If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Original printer cost vs later ink costs?
I'm in the market for a new printer up to $100. Which is the best buy,
considering future cartridge costs? TIA, Howie. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 21:05:28 GMT, PortNatal wrote:
=I'm in the market for a new printer up to $100. Which is the best buy, =considering future cartridge costs? = =TIA, =Howie. None of them. 2 to 3 sets of b/w and colour cartridges will cost $100 or more, regardess of what printer you buy. There will be some who will tell you that refilling the cartridges will save you money. That's true, but you may find that the cost in aggravation is tto much for you. A typical printer will last long enough that you will pay _at least_ ten times as much for the ink as to buy the machine. (Footnote) After much calculation, and headscratching, and peering at the innards of birds, and watching straws drift in the wind, and consulting the tea leaves, I have come to the conclusion that a laser printer is cheaper over the life of the machine than any inkjet. As soon as the two prtinters in this house have used up all the ink (I bought some on sale, for it will take a while), the printers be trashed, and I will buy a laser printer. Footnote: Inkjet printers are an interesting bit of technology, sociologically. They are the first complex machines we've been offered as consumers that cost much, much more to operate than to buy. We are used to machines costing a lot to buy and relatively little to operate. So we tend to ask the wrong questions about printers - how much they cost to buy, not how much they cost to operate. Your question is the right question IMO -- and its answer is not a pleasant one. HTH&GL -- Wolf Kirchmeir If you didn't want to go to Chicago, why did you get on the train? (Garrison Keillor) just one w and plain ca for correct e-mail address |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
PortNatal wrote:
I'm in the market for a new printer up to $100. Which is the best buy, considering future cartridge costs? The Canon i850... probably the most popular printer in this newsgroup. It's over a $100, but if you've half a brain, like me, you'll refill with bulk ink (250 ml bottles) from a respected supplier, like atlanticinkjet.com (separate divisions in the US and Canada). Their ink is indistinguishable from Canon's in side-by-side photo comparisons. Text seems to be spot on too. I've had this printer since March and I haven't had to clean the print head yet because of clogging or streaking. Refilling all 4 cartridges costs me about $5. The low cost of refilling allowed me to buy a better, more expensive printer, and then print to my heart's delight without worrying about ink usage. A long time ago I use to do test prints in draft, in order to save ink. Not any more. I now do test prints in the High Quality setting. -Taliesyn |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Taliesyn wrote:
PortNatal wrote: I'm in the market for a new printer up to $100. Which is the best buy, considering future cartridge costs? The Canon i850... probably the most popular printer in this newsgroup. It's over a $100, but if you've half a brain, like me, you'll refill with bulk ink (250 ml bottles) from a respected supplier, like atlanticinkjet.com (separate divisions in the US and Canada). Their ink is indistinguishable from Canon's in side-by-side photo comparisons. Text seems to be spot on too. I've had this printer since March and I haven't had to clean the print head yet because of clogging or streaking. Refilling all 4 cartridges costs me about $5. The low cost of refilling allowed me to buy a better, more expensive printer, and then print to my heart's delight without worrying about ink usage. A long time ago I use to do test prints in draft, in order to save ink. Not any more. I now do test prints in the High Quality setting. -Taliesyn I agree the Canons have the lowest ink/cartridge cost but what about those print heads? I imagine some people will just replace the printer when they need new heads. Any one out there have a lot of mileage on the Canon print heads yet? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
tomcas wrote:
Taliesyn wrote: PortNatal wrote: I'm in the market for a new printer up to $100. Which is the best buy, considering future cartridge costs? The Canon i850... probably the most popular printer in this newsgroup. It's over a $100, but if you've half a brain, like me, you'll refill with bulk ink (250 ml bottles) from a respected supplier, like atlanticinkjet.com (separate divisions in the US and Canada). Their ink is indistinguishable from Canon's in side-by-side photo comparisons. Text seems to be spot on too. I've had this printer since March and I haven't had to clean the print head yet because of clogging or streaking. Refilling all 4 cartridges costs me about $5. The low cost of refilling allowed me to buy a better, more expensive printer, and then print to my heart's delight without worrying about ink usage. A long time ago I use to do test prints in draft, in order to save ink. Not any more. I now do test prints in the High Quality setting. -Taliesyn I agree the Canons have the lowest ink/cartridge cost but what about those print heads? I imagine some people will just replace the printer when they need new heads. Any one out there have a lot of mileage on the Canon print heads yet? Canon has stated that the print heads on the new "i" series printers were designed to last the "life of the printer". -Taliesyn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
