If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is it OK for retailers to sell engineering sample chips??
I bought a chip from an online retailer, and the page and product
description did NOT mention that this chip was an engineering sample (which it turned out to be.) Here is the description: "Intel Pentium D 950 3.4GHz 2x2MB (4MB) Dual Core 800Mhz Socket LGA 775 - OEM + FREE HEATSINK/FAN!!! Mfg. Part No.: PD 950/3.4/4M/800/775 Product Code: CPPD-PD950OEM" I spoke with them on the phone and they claim that these chips are OK to sell, and that major manufacturers use these in their machines... Yet it has "INTEL CONFIDENTIAL" written right on the front. The chip has ES in the model number, SisSoft Sandra & CPU-Z say it's an engineering sample as well, Sandra shows this as a warning. Is it legal for retailers to sell these chips? Shouldn't they be required to tell me that it's an Engineering Sample? If anyone has a link to Intel documentation indicating if these should be for sale or not would be very much appreciated. At this point, I want my money back. I don't know if it could have defects due to being an early version, if it could have been used for benchmarking/overclocking/etc. before I bought it, and so on... But they seem to think this is fine to do. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is it OK for retailers to sell engineering sample chips??
Thanks for the link! I also talked to Intel technical support and they
told me these chips were NOT to be sold, and were supposed to be destroyed after testing. I gave them the name of the online merchant and they are escalating the ticket in order to investigate how this chip got to a retail store. Brownz (mobile) wrote: wrote: I bought a chip from an online retailer, and the page and product description did NOT mention that this chip was an engineering sample (which it turned out to be.) Here is the description: "Intel Pentium D 950 3.4GHz 2x2MB (4MB) Dual Core 800Mhz Socket LGA 775 - OEM + FREE HEATSINK/FAN!!! Mfg. Part No.: PD 950/3.4/4M/800/775 Product Code: CPPD-PD950OEM" I spoke with them on the phone and they claim that these chips are OK to sell, and that major manufacturers use these in their machines... Yet it has "INTEL CONFIDENTIAL" written right on the front. The chip has ES in the model number, SisSoft Sandra & CPU-Z say it's an engineering sample as well, Sandra shows this as a warning. Is it legal for retailers to sell these chips? Shouldn't they be required to tell me that it's an Engineering Sample? If anyone has a link to Intel documentation indicating if these should be for sale or not would be very much appreciated. At this point, I want my money back. I don't know if it could have defects due to being an early version, if it could have been used for benchmarking/overclocking/etc. before I bought it, and so on... But they seem to think this is fine to do. No, they're not allowed to sell q-spec samples. Engineering samples can go through a number of revisions before becoming production s-spec silicon, so may be lacking in certain features - e.g. EIST disabled etc etc A bit more info below. http://www.intel.com/support/process.../cs-001616.htm On the upside its unlikely to be clock locked so should be easily overclockable. -- Cheerz - Brownz http://www.brownz.org/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is it OK for retailers to sell engineering sample chips??
At this point, the merchant is refusing to take it back (sighting a 30
day warranty when their website says 90) even though it is an engineering sample and they shouldn't have sold it in the first palce. Anyone know if I have a course of action with these people? I got confirmation from Intel that these chips weren't to be sold, but they refuse to take it back... See their response: Kyle, The product was advertised as an OEM product, which means that the CPU is not retail. Accordingly, the specs of the CPU matches exactly what was advertised; at this point, the CPU is out of warranty and we cannot accept returns on it. All CPUs have a 30 day warranty from the date of invoice. Thank you. Sincerely, Customer Service Stalliontek.com - Hide quoted text - ----- Original Message ----- From: Kyle Kvech To: ; Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:28 PM Subject: PLEASE RESPOND This is my second email, please respond: I purchased a Pentium D 950 from stalliontek.com about a month and a half ago, and yesterday I discovered that it is in fact an engineering sample and not a production chip. Please see attached screenshots of CPU-Z, Sandra, and a photo of the chip itself. What is interesting is the fact that the description for this product did not say it was an engineering sample, however the printed invoice contains 'ES' in the model number, indicating that I was sold an engineering sample. I have contacted Intel and they have confirmed that: 1) The chip is in fact an Engineering Sample 2) Engineering samples are in no way supported by Intel and are NOT to be used for any purpose other than engineering / product testing 3) Engineering samples may not be up to spec with production units 4) Engineering samples are to be destroyed, and are NOT to be resold In addition to that, I have concerns that I was sold this chip and not told it was an engineering sample. Since it is an engineering sample, I do not know the origin of this chip, if it was used for benchmark tests, if it was overclocked, put through stress tests, etc. Here are some excerpts from the Intel documentation on engineering sample chips: "Engineering sample processors are available to those who qualify for, and obtain, a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). An Intel® Authorized Distributor can assist with the application to obtain an NDA. There are no other means to obtain sample processors from Intel " "These processors are not packaged or labeled for sale to consumers, and may incur damage when tested by system builders." "Engineering samples are not supported by Intel Customer Support and are not eligible for warranty service." I am requesting a complete and immediate refund for this purchase, as well as for you to pay for return shipping. Sincerely, Kyle Kvech |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is it OK for retailers to sell engineering sample chips??
