If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Toshiba Satellite problem
Hey, all,
I'm back with a problem that I hope is curable, but I fear the worst. I was given a Satellite A45-S250 by a family member. It intermittently booted up but didn't run for long. It had the problem of BSD after memory dump on a regular basis. I looked up the error message and many suggested bad RAM. I replaced the RAM with known good RAM and the problem persisted. I disabled all the peripherals I could and tried to load a fresh install of XP. This didn't work. Long story, short: I thought I might have a burnt CPU so I took out the P4-2.8 Celeron that runs at 533 and replaced with a P4 M 1.6 that runs at 400. According to the Toshiba website the mobo should run either. I tried booting the laptop with the 1.6 and it wouldn't boot. So I replaced the 1.6 with the original 2.8 and now the laptop won't boot at all with the 2.8. It does not go into the BIOS even though the lights come on and I hear activity in the cd-rom. I fear that I might have blown the motherboard. Anyway, if anyone has suggestions as to what I might do at this point beyond getting a new mobo I'd like to hear them. Again, thanks to any and all who take the time to suggest possibilities. JG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Toshiba Satellite problem
JFG wrote:
Hey, all, I'm back with a problem that I hope is curable, but I fear the worst. I was given a Satellite A45-S250 by a family member. It intermittently booted up but didn't run for long. It had the problem of BSD after memory dump on a regular basis. I looked up the error message and many suggested bad RAM. I replaced the RAM with known good RAM and the problem persisted. I disabled all the peripherals I could and tried to load a fresh install of XP. This didn't work. Long story, short: I thought I might have a burnt CPU so I took out the P4-2.8 Celeron that runs at 533 and replaced with a P4 M 1.6 that runs at 400. According to the Toshiba website the mobo should run either. I tried booting the laptop with the 1.6 and it wouldn't boot. So I replaced the 1.6 with the original 2.8 and now the laptop won't boot at all with the 2.8. It does not go into the BIOS even though the lights come on and I hear activity in the cd-rom. I fear that I might have blown the motherboard. Anyway, if anyone has suggestions as to what I might do at this point beyond getting a new mobo I'd like to hear them. Again, thanks to any and all who take the time to suggest possibilities. JG Examine the socket and the processor carefully, for connection problems. If there is a lever, or a screw that clamps the ZIF socket into place, make sure it is secure. Make sure the physical assembly was all put back the same way (thermal paste, heatpipe heatsink onto processor, and so on). The Celeron would not burn, because it would have THERMTRIP. If the heatsink falls off, the THERMTRIP signal is available to kill power to the processor. So in theory, you shouldn't be able to burn a processor. Both modern Intel and AMD processors now have THERMTRIP. You'd have to go back to some of the early Athlons, to find cases where the protection is less than ideal. (My AthlonXP motherboard, has a separate eight pin chip, which monitors the temperature and does the equivalent of THERMTRIP.) You can check for THERMTRIP, by downloading the datasheet for the processor. One way to do that, is go through the list of Celerons here, select an appropriate one, and then see of there is a documentation link. http://processorfinder.intel.com/ I wouldn't panic yet, because I interpret your results to suggest something isn't assembled right. Like turning the screw on one of those small ZIF sockets, to lock it. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Toshiba Satellite problem
"Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: Hey, all, I'm back with a problem that I hope is curable, but I fear the worst. I was given a Satellite A45-S250 by a family member. It intermittently booted up but didn't run for long. It had the problem of BSD after memory dump on a regular basis. I looked up the error message and many suggested bad RAM. I replaced the RAM with known good RAM and the problem persisted. I disabled all the peripherals I could and tried to load a fresh install of XP. This didn't work. Long story, short: I thought I might have a burnt CPU so I took out the P4-2.8 Celeron that runs at 533 and replaced with a P4 M 1.6 that runs at 400. According to the Toshiba website the mobo should run either. I tried booting the laptop with the 1.6 and it wouldn't boot. So I replaced the 1.6 with the original 2.8 and now the laptop won't boot at all with the 2.8. It does not go into the BIOS even though the lights come on and I hear activity in the cd-rom. I fear