A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Motherboards » Asus Motherboards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dealing with A7V133...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 20th 04, 09:23 PM
Marek Tomczyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dealing with A7V133...

Hello, this problem is old as a world, but I didn`t find any solution
for it.

A7V133 with T-Bred 1700+ CPU (Hard-modded to 2100+ (cut L5 bridges))I`m
using the newest 1010b beta BIOS. I know, that T-Bred is not officialy
supported by A7V133, but if it runs without any problems on its defaults
(133x11) so maybe new BIOS may help setting proper multips. After
modding CPU to 2100+, with 133FSB I can only set 9x, which gives me 16x
multiplier. Other multips with 133 FSB causes not booting to BIOS. But
setting 9x with 100mhz FSB gives me 17x multiplier, also I can set any
multiplier whet set to 100mhz FSB. Setting 133x16 makes my system
unstable, and even raising VCore to 1,85V won`t help.

Do anybody knows if a new BIOS is planned? or did asus stop supporting
this mobo at all?

Oh, and sorry for my poor english

--
Regards
Marek Tomczyk
GG#472516

  #2  
Old February 20th 04, 10:28 PM
Marek Tomczyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

U=BFytkownik Ed napisa=B3:

What about dropping in some wire in the socket to set the multiplier yo=

u
want? IIR, just set BIOS to auto detect the multiplier and use the wire=


to set what you want. ;p


I think, that the result will be the same as in bridge-cutting mod, but=20
I`m not sure, maybie someone can confirm Ed`s theory? And BTW: I prefer=20
jumper mode than jumperless. It`s more reliable...

--=20
Regards
Marek Tomczyk
GG#472516

  #3  
Old February 21st 04, 12:27 AM
Tom Joyce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:23:42 +0100, Marek Tomczyk
wrote:

A7V133 with T-Bred 1700+ CPU (Hard-modded to 2100+ (cut L5 bridges))I`m
using the newest 1010b beta BIOS. I know, that T-Bred is not officialy
supported by A7V133, but if it runs without any problems on its defaults
(133x11) so maybe new BIOS may help setting proper multips. After
modding CPU to 2100+, with 133FSB I can only set 9x, which gives me 16x
multiplier. Other multips with 133 FSB causes not booting to BIOS. But
setting 9x with 100mhz FSB gives me 17x multiplier, also I can set any
multiplier whet set to 100mhz FSB. Setting 133x16 makes my system
unstable, and even raising VCore to 1,85V won`t help.


You have more chance of succeeding with this if your board revision is
1.04. or later. I was able to run a 2100+ Tbred B on my 1.05 with 1010b,
Crucial CL2 PC133, 1.8vcore and 17*133.3 (2266MHz, set jumper to 9*) but
it's a matter of luck. In jumper free mode it ran at 20*100.

Regards,
Tom


  #4  
Old February 21st 04, 07:42 AM
Marek Tomczyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

U=BFytkownik Tom Joyce napisa=B3:

You have more chance of succeeding with this if your board revision is
1.04. or later. I was able to run a 2100+ Tbred B on my 1.05 with 1010b=

,
Crucial CL2 PC133, 1.8vcore and 17*133.3 (2266MHz, set jumper to 9*) bu=

t
it's a matter of luck. In jumper free mode it ran at 20*100.=20


My board is rev 1.05 (without trailing dot). I was able to reach 2124mhz =

(118*18) with 1.85V (RAM at 151mhz). My 1700+ CPU can`t run faster. But=20
it`s weird, that with 100mhz fsb setting 9x multi gives me 17x, and when =

133mhz is selected, it gives me 16x multiplier. I`d like to have 133*15, =

or even 133*15,5, but it`s a no-go when I set 133*7 or 133*7,5. Did=20
anybody forced this mobo to work with 133FSB and multiplie other than 16/=
17?

And one more thing. When I set 133*16 (2128mhz) it fails even to boot to =

OS, sometimes hangs in BIOS, but 118*18 (2124mhz) it is rock-stable,=20
passes 8-hour prime95 torture test. Is 133 fsb a so big challenge for=20
mobo/cpu that it can`t run as fast? My 1700+ (when it was a 1700+, not=20
2100+ ) run without any problems at 150*12,5.

--=20
Pozdrawiam
Marek Tomczyk
GG#472516

  #5  
Old February 21st 04, 12:39 PM
Tom Joyce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:42:25 +0100, Marek Tomczyk
wrote:

My board is rev 1.05 (without trailing dot). I was able to reach 2124mhz
(118*18) with 1.85V (RAM at 151mhz). My 1700+ CPU can`t run faster. But
it`s weird, that with 100mhz fsb setting 9x multi gives me 17x, and when
133mhz is selected, it gives me 16x multiplier. I`d like to have 133*15,
or even 133*15,5, but it`s a no-go when I set 133*7 or 133*7,5. Did
anybody forced this mobo to work with 133FSB and multiplie other than 16/17?


The problem is that the KT133A chipset supports only a limited range of
valid multiplier/cpu combinations. I have three useful archived web pages
(mostly relevant to CPUs with native multiplier of 13* or higher) I could
email you, or have a look on

http://www.a7vtroubleshooting.com/fo...n/yabb/YaBB.pl

My 2100+ was completely stable at 17*133/1.8v but would not go any higher.
The performance difference between 17*133 and 20*100 was measurable but
hardly noticeable. Your 2124MHz is not bad for a 1700+.

Regards,
Tom
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
a7v133 rev1.04 + amd duron 1600 Max Asus Motherboards 1 February 8th 04 08:46 AM
Performance of Athlon XP with A7V133 -DraconuS- Asus Motherboards 0 November 18th 03 08:54 AM
R.I.P A7v133 rutger Asus Motherboards 0 July 28th 03 03:56 AM
A7V133 and USB2.0 Card Egil Solberg Asus Motherboards 0 June 29th 03 07:46 PM
1.05 revisions of A7V133 and Thoroughbred. Help needed kc.virtual Overclocking AMD Processors 3 June 27th 03 04:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.