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:56:20 -0700, kyle.kvech wrote:
At this point, the merchant is refusing to take it back (sighting a 30 day warranty when their website says 90) even though it is an engineering sample and they shouldn't have sold it in the first palce. Anyone know if I have a course of action with these people? I got confirmation from Intel that these chips weren't to be sold, but they refuse to take it back... See their response: Kyle, The product was advertised as an OEM product, which means that the CPU is not retail. Accordingly, the specs of the CPU matches exactly what was advertised; at this point, the CPU is out of warranty and we cannot accept returns on it. All CPUs have a 30 day warranty from the date of invoice. Thank you. Sincerely, Customer Service Stalliontek.com - Hide quoted text - ----- Original Message ----- From: Kyle Kvech To: ; Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:28 PM Subject: PLEASE RESPOND This is my second email, please respond: I purchased a Pentium D 950 from stalliontek.com about a month and a half ago, and yesterday I discovered that it is in fact an engineering sample and not a production chip. Please see attached screenshots of CPU-Z, Sandra, and a photo of the chip itself. What is interesting is the fact that the description for this product did not say it was an engineering sample, however the printed invoice contains 'ES' in the model number, indicating that I was sold an engineering sample. I have contacted Intel and they have confirmed that: 1) The chip is in fact an Engineering Sample 2) Engineering samples are in no way supported by Intel and are NOT to be used for any purpose other than engineering / product testing 3) Engineering samples may not be up to spec with production units 4) Engineering samples are to be destroyed, and are NOT to be resold In addition to that, I have concerns that I was sold this chip and not told it was an engineering sample. Since it is an engineering sample, I do not know the origin of this chip, if it was used for benchmark tests, if it was overclocked, put through stress tests, etc. Here are some excerpts from the Intel documentation on engineering sample chips: "Engineering sample processors are available to those who qualify for, and obtain, a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). An Intel® Authorized Distributor can assist with the application to obtain an NDA. There are no other means to obtain sample processors from Intel " "These processors are not packaged or labeled for sale to consumers, and may incur damage when tested by system builders." "Engineering samples are not supported by Intel Customer Support and are not eligible for warranty service." I am requesting a complete and immediate refund for this purchase, as well as for you to pay for return shipping. Sincerely, Kyle Kvech Your only practical course of action is to give them a bad reseller rating on every site that you can find. It sounds like you've already contacted Intel although it's unlikely they can do anything about this because the dealer that you bought this from is buying from distributors and the grey market and not from Intel directly. Forget about legal action, it's not worth a lawyers time. In the future buy from a respectable dealer like Newegg. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is it OK for retailers to sell engineering sample chips??
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intel will now allow its OEMs to sell AMD chips | YKhan | General | 2 | July 14th 05 10:16 PM |
Xenon - Xbox360 getting embedded DRAM confirmed. NEC will manufacture the eDRAM graphics chip | Del Cecchi | General | 4 | May 8th 05 03:34 PM |
Why would adding 2 new chips of memory cause Win XP Pro Not to Boot? | [email protected] | General | 18 | February 19th 04 01:41 AM |
256meg Memory : 8 chips or 16 chips ???? | Al Franz | Homebuilt PC's | 6 | October 22nd 03 12:29 AM |
Inq update on future ATI & Nvidia chips | Radeon350 | Ati Videocards | 0 | August 13th 03 10:41 PM |