If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Maximum logical drive size that will allow scandisk to run
A friend of mine runs Windows 98 SE. He has an 80 gig drive partitioned
as one logical drive. He can not run scandisk. Windows says he does not have enough memory. He says he has 240 megs of ram. What is the maximum logical drive size that will allow scandisk to run on his system? Would more ram help or does scandisk use conventional memory only? Thank you in advance for all replies. -- the only way I could keep my cat off the kitchen table would be to tie him up with a cable then he would be unable to get on the table |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel Prince wrote:
A friend of mine runs Windows 98 SE. He has an 80 gig drive partitioned as one logical drive. He can not run scandisk. Windows says he does not have enough memory. He says he has 240 megs of ram. What is the maximum logical drive size that will allow scandisk to run on his system? Would more ram help or does scandisk use conventional memory only? Thank you in advance for all replies. I dunno, but this machine runs W98SE and just finished a scandisk on an 80 gig drive partitioned as one big disk with only 256 MB of RAM. Does your friend have a lot of programs open when he tries? Does your friend have all MSFT's patches applied? -- After being targeted with gigabytes of trash by the "SWEN" worm, I have concluded we must conceal our e-mail address. Our true address is the mirror image of what you see before the "@" symbol. It's a shame such steps are necessary. ...Charlie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
He did not use Microsoft format, and chose a small cluster size that results
in too large FAT for DOS. Reformat and reinstall Windows. "Daniel Prince" wrote in message news A friend of mine runs Windows 98 SE. He has an 80 gig drive partitioned as one logical drive. He can not run scandisk. Windows says he does not have enough memory. He says he has 240 megs of ram. What is the maximum logical drive size that will allow scandisk to run on his system? Would more ram help or does scandisk use conventional memory only? Thank you in advance for all replies. -- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel Prince wrote in message news A friend of mine runs Windows 98 SE. He has an 80 gig drive partitioned as one logical drive. He can not run scandisk. Windows says he does not have enough memory. Thats a scandisk problem usually caused by too many clusters in the partition, caused by the use of non standard cluster sizes. http://support.microsoft.com/default...d=kb;ko;229154 He says he has 240 megs of ram. Thats irrelevant. What is the maximum logical drive size that will allow scandisk to run on his system? That drive would be fine if standard cluster sizes had been used. Would more ram help Nope. or does scandisk use conventional memory only? Its more complicated than that. Its a 16 bit app which does have a problem with not having access to enough memory to handle all the clusters if a non standard cluster size is used. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
CJT wrote:
Daniel Prince wrote: A friend of mine runs Windows 98 SE. He has an 80 gig drive partitioned as one logical drive. He can not run scandisk. Windows says he does not have enough memory. He says he has 240 megs of ram. What is the maximum logical drive size that will allow scandisk to run on his system? Would more ram help or does scandisk use conventional memory only? Thank you in advance for all replies. I dunno, but this machine runs W98SE and just finished a scandisk on an 80 gig drive partitioned as one big disk with only 256 MB of RAM. Does your friend have a lot of programs open when he tries? Does your friend have all MSFT's patches applied? I am afraid that I do not know what MSFT patches are. I assume that MS is Microsoft but I do not know what FT is. -- the only way I could keep my cat off the kitchen table would be to tie him up with a cable then he would be unable to get on the table |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel Prince wrote:
CJT wrote: Daniel Prince wrote: A friend of mine runs Windows 98 SE. He has an 80 gig drive partitioned as one logical drive. He can not run scandisk. Windows says he does not have enough memory. He says he has 240 megs of ram. What is the maximum logical drive size that will allow scandisk to run on his system? Would more ram help or does scandisk use conventional memory only? Thank you in advance for all replies. I dunno, but this machine runs W98SE and just finished a scandisk on an 80 gig drive partitioned as one big disk with only 256 MB of RAM. Does your friend have a lot of programs open when he tries? Does your friend have all MSFT's patches applied? I am afraid that I do not know what MSFT patches are. I assume that MS is Microsoft but I do not know what FT is. MSFT is Microsoft's stock ticker symbol. So the question is whether all Microsoft's patches have been applied. -- After being targeted with gigabytes of trash by the "SWEN" worm, I have concluded we must conceal our e-mail address. Our true address is the mirror image of what you see before the "@" symbol. It's a shame such steps are necessary. ...Charlie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 23:53:54 GMT, Daniel Prince
wrote: A friend of mine runs Windows 98 SE. He has an 80 gig drive partitioned as one logical drive. He can not run scandisk. Windows says he does not have enough memory. He says he has 240 megs of ram. What is the maximum logical drive size that will allow scandisk to run on his system? Would more ram help or does scandisk use conventional memory only? Thank you in advance for all replies. weird. On the new Large drives bigger than 128Gig, the documentation says to keep partitions to 128Gig or less for older disk utilities to work. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Are there any good free utils to use instead of scandisk. I have a 160G set
as one large data partition and would like to be able to check it. wrote in message ... On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 23:53:54 GMT, Daniel Prince wrote: A friend of mine runs Windows 98 SE. He has an 80 gig drive partitioned as one logical drive. He can not run scandisk. Windows says he does not have enough memory. He says he has 240 megs of ram. What is the maximum logical drive size that will allow scandisk to run on his system? Would more ram help or does scandisk use conventional memory only? Thank you in advance for all replies. weird. On the new Large drives bigger than 128Gig, the documentation says to keep partitions to 128Gig or less for older disk utilities to work. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why should there be? Windows 98/ME does not support that configuration. Get
a supported OS. "Jim" wrote in message news:BX3Gb.640829$Fm2.572151@attbi_s04... Are there any good free utils to use instead of scandisk. I have a 160G set as one large data partition and would like to be able to check it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Eric Gisin wrote in message ... Why should there be? Because some may choose to use drives that large, stupid. Windows 98/ME does not support that configuration. Get a supported OS. Just one way. Jim wrote Are there any good free utils to use instead of scandisk. I have a 160G set as one large data partition and would like to be able to check it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
corrupted partition table - help needed! | Justin Case | General | 0 | August 3rd 04 09:22 AM |
Primary Hard Disk Drive 1 Not Found | brandon | General Hardware | 5 | July 18th 04 11:39 PM |
my new mobo o/c's great | rockerrock | Overclocking AMD Processors | 9 | June 30th 04 08:17 PM |
FDISK, HDD #s, don't know how to install two HDDs. | sunslight | Storage (alternative) | 14 | October 29th 03 07:56 PM |
Is my data lost? Partition Table Trouble w/ 200GB WD 2000JB drive. Help!! | Carlos R. | Storage (alternative) | 9 | September 3rd 03 08:55 PM |