that I might have blown the motherboard. Anyway, if anyone has suggestions as to what I might do at this point beyond getting a new mobo I'd like to hear them. Again, thanks to any and all who take the time to suggest possibilities. JG Examine the socket and the processor carefully, for connection problems. If there is a lever, or a screw that clamps the ZIF socket into place, make sure it is secure. Make sure the physical assembly was all put back the same way (thermal paste, heatpipe heatsink onto processor, and so on). The Celeron would not burn, because it would have THERMTRIP. If the heatsink falls off, the THERMTRIP signal is available to kill power to the processor. So in theory, you shouldn't be able to burn a processor. Both modern Intel and AMD processors now have THERMTRIP. You'd have to go back to some of the early Athlons, to find cases where the protection is less than ideal. (My AthlonXP motherboard, has a separate eight pin chip, which monitors the temperature and does the equivalent of THERMTRIP.) You can check for THERMTRIP, by downloading the datasheet for the processor. One way to do that, is go through the list of Celerons here, select an appropriate one, and then see of there is a documentation link. http://processorfinder.intel.com/ I wouldn't panic yet, because I interpret your results to suggest something isn't assembled right. Like turning the screw on one of those small ZIF sockets, to lock it. Paul Great post, Paul. Very good information. The cpu socket is one of those with a lever. I checked the cpu itself for bent pins, etc and it appears ok. It is locked tight in place and I'm pretty sure I put the cooler assembly back correctly. You've convinced me that I haven't burnt the cpu and now I'm wondering if I didn't do some harm to the motherboard. The laptop wasn't working properly when I started on this project and now it doesn't go to BIOS. I haven't completely given up on the one I have yet. I'll try reassembling it today. I'm thinking that what I'll end up doing is buying an equivalent unit from ebay with a broken screen and missing parts. I'll cannabalize the one I have and make one good one. Thanks for your response. JG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Toshiba Satellite problem
JFG wrote:
"Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: Hey, all, I'm back with a problem that I hope is curable, but I fear the worst. I was given a Satellite A45-S250 by a family member. It intermittently booted up but didn't run for long. It had the problem of BSD after memory dump on a regular basis. I looked up the error message and many suggested bad RAM. I replaced the RAM with known good RAM and the problem persisted. I disabled all the peripherals I could and tried to load a fresh install of XP. This didn't work. Long story, short: I thought I might have a burnt CPU so I took out the P4-2.8 Celeron that runs at 533 and replaced with a P4 M 1.6 that runs at 400. According to the Toshiba website the mobo should run either. I tried booting the laptop with the 1.6 and it wouldn't boot. So I replaced the 1.6 with the original 2.8 and now the laptop won't boot at all with the 2.8. It does not go into the BIOS even though the lights come on and I hear activity in the cd-rom. I fear that I might have blown the motherboard. Anyway, if anyone has suggestions as to what I might do at this point beyond getting a new mobo I'd like to hear them. Again, thanks to any and all who take the time to suggest possibilities. JG Examine the socket and the processor carefully, for connection problems. If there is a lever, or a screw that clamps the ZIF socket into place, make sure it is secure. Make sure the physical assembly was all put back the same way (thermal paste, heatpipe heatsink onto processor, and so on). The Celeron would not burn, because it would have THERMTRIP. If the heatsink falls off, the THERMTRIP signal is available to kill power to the processor. So in theory, you shouldn't be able to burn a processor. Both modern Intel and AMD processors now have THERMTRIP. You'd have to go back to some of the early Athlons, to find cases where the protection is less than ideal. (My AthlonXP motherboard, has a separate eight pin chip, which monitors the temperature and does the equivalent of THERMTRIP.) You can check for THERMTRIP, by downloading the datasheet for the processor. One way to do that, is go through the list of Celerons here, select an appropriate one, and then see of there is a documentation link. http://processorfinder.intel.com/ I wouldn't panic yet, because I interpret your results to suggest something isn't assembled right. Like turning the screw on one of those small ZIF sockets, to lock it. Paul Great post, Paul. Very good information. The cpu socket is one of those with a lever. I