If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DAO vs TAO
While I understand (conceptually, at least) the difference between TAO and
DAO, which will give best results (i.e., fewer errors) with (a) data back-up, and (b) music? Note: I only use single sessions and want a few seconds between songs, and I want data to be as accurate as possible)? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
David Rafky wrote:
While I understand (conceptually, at least) the difference between TAO and DAO, which will give best results (i.e., fewer errors) with (a) data back-up, and (b) music? There is no difference in error rate since the data are written the same with either. Mike -- http://www.mrichter.com/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
David Rafky wrote:
While I understand (conceptually, at least) the difference between TAO and DAO, which will give best results (i.e., fewer errors) with (a) data back-up, and (b) music? Note: I only use single sessions and want a few seconds between songs, and I want data to be as accurate as possible)? As Mike pointed out, both work OK. But for audio always use DAO, or else you might get some garbage-data between the tracks. In general, always use DAO for everything, except when it's not possible (in which case your burning program will not allow you to burn in DAO mode). For example, you have to use DAO/96 mode to create real 1:1 copies of protected CDs. -- Niko |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|