If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
polarity of power cord - gateway fpd1520
In ,
Michael A. Terrell typed on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:48:38 -0400: I guess that no one bothered to check out the link I posted to a replacement supply that not only shows it to be center positive, but it tells you which coaxial power plug you need. Yes we know Michael. And thanks again. aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file * drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic. Why do you say that? aioe is based in Italy. -- Bill |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
polarity of power cord - gateway fpd1520
In ,
Arfa Daily typed on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:24:25 GMT: "BillW50" wrote in message . com... In , Arfa Daily typed on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:23:08 GMT: "BillW50" wrote in message . com... In , Arfa Daily typed on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:07:57 GMT: "BillW50" wrote in message . com... In , Arfa Daily typed on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:52:58 GMT: [...] As for a transistor radio that uses PNP transistors, I haven't seen one that uses transistors at all for many years, let alone PNP ones, so I think you might be struggling to fit that into my "modern" category, also. Well Arfa... they still use transistors (both NPN and PNP types) in modern equipment. The reason you don't see them anymore is do to the magic of minturization. But they are still there, just neatly packaged into what is known today as the intergrated circuit (IC chip). And I though I was pedantic !! Yes, of course ICs contain transistors, and yes, I would accept that some of them may be PNP types, depending on block function within the IC, but I don't think, with the best will in the world, that this is the level of transistor existence that William was referring to with his "transistor radio using PNP transistors" scenario. In any event, in the case of an IC taking a single polarity rail, it is irrelevant whether the transistors inside are NPN or PNP or FETs or whatever. PNP transistors are just used 'upside down', as are discrete PNP transistors when used in any piece of single polarity rail equipment. The ground is still (typically for //modern// equipment) the "-" side of the power supply / battery. Anyway, this is getting out of hand. The OP aked a simple question, and I gave a simple answer. This afternoon, I was in a friend's computer repair shop. Bear in mind that he deals with monitors of all types and makes on a daily basis. I asked him how he would go about determining the polarity of such a monitor, and he said that he would stick one side of his ohm meter on one of the D connector locking screws, and the other on each pin of the DC connector. When he found the pin that read short to the connector locking screw, it was his contention that he would have identified the "-" side of the power supply. So that's pretty much exactly what I said. He also frowned and shook his head, and said that he couldn't remember how many years it had been since he had seen a DC connector that had the pin as the "-". Which is also pretty much what I said ... Arfa That would be okay if it were a negative ground system. But like what William Sommerwerck mentioned, we don't know that. The way I would do it is to ohm the the power in. And the lower resistance would be the correct polarity. Although you would need another meter to read the polarity of the ohm meter. As they are not standardized on multimeters. You could also use a diode (or LED) to learn of the polarity of the meter as well. -- Bill JHC !!! Do you not understand the word "modern" ? Do you not understand the phrase "... deals with monitors of all types on a daily basis" ? I repair this stuff all day every day for a living. I have done for over 35 years. I cannot remember the last time I saw a piece of kit of any description, which employed a positive ground. My friend, who owns a computer repair shop, and has done for many years, cannot remember the last time - if ever - that he saw a monitor with an external power supply, that was not negative ground with the connector sleeve as the negative connection. With so much interconnectivity between household items now, there has had to be a degree of standardisation on this issue, and it has evolved through a general concensus amongst manufacturers, that negative ground will be the convention. As for your method of determining polarity, it makes no sense at all, unless you are assuming a series diode, which is quite unlikely in most modern kit, as it represents a waste of power due to its forward voltage drop. It may even have a shunt protection diode, in which case, your 'test' will ensure that the polarity is determined INcorrectly. Even if the device did have a series diode, depending on where the supply first goes, there is still no guarantee that there will be any reading at all on a standard multimeter on ohms. If there is not any diode - series or shunt - any reading of ohms obtained across the input socket, is unlikely to reveal anything meaningful. What is your experience in fault-finding, I wonder, to have caused you to have formulated such a bizarre method, and believe that it would uncategorically give you a correct result ? Arfa Actually being an electrical engineer for 35 years, I could careless how long your friend has been repairing computers. And the reason why the ohm meter works is because all of the curcuits are in parallel with the supply. Thus you will get a lower reading when the polarity is correct. And you will get a higher reading when it is not correct. Thus as all of the circuits are reversed biased. That is unmitigated nonsense. If there is a shunt protection