checked the cpu itself for bent pins, etc and it appears ok. It is locked tight in place and I'm pretty sure I put the cooler assembly back correctly. You've convinced me that I haven't burnt the cpu and now I'm wondering if I didn't do some harm to the motherboard. The laptop wasn't working properly when I started on this project and now it doesn't go to BIOS. I haven't completely given up on the one I have yet. I'll try reassembling it today. I'm thinking that what I'll end up doing is buying an equivalent unit from ebay with a broken screen and missing parts. I'll cannabalize the one I have and make one good one. Thanks for your response. JG To know exactly what you did, I'd want the SLxxx number off both processors. One of the differences on a mobile processor, is there are a couple signals for SpeedStep. But that shouldn't harm it. For example, people buy SL726 processors, and install them in desktop boards, to overclock them. You can raise an SL726 to FSB1200, causing the core to run at 3.6GHz, and I'm told they run pretty cool while doing so. So I don't necessarily see the installation of a mobile processor, as a death sentence. But to know more, you'd want to use the code on the processor, and look it up, to see exactly what it is. From that generation, I don't know if there are any ULV (ultra low voltage) versions of S478 chips or not. But it is easiest to trace this info, by using the SLxxx number. This is the mobile that overclocks so nice. It runs at a lower speed than the stated values on this page, when plugged into a desktop board, which is why it ends up at FSB1200 and 3.6GHz core. The reason I'm interested in that one, is it would fit perfectly in my current motherboard (P4C800-E Deluxe), which can apparently overclock that high. I've run into a few people who buy these, and don't know what a good deal they got (they're puzzled by the speed it runs at). http://processorfinder.intel.com/Det...px?sSpec=sl726 Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Toshiba Satellite problem
"Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: "Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: Hey, all, I'm back with a problem that I hope is curable, but I fear the worst. I was given a Satellite A45-S250 by a family member. It intermittently booted up but didn't run for long. It had the problem of BSD after memory dump on a regular basis. I looked up the error message and many suggested bad RAM. I replaced the RAM with known good RAM and the problem persisted. I disabled all the peripherals I could and tried to load a fresh install of XP. This didn't work. Long story, short: I thought I might have a burnt CPU so I took out the P4-2.8 Celeron that runs at 533 and replaced with a P4 M 1.6 that runs at 400. According to the Toshiba website the mobo should run either. I tried booting the laptop with the 1.6 and it wouldn't boot. So I replaced the 1.6 with the original 2.8 and now the laptop won't boot at all with the 2.8. It does not go into the BIOS even though the lights come on and I hear activity in the cd-rom. I fear that I might have blown the motherboard. Anyway, if anyone has suggestions as to what I might do at this point beyond getting a new mobo I'd like to hear them. Again, thanks to any and all who take the time to suggest possibilities. JG Examine the socket and the processor carefully, for connection problems. If there is a lever, or a screw that clamps the ZIF socket into place, make sure it is secure. Make sure the physical assembly was all put back the same way (thermal paste, heatpipe heatsink onto processor, and so on). The Celeron would not burn, because it would have THERMTRIP. If the heatsink falls off, the THERMTRIP signal is available to kill power to the processor. So in theory, you shouldn't be able to burn a processor. Both modern Intel and AMD processors now have THERMTRIP. You'd have to go back to some of the early Athlons, to find cases where the protection is less than ideal. (My AthlonXP motherboard, has a separate eight pin chip, which monitors the temperature and does the equivalent of THERMTRIP.) You can check for THERMTRIP, by downloading the datasheet for the processor. One way to do that, is go through the list of Celerons here, select an appropriate one, and then see of there is a documentation link. http://processorfinder.intel.com/ I wouldn't panic yet, because I interpret your results to suggest something isn't assembled right. Like turning the screw on one of those small ZIF sockets, to lock it. Paul Great post, Paul. Very good information. The cpu socket is one of those with a lever. I checked the cpu itself for bent pins, etc and it appears ok. It is locked tight in place and I'm pretty sure I put the cooler assembly back correctly. You've convinced me that I haven't