If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Well, then, you are also a true veteran of the computer industry, unlike these
wet-behind-the-ears newcomers who became enamored with the IBM XT running an Intel 8088. .... Ben Myers On 19 Jan 2005 14:46:55 -0800, "Mark" wrote: Ben Myers wrote: ... Anybody been arould here long enough to have written programs in FORTRAN using punched "IBM" cards? ... Ben Myers Yep, FORTRAN II on an IBM 1620... magnetic core memory, punch cards, the whole works back in college. I also used an IBM assembler called "SPS" (Symbolic Programming System) because, then as now, assembly language executed MUCH faster (and also made it possible to do things that those taking the FORTRAN class declared to be "Impossible!", heh-heh! And then there was the trick of seeding pre-punched cards into the input hopper of the keypunch machines that so that the phrase would later appear in the error list received by the hapless fellow DP101 student: ERROR F7 UNRECOGNIZABLE STATEMENT: YOU BLEW IT, STUPID! Ah, yes, I remember it well.... Mark |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Ben Myers wrote: Anybody been around here long enough to have used an IBM XT as his or her first office computer? Anybody been around long enough to have worked with and cursed IBM's MicroChannel computers or Compaq's and other EISA bus computers with their hare-brained configuration diskettes? Anybody been arould here long enough to have written programs in FORTRAN using punched "IBM" cards? ... Ben Myers Can remember using a Hewlett packard 9845 with resident basic, twin micro cassette drives and an add on external 8" floppy drive that was as big as some PC's nowadays. Alec |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
My first micro was an Epson QX-10. Very advanced in some ways,
instantly obsolete in others (like using a Z80 cpu). When I got a clue, my first "PC clone" was the original Compaq Portable. I remember spending several hundred dollars to upgrade from 256k RAM to 640k on the motherboard, including the "Plus" BIOS. My first modem was a Hayes 1200b internal, for $495. It was the only one that worked with Kermit and the Miami U software. And yes, I used Fortran 77 back in the early 80s at MU, but it was via terminal (Televideo 920s IIRC) on campus, or dial-up and Kermit from home. The IBM VM batch language was pretty nice; I managed to whip up some batch files to automate the edit/compile cycle, and dedicated some macros to certain PF keys. Most of the other guys were wondering why it didn't work so hard... Heh. Actually (I collect antique computers) I have a Portable, a Plus, a Portable II, and a Portable 386. No Portable III yet. Also have the original Deskpro, and a Deskpro 286. Now, if I can only get my hands on a Deskpro 386... Alas, there was one on eBay last month. I didn't HAVE the money last month, naturally! Argh. I missed out on MCA and EISA though. Darn... While I'm here... Does anyone know of anybody who has Compaq MS-DOS 3.31? I'd love to get a copy for the large hard drive support, and the special mode commands unique to Compaq MS-DOS. I think 4.x and later were more like generic MS-DOS. For some reason, my Portable 386 thinks it's monochorome only, and the Setup program I have doesn't seem to have an option to change that. I tried selecting video card, or default video mode (whatever it was, about two months ago) and the proggy kept telling me I had to change it somewhere else. Now, I know it worked fine in graphical mode when I first got it, but I mucked something up playing with the config files. I don't honestly remember if there was a special driver loaded or anything like that when I first got it. I never had this problem with the Portable and the Deskpro. Ah, well... On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:46:08 GMT, ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net (Ben Myers) wrote: Anybody been around here long enough to have used an IBM XT as his or her first office computer? Anybody been around long enough to have worked with and cursed IBM's MicroChannel computers or Compaq's and other EISA bus computers with their hare-brained configuration diskettes? Anybody been arould here long enough to have written programs in FORTRAN using punched "IBM" cards? ... Ben Myers On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:58:01 GMT, T wrote: |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
1200 baud? Thats modern. Try 300. Used that with an Atari 850 to send