diode, it will be FORWARD biased when the polarity is WRONG. Also, the fact that my friend repairs this stuff all day, and as an electrical engineer, you clearly do not, that makes him an expert, compared to you ... If there was a shunt protection diode, then both resistance measurements would be forward biased. Thus you would know that since there was no high resistance reading. But let's assume and use your plan for a minute. There are plenty of examples where they don't ground the shield but just let it float. Yes it sounds stupid I know, but it has been done from time to time. And I worry about everything seemingly coming from China nowadays. Which IMHO is only going to make things worse. And some of this stuff from China, isn't even UL or FCC approved. Whether or not all manufactures use negative ground or not, I have no idea. Well, as I repair this stuff all day as well, I *do* have an idea, so that clearly also makes me more of an expert on this particular subject, than you ... That is indeed possible. I always said and believed that we can learn a lot even from a child. Although in all of my experience, I have learned to never assume anything. And I have seen many strange designs. One of them had an OP amp's output connected directly to ground. I was confused about that one until I chatted with the designer. Then it all made sense. -- Bill In general, I would agree with you not to assume anything, but some things are a matter of convention, and in recent years, based on my direct experience of such things, I would stick my neck on the line, and say that this is one, and that all modern kit, manufactured for the domestic market, employs circuitry with a negative ground, to which (most) external metalwork is firmly bonded. Arfa I also have seen grounds that wasn't really ground either. Shields that were not connected to anything. Lots of weird stuff goes on in consumer grade equipment. Most of it IMHO is done to save a buck. Some of it is just ingenious! And some of it is just sloppy engineering. And sometimes it was done as a last minute bandaid just to pass FCC radio emissions. -- Bill |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
polarity of power cord - gateway fpd1520
Why do you say that? aioe is based in Italy. It has nothing to do with where it's based. Apparently you missed the very long thread about this a while back and the load of impostors trying to raise hell spamming from aioe. Most of us blocked the server entirely. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
polarity of power cord - gateway fpd1520
In news:LQTHj.923$at6.237@trndny01,
James Sweet typed on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:44:11 GMT: Why do you say that? aioe is based in Italy. It has nothing to do with where it's based. Apparently you missed the very long thread about this a while back and the load of impostors trying to raise hell spamming from aioe. Most of us blocked the server entirely. Hi James! Oh yes I did miss that one. Thanks for the heads up. -- Bill |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
polarity of power cord - gateway fpd1520
"msg" wrote in message ... Arfa Daily wrote: snip JHC !!! Do you not understand the word "modern" ? Do you not understand the phrase "... deals with monitors of all types on a daily basis" ? I repair this stuff all day every day for a living. I have done for over 35 years. I cannot remember the last time I saw a piece of kit of any description, which employed a positive ground. My friend, who owns a computer repair shop, and has done for many years, cannot remember the last time - if ever - that he saw a monitor with an external power supply, that was not negative ground with the connector sleeve as the negative connection. With so much interconnectivity between household items now, there has had to be a degree of standardisation on this issue, and it has evolved through a general concensus amongst manufacturers, that negative ground will be the convention. snip I have resisted commenting but can do no longer; I don't know about the U.K., but I frequently encounter negative center coaxial power equipment in my work. These are not monitors, but a variety of consumer and industrial portable devices. When the connector is not labeled and I don't have docs, I will physically inspect the internal wiring or the pcb that hosts the power connector and also do resistance measurements between ground planes and the power connector contacts to determine ground. The assumption that ground planes are negative is a given in most instances. As for the subjective label "modern", that is a religious issue that shouldn't be a factor in good electronics practice Michael Michael. I'm not quite sure exactly what you are saying here. I do not doubt that you encounter equipment with a negative pin connection on the coaxial DC connector. I have not disputed this during this thread. In fact, I actually said in my original reply to the OP, that although these days, pin = "+" is the common convention, it is by no means cast in stone. I'm sure that even though you do have dealings with negative pin equipment, you would concede that positive pin is by far the more common at this point in time, and has been for some years. Irrespective of which pole of the connector is the positive one, you seem to accept that ground being negative is the "... given in most instances", which is what most of the controversy generated within the thread, has been about. So as far as I can see, we are both 'on the same page'. I don't understand what you are saying about the word "modern". It is quite a well defined word, and fits well, in this context, with the dictionary definition http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/modern particularly with the entry that refers to it being something