burnt the cpu and now I'm wondering if I didn't do some harm to the motherboard. The laptop wasn't working properly when I started on this project and now it doesn't go to BIOS. I haven't completely given up on the one I have yet. I'll try reassembling it today. I'm thinking that what I'll end up doing is buying an equivalent unit from ebay with a broken screen and missing parts. I'll cannabalize the one I have and make one good one. Thanks for your response. JG To know exactly what you did, I'd want the SLxxx number off both processors. One of the differences on a mobile processor, is there are a couple signals for SpeedStep. But that shouldn't harm it. For example, people buy SL726 processors, and install them in desktop boards, to overclock them. You can raise an SL726 to FSB1200, causing the core to run at 3.6GHz, and I'm told they run pretty cool while doing so. So I don't necessarily see the installation of a mobile processor, as a death sentence. But to know more, you'd want to use the code on the processor, and look it up, to see exactly what it is. From that generation, I don't know if there are any ULV (ultra low voltage) versions of S478 chips or not. But it is easiest to trace this info, by using the SLxxx number. This is the mobile that overclocks so nice. It runs at a lower speed than the stated values on this page, when plugged into a desktop board, which is why it ends up at FSB1200 and 3.6GHz core. The reason I'm interested in that one, is it would fit perfectly in my current motherboard (P4C800-E Deluxe), which can apparently overclock that high. I've run into a few people who buy these, and don't know what a good deal they got (they're puzzled by the speed it runs at). http://processorfinder.intel.com/Det...px?sSpec=sl726 Paul Turns out that you were 100% correct. I had not put the original CPU back in correctly. It was slightly cocked and rocked a little before putting down the lever. After installing correctly, the laptop then booted. So, no harm no foul on the CPU switch. However, the original problem remains - that is, the occasional BSD with the quick message of memory dump. I have a couple of new sticks of RAM coming in and I'll see if that makes a difference. Meanwhile I've bid on an equivalent model on eBay that has no peripherals and a broken screen. If the motherboard on that one works, I'll be in high cotton if I win it and can cannabalize my unit successfully. I have to wait one week for that since the auction doesn't end until then. In the nonce, I'll continue to fool around with the one I have here. I appreciate your taking the time to find out all the helpful information. Best, JG |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Toshiba Satellite problem
"JFG" wrote in message newsuu5k.156704$TT4.5397@attbi_s22... "Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: "Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: Hey, all, I'm back with a problem that I hope is curable, but I fear the worst. I was given a Satellite A45-S250 by a family member. It intermittently booted up but didn't run for long. It had the problem of BSD after memory dump on a regular basis. I looked up the error message and many suggested bad RAM. I replaced the RAM with known good RAM and the problem persisted. I disabled all the peripherals I could and tried to load a fresh install of XP. This didn't work. Long story, short: I thought I might have a burnt CPU so I took out the P4-2.8 Celeron that runs at 533 and replaced with a P4 M 1.6 that runs at 400. According to the Toshiba website the mobo should run either. I tried booting the laptop with the 1.6 and it wouldn't boot. So I replaced the 1.6 with the original 2.8 and now the laptop won't boot at all with the 2.8. It does not go into the BIOS even though the lights come on and I hear activity in the cd-rom. I fear that I might have blown the motherboard. Anyway, if anyone has suggestions as to what I might do at this point beyond getting a new mobo I'd like to hear them. Again, thanks to any and all who take the time to suggest possibilities. JG Examine the socket and the processor carefully, for connection problems. If there is a lever, or a screw that clamps the ZIF socket into place, make sure it is secure. Make sure the physical assembly was all put back the same way (thermal paste, heatpipe heatsink onto processor, and so on). The Celeron would not burn, because it would have THERMTRIP. If the heatsink falls off, the THERMTRIP signal is available to kill power to the processor. So in theory, you shouldn't be able to burn a processor. Both modern Intel and AMD processors now have THERMTRIP. You'd have to go back to some of the early Athlons, to find cases where the protection is less than ideal. (My AthlonXP motherboard, has a separate eight pin