If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RAID5 SATA rebuild times
Hi, does anyone have any practical experience with rebuild times of
SATA arrays? I've heard many recommendations suggesting that RAID5 SATA arrays with big (750GB, 1TB) disks should not have too many spindles due to long rebuild times - but how many spindles is 'too many'? I currently work on the basis of anything between 4+1 to 7+1 and it would be nice to have some evidence to support this. RAID6 would help but that's not an option unfortunately. Thanks Jono |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
RAID5 SATA rebuild times
On Feb 7, 2:30 pm, Jono968 wrote:
Hi, does anyone have any practical experience with rebuild times of SATA arrays? I've heard many recommendations suggesting that RAID5 SATA arrays with big (750GB, 1TB) disks should not have too many spindles due to long rebuild times - but how many spindles is 'too many'? I just finished a test early this morning on a Nexsan SATABoy containing a 13-member RAID-6 set consisting of 750GB drives (with 1 hot spare in the 14-drive enclosure). We yanked a drive out and watched the rebuild - it took 18.5 hours. There wasn't much load on the array during this time and the rebuild priority was set to "medium" - 3 on a scale of 1 to 5. How many spindles is "too many" depends on how you define "long rebuild times" and what level of risk you want to have while the raidset is rebuilding. Personally, I think that 18.5 hours is pretty darn good for a 7.5TB raidset. I did not do a test of a rebuild on a RAID5 set on this array. .../Ed |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
RAID5 SATA rebuild times
Jono968 wrote:
Hi, does anyone have any practical experience with rebuild times of SATA arrays? I've heard many recommendations suggesting that RAID5 SATA arrays with big (750GB, 1TB) disks should not have too many spindles due to long rebuild times - but how many spindles is 'too many'? I currently work on the basis of anything between 4+1 to 7+1 and it would be nice to have some evidence to support this. RAID6 would help but that's not an option unfortunately. The rebuild time of a SATA or SCSI or FC RAID5 array is as dependent on the raid controller as it is on number of spindles in the array and the trade-off between performance hit during the rebuild and the desire to restore redundancy. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help rebuild SATA Mirrored Pair | Dead Dead Money | Storage (alternative) | 9 | July 14th 07 12:02 AM |
After RAID5 rebuild I get a disk E: check every boot | John7 | Asus Motherboards | 1 | April 24th 06 10:43 PM |
SATA RAID5: low cost suggestions pls. | Zeneca | Asus Motherboards | 2 | November 28th 05 03:52 PM |