If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What Can I Really Compare A AMD Athlon XP 3200+ Processor to??
Hi,
Sorry of this is a stupid question. I did a little research before buying, but maybe not enough. I walked into my local Best Buy ready to purchase a new Gateway PC with a Intel® Pentium® 4 processor 530 with Hyper-Threading Technology that was 3.0 MHZ. When I arrived, the machine I had selected online was (of course) out of stock and I spotten an HP PC instead that was about $150 less and had a AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor in it. I found a salesperson who seemed to know what he was saying and when I asked for a simply comparison between the AMD processor and the Intel in the machine they were out of, he said: "The AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor is actually faster than the 3.0 MHZ Pentium 4 in the Gateway. Actually, it works out to about 3.1 MHZ for this Athlon and AMD processors are better at Graphics than Intel." I have had PC's with both Intel and AMD processors in them and have never had trouble with either. In fact, some I had long forgotten which they had in them unless I was asked. SO, I took the salesperson's word as above and decided to save some money and get the HP with the AMD Athlon XP 3200+. Maybe I screwed up. While I am happy with this new machine, the "system" area of Windows XP claims the processor speed on this machine is 2.2 MHZ. Can someone give me a clear comparison? How does my AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor compare to the Pentium 4 3.0 MHZ I was planning to buy. It this Athlon actually better than the Intel as the salesperson said. I am kinda nervous that I should have ignored him and waited for the Gateway with Intel.. I am not finding anything on the web that takes an AMD Athlon and tells you what it is equal to in Intel. Anyone have answers? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
For business software, the Athlon XP3200+ is great. An Athlon Xp3000+
beats a much more expensive Pentium 4 3.2 ghz in Business Winstone 2004. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=2065&p=6 For gaming though, an Athlon 64 processor would be the best choice. I usually advise people to buy an Athlon XP processor if they plan to run business software, but aren't into gaming. Ryan wrote: Hi, Sorry of this is a stupid question. I did a little research before buying, but maybe not enough. I walked into my local Best Buy ready to purchase a new Gateway PC with a Intel® Pentium® 4 processor 530 with Hyper-Threading Technology that was 3.0 MHZ. When I arrived, the machine I had selected online was (of course) out of stock and I spotten an HP PC instead that was about $150 less and had a AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor in it. I found a salesperson who seemed to know what he was saying and when I asked for a simply comparison between the AMD processor and the Intel in the machine they were out of, he said: "The AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor is actually faster than the 3.0 MHZ Pentium 4 in the Gateway. Actually, it works out to about 3.1 MHZ for this Athlon and AMD processors are better at Graphics than Intel." I have had PC's with both Intel and AMD processors in them and have never had trouble with either. In fact, some I had long forgotten which they had in them unless I was asked. SO, I took the salesperson's word as above and decided to save some money and get the HP with the AMD Athlon XP 3200+. Maybe I screwed up. While I am happy with this new machine, the "system" area of Windows XP claims the processor speed on this machine is 2.2 MHZ. Can someone give me a clear comparison? How does my AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor compare to the Pentium 4 3.0 MHZ I was planning to buy. It this Athlon actually better than the Intel as the salesperson said. I am kinda nervous that I should have ignored him and waited for the Gateway with Intel.. I am not finding anything on the web that takes an AMD Athlon and tells you what it is equal to in Intel. Anyone have answers? Thanks! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 19:26:36 -0800, Ryan wrote:
Can someone give me a clear comparison? How does my AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor compare to the Pentium 4 3.0 MHZ I was planning to buy. It this Athlon actually better than the Intel as the salesperson said. The salesman was right(ish) - it would be the roughly the same or faster than the P4 in most situations. But they would still be pretty close, you probably wouldn't be able to 'feel' it. And XP is correct too. The 3200+ model number is a performance rating, and its clockspeed is actually 2.whatever GHz. It's all ok, don't worry. Cheers Anton |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Here is a review of the Athlon XP3000+. The 3200+ would of course be