chip, which monitors the temperature and does the equivalent of THERMTRIP.) You can check for THERMTRIP, by downloading the datasheet for the processor. One way to do that, is go through the list of Celerons here, select an appropriate one, and then see of there is a documentation link. http://processorfinder.intel.com/ I wouldn't panic yet, because I interpret your results to suggest something isn't assembled right. Like turning the screw on one of those small ZIF sockets, to lock it. Paul Great post, Paul. Very good information. The cpu socket is one of those with a lever. I checked the cpu itself for bent pins, etc and it appears ok. It is locked tight in place and I'm pretty sure I put the cooler assembly back correctly. You've convinced me that I haven't burnt the cpu and now I'm wondering if I didn't do some harm to the motherboard. The laptop wasn't working properly when I started on this project and now it doesn't go to BIOS. I haven't completely given up on the one I have yet. I'll try reassembling it today. I'm thinking that what I'll end up doing is buying an equivalent unit from ebay with a broken screen and missing parts. I'll cannabalize the one I have and make one good one. Thanks for your response. JG To know exactly what you did, I'd want the SLxxx number off both processors. One of the differences on a mobile processor, is there are a couple signals for SpeedStep. But that shouldn't harm it. For example, people buy SL726 processors, and install them in desktop boards, to overclock them. You can raise an SL726 to FSB1200, causing the core to run at 3.6GHz, and I'm told they run pretty cool while doing so. So I don't necessarily see the installation of a mobile processor, as a death sentence. But to know more, you'd want to use the code on the processor, and look it up, to see exactly what it is. From that generation, I don't know if there are any ULV (ultra low voltage) versions of S478 chips or not. But it is easiest to trace this info, by using the SLxxx number. This is the mobile that overclocks so nice. It runs at a lower speed than the stated values on this page, when plugged into a desktop board, which is why it ends up at FSB1200 and 3.6GHz core. The reason I'm interested in that one, is it would fit perfectly in my current motherboard (P4C800-E Deluxe), which can apparently overclock that high. I've run into a few people who buy these, and don't know what a good deal they got (they're puzzled by the speed it runs at). http://processorfinder.intel.com/Det...px?sSpec=sl726 Paul Turns out that you were 100% correct. I had not put the original CPU back in correctly. It was slightly cocked and rocked a little before putting down the lever. After installing correctly, the laptop then booted. So, no harm no foul on the CPU switch. However, the original problem remains - that is, the occasional BSD with the quick message of memory dump. I have a couple of new sticks of RAM coming in and I'll see if that makes a difference. Meanwhile I've bid on an equivalent model on eBay that has no peripherals and a broken screen. If the motherboard on that one works, I'll be in high cotton if I win it and can cannabalize my unit successfully. I have to wait one week for that since the auction doesn't end until then. In the nonce, I'll continue to fool around with the one I have here. I appreciate your taking the time to find out all the helpful information. Best, JG Follow-up for those interested in this problem: It turned out to be a defective cpu. I replaced the 2.8 with a known good 2.6 and the machine behaves as it should. I guess that the original cpu was overheated and burnt in some way. Best, JG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Toshiba Satellite problem
JFG wrote:
"JFG" wrote in message newsuu5k.156704$TT4.5397@attbi_s22... "Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: "Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: Hey, all, I'm back with a problem that I hope is curable, but I fear the worst. I was given a Satellite A45-S250 by a family member. It intermittently booted up but didn't run for long. It had the problem of BSD after memory dump on a regular basis. I looked up the error message and many suggested bad RAM. I replaced the RAM with known good RAM and the problem persisted. I disabled all the peripherals I could and tried to load a fresh install of XP. This didn't work. Long story, short: I thought I might have a burnt CPU so I took out the P4-2.8 Celeron that runs at 533 and replaced with a P4 M 1.6 that runs at 400. According to the Toshiba website the mobo should run either. I tried booting the laptop with the 1.6 and it wouldn't boot. So I replaced the 1.6 with the original 2.8 and now the laptop won't boot at all with the 2.8. It does not go into the BIOS even though the