If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
USB PC Microscope (88201)
I've got a PC Link USB Microscope that claims to run without drivers as a
'USB Video Device' http://www.eastcolight.com/eng/techn...cope%20faq.pdf When I plug it in, it tries to run the windows driver installer. If I abort out, it says it won't work properly. When I right click on 'My Computer' and select Hardware / Device Manager, It shows other devices / usb camera with a '?' There is an exe file on the CD that came with the microscope and in the 'driver' folder is an exe file. When I execute that, It says it will install the driver, and when I select 'next' it states the camera is not found. Plug it in and restart. I've tried this on three computers. Any suggestions? I found an updated driver at: http://www.eastcolight.com/eng/techn...t/download.htm After installing this driver, which isn't included on the CD that came with the kit, all is well. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
USB PC Microscope (88201)
Sam P wrote:
I've got a PC Link USB Microscope that claims to run without drivers as a 'USB Video Device' http://www.eastcolight.com/eng/techn...cope%20faq.pdf When I plug it in, it tries to run the windows driver installer. If I abort out, it says it won't work properly. When I right click on 'My Computer' and select Hardware / Device Manager, It shows other devices / usb camera with a '?' There is an exe file on the CD that came with the microscope and in the 'driver' folder is an exe file. When I execute that, It says it will install the driver, and when I select 'next' it states the camera is not found. Plug it in and restart. I've tried this on three computers. Any suggestions? I found an updated driver at: http://www.eastcolight.com/eng/techn...t/download.htm After installing this driver, which isn't included on the CD that came with the kit, all is well. That download is an Installshield, so I cannot comment on it. I don't have any tools for dissassembling Installshield. USB video cameras come in two flavors. A camera can be UVC compliant, or it can possess a non-standard proprietary interface. If it is proprietary, a company provided driver package will be required. If a camera is UVC, then it can automatically have a driver installed by Windows. But beware, that even if it is UVC compliant, not all of the functionality may be controlled or offered by UVC. My camera, for example, will not present its top resolution choice, when used with Windows software. But if I install the vendors bloated driver package, then the top resolution choice is offered. (The driver package is bad enough, that I uninstall the software, after I'm finished using the camera. It leaves stuff running all the time in Task Manager, even when the camera is unplugged. And more than one process.) If you wish to examine the configuration data offered by the camera, Microsoft has an old program called UVCView. The download is no longer offered, but is archived here. At one time, the archive copy was damaged (missing the last byte), but the archive operators have fixed that problem. The following is all one URL. http://web.archive.org/*/http://down...VCView.x86.exe Click the latest entry on the page, and give it a try. When the program is running, the entries look similar to this. The right hand pane holds the configuration data. http://www.die.de/blog/content/binary/usbview.png USB web camera controller ICs, have the ability to support custom vendor and device ID numbers. That makes it virtually impossible to trace what hardware is inside. There is a controller chip and a sensor chip, and if a driver is needed, it needs to understand both of those parts. And some webcams (like mine), have additional junk inside, such as a focus motor. Even if you find a driver which is "close" to being correct, it may not know there is a focus motor present or what to do with it. Which is why I say, for USB video devices, the main value of the product is the software CD, not the hardware. If it doesn't come with working software, the hardware is worth very little. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
USB PC Microscope (88201)
wow, that's a lot of great info.
After I wrote the message, but before I sent it, I was re-reading a FAQ for the product. One of the questions said that if you lost the original CD, you could download from their site. On a whim, I went to that site and downloaded the file. Turns out it was the correct driver. A filet that was not on the CD. I ran that program and now the microscope works pretty well. I'll take a look at the UVC tool you mentioned. thanks again for your thoughtful reply. "Paul" wrote in message ... Sam P wrote: I've got a PC Link USB Microscope that claims to run without drivers as a 'USB Video Device' http://www.eastcolight.com/eng/techn...cope%20faq.pdf When I plug it in, it tries to run the windows driver installer. If I abort out, it says it won't work properly. When I right click on 'My Computer' and select Hardware / Device Manager, It shows other devices / usb camera with a '?' There is an exe file on the CD that came with the microscope and in the 'driver' folder is an exe file. When I execute that, It says it will install the driver, and when I select 'next' it states the camera is not found. Plug it in and restart. I've tried this on three computers. Any suggestions? I found an updated driver at: http://www.eastcolight.com/eng/techn...t/download.htm After installing this driver, which isn't included on the CD that came with the kit, all is well. That download is an Installshield, so I cannot comment on it. I don't have any tools for dissassembling Installshield. USB video cameras come in two flavors. A camera can be UVC compliant, or it can possess a non-standard proprietary interface. If it is proprietary, a company provided driver package will be required. If a camera is UVC, then it can automatically have a driver installed by Windows. But beware, that even if it is UVC compliant, not all of the functionality may be controlled or offered by UVC. My camera, for example, will not present its top resolution choice, when used with Windows software. But if I install the vendors bloated driver package, then the top resolution choice is offered. (The driver package is bad enough, that I uninstall the software, after I'm finished using the camera. It leaves stuff running all the time in Task Manager, even when the camera is unplugged. And more than one process.) If you wish to examine the configuration data offered by the camera, Microsoft has an old program called UVCView. The download is no longer offered, but is archived here. At one time, the archive copy was damaged (missing the last byte), but the archive operators have fixed that problem. The following is all one URL. http://web.archive.org/*/http://down...VCView.x86.exe Click the latest entry on the page, and give it a try. When the program is running, the entries look similar to this. The right hand pane holds the configuration data. http://www.die.de/blog/content/binary/usbview.png USB web camera controller ICs, have the ability to support custom vendor and device ID numbers. That makes it virtually impossible to trace what hardware is inside. There is a controller chip and a sensor chip, and if a driver is needed, it needs to understand both of those parts. And some webcams (like mine), have additional junk inside, such as a focus motor. Even if you find a driver which is "close" to being correct, it may not know there is a focus motor present or what to do with it. Which is why I say, for USB video devices, the main value of the product is the software CD, not the hardware. If it doesn't come with working software, the hardware is worth very little. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
QX3 Microscope | Terry Pinnell[_2_] | General | 16 | May 15th 09 12:36 AM |
5 Megapixels vs Kodachrome vs Velvia + Microscope Views | Tony Whitaker | Scanners | 0 | September 21st 03 07:33 PM |