If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
FEAR runs crappy, Quake runs fine
I just started playing FEAR and it runs like soup through a fine-toothed
comb. Does anyone have any ideas? I have played around with the settings. It looks butt ugly on "low" and runs choppy on "medium." The thing is, Quake 4 runs perfectly fine. I have an ATI X800 and 512RAM running on an AMD 64 2.4GHZ system. I also have the latest FEAR patch. I tried messing aroudn with VM some as well; that didn't help. In FEAR, at 800 x 600 with medium settings, there are tons of pauses and stuttering, and nothing ever runs too smooth. But in low, at 640 x 480, all the graphics look so low-res that the game is almost unplayable because I can't hardly see anything clearly. I have Quake 4 set to about medium or a little higher. Oddly, I remember the demo running perfectly fine and the graphics looked smooth and high-res. Any ideas? Also, for some reason, both games do a performance check and put everything pretty low, even though the X800 card shoudl be fast enough for at least medium quality... - JB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
FEAR runs crappy, Quake runs fine
"JB" wrote in message ... I just started playing FEAR and it runs like soup through a fine-toothed comb. Does anyone have any ideas? I have played around with the settings. It looks butt ugly on "low" and runs choppy on "medium." The thing is, Quake 4 runs perfectly fine. I have an ATI X800 and 512RAM running on an AMD 64 2.4GHZ system. I also have the latest FEAR patch. I tried messing aroudn with VM some as well; that didn't help. In FEAR, at 800 x 600 with medium settings, there are tons of pauses and stuttering, and nothing ever runs too smooth. But in low, at 640 x 480, all the graphics look so low-res that the game is almost unplayable because I can't hardly see anything clearly. I have Quake 4 set to about medium or a little higher. Oddly, I remember the demo running perfectly fine and the graphics looked smooth and high-res. Any ideas? Also, for some reason, both games do a performance check and put everything pretty low, even though the X800 card shoudl be fast enough for at least medium quality... - JB Do you have soft shadows turned on? This puts a severe performance hit on all but top-line cards? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
FEAR runs crappy, Quake runs fine
there is a problem with the ati drivers and FEAR. It does improve with 5.11
but should be completely resolved with 5.12 MadHewi "JB" wrote in message ... I just started playing FEAR and it runs like soup through a fine-toothed comb. Does anyone have any ideas? I have played around with the settings. It looks butt ugly on "low" and runs choppy on "medium." The thing is, Quake 4 runs perfectly fine. I have an ATI X800 and 512RAM running on an AMD 64 2.4GHZ system. I also have the latest FEAR patch. I tried messing aroudn with VM some as well; that didn't help. In FEAR, at 800 x 600 with medium settings, there are tons of pauses and stuttering, and nothing ever runs too smooth. But in low, at 640 x 480, all the graphics look so low-res that the game is almost unplayable because I can't hardly see anything clearly. I have Quake 4 set to about medium or a little higher. Oddly, I remember the demo running perfectly fine and the graphics looked smooth and high-res. Any ideas? Also, for some reason, both games do a performance check and put everything pretty low, even though the X800 card shoudl be fast enough for at least medium quality... - JB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
FEAR runs crappy, Quake runs fine
there is a problem with the ati drivers. I found using 5.11 the game ran
much better but I understand it should be resolved in releasee 5.12 Regards MadHewi "KCB" wrote in message news "JB" wrote in message ... I just started playing FEAR and it runs like soup through a fine-toothed comb. Does anyone have any ideas? I have played around with the settings. It looks butt ugly on "low" and runs choppy on "medium." The thing is, Quake 4 runs perfectly fine. I have an ATI X800 and 512RAM running on an AMD 64 2.4GHZ system. I also have the latest FEAR patch. I tried messing aroudn with VM some as well; that didn't help. In FEAR, at 800 x 600 with medium settings, there are tons of pauses and stuttering, and nothing ever runs too smooth. But in low, at 640 x 480, all the graphics look so low-res that the game is almost unplayable because I can't hardly see anything clearly. I have Quake 4 set to about medium or a little higher. Oddly, I remember the demo running perfectly fine and the graphics looked smooth and high-res. Any ideas? Also, for some reason, both games do a performance check and put everything pretty low, even though the X800 card shoudl be fast enough for at least medium quality... - JB Do you have soft shadows turned on? This puts a severe performance hit on all but top-line cards? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
