1 bit of information. Now if you take this idea from my web site you could make this allot more complex and unbreakable. Data encryption 360 degrees rotation document 90 degrees and encrypt on every angel then 45 degrees change it two binary code do it again and again and fold it over like a piece of paper then having the one's and zero cancel each other out. In theory you could send a 100 terabit program to someone's computer and have it unzip and run and install or make A computer processor like the new 64 bit AMD have the bit unzip into a large ram drive and buffer use one half of the 64 bit processor decode the message and the main 64 bit run the numbers. Another way of doing this is to have a parallel computers with using one of the processes run the compressed 1 bit of information give the uncompressed a address on the ram drive to change and not even go threw the processor and then with different information on each machine compare and run statistics on information on a 45 tflops supercomputer and turn that 45 tflops computer into a 1 bit = 100,000 terabits to infinite as long as you have the ram for storage! with my calculations 45 tflops wouldn't matter any more it would be how much data you have on a 32bit operating system changing that to a 1 bit system it would be 32 * 45tflops would = 1440 tflops Matter moves so fast that it intergreats and deintergreats faster then any speed we can see it like water from a hose at real close speed it moves in -------- lines. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bitstring .com, from
the wonderful person bxf said wrote: The world's fastest transistor has been developed with a speed of 604 GHz thats 604 billion operations every second... Goody! Do we have an estimate as to when the first laptops with these transistors will be available? As soon as they figure out how to make more than one of them (transistors that is)? And what's the cooling requirement, in terms of Niagara's?? -- GSV Three Minds in a Can Contact recommends the use of Firefox; SC recommends it at gunpoint. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On 29 Jul 2005 06:29:16 -0700, "bxf" wrote:
wrote: The world's fastest transistor has been developed with a speed of 604 GHz thats 604 billion operations every second... Goody! Do we have an estimate as to when the first laptops with these transistors will be available? Roughly never. Or perhaps about 20 years after GaAs transistors become the standard (these transistors seem to extend on the idea of GaAs transistors). I believe our own Keith was once quoted as saying something like "GaAs transistors are the technology for 10 years in the future; always have been and always will be". (or maybe it wasn't Keith, but it sure sounds like something he'd say : ). This is just one of the many nonsense press releases that about a discovery with some interesting academic implications but VERY limited practical ones. They might find a VERY small niche in the same sorts of products that GaAs transistors currently occupy, but probably not much else. ------------- Tony Hill hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:49:46 -0400, Tony Hill wrote:
On 29 Jul 2005 06:29:16 -0700, "bxf" wrote: wrote: The world's fastest transistor has been developed with a speed of 604 GHz thats 604 billion operations every second... Goody! Do we have an estimate as to when the first laptops with these transistors will be available? Roughly never. Or perhaps about 20 years after GaAs transistors become the standard (these transistors seem to extend on the idea of GaAs transistors). I believe our own Keith was once quoted as saying something like "GaAs transistors are the technology for 10 years in the future; always have been and always will be". (or maybe it wasn't Keith, but it sure sounds like something he'd say : ). I don't think it was me. GaAs is here and real (for analog/RF anyway), but SiGe has stolen most of its thunder, AIUI because it's easier to make on a Si process. Did anyone really think that GaAs was for logic? This is just one of the many nonsense press releases that about a discovery with some interesting academic implications but VERY limited practical ones. They might find a VERY small niche in the same sorts of products that GaAs transistors currently occupy, but probably not much else. They already found a use (press release) for it. ;-) -- Keith |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
keith wrote:
Did anyone really think that GaAs was for logic? Seymour Cray. RM |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:28:50 -0700, Robert Myers wrote:
keith wrote: Did anyone really think that GaAs was for logic? Seymour Cray. Only because he had the full faith and credit of the US government behind him. -- Keith |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
keith wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:28:50 -0700, Robert Myers wrote: keith wrote: Did anyone really think that GaAs was for logic? Seymour Cray. Only because he had the full faith and credit of the US government behind him. Convex? Telecom companies? Some factions at IBM? -- Del Cecchi "This post is my own and doesn’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.” |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:22:44 -0500, Del Cecchi wrote:
keith wrote: On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:28:50 -0700, Robert Myers wrote: keith wrote: Did anyone really think that GaAs was for logic? Seymour Cray. Only because he had the full faith and credit of the US government behind him. Convex? Telecom companies? Some factions at IBM? Where did SC's money come *from* for the GaAs boondoggle? -- Keith |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
keith wrote: On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:28:50 -0700, Robert Myers wrote: keith wrote: Did anyone really think that GaAs was for logic? Seymour Cray. Only because he had the full faith and credit of the US government behind him. -- Keith Isn't indium phosphide (InP) supposed to be an even better material than GaAs or SiGe? David |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|