If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Core 2 Duo Processor
I'm running XP Pro and am wondering if its truly able to support the
Core funcionality of this processor. Is it XP or do the programs also need to support the Core 2 Duo processor? I'm going from a 550mhz processor 5 years old so was expecting a lot more speed from the core 2 duo. Thanks, Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Core 2 Duo Processor
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:49:14 -0800 (PST), Peter
wrote: I'm running XP Pro and am wondering if its truly able to support the Core funcionality of this processor. Is it XP or do the programs also need to support the Core 2 Duo processor? I'm going from a 550mhz processor 5 years old so was expecting a lot more speed from the core 2 duo. Thanks, Pete I know what you're saying. A friend was given an old laptop several months ago. I forgot the specs, but it was very "obsolete", something even less than a PIII w 128M RAM, that kind of thing but it was very zippy opening apps like Word and Excel 97. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Core 2 Duo Processor
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:38:50 -0500, "Tom Lake"
wrote: "Peter" wrote in message ... I'm running XP Pro and am wondering if its truly able to support the Core funcionality of this processor. Is it XP or do the programs also need to support the Core 2 Duo processor? I'm going from a 550mhz processor 5 years old so was expecting a lot more speed from the core 2 duo. XP Pro does support the Core 2 Duo but your bottleneck may be somewhere else. If you have insufficient RAM or slow hard drives, the CPU can't compensate for inadequate hardware. Tom Lake Tom brings up an important point. When I buy a laptop, I always go for the faster drive (7200 rpm). I don't think the faster drive uses much more electricity because I get excellent battery life. On the desktop side of things I don't know if there is a cost effective faster drive that could be used as the C drive. Hmm... just thought of this -- on XP, I wonder if a high speed flash drive could contain the swap file..... On Vista, I think Ready Boost is a gimmick. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Core 2 Duo Processor
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:18:06 -0600, Journey wrote:
Hmm... just thought of this -- on XP, I wonder if a high speed flash drive could contain the swap file..... Forget what I said about a flash drive being used for a swap file. If that could be done and had any benefit obviously we'd already know about it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Core 2 Duo Processor
Hi!
I'm running XP Pro and am wondering if its truly able to support the Core funcionality of this processor. XP (even with SP2) predates the introduction of the Core2 Duo processor and therefore doesn't make use of everything the Core2 chip is capable of doing. Which isn't necessarily bad or a shortcoming...it is just the way things are. Core2 Duo chips are capable of running a 64-bit OS, such as Windows XP x64 edition. (I don't recommend you do this--it can be quite frustrating!) I'm going from a 550mhz processor 5 years old so was expecting a lot more speed from the core 2 duo. There are some applications that will only ever go so fast. Word processing and spreadsheeting programs really don't get a lot faster as time goes by for most users. Web browsing can still be done quite comfortably on a decently equipped Pentium II or III machine. You also have to think about the supporting components outside of the processor. It is possible to "starve" a processor for data if the disk and memory subsystems in the computer cannot keep up. This will hamper the processor's ability to perform at its best. As an example, a well configured Pentium III with plenty of RAM and a fast disk subsystem will outperform a newer system that is short on RAM with a slow disk. Another example--if you're going to edit video on a computer, you wouldn't equip it with a Core2 Duo processor, 256MB RAM and a 4200 RPM hard disk. The processor would be too fast for the supporting components and would always be waiting on them, wasting its higher operating speed. William |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Core 2 Duo Processor
Hi!
Forget what I said about a flash drive being used for a swap file. If that could be done and had any benefit obviously we'd already know about it. The key problem is that flash memory isn't really all that fast. It is getting faster every day, however. I haven't tried ReadyBoost (not using Vista on production hardware, don't own a memory key capable of it, don't really care, etc...) but I'd have to think the limiting factor there would be USB bandwidth as opposed to flash memory speed. William |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is RAM Dedicated by Core in Mutli-Core Processor Systems? | JB | General | 3 | August 12th 07 07:36 PM |
Do I REALLY need a dual core processor? | No one | Overclocking AMD Processors | 9 | November 12th 06 06:49 PM |
Core 2 Duo Processor | Craig | Dell Computers | 7 | September 3rd 06 03:14 AM |
Would a dual core processor help me with this? | Don | General | 20 | April 3rd 06 09:00 PM |
VIA twin-core processor | Yousuf Khan | General | 6 | November 2nd 04 02:28 AM |