a bit faster. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...px?i=1783&p=10 JK wrote: For business software, the Athlon XP3200+ is great. An Athlon Xp3000+ beats a much more expensive Pentium 4 3.2 ghz in Business Winstone 2004. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=2065&p=6 For gaming though, an Athlon 64 processor would be the best choice. I usually advise people to buy an Athlon XP processor if they plan to run business software, but aren't into gaming. Ryan wrote: Hi, Sorry of this is a stupid question. I did a little research before buying, but maybe not enough. I walked into my local Best Buy ready to purchase a new Gateway PC with a Intel® Pentium® 4 processor 530 with Hyper-Threading Technology that was 3.0 MHZ. When I arrived, the machine I had selected online was (of course) out of stock and I spotten an HP PC instead that was about $150 less and had a AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor in it. I found a salesperson who seemed to know what he was saying and when I asked for a simply comparison between the AMD processor and the Intel in the machine they were out of, he said: "The AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor is actually faster than the 3.0 MHZ Pentium 4 in the Gateway. Actually, it works out to about 3.1 MHZ for this Athlon and AMD processors are better at Graphics than Intel." I have had PC's with both Intel and AMD processors in them and have never had trouble with either. In fact, some I had long forgotten which they had in them unless I was asked. SO, I took the salesperson's word as above and decided to save some money and get the HP with the AMD Athlon XP 3200+. Maybe I screwed up. While I am happy with this new machine, the "system" area of Windows XP claims the processor speed on this machine is 2.2 MHZ. Can someone give me a clear comparison? How does my AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor compare to the Pentium 4 3.0 MHZ I was planning to buy. It this Athlon actually better than the Intel as the salesperson said. I am kinda nervous that I should have ignored him and waited for the Gateway with Intel.. I am not finding anything on the web that takes an AMD Athlon and tells you what it is equal to in Intel. Anyone have answers? Thanks! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Ryan" wrote in message om... While I am happy with this new machine, the "system" area of Windows XP claims the processor speed on this machine is 2.2 MHZ. You mean of course GHz. The clock frequency of the 3200+ is indeed 2.2 GHz (2200 MHz). However, raw clock frequencies have become less relevant in modern CPUs. Can someone give me a clear comparison? How does my AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor compare to the Pentium 4 3.0 MHZ I was planning to buy. It this Athlon actually better than the Intel as the salesperson said. The 3200+ is comparable to a P4 2.6-2.8 GHz, in applications where the difference would be noticed. I am kinda nervous that I should have ignored him and waited for the Gateway with Intel.. I am not finding anything on the web that takes an AMD Athlon and tells you what it is equal to in Intel. Such a comparison is impossible, as the two chips utilize different design philosophies. The relative performance level is then reliant upon the actual software tasks that the chips are being asked to run. In some cases you might find a "slower" Athlon to be better than a "faster" Intel, in other cases the opposite. There is no set formula for comparing the two chips. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
(Ryan) wrote :
Best Buy he said: "The AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor is actually faster than the 3.0 MHZ Pentium 4 in the Gateway. Actually, it works out to about 3.1 MHZ for this Athlon and AMD processors are better at Graphics than Intel." weird, salesperson told you true ... WEIRD ! Pozdrawiam. -- RusH // http://randki.o2.pl/profil.php?id_r=352019 Like ninjas, true hackers are shrouded in secrecy and mystery. You may never know -- UNTIL IT'S TOO LATE. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Ryan" a écrit dans le message de
om... Anyone have answers? Thanks! As already said, there is no significant difference, since AMD probably overevaluates a little the performance. Now you should look at other features. the next most important ones are the clock frequency of the front side bus and motherboard, and then the capacity of the first level cache memory. -- clmasse at free dot F-country Free technical support at : http://www.protonic.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Performance Increase Athlon 64 3500 vs Athlon XP-M 2500 O'Ced to 3200 | Coca Cola Kid | Overclocking AMD Processors | 48 | November 11th 04 09:04 PM |
Best Heatsink for an Athlon XP 3200 | Steve | Overclocking AMD Processors | 8 | October 11th 04 09:22 AM |
fake or re-marked 3200 athlon - help | PBS | Overclocking AMD Processors | 38 | July 25th 04 02:49 AM |
Newbie: How much faster is the FX-53 than the Athlon 3200 ? | Steve H. | AMD x86-64 Processors | 2 | July 23rd 04 08:05 PM |
AMD 64 Athlon 3200 +/Motu sound card | News Group | AMD x86-64 Processors | 8 | July 1st 04 08:51 AM |