Duplicating files on another hard drive

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/6eldj

(No Mikey S-lickers have been able to prove ANY of the above is a LIBEL)
( -- despite Mikey claimed to have proof of misquotes !! )

Bond (Mikey S-licker) screamed:

snip screaming

Stop that screaming, sicko!
Are you coming, sicko?

Did you get ectatic with this Mikey's spew?

-----------------------------------------------------
Mike Richter's Cockamamie Mumbo Jumbo on C1/C2 Errors
-----------------------------------------------------

=============================================
From: Noik
Date: 8/13/05

Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin ****) splattered:

James Perrett wrote:

if I'm seeing C2 errors then there MUST, by definition,
be C1 errors on the disc - in fact, every disc will
have a few C1 errors.

You are assuming a correlation between C1 and C2 errors
which is stronger than reality.

They are different measures and while they do have a gross
correlation, it is not the sort you are expecting.

I still feel that C1 and C2 errors are substantially different.

I think that a C2 error is a C1 error(s) that couldn't be corrected
with the C1 error correction capabilities. They're not independant,
they're basically the same thing except for which level of error
correction can correct the error. You're using a program that just
doesn't report C1 errors, as indicated by the fact that the "C1 error"
part in your screenshot is greyed out.

Now I know why you can create disks that have no C1 errors.
=============================================

-------------------------------
Wow! What a slimy friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/6eldj

(No Mikey S-lickers have been able to prove ANY of the above is a LIBEL)
( -- despite Mikey claimed to have proof of misquotes !! )

Bond (Mikey S-licker) whimpered:

snip whimpering

Stop that whimpering, sicko!
Are you coming, sicko?

Did you get ectatic with this Mikey's spew?

-----------------------------------------------------
Mike Richter's Cockamamie Mumbo Jumbo on C1/C2 Errors
-----------------------------------------------------

=============================================
From: Noik
Date: 8/13/05

Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin ****) splattered:

James Perrett wrote:

if I'm seeing C2 errors then there MUST, by definition,
be C1 errors on the disc - in fact, every disc will
have a few C1 errors.

You are assuming a correlation between C1 and C2 errors
which is stronger than reality.

They are different measures and while they do have a gross
correlation, it is not the sort you are expecting.

I still feel that C1 and C2 errors are substantially different.

I think that a C2 error is a C1 error(s) that couldn't be corrected
with the C1 error correction capabilities. They're not independant,
they're basically the same thing except for which level of error
correction can correct the error. You're using a program that just
doesn't report C1 errors, as indicated by the fact that the "C1 error"
part in your screenshot is greyed out.

Now I know why you can create disks that have no C1 errors.
=============================================

-------------------------------
Wow! What a slimy friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/6eldj

(No Mikey S-lickers have been able to prove ANY of the above is a LIBEL)
( -- despite Mikey claimed to have proof of misquotes !! )

Bond (Mikey S-licker) screamed:

snip screaming

Stop that screaming, sicko!
Are you coming, sicko?

Did you get ectatic with this Mikey's spew?

---------------------------------------------
Mike Richter, where's the Beef (Error Rates)? (ii)
---------------------------------------------

======================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Frggin Asshole)
Date: 11/2/01

Brendan R. Wehrung (Schmuck) squeaked:

the 200 pack Prime Paripherals blanks...wasn't bad.

Obviously, YMMV, but after I got my rebate and the discs were
essentially free, I determined that they're not worth the price.

Given the high error rates those discs delivered on each of my drives

They are marginal if you burn no more than 60 minutes per disc

- or if you just don't care about the error rates.
======================

Did you indeed get high error rates with your drives, not dug out of
your assholes?

And Mikey cares about the error rates! But see below.

======================
From: RK
Date: 11/3/01

Just wondering if something is wrong with your burner as i have
burned over 400 of them and they are one of the best disks i ever
used so far. Never had a single error on even one disk
======================
======================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Frggin Asshole)
Date: 11/3/01

There are three burners on which I've tried them with equivalent
results. All are Plextor SCSI and all deliver excellent results on
good media: 1210, 820 and 412.
======================

There's no way you could have gotten the error rates with those drives.
Why not? Because those drives do not report C1 errors, despite they
are Plextors and SCSI.

Are you sure you did not dig them out of your assholes?

======================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Frggin Asshole)
Date: 11/3/01

I burned a PP 80 in my Ricoh 6201s at its maximum write speed - 2x.

The result is much the same as it was at higher speeds

and I've posted
the report of a quick scan (sufficient in this case)

The software is CD-R Inspector, big brother to CD-R Diagnostic
======================

Guess you had no choice but to burn at 2x, that being the max speed,
isn't that right, Slimey? But why didn't you use Plextor 1210 and burn
at 12x? After all you were supposed to have gotten the high error rates
with Plextors, not Ricoh.

And much the same result at 2x and 12x? Doesn't it then give one more
reason why you should have posted the result of Plextor 12x?

Maybe this post of yours has something to do with why you used Ricoh 2x
instead of Plextor 12x? Couldn't even get soft/hard errors with Plextor
12x?

----------------------
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin ****)
Date: 8/19/01

My Ricoh 6201s will write high-speed media, but the (recoverable)
error rate is significantly higher than when I feed it the blanks
it was designed to take.

The media I prefer are rated to 16x. In any of my drives, they
perform superbly from 4x-12x but show significant recoverable
errors at 2x
----------------------

Did the Quick scan report the error rates? No? Would the Complete scan
have reported the error rates? No? No report of error rates, but
sufficient? Didn't you care about the error rates??!!

Wonder who's the asshole that spewed this?

"if you just don't care about the error rates"

Anyhow, how did you get the error rates when the Plextors did not report
C1 errors and CD-R Inspector/Diagnostic never supported error rates?

Did you dig them out of your assholes?
'
-------------------------------
Wow! What a slimy friggin SOB