that is "not obsolete". Whilst you are correct that it is a subjective word, in the case of electronic equipment, I would contend that most electronic engineers would infer something of the order of 8 -10 years to be meant, when calling electronic equipment "modern". And Bill. I will now explain why your contention that your method will work under all circumstances, is not valid. You are quite wrong with your assumption that all of the circuits in a piece of equipment are stacked up in parallel across the DC input socket. Whilst this might have been the case some years back, the DC connector on "modern" (infer whatever period you like from that word) equipment, usually connects straight into some form of internal ancilliary power supply, or a regulator or regulators, which are often switching types. The reasons for this are manifold, but include the fact that most modern equipment does not contain circuitry that runs just from 12v, which is a typical 'standard' value for external power unit equipment, and also efficiency, which dictates the regulators typically being switchers. The various circuits contained within the equipment, are connected to the back end of these regulators, and are thus not connected to the DC power socket in any way. Often, the input to this regulator circuitry, contained within special purpose ICs, will not produce any meaningful ohms reading, when subjected to the low test voltage from a multimeter. So, you are just as likely to read a virtual open circuit across the socket, irrespective of which way round you have your meter. This, in itself, will not help you to determine the polarity. But worse. If the unit employs a shunt protection diode, when your meter is connected //backwards// to the correct polarity, you will get a reading of 700 ohms or so, but when it is connected the //correct// way round, you may well read infinity or near. By your definition of how your system works to determine polarity, that would give you a clear indication of which was the correct polarity, but would actually yield the *INcorrect* polarity. As for external metalwork not being connected to the internal common ground, these days, that is rare. I do come across the situation sometimes, on AV amps, where the RCA socket sleeves are floating with respect to the chassis, but it is the exception rather than the rule, and is done to help alleviate potential ground loop issues when connecting to other equipment. As far as the polarity of the ground goes, I am prepared to say that in my considerable experience, on modern equipment designed for the consumer market, it is always negative. And that really is about as cast in stone as anything in electronic design ever is. I could of course be wrong on this, but if anyone wants to correct me with specific examples - remembering "modern" and "domestic", I'm listening, and willing to modify my position on it. I say again, that the OP asked a simple question, to which there was a simple answer. I don't really believe that there was any need to muddy the waters to the extent of all of this silly stuff that has been put forward, but hey - ho. I guess it all makes for an interesting life ... d;~} Arfa |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
polarity of power cord - gateway fpd1520
In ,
Arfa Daily typed on Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:37:00 GMT: [...] And Bill. I will now explain why your contention that your method will work under all circumstances, is not valid. Sorry if you got that impression, but that isn't what I meant. You are quite wrong with your assumption that all of the circuits in a piece of equipment are stacked up in parallel across the DC input socket. Whilst this might have been the case some years back, the DC connector on "modern" (infer whatever period you like from that word) equipment, usually connects straight into some form of internal ancilliary power supply, or a regulator or regulators, which are often switching types. Yes I remember. The reasons for this are manifold, but include the fact that most modern equipment does not contain circuitry that runs just from 12v, which is a typical 'standard' value for external power unit equipment, and also efficiency, which dictates the regulators typically being switchers. The various circuits contained within the equipment, are connected to the back end of these regulators, and are thus not connected to the DC power socket in any way. Yes but the regulators are. Often, the input to this regulator circuitry, contained within special purpose ICs, will not produce any meaningful ohms reading, when subjected to the low test voltage from a multimeter. So, you are just as likely to read a virtual open circuit across the socket, irrespective of which way round you have your meter. This, in itself, will not help you to determine the polarity. Yes... so if you have a high/low resistance readings, this is very useful. If you have a low/low or a high/high, checking the resistance isn't useful under these conditions. But worse. If the unit employs a shunt protection diode, when your meter is connected //backwards// to the correct polarity, you will get a reading of 700 ohms or so, but when it is connected the //correct// way round, you may well read infinity or near. By your definition of how your system works to determine polarity, that would give you a clear indication of which was the correct polarity, but would actually yield the *INcorrect* polarity. True, but it will not hurt anything. As the shunt will only allow about a negative 0.7v to the rest of the unit. So unless the shunt blows, it shouldn't ever hurt it. You can possibly damage the adapter, but it should be protected against such anyway. But it is cheaper than the unit it is powering anyway. ;-) As for external metalwork not