columns from home to the ATEX main frame at my newspaper, circa 1978. HH "Casey Tompkins" wrote in message ... My first micro was an Epson QX-10. Very advanced in some ways, instantly obsolete in others (like using a Z80 cpu). When I got a clue, my first "PC clone" was the original Compaq Portable. I remember spending several hundred dollars to upgrade from 256k RAM to 640k on the motherboard, including the "Plus" BIOS. My first modem was a Hayes 1200b internal, for $495. It was the only one that worked with Kermit and the Miami U software. And yes, I used Fortran 77 back in the early 80s at MU, but it was via terminal (Televideo 920s IIRC) on campus, or dial-up and Kermit from home. The IBM VM batch language was pretty nice; I managed to whip up some batch files to automate the edit/compile cycle, and dedicated some macros to certain PF keys. Most of the other guys were wondering why it didn't work so hard... Heh. Actually (I collect antique computers) I have a Portable, a Plus, a Portable II, and a Portable 386. No Portable III yet. Also have the original Deskpro, and a Deskpro 286. Now, if I can only get my hands on a Deskpro 386... Alas, there was one on eBay last month. I didn't HAVE the money last month, naturally! Argh. I missed out on MCA and EISA though. Darn... While I'm here... Does anyone know of anybody who has Compaq MS-DOS 3.31? I'd love to get a copy for the large hard drive support, and the special mode commands unique to Compaq MS-DOS. I think 4.x and later were more like generic MS-DOS. For some reason, my Portable 386 thinks it's monochorome only, and the Setup program I have doesn't seem to have an option to change that. I tried selecting video card, or default video mode (whatever it was, about two months ago) and the proggy kept telling me I had to change it somewhere else. Now, I know it worked fine in graphical mode when I first got it, but I mucked something up playing with the config files. I don't honestly remember if there was a special driver loaded or anything like that when I first got it. I never had this problem with the Portable and the Deskpro. Ah, well... On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:46:08 GMT, ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net (Ben Myers) wrote: Anybody been around here long enough to have used an IBM XT as his or her first office computer? Anybody been around long enough to have worked with and cursed IBM's MicroChannel computers or Compaq's and other EISA bus computers with their hare-brained configuration diskettes? Anybody been arould here long enough to have written programs in FORTRAN using punched "IBM" cards? ... Ben Myers On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:58:01 GMT, T wrote: |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
1965?, or thereabouts, FORTRAN (it was all caps then) on IBM 7074?
punched cards myself and after dropping the deck I learned about col 73-80 and sequence numbers! Just missed programming IBM 650? using mag drum for main memory - bet that was quick! HP mini's in 70's using paper tape (300 cps in 75 cps out) ASR 33 terminal 8k of magnetic core RAM - ALGOL was cool but I had to write drivers ... Got a VIC (3K) for the kids 'cause there was an assembler for 6502 - FORTH - basic - made some money off that sucker. Several 64's an 128 which we finally got running CP/M :-( I KNOW why DOS was a success! First "PC" was a Tandy 2000 - processor 8086/80286 hybrid - 2 5" 720K floppies - hi res video - really smoking fast Ran a region on Tandy 100 laptop - 8085 32K SuperROM programs - best keyboard I've ever used - good basic operating system - more FORTH BTW Compaq started out making CHEAP knockoffs of IBM equipment without much regard to power requirements and IMHO only recently made anything decent! Only work PC I had compatability problems with were Compaqs - they didn't have a better idea! Yes, I remember that!! Good old days - BS! T wrote: Compaq actually beat IBM to market with it, it was a feather in their cap tat day. Man, how things have changed over time; they spread out shrimp, no prawns, ice sculpture, (where there dancing girls? Maybe.) Nowadays it's a spot on some TV show that masquerades as a magazine and is really an advertisement. It was a really big deal back then, the 386. It had people running around training folks on the architecture and pipe lines and this new idea; a cache. What's that? Ah, the good old days. TBerk |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
IBM XT was actually my third office computer.
1. TRS-80 Model I (NewDOS/80) 2. TRS-80 Model II (TRSDOS, Lifeboat CP/M, P&T CP/M) 3. Kaypro II (CP/M) We used Borland's Sidekick (TSR) to simulate task swapping. We also used Hercules's RAMfont (monochrome & InColor) cards to display "fonts" on WordPerfect 5.1 The bank I worked at did "upgrade" to Micro-Channel. They were easier to manage on the network. Otherwise they were just expensive & underpowered. My first programming class was FORTRAN-77 on a Univac-1100 series machine (36 bit processor). Since I was/am a lousy typist, punch cards were lots of fun |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Long amount of beeps | AjBrut | Asus Motherboards | 2 | June 24th 04 11:02 AM |
Bad news for ATI: Nvidia to 'own' ATI at CeBit - no pixel shader 3.0 support in R420 (long) | NV55 | Ati Videocards | 12 | February 24th 04 07:29 AM |
Asus A7N8X - Extremely long delay at boot time | JLM | Asus Motherboards | 6 | February 2nd 04 11:11 AM |
System Beeps - Five Beeps (One long, two short, high pitch, low pitch) | Huw E | Asus Motherboards | 1 | January 29th 04 09:24 AM |
The solution for my long file names problem. | John Corliss | Cdr | 21 | August 2nd 03 08:12 AM |