If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2 TB storage solution
Hi everyone,
I'm wondering what are the low cost solution for 2 Terabytes storage. It's SAN, NAS or something else. Thanks Sam |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sam wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm wondering what are the low cost solution for 2 Terabytes storage. It's SAN, NAS or something else. Thanks Sam As with many such questions, "It depends ..." Performance, support, backup, security, and price are all things to consider. If you're starting up the next Google your needs will be different from if you're storing your CD collection. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sam wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm wondering what are the low cost solution for 2 Terabytes storage. It's SAN, NAS or something else. Thanks Sam Maxtor has a 300GB PATA HD for 300$US. 2 per IDE cable, using the dual on-board IDE of typical MBs, plus a PCI-IDE controller, gets a real cheap hardware solution: just glue it onto your 10bT or 100 bTX network. For cheap software, make each HD a share, under XP or even W9x. Done. And, since you care about cost, don't create backup procedures or buy any backup software, and don't bother with UPS or even a line conditioner; also, you can save a lot on HVAC and temperature monitoring, by letting your PCs and HDs run at the redline. Oh, did you also want reliability and data integrity? That costs a few $s more. -- Cheers, Bob |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Sam" wrote in news:c7gc8u$1eeb$1
@cti15.citenet.net: Hi everyone, I'm wondering what are the low cost solution for 2 Terabytes storage. It's SAN, NAS or something else. Thanks Sam This is just an example. Take it all with a grain of salt. Your needs are most likely different from mine. You might want to review some of the sites that compare SAN vs NAS, just to make sure you don't have any specific requirements that might be better served by one vs the other. Things like redundancy, fault tolerance, down time, performance, etc. Those factors might affect which option you go with and how much it will cost. But based on lowest price alone, I think the lowest priced option would be a build-it-yourself NAS. This is what I would want if building my own low cost 2TB storage for home use. I only have about 400GB right now, soon to be 700GB by next week. It's mostly for video, music, and backup, so speed is not a big factor. My backup media includes DLT, DVD-R, and CDR. I also built something similar for work. But it was for a very low-risk storage area that was not considered production, just test. Anything in our "production" environment is built with SCSI hot swap arrays and hardware RAID, 1 or 5, minimum. Production servers that need more storage or fault tolerance get fiber channel arrays. If they need more fault tolerance, storage, or speed then they go on EMC or Hitachi SANs. There's quite a range of options out there, and prices to go along with them. - Pick your OS and connectivity method that you want to use. Linux, Windows, etc. Suggest you decide this soon because you'll want to make sure the hardware you buy is compatible with the OS you plan to use. A lot of people use Linux / Samba because it's free and performs well with limited hardware. - Buy a server case. You'll need bays for all your drives, fans for cooling, and a good power supply to keep it going. - You should decide if you will be adding any optical or tape backup units to this server, and if they will be internal or external. - Add motherboard, cpu(s), ram. How much cpu and ram you need depends on what OS you're running, and what else you plan to run on this server. I.E. virus scanning, backup software, etc. - Many motherboards have integrated video/sound/network/usb/firewire so you don't have to get those separate if you don't want to. - Install an ATA RAID controller. I like the 3Ware ATA controllers for 8 or 12 drives, but Adaptec sells some nice ones too. Populate it with some high density ATA drives, like the Maxline II 300GB drives. You'll need to decide how much fault tolerance you want, if any. The 3Ware card can do RAID 5 with a hotspare for example. 9x300GB drives in this config would get you to 2TB of storage. 7x300=2100 plus one more with Raid 5 plus one more for hotspare. Software RAID is possible but I wouldn't recommend it. I'd rather use a hardware RAID controller. If you don't want to build it yourself, you could either pay someone to build it, or you could to do some shopping around for a turn-key solution. A while back I did some looking through magazines and web sites, and from my limited shopping, it seems if you're looking for the absolute lowest priced options, you'll probably see more low-end NAS options to choose from than SAN solutions. I went the DIY route. For the low-end NAS solutions, you can find cheap boxes that run Windows or Linux or similar OS, and a number of ATA drives. You connect over Windows SMB share over your existing network. Often management is done through a web page. I don't know the names of ones that do 2TB off the top of my head but I'm sure you can find some today since the 300GB drives are more common now. Previously a lot of these arrays came with 120 or 160GB drives. For SAN solutions, you will also find a wide range of prices. You start with a disk storage unit and something to manage the disk array. To that, you typically add servers and the fabric that connects the servers to the storage. For example, in some low-cost options, you will find ATA drive enclosures that allow you to build an ATA array and connect it to your server(s) using SCSI cards. At the high end, you will find options that are faster, more fault tolerant and more expensive. For example, arrays built with SCSI or SCSI Fiber drives, several GB of cache, using multi- gigabit redundant switched fabric connecting the storage to clustered servers. Some configurations even use redundant switches and back up the entire works with batteries, not just the cache. Depends what your needs are. Best of luck on building your server. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Sam" wrote in message ... Hi everyone, I'm wondering what are the low cost solution for 2 Terabytes storage. It's SAN, NAS or something else. 8x250GB. These are widely available on EBay, for reasonable prices. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Mr. Grinch" wrote in message This is what I would want if building my own low cost 2TB storage for home use. I only have about 400GB right now, soon to be 700GB by next week. It's mostly for video, music, and backup, so speed is not a big factor. My backup media includes DLT, DVD-R, and CDR. The most price-performance effective backup media in a small business or home is one of those 300GB ATA HDs in a removeable tray or USB2. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I need a solution for really fast storage (GByte/sec) | Giorgos P. | Storage & Hardrives | 8 | December 2nd 04 09:29 PM |
storage solution | JL | Storage & Hardrives | 0 | October 18th 04 10:45 AM |
HowTo create a complete virtual storage solution | ttr | Storage & Hardrives | 0 | August 13th 04 03:34 PM |
**** Immediate Opening – Senior Storage and Server Solution Architect **** | Josh Lopez | Storage & Hardrives | 0 | June 23rd 04 11:55 PM |
Terabyte Storage By Real-Storage | Real-Storage | Storage & Hardrives | 2 | October 23rd 03 04:18 PM |