If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Video memory mapping
I'm not sure if this is a question for a videocard group or a
mainboard group or in fact where it belongs. The programming videocard group is full of spam so I'm posting this to matrox and nvidia because those two are representative. I have a series of legacy programs dating from the eighties and early nineties which were developed using a compiler and a screen generator that insert into the generated executables a "default memory-mapped video routine" about which they say "This is seldom a problem..." Maybe it wasn't back in the days of the 386 when SVGA was state of the art but it sure is today. Up until about three weeks ago, these executables with their "memory-mapped video" worked fine on a series of machines starting with a 286 and ending with a Celeron on a Tyan board using a Matrox G200 video adapter and running NT4. Then, as a result of desire to upgrade and acquire use of the USB, I purchased a Biostar with an S3 Pro Savage 8 integrated running XP Home. Disaster! The legacy programs stopped working or gave bizarre video results such as a screen of "!" in a stepped fashion. At first I blamed the OS as I'd already tried the programs under Win2K and they worked fine. But then using DOS 6.2 from a diskette on the Biostar machine I had the same problem. It wasn't the OS! Similarly the Tyan machine has been fitted with a 3D Force MX 400 64 and it too produces the bizarre video results or freezes the machine. So I don't think it's the motherboard. It's the videocard: Matrox good: S3 Force and S3 Pro Savage bad! However the Matrox card is slightly old and puny and I'd hate to be stuck with the same video adapter for the rest of my life. OTOH, I can hardly buy a series of cards and go through the hassle of testing each to see which works. Obviously there's a conflict with the video and my programs fighting for the same memory addresses. Question: Where is "default memory-mapped video"? This must be an industry term and describe a section of real memory, x"F000" through x"FFFF" for example? Qusetion: Who decides where the video board will be in memory? I.e., what address does it map to and how can I find this out for each board? Obviously I'm considering throwing out the S3 Pro Savage and buying a new board which will not conflict with the "default memory-mapped video". Does anyone have a better suggestion? (Note: The compiler mfg and screen generator mfg no longer support their eighties versions and upgrading to a current compiler and SG would cost in excess of $3000-- yeah, three big ones-- I could buy a separate machine cheaper than that! Upgrading to another language/SG would be around two man years work, something that I'll eventually do but I need time. These are not games BTW and there's no current substitute. If there were it'd be a tiny niche market and would probably cost $3000 too.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Video Card AGP | B&B Musmon | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | August 29th 04 02:25 PM |
Why doesn't ATI make VIVO cards anymore , I don't want TV SH*T, just capability of recording VIDEO IN! | [email protected] | Ati Videocards | 10 | January 28th 04 05:43 AM |
9700 Pro Crash during benchmark with 3dmark03 | Sean | Ati Videocards | 5 | December 17th 03 04:47 PM |
Does Video Memory Size Matter? | Carol Fieldus | Nvidia Videocards | 6 | October 31st 03 12:00 PM |
How much memory does your video card use? | Scott C. Smith | Ati Videocards | 1 | June 26th 03 06:49 AM |