If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Harddisks: Seek, Read, Write, Read, Write, Slow ?
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:38:50 +0200, "Folkert Rienstra"
wrote: snip Is this a hardware issue ? ( Harddisk Read Head and Harddisk Write Head can't work together like this and an extra seek is needed ? ) There are NOT two heads Yes there are, you mighty clueless one. Actually, the document you quote seems to prove you wrong. A bit of sloppy writing in the document that confused you probably. "The head consists of a thin film inductive write element and an MR read element. "The head consists..." Now, english is not my native language, but I think "the head" clearly indicates ONE head. Otherwise they would have said "the heads" But that single head has two elements: a write element and a read element. The read element is typically narrower than the write element to improve the off-track performance. In practice, there is an offset between the center of the read and write elements due to the longitudinal separation of the elements. When used with a rotary actuator, the head is skewed with respect to the tracks as the actuator moves across the disk. The result is a lateral offset between the read and write head centerlines. This statement is completely logical when you have one head with two elements. It doesn't make sense when you would have two seperate heads. Optimum performance is achieved by centering the read head over the data track for read operations, and centering the write head over the data track for write operations. This operation will cause the read head to be partially off-track during a write operation. " Here the confusion starts. The document suddenly speaks about "read heads". But that doesn't make any sense when you compare it to the first part of the document. But if you replace the words "read head" and "write head" with "read element" and "write element" it makes perfect sense again. Source: IBM/HGST http://www.hgst.com/hdd/ipl/oem/tech/noid.htm Looking at that document it becomes crystal clear that there is only 1 head with a write and a read element, but that the author sometimes uses "read head" where it should really be "read element". but just a single head per disk surface. That head both reads and writes No, it doesn't. Yes it does. It's clearly shown in that info from IBM/HGST. but can do only one or the other at a given instant. There is a finite switch time between read and write mode. Because of the 2 heads, one aligned behind the other. One head, with 2 elements. One behind the other. As you can clearly see in figure 4 on the webpage you have pointed at yourself. Marc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|