FEAR runs crappy, Quake runs fine
there is a problem with the ati drivers and FEAR. It does improve with 5.11
but I understand the main fix will be in 5.12 MadHewi "JB" wrote in message ... I just started playing FEAR and it runs like soup through a fine-toothed comb. Does anyone have any ideas? I have played around with the settings. It looks butt ugly on "low" and runs choppy on "medium." The thing is, Quake 4 runs perfectly fine. I have an ATI X800 and 512RAM running on an AMD 64 2.4GHZ system. I also have the latest FEAR patch. I tried messing aroudn with VM some as well; that didn't help. In FEAR, at 800 x 600 with medium settings, there are tons of pauses and stuttering, and nothing ever runs too smooth. But in low, at 640 x 480, all the graphics look so low-res that the game is almost unplayable because I can't hardly see anything clearly. I have Quake 4 set to about medium or a little higher. Oddly, I remember the demo running perfectly fine and the graphics looked smooth and high-res. Any ideas? Also, for some reason, both games do a performance check and put everything pretty low, even though the X800 card shoudl be fast enough for at least medium quality... - JB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
FEAR runs crappy, Quake runs fine
"JB" once tried to test me with:
I just started playing FEAR and it runs like soup through a fine-toothed comb. Does anyone have any ideas? I have played around with the settings. It looks butt ugly on "low" and runs choppy on "medium." The thing is, Quake 4 runs perfectly fine. I have an ATI X800 and 512RAM running on an AMD 64 2.4GHZ system. I also have the latest FEAR patch. I tried messing aroudn with VM some as well; that didn't help. In FEAR, at 800 x 600 with medium settings, there are tons of pauses and stuttering, and nothing ever runs too smooth. But in low, at 640 x 480, all the graphics look so low-res that the game is almost unplayable because I can't hardly see anything clearly. I have Quake 4 set to about medium or a little higher. Oddly, I remember the demo running perfectly fine and the graphics looked smooth and high-res. Any ideas? Also, for some reason, both games do a performance check and put everything pretty low, even though the X800 card shoudl be fast enough for at least medium quality... This is going to sound crazy but try renaming the fear.exe file to something else, and then create a new shortcut to run it. There is a bug in the ATI driver that tries to optimize fear but does it completely wrong. -- Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
FEAR runs crappy, Quake runs fine
Also, 512 MB of system memory doesn't cut it with today's games!
-- Shinnokxz - http://www.coryhansen.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
FEAR runs crappy, Quake runs fine
"Shinnokxz" wrote in message ... Also, 512 MB of system memory doesn't cut it with today's games! -- Shinnokxz - http://www.coryhansen.com just to confirm - rename the FEAR.exe to something else like SCARE.exe and use that - it bypasses a bug in the drivers caused through catalystAI and yeah - it does need more than 512mb of RAM. also some ppl have found problems with the 1.2 patch so if the first 2 dont help reinstall and dont patch until 1.3 comes out. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
FEAR runs crappy, Quake runs fine
"just to confirm - rename the FEAR.exe to something else like SCARE.exe
and use that - it bypasses a bug in the drivers caused through catalyst AI " Yes that should sort it....I am running Radeon 9800 pro with FEAR at 1024 x 768 on HIGHEST settings and it seems at least as smooth as Quake 4 at same Res...Your X800 should be better... The lower Graphic settings are very much poorer.. Luv mouse @@@@@ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
FEAR runs crappy, Quake runs fine
just to confirm - rename the FEAR.exe to something else like SCARE.exe Or MOOHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!.EXE |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Upgraded memory and CPU - system runs fine but boots up *slower*! | Chandler Bing | Intel | 2 | February 8th 05 01:56 AM |
Computer constantly ON runs fine, just don't shut it down and try to restart later! Why? | Hans Huber | Homebuilt PC's | 5 | May 27th 04 07:26 AM |
Computer constantly ON runs fine, just don't shut it down and try to restart later! Why? | Hans Huber | General | 0 | May 26th 04 07:18 AM |