being connected to the internal common ground, these days, that is rare. I do come across the situation sometimes, on AV amps, where the RCA socket sleeves are floating with respect to the chassis, but it is the exception rather than the rule, and is done to help alleviate potential ground loop issues when connecting to other equipment. As far as the polarity of the ground goes, I am prepared to say that in my considerable experience, on modern equipment designed for the consumer market, it is always negative. And that really is about as cast in stone as anything in electronic design ever is. I could of course be wrong on this, but if anyone wants to correct me with specific examples - remembering "modern" and "domestic", I'm listening, and willing to modify my position on it. Yes I agree. But thinking that way, you may fry every positive ground you come across. If that is an acceptable risk for you and others... well what can I say? While some risks are acceptable to me, frying something because you had the polarity wrong just isn't one of them. LOL I say again, that the OP asked a simple question, to which there was a simple answer. I don't really believe that there was any need to muddy the waters to the extent of all of this silly stuff that has been put forward, but hey - ho. I guess it all makes for an interesting life ... d;~} I believe having enough information to make a wise choice is far better than bozos telling you that you have to do it this way and there are no becauses. -- Bill |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
polarity of power cord - gateway fpd1520
"BillW50" wrote in message . com... In , Arfa Daily typed on Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:37:00 GMT: [...] And Bill. I will now explain why your contention that your method will work under all circumstances, is not valid. Sorry if you got that impression, but that isn't what I meant. You are quite wrong with your assumption that all of the circuits in a piece of equipment are stacked up in parallel across the DC input socket. Whilst this might have been the case some years back, the DC connector on "modern" (infer whatever period you like from that word) equipment, usually connects straight into some form of internal ancilliary power supply, or a regulator or regulators, which are often switching types. Yes I remember. The reasons for this are manifold, but include the fact that most modern equipment does not contain circuitry that runs just from 12v, which is a typical 'standard' value for external power unit equipment, and also efficiency, which dictates the regulators typically being switchers. The various circuits contained within the equipment, are connected to the back end of these regulators, and are thus not connected to the DC power socket in any way. Yes but the regulators are. Often, the input to this regulator circuitry, contained within special purpose ICs, will not produce any meaningful ohms reading, when subjected to the low test voltage from a multimeter. So, you are just as likely to read a virtual open circuit across the socket, irrespective of which way round you have your meter. This, in itself, will not help you to determine the polarity. Yes... so if you have a high/low resistance readings, this is very useful. If you have a low/low or a high/high, checking the resistance isn't useful under these conditions. But worse. If the unit employs a shunt protection diode, when your meter is connected //backwards// to the correct polarity, you will get a reading of 700 ohms or so, but when it is connected the //correct// way round, you may well read infinity or near. By your definition of how your system works to determine polarity, that would give you a clear indication of which was the correct polarity, but would actually yield the *INcorrect* polarity. True, but it will not hurt anything. As the shunt will only allow about a negative 0.7v to the rest of the unit. So unless the shunt blows, it shouldn't ever hurt it. You can possibly damage the adapter, but it should be protected against such anyway. But it is cheaper than the unit it is powering anyway. ;-) As for external metalwork not being connected to the internal common ground, these days, that is rare. I do come across the situation sometimes, on AV amps, where the RCA socket sleeves are floating with respect to the chassis, but it is the exception rather than the rule, and is done to help alleviate potential ground loop issues when connecting to other equipment. As far as the polarity of the ground goes, I am prepared to say that in my considerable experience, on modern equipment designed for the consumer market, it is always negative. And that really is about as cast in stone as anything in electronic design ever is. I could of course be wrong on this, but if anyone wants to correct me with specific examples - remembering "modern" and "domestic", I'm listening, and willing to modify my position on it. Yes I agree. But thinking that way, you may fry every positive ground you come across. If that is an acceptable risk for you and others... well what can I say? While some risks are acceptable to me, frying something because you had the polarity wrong just isn't one of them. LOL I say again, that the OP asked a simple question, to which there was a simple answer. I don't really believe that there was any need to muddy the waters to the extent of all of this silly stuff that has been put forward, but hey - ho. I guess it all makes for an interesting life ... d;~} I believe having enough information to make a wise choice is far better than bozos telling you that you have to do it this way and there are no becauses. -- Bill Well, I guess we could go on dancing around this one for ever ... With the circuit loads being connected to the back end of regulators