In article , Taliesyn wrote: Canon has stated that the print heads on the new "i" series printers were designed to last the "life of the printer". Now, have they defined how long the printer is supposed to last? No. So, what they're actually saying--boy, these marketers are clever--is that when the print heads go bad, the printer has by definition reached its end of life. Time to buy a new one! Which is exactly the goal of the marketers--to get you to keep buying. "Last the life of the printer". Boy oh boy. What suckers they take us for. The average person (not you, of course) takes that to mean it should serve well for several years. 3 years would be fine for me before I move on the something better. No printer nor print head - this is my sixth printer - has ever died on me; I've simply put them all "to rest" or given them away when they served their time. People like you, who live in constant fear of "marketers" amuse me to no end. Everyone's out to get you, right?.... Chill out! -Taliesyn |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 20:31:35 -0400, Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
=In article ico.ca, = "Wolf Kirchmeir" wrote: = = After much calculation, and headscratching, and peering at the innards of = birds, and watching straws drift in the wind, and consulting the tea leaves, = I have come to the conclusion that a laser printer is cheaper over the life = of the machine than any inkjet. = =That's not hard to figure out. I figure that 4th grade math is all you =need. = Do I really have to use :-) to indicate irony?? -- Wolf Kirchmeir If you didn't want to go to Chicago, why did you get on the train? (Garrison Keillor) just one w and plain ca for correct e-mail address |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Unverified, but a Canon sales rep that happened to be at Fry's said that the
warranty on Canon printer heads was 5 years. "Taliesyn" wrote in message ... tomcas wrote: Taliesyn wrote: PortNatal wrote: I'm in the market for a new printer up to $100. Which is the best buy, considering future cartridge costs? The Canon i850... probably the most popular printer in this newsgroup. It's over a $100, but if you've half a brain, like me, you'll refill with bulk ink (250 ml bottles) from a respected supplier, like atlanticinkjet.com (separate divisions in the US and Canada). Their ink is indistinguishable from Canon's in side-by-side photo comparisons. Text seems to be spot on too. I've had this printer since March and I haven't had to clean the print head yet because of clogging or streaking. Refilling all 4 cartridges costs me about $5. The low cost of refilling allowed me to buy a better, more expensive printer, and then print to my heart's delight without worrying about ink usage. A long time ago I use to do test prints in draft, in order to save ink. Not any more. I now do test prints in the High Quality setting. -Taliesyn I agree the Canons have the lowest ink/cartridge cost but what about those print heads? I imagine some people will just replace the printer when they need new heads. Any one out there have a lot of mileage on the Canon print heads yet? Canon has stated that the print heads on the new "i" series printers were designed to last the "life of the printer". -Taliesyn |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Maywood wrote:
Unverified, but a Canon sales rep that happened to be at Fry's said that the warranty on Canon printer heads was 5 years. I don't plan to grow old with my printers, I change them every 2 or 3 years because they simply become obsolete. Newer, better, faster, more affordable printers are always coming out, and I need the best print possible at the most affordable price. Hence, print heads failing due to age is the least of my worries. -Taliesyn "Taliesyn" wrote in message ... tomcas wrote: Taliesyn wrote: PortNatal wrote: I'm in the market for a new printer up to $100. Which is the best buy, considering future cartridge costs? The Canon i850... probably the most popular printer in this newsgroup. It's over a $100, but if you've half a brain, like me, you'll refill with bulk ink (250 ml bottles) from a respected supplier, like atlanticinkjet.com (separate divisions in the US and Canada). Their ink is indistinguishable from Canon's in side-by-side photo comparisons. Text seems to be spot on too. I've had this printer since March and I haven't had to clean the print head yet because of clogging or streaking. Refilling all 4 cartridges costs me about $5. The low cost of refilling allowed me to buy a better, more expensive printer, and then print to my heart's delight without worrying about ink usage. A long time ago I use to do test prints in draft, in order to save ink. Not any more. I now do test prints in the High Quality setting. -Taliesyn I agree the Canons have the lowest ink/cartridge cost but what about those print heads? I imagine some people will just replace the printer when they need new heads. Any one out there have a lot of mileage on the Canon print heads yet? Canon has stated that the print heads on the new "i" series printers were designed to last the "life of the printer". -Taliesyn |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What am I doing wrong ??? Or is Adaptec 21610SA just a crappy RAID card ? | news.tele.dk | Storage & Hardrives | 160 | December 28th 04 04:34 AM |
Color Laser Printer Costs per Page | Phil | General Hardware | 0 | January 30th 04 05:33 AM |
Linux to emulate/act as a printer. | Peteris Krumins | General | 0 | December 26th 03 04:22 AM |
USB or parallel port, which should the printer use? | *Vanguard* | General | 6 | November 29th 03 09:01 PM |
Ongoing printer costs | Henry SC | Printers | 9 | July 31st 03 11:02 PM |