lights come on and I hear activity in the cd-rom. I fear that I might have blown the motherboard. Anyway, if anyone has suggestions as to what I might do at this point beyond getting a new mobo I'd like to hear them. Again, thanks to any and all who take the time to suggest possibilities. JG Examine the socket and the processor carefully, for connection problems. If there is a lever, or a screw that clamps the ZIF socket into place, make sure it is secure. Make sure the physical assembly was all put back the same way (thermal paste, heatpipe heatsink onto processor, and so on). The Celeron would not burn, because it would have THERMTRIP. If the heatsink falls off, the THERMTRIP signal is available to kill power to the processor. So in theory, you shouldn't be able to burn a processor. Both modern Intel and AMD processors now have THERMTRIP. You'd have to go back to some of the early Athlons, to find cases where the protection is less than ideal. (My AthlonXP motherboard, has a separate eight pin chip, which monitors the temperature and does the equivalent of THERMTRIP.) You can check for THERMTRIP, by downloading the datasheet for the processor. One way to do that, is go through the list of Celerons here, select an appropriate one, and then see of there is a documentation link. http://processorfinder.intel.com/ I wouldn't panic yet, because I interpret your results to suggest something isn't assembled right. Like turning the screw on one of those small ZIF sockets, to lock it. Paul Great post, Paul. Very good information. The cpu socket is one of those with a lever. I checked the cpu itself for bent pins, etc and it appears ok. It is locked tight in place and I'm pretty sure I put the cooler assembly back correctly. You've convinced me that I haven't burnt the cpu and now I'm wondering if I didn't do some harm to the motherboard. The laptop wasn't working properly when I started on this project and now it doesn't go to BIOS. I haven't completely given up on the one I have yet. I'll try reassembling it today. I'm thinking that what I'll end up doing is buying an equivalent unit from ebay with a broken screen and missing parts. I'll cannabalize the one I have and make one good one. Thanks for your response. JG To know exactly what you did, I'd want the SLxxx number off both processors. One of the differences on a mobile processor, is there are a couple signals for SpeedStep. But that shouldn't harm it. For example, people buy SL726 processors, and install them in desktop boards, to overclock them. You can raise an SL726 to FSB1200, causing the core to run at 3.6GHz, and I'm told they run pretty cool while doing so. So I don't necessarily see the installation of a mobile processor, as a death sentence. But to know more, you'd want to use the code on the processor, and look it up, to see exactly what it is. From that generation, I don't know if there are any ULV (ultra low voltage) versions of S478 chips or not. But it is easiest to trace this info, by using the SLxxx number. This is the mobile that overclocks so nice. It runs at a lower speed than the stated values on this page, when plugged into a desktop board, which is why it ends up at FSB1200 and 3.6GHz core. The reason I'm interested in that one, is it would fit perfectly in my current motherboard (P4C800-E Deluxe), which can apparently overclock that high. I've run into a few people who buy these, and don't know what a good deal they got (they're puzzled by the speed it runs at). http://processorfinder.intel.com/Det...px?sSpec=sl726 Paul Turns out that you were 100% correct. I had not put the original CPU back in correctly. It was slightly cocked and rocked a little before putting down the lever. After installing correctly, the laptop then booted. So, no harm no foul on the CPU switch. However, the original problem remains - that is, the occasional BSD with the quick message of memory dump. I have a couple of new sticks of RAM coming in and I'll see if that makes a difference. Meanwhile I've bid on an equivalent model on eBay that has no peripherals and a broken screen. If the motherboard on that one works, I'll be in high cotton if I win it and can cannabalize my unit successfully. I have to wait one week for that since the auction doesn't end until then. In the nonce, I'll continue to fool around with the one I have here. I appreciate your taking the time to find out all the helpful information. Best, JG Follow-up for those interested in this problem: It turned out to be a defective cpu. I replaced the 2.8 with a known good 2.6 and the machine behaves as it should. I guess that the original cpu was overheated and burnt in some way. Best, JG There are other ways to kill a processor besides heat. It will be interesting now, to see how long the replacement processor lasts. As