that are likely to have high input resistances with respect to the low test voltage supplied by a multimeter, you really are unlikely to read anything meaningful across the DC input socket. Trust me. I do this (very successfully) for a living. Reading high-low, low-low, high-high, is fundamentally useless to determining input polarity, unless you have a schematic for the equipment to know what you are looking at. If you had a schematic, you would not, of course, be trying to determine the polarity in the first place ... It is also not necessarily true that you will damage nothing if you do arrive at a wrong conclusion as a result of applying your ohm-meter test to an equipment which employs a shunt protection diode. Remember that the power supplies for LCD TV sets and monitors, when these are external types, are capable of supplying typically 2 to 4 amps. This is plenty enough to destroy a typical 1 amp shunt diode, or to blow a pico or surface mount fuse, as is typically found in such devices, or even to take out print, which is sometimes deliberately 'necked' to provide a fuse function. Shunt protection diodes seldom survive a reverse connection. Ask anyone who repairs CB radios, or PMR radios, or plain old car entertainment radios. Even if no shunt diode is used, there is still no guarantee that any regulator device which has reverse polarity applied to it, will survive. I have seen plenty that haven't. I honestly don't believe that I am going to fry *any* positive grounds that I come across, for the simple reason that on modern equipment, I just don't come across them. They died out pretty much with germanium PNP transistors. Obviously, if I was trying to determine the polarity of a piece of 30 year old kit, I would take the trouble to employ different methods to do so, on the off-chance that it might have a positive ground, but again, trust me, positive grounds simply *aren't* encountered on modern equipment. I hope when you refer to "bozos", you are not including me in that, as it would cause me to take extreme offence at you. Having enough information to make a wise choice is indeed a laudable objective, but discounting the advice of someone who has more than 35 years declared experience in a field, borders on stupidity. I certainly would not tell anyone that they *must* do it this way, but if I believe, based on my considerable experience in the repair field, that a particular method is likely to yield a correct answer with a better than 95% certainty, then I am going to advise them of this, which I believe is the way I approached the OP's original question, in the first place. Whilst there are always "becauses" as you put it, in this particular case, their validity is negligible, for all of the reasons that I have (painstakingly) explained over and over. Arfa |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
polarity of power cord - gateway fpd1520
Arfa Daily wrote:
"zirath" wrote in message news:0f2Hj.7616$Yy2.1091@trndny04... We recently got a gateway fpd1520 (15" lcd flatscreen) monitor from ebay. It didn't have a power cord. It says it's a 12v dc 2.5a but it doesn't give the polarity. A person from gateway said he thought it wouldn't hurt the monitor if it got plugged in backwards but I'd rather not try it. Would appreciate any help. If it has got any external metal parts such as RCA (phono) connector outers, BNC connector outers, 'D' connector surround etc, or possibly screws for a stand, as these often go right through the plastic case, and into the internal chassis, then try measuring from any such metal to each of the DC power input connector's terminals in turn, using an ohm meter. Chances are you'll find a direct connection, and that will be your DC ground ( "-" ) connection. The other will then be the "+". Assuming that it's a 'standard' co-axial DC connector, on most modern equipment, 'pin' is "+" and side contact is "-" although that's not cast in stone. Be aware when you are obtaining a replacement PSU, that the plug is often a slightly abnormal size, being a little larger than those you typically find on 'general' power supplies. Also, make sure that you get one well rated for the job, as these monitors do draw quite a lot of current, and may well surge up close to the quoted 2.5 amps at startup, as the LCD backlights first fire up before settling to their run current. As to whether it would be safe to reverse connect it, I wouldn't like to say. Some equipment is perfectly well protected against such 'consumer antics', but it is by no means guaranteed, and if it is not adequately protected, the result is often an item that's fried beyond repair, for no other reason than unobtainable power supply devices, as many previous posts on this subject over the years, will attest ... Arfa The ohm meter showed something like a capacitor on the center pin (it went to 0 and then back towards the center). The side showed no resistance. The monitor went on briefly and then went black when plugged into the power. Seems like it's a dud. Not sure if it's worth trying to repair it or just return it. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
polarity of power cord - gateway fpd1520
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
polarity of power cord - gateway fpd1520
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
di-604 power cord | donut | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | September 26th 07 07:03 AM |
Compaq JBL Pro speakers - need to know polarity of power supply | Larry Dawson | Compaq Computers | 0 | July 13th 05 04:13 AM |
Gateway 9150 Needs Power Cord & Battery | netnews.comcast.net | Gateway Computers | 1 | July 28th 04 12:08 PM |
Power Cord? | Eugene | Dell Computers | 6 | June 12th 04 10:18 PM |
Power Cord? | Scott | Gateway Computers | 1 | December 11th 03 08:40 PM |