If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
copper shim vs. thermal pad
I'm putting a different motherboard in my XPS M1330 -
the motherboard without the discrete nVidia graphics chip. I find that there is about a 1.6mm gap between the Intel system chip and the heat sink that is attached to the copper heat pipe. I don't want to tighten the gap down because that would put a tipping force on the CPU heat sink junction, but 1.6mm seems like it would be too large a gap for a thermal pad to conduct heat away well. So I'm looking into using a copper shim - 1.5cm x 1.25cm and either 1.5mm or 1.2mm thick. Are there any caveats about using a copper shim? Are they better than using thermal pads? *TimDaniels* |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
copper shim vs. thermal pad
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 23:21:45 -0700, "Timothy Daniels"
wrote: I'm putting a different motherboard in my XPS M1330 - the motherboard without the discrete nVidia graphics chip. I find that there is about a 1.6mm gap between the Intel system chip and the heat sink that is attached to the copper heat pipe. I don't want to tighten the gap down because that would put a tipping force on the CPU heat sink junction, but 1.6mm seems like it would be too large a gap for a thermal pad to conduct heat away well. So I'm looking into using a copper shim - 1.5cm x 1.25cm and either 1.5mm or 1.2mm thick. Are there any caveats about using a copper shim? Are they better than using thermal pads? YES !!!!! Many "copper" things are beryllium bronze, which is EXTREMELY poisonous. I know a man whose wife was poisoned. Her case is known in the US medical archives. She worked in a dental lab and got the debris particles from material containing beryllium into her lung. THAT is the crucial thing: DO NOT INHALE DUST! So, if you use "copper", try to find out if it really is PURE copper or a compound containing beryllium. The "thermal pads" have very bad thermal characteristics. Their sole purpose is to close air gaps, and so they must be pressed by great force to be very thing. 1.6mm is by far much too much for any thermal pad. Very good copper sheets can be found in shops for do-it-yourself where the copper is meant to be used for hammering vases and other stuff. Some cm2 of surplus material should be cheap. But you have to be extremely cautious about the surface and oxidation. I would use a piece of such copper PLUS some thermal paste (expression correct ?) to better the contact between the metal surfaces. -- TG_1 pwned by FRAUENPOWER ---------------------------------------- http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
copper shim vs. thermal pad
"Happy Oyster" -*-*.@.*-*- wrote: "Timothy Daniels" wrote: I'm putting a different motherboard in my XPS M1330 - the motherboard without the discrete nVidia graphics chip. I find that there is about a 1.6mm gap between the Intel system chip and the heat sink that is attached to the copper heat pipe. I don't want to tighten the gap down because that would put a tipping force on the CPU heat sink junction, but 1.6mm seems like it would be too large a gap for a thermal pad to conduct heat away well. So I'm looking into using a copper shim - 1.5cm x 1.25cm and either 1.5mm or 1.2mm thick. Are there any caveats about using a copper shim? Are they better than using thermal pads? YES !!!!! Many "copper" things are beryllium bronze, which is EXTREMELY poisonous. I know a man whose wife was poisoned. Her case is known in the US medical archives. She worked in a dental lab and got the debris particles from material containing beryllium into her lung. THAT is the crucial thing: DO NOT INHALE DUST! So, if you use "copper", try to find out if it really is PURE copper or a compound containing beryllium. The "thermal pads" have very bad thermal characteristics. Their sole purpose is to close air gaps, and so they must be pressed by great force to be very thing. 1.6mm is by far much too much for any thermal pad. Very good copper sheets can be found in shops for do-it-yourself where the copper is meant to be used for hammering vases and other stuff. Some cm2 of surplus material should be cheap. But you have to be extremely cautious about the surface and oxidation. I would use a piece of such copper PLUS some thermal paste (expression correct ?) to better the contact between the metal surfaces. Interesting about the beryllium. I do not intend to saw or grind or file the shims, so I guess that is a moot point, but I wonder if that is why no large U.S. retailer carries copper shims - which all seem to be made from recycled material. *TimDaniels* |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
copper shim vs. thermal pad
On Friday, August 30, 2013 3:44:49 PM UTC-6, Timothy Daniels wrote:
"Happy Oyster" -*-*.@.*-*- wrote: "Timothy Daniels" wrote: I'm putting a different motherboard in my XPS M1330 - the motherboard without the discrete nVidia graphics chip. I find that there is about a 1.6mm gap between the Intel system chip and the heat sink that is attached to the copper heat pipe. I don't want to tighten the gap down because that would put a tipping force on the CPU heat sink junction, but 1.6mm seems like it would be too large a gap for a thermal pad to conduct heat away well. So I'm looking into using a copper shim - 1.5cm x 1.25cm and either 1.5mm or 1.2mm thick. Are there any caveats about using a copper shim? Are they better than using thermal pads? YES !!!!! Many "copper" things are beryllium bronze, which is EXTREMELY poisonous. I know a man whose wife was poisoned. Her case is known in the US medical archives. She worked in a dental lab and got the debris particles from material containing beryllium into her lung. THAT is the crucial thing: DO NOT INHALE DUST! So, if you use "copper", try to find out if it really is PURE copper or a compound containing beryllium. The "thermal pads" have very bad thermal characteristics. Their sole purpose is to close air gaps, and so they must be pressed by great force to be very thing. 1.6mm is by far much too much for any thermal pad. Very good copper sheets can be found in shops for do-it-yourself where the copper is meant to be used for hammering vases and other stuff. Some cm2 of surplus material should be cheap. But you have to be extremely cautious about the surface and oxidation. I would use a piece of such copper PLUS some thermal paste (expression correct ?) to better the contact between the metal surfaces. Interesting about the beryllium. I do not intend to saw or grind or file the shims, so I guess that is a moot point, but I wonder if that is why no large U.S. retailer carries copper shims - which all seem to be made from recycled material. *TimDaniels* I wonder if the old copper "wheat" pennies are pure copper? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
copper shim vs. thermal pad
On Friday, August 30, 2013 4:13:54 PM UTC-6, Larry wrote:
On Friday, August 30, 2013 3:44:49 PM UTC-6, Timothy Daniels wrote: "Happy Oyster" -*-*.@.*-*- wrote: "Timothy Daniels" wrote: I'm putting a different motherboard in my XPS M1330 - the motherboard without the discrete nVidia graphics chip. I find that there is about a 1.6mm gap between the Intel system chip and the heat sink that is attached to the copper heat pipe. I don't want to tighten the gap down because that would put a tipping force on the CPU heat sink junction, but 1.6mm seems like it would be too large a gap for a thermal pad to conduct heat away well. So I'm looking into using a copper shim - 1.5cm x 1.25cm and either 1.5mm or 1.2mm thick. Are there any caveats about using a copper shim? Are they better than using thermal pads? YES !!!!! Many "copper" things are beryllium bronze, which is EXTREMELY poisonous. I know a man whose wife was poisoned. Her case is known in the US medical archives. She worked in a dental lab and got the debris particles from material containing beryllium into her lung. THAT is the crucial thing: DO NOT INHALE DUST! So, if you use "copper", try to find out if it really is PURE copper or a compound containing beryllium. The "thermal pads" have very bad thermal characteristics. Their sole purpose is to close air gaps, and so they must be pressed by great force to be very thing. 1.6mm is by far much too much for any thermal pad. Very good copper sheets can be found in shops for do-it-yourself where the copper is meant to be used for hammering vases and other stuff. Some cm2 of surplus material should be cheap. But you have to be extremely cautious about the surface and oxidation. I would use a piece of such copper PLUS some thermal paste (expression correct ?) to better the contact between the metal surfaces. Interesting about the beryllium. I do not intend to saw or grind or file the shims, so I guess that is a moot point, but I wonder if that is why no large U.S. retailer carries copper shims - which all seem to be made from recycled material. *TimDaniels* I wonder if the old copper "wheat" pennies are pure copper? Just checked on it myself...all pennies 1982 and before are 95% copper...just a thought. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
copper shim vs. thermal pad
"Larry" wrote:
Just checked on it myself...all pennies 1982 and before are 95% copper...just a thought. Some were. The rest, and all since 1983, are 97.5% zinc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._penny Please remember that the original questions we "Are there any caveats about using a copper shim? Are they better than using thermal pads?" *TimDaniels* |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
copper shim vs. thermal pad
"Timothy Daniels" asked:
I'm putting a different motherboard in my XPS M1330 - the motherboard without the discrete nVidia graphics chip. I find that there is about a 1.6mm gap between the Intel system chip and the heat sink that is attached to the copper heat pipe. I don't want to tighten the gap down because that would put a tipping force on the CPU heat sink junction, but 1.6mm seems like it would be too large a gap for a thermal pad to conduct heat away well. So I'm looking into using a copper shim - 1.5cm x 1.25cm and either 1.5mm or 1.2mm thick. Are there any caveats about using a copper shim? Are they better than using thermal pads? *TimDaniels* I've finally installed the used motherboard without the nVidia graphics chip. It runs a little cooler than the original motherboard that had the nVidia chip, and I see no difference in YouTube videos of wingsuit flying than when I watch them on my Precision T3500 workstation. I used a 1.2mm thick copper shim with thermal paste between the shim and the Intel system chip, and 0.2mm thick Dell thermal pad between the shim and the chip's heatsink. That combination put the least bending torque on the heatpipe so the CPU heatsink would remain flat against the CPU. Between the CPU and its heatsink I used thermal paste. Running YouTube wingsuit videos for half an hour caused no speedup of the fan or any anomalies in the video display. That's all the video performance that I need, and I wish that I had not gotten the troublesome optional nVidia graphics chip in the first place. *TimDaniels* |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
copper shim vs. thermal pad
I recently repasted the heatsink on my XPS M1210 and the gpu portion utilized a rubber pad to fill the gap between the gpu and heatsink. Unsatisfied with the mediocre performance of the pad I started looking for a source of copper to use as a shim. My final solution was to use a pre 1982 penny for the 92% copper content and a near perfect size. I filed both sides smooth, applied as5 to the gpu and heatsink and reassembled with the penny replacing the rubber pad. Since I did it I've noticed drastically reduced temperatures and performance has become more stable due to decreased temps. This won't get you any significant increases in performance but you'll notice a difference.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
copper shim vs. thermal pad
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 9:16:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
I recently repasted the heatsink on my XPS M1210 and the gpu portion utilized a rubber pad to fill the gap between the gpu and heatsink. Unsatisfied with the mediocre performance of the pad I started looking for a source of copper to use as a shim. My final solution was to use a pre 1982 penny for the 92% copper content and a near perfect size. I filed both sides smooth, applied as5 to the gpu and heatsink and reassembled with the penny replacing the rubber pad. Since I did it I've noticed drastically reduced temperatures and performance has become more stable due to decreased temps. This won't get you any significant increases in performance but you'll notice a difference. Heat is definitely the enemy of the nVidia graphics chips on the XPS M-series many other Dell laptop models, plus Apple and HP laptops. To reduce heat even further at a smallish sacrifice in graphics performance for most applications, give the MSI Afterburner a try. But do something different. UNDERclock everything you can, reducing the speed of the GPU itself and memory. Heat is produced in proportion to clock speed. Cut clock speed by 20% and you reduce heat by 20%, more or less. Of course, the original raison d'être for Afterburner and similar utilities is to pump up the graphics subsystem to the max, achieving greater frame rates and more realistic graphics in video games. Interesting tradeoff for laptops: longer life vs faster graphics. With a laptop, the choice is a no-brainer for me. With a desktop, hey, you can always replace the nVidia card that went up in smoke... Ben Myers |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
copper shim vs. thermal pad
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 at 8:21:45 AM UTC+2, Timothy Daniels wrote:
I'm putting a different motherboard in my XPS M1330 - the motherboard without the discrete nVidia graphics chip. I find that there is about a 1.6mm gap between the Intel system chip and the heat sink that is attached to the copper heat pipe. I don't want to tighten the gap down because that would put a tipping force on the CPU heat sink junction, but 1.6mm seems like it would be too large a gap for a thermal pad to conduct heat away well. So I'm looking into using a copper shim - 1.5cm x 1.25cm and either 1.5mm or 1.2mm thick. Are there any caveats about using a copper shim? Are they better than using thermal pads? *TimDaniels* I replaced thermal pads on a nvidia GPU with copper shim made out of copper plumbing pipes thermal paste on both sides of the shim works fine and certainly not toxic |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Copper Shim Question | Mark | Overclocking AMD Processors | 16 | August 20th 04 08:54 PM |
Copper Shim for AMD proc's | XLR8R | Overclocking AMD Processors | 5 | March 21st 04 10:26 PM |
To Shim or not to Shim??? | Darth Joules | Overclocking AMD Processors | 13 | February 24th 04 12:15 AM |
Where does thermal grease go? Between CPU & shim, shim & fan, or all 3. | Ben | General Hardware | 1 | January 28th 04 11:40 PM |
To Shim, or not to Shim? | Wayne Youngman | Overclocking AMD Processors | 5 | July 25th 03 05:27 PM |