an example, Northwood processors are sensitive to excessive Vcore, and some overclockers noted their processor croaked instantly, at a certain voltage. If something on the motherboard of the laptop, is not regulating power properly, it could place a voltage on there, which shortens the life of the processor. The Arrhenius equation provides a mechanism to relate temperature, to operating life, but generally speaking, this doesn't seem to be an issue for the average life of computers. Most people upgrade, before any thermal limit seems to be reached. One of the video card companies, did a reliability calculation of one of their competitor's offerings, in the hopes of scaring customers away. The calculation predicted a short life for the video card, like a year or less. But I never noticed any rash of those products dying. Good reliability calculations, use field data collected from previous failures, to adjust the equations to give better results. But that was not the first time I was scared unnecessarily by such calculations. The first big system I worked on, the reliability calculation said the Intel processor used, would be more unreliable, than any other piece of hardware in the equipment. Which was pure B.S. Paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Toshiba Satellite problem
"Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: "JFG" wrote in message newsuu5k.156704$TT4.5397@attbi_s22... "Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: "Paul" wrote in message ... JFG wrote: Hey, all, I'm back with a problem that I hope is curable, but I fear the worst. I was given a Satellite A45-S250 by a family member. It intermittently booted up but didn't run for long. It had the problem of BSD after memory dump on a regular basis. I looked up the error message and many suggested bad RAM. I replaced the RAM with known good RAM and the problem persisted. I disabled all the peripherals I could and tried to load a fresh install of XP. This didn't work. Long story, short: I thought I might have a burnt CPU so I took out the P4-2.8 Celeron that runs at 533 and replaced with a P4 M 1.6 that runs at 400. According to the Toshiba website the mobo should run either. I tried booting the laptop with the 1.6 and it wouldn't boot. So I replaced the 1.6 with the original 2.8 and now the laptop won't boot at all with the 2.8. It does not go into the BIOS even though the lights come on and I hear activity in the cd-rom. I fear that I might have blown the motherboard. Anyway, if anyone has suggestions as to what I might do at this point beyond getting a new mobo I'd like to hear them. Again, thanks to any and all who take the time to suggest possibilities. JG Examine the socket and the processor carefully, for connection problems. If there is a lever, or a screw that clamps the ZIF socket into place, make sure it is secure. Make sure the physical assembly was all put back the same way (thermal paste, heatpipe heatsink onto processor, and so on). The Celeron would not burn, because it would have THERMTRIP. If the heatsink falls off, the THERMTRIP signal is available to kill power to the processor. So in theory, you shouldn't be able to burn a processor. Both modern Intel and AMD processors now have THERMTRIP. You'd have to go back to some of the early Athlons, to find cases where the protection is less than ideal. (My AthlonXP motherboard, has a separate eight pin chip, which monitors the temperature and does the equivalent of THERMTRIP.) You can check for THERMTRIP, by downloading the datasheet for the processor. One way to do that, is go through the list of Celerons here, select an appropriate one, and then see of there is a documentation link. http://processorfinder.intel.com/ I wouldn't panic yet, because I interpret your results to suggest something isn't assembled right. Like turning the screw on one of those small ZIF sockets, to lock it. Paul Great post, Paul. Very good information. The cpu socket is one of those with a lever. I checked the cpu itself for bent pins, etc and it appears ok. It is locked tight in place and I'm pretty sure I put the cooler assembly back correctly. You've convinced me that I haven't burnt the cpu and now I'm wondering if I didn't do some harm to the motherboard. The laptop wasn't working properly when I started on this project and now it doesn't go to BIOS. I haven't completely given up on the one I have yet. I'll try reassembling it today. I'm thinking that what I'll end up doing is buying an equivalent unit from ebay with a broken screen and missing parts. I'll cannabalize the one I have and make one good one. Thanks for your response. JG To know exactly what you did, I'd want the SLxxx number off both processors. One of the differences on a mobile processor, is there are a couple signals for SpeedStep. But that shouldn't harm it. For example, people buy SL726 processors, and install them in desktop boards, to overclock them. You can raise an SL726 to FSB1200, causing the core to run at 3.6GHz, and I'm told they run pretty cool while doing so. So I don't necessarily see the installation of a mobile processor, as a death sentence. But to know more, you'd want to use the code on the processor, and look it up, to see exactly what it is. From that generation, I don't know if there are any ULV (ultra low voltage) versions of S478 chips or not. But it is easiest to trace this info, by using the SLxxx number. This is the mobile that overclocks so nice. It runs at a lower speed than the stated values on this page, when plugged into a desktop board, which is why it ends up at FSB1200 and 3.6GHz core. The reason I'm interested in that one, is it would fit perfectly in my current motherboard (P4C800-E Deluxe), which can apparently overclock that high. I've run into a few people who buy these, and don't know what a good deal they got (they're puzzled by the speed it runs at). http://processorfinder.intel.com/Det...px?sSpec=sl726 Paul Turns out that you were 100% correct. I had not put the original CPU back in correctly. It was slightly cocked and rocked a little before putting down the lever. After installing correctly, the laptop then booted. So, no harm no foul on the CPU switch. However, the original problem remains - that is, the occasional BSD with the quick message of memory dump. I have a couple of new sticks of RAM coming in and I'll see if that makes a difference. Meanwhile I've bid on an equivalent model on eBay that has no peripherals and a broken screen. If the motherboard on that one works, I'll be in high cotton if I win it and can cannabalize my unit successfully. I have to wait one week for that since the auction doesn't end until then. In the nonce, I'll continue to fool around with the one I have here. I appreciate your taking the time to find out all the helpful information. Best, JG Follow-up for those interested in this problem: It turned out to be a defective cpu. I replaced the 2.8 with a known good 2.6 and the machine behaves as it should. I guess that the original cpu was overheated and burnt in some way. Best, JG There are other ways to kill a processor besides heat. It will be interesting now, to see how long the replacement processor lasts. As an example, Northwood processors are sensitive to excessive Vcore, and some overclockers noted their processor croaked instantly, at a certain voltage. If something on the motherboard of the laptop, is not regulating power properly, it could place a voltage on there, which shortens the life of the processor. The Arrhenius equation provides a mechanism to relate temperature, to operating life, but generally speaking, this doesn't seem to be an issue for the average life of computers. Most people upgrade, before any thermal limit seems to be reached. One of the video card companies, did a reliability calculation of one of their competitor's offerings, in the hopes of scaring customers away. The calculation predicted a short life for the video card, like a year or less. But I never noticed any rash of those products dying. Good reliability calculations, use field data collected from previous failures, to adjust the equations to give better results. But that was not the first time I was scared unnecessarily by such calculations. The first big system I worked on, the reliability calculation said the Intel processor used, would be more unreliable, than any other piece of hardware in the equipment. Which was pure B.S. Paul Thanks again for all the good info. Upon further investigation it seems that this laptop belonged to a young teen who left it on at all times, didn't provide for proper circulation around it (had it on a soft surface) and generally kept it very hot. In fact, he said that he couldn't put it on his lap. It could be many things, as you said, but the interocular test (right between the eyes) tells me that the cpu got overheated. It didn't look burnt but I'd bet on it. Anyway, all is better now with a new cpu and I appreciate your ongoing help. Best, JG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Toshiba Satellite : Hibernate Problem | laknabu | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | September 10th 06 09:03 AM |
problem with display - toshiba satellite 1800-400 HELP please | pm | General | 4 | February 9th 06 05:10 PM |
resetting Toshiba Satellite BIOS password - need toshiba manuals | blq knight | General | 2 | December 1st 04 07:35 PM |
Problem with TOSHIBA Satellite 1130 ! | R.Roshak | General | 0 | May 20th 04 02:05 PM |
problem with Toshiba Satellite LCD laptop monitor | em | General Hardware | 0 | April 30th 04 07:41 PM |