If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Is Win2k still usable on new systems?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Is Win2k still usable on new systems?
nemo wrote:
On Aug 11, 1:35 am, Bob Fry wrote: I use XP Pro on a desktop machine and W2K on a laptop. They both work fine which you'll rarely hear about Vista. If you like W2K you'll really like XP Pro, but if W2K will run on your new system there's really nothing wrong or obsolete about it that I can think of. Thanks for the reply, but that's the sticky wicket now isn't it, whether it will run properly on a new system given the potential lack of support. One poster has indicated that most developers are still supporting W2k even though MS has dropped "official" support. I am also a bit concerned about potential security issues considering the way that MS writes their software letting the virus writers perform security testing for them. If MS stops providing security updates, I guess I will have to go with XP. The 'extended support' ends on July 13, 2010! http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3071 So, until mid-2010, you will get critical updates for W2k. (And then you may be 'testing' Windows 7 Beta, too;-) Gert |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Is Win2k still usable on new systems?
"Gert Elstermann" wrote in message ...
wrote: "nemo" wrote in message oups.com... ... My understanding is that MS has dropped "official" support of W2k and that manufacturers were therefore going to stop writing drivers for new products. Am I mistaken about this? You're correct on that first part, but my point is, as long as Win2K is in widespread use (which it still is and will continue to be in the foreseeable future, at least in some sectors) hardware developers will continue to support it. The 'extended support' ends on July 13, 2010! http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3071 So, until mid-2010, you will get critical updates for W2k. True, but Extended Support doesn't include driver updates and bug fixes, just critical security patches: http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifepolicy |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Is Win2k still usable on new systems?
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:45:36 -0700, nemo wrote:
On Aug 11, 1:35 am, Bob Fry wrote: I use XP Pro on a desktop machine and W2K on a laptop. They both work fine which you'll rarely hear about Vista. If you like W2K you'll really like XP Pro, but if W2K will run on your new system there's really nothing wrong or obsolete about it that I can think of. Thanks for the reply, but that's the sticky wicket now isn't it, whether it will run properly on a new system given the potential lack of support. One poster has indicated that most developers are still supporting W2k even though MS has dropped "official" support. I am also a bit concerned about potential security issues considering the way that MS writes their software letting the virus writers perform security testing for them. If MS stops providing security updates, I guess I will have to go with XP. I installed win2k on a machine that was new about a year and a half ago... my experience has been that it runs all the software I want to use, but I have run into glitches with some hardware, most notably my HP photosmart 7350 printer. Microsoft is using various ploys to discourage consumers from using win2k... for example, if you want to make lossless .wma files from your audio CDs, you have to upgrade from win2k to XP. But, having said all that, why not start with Win2k and buy a copy of XP if you decide you need it? Charlie |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Is Win2k still usable on new systems?
On Aug 10, 9:28 am, nemo wrote:
I have been using Win2k on my computers for some 5 or more years. I like the fact that when I upgrade the hardware I don't have to buy a new OS license. I am about to build a new computer and it occurred to me that maybe Win2k is not supported by the hardware makers so much now. If I buy all new components, will I be able to find Win2k drivers for them? I have heard little except bad about Vista, so I guess I might be willing to give XP a try if I have no other choice. Vista is actually the reason I want to build a new system rather than buy. Dell's prices are not much higher than a DIY machine, but it looks like they only provide Vista and not XP anymore. Any thoughts on Vista? Dell still has the XP OS option on their small business line of computers. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
// Why I find Qimage not usable // | RickTrelles | Printers | 3 | June 19th 06 06:12 PM |
--> AMAZING! Free Ipods, Laptops, PC's, Game Systems, Car Gear, Computer Parts, TV's, Home Theater Systems, Bose iPod Sound Dock, + Much Much More! Check It OUT! <-- | GuitarMan | Nvidia Videocards | 0 | January 24th 05 08:59 PM |
Inspiron 700m. Is 12.1" really usable? | Thomas G. Marshall | Dell Computers | 4 | August 31st 04 04:55 PM |
New 8400, XPS gen 3 systems - can your systems play current games (Far Cry...)? | scooby | Dell Computers | 3 | August 7th 04 05:57 PM |
P4S533-MX: What is the fastest RAM usable? | Arifi Koseoglu | Asus Motherboards | 1 | January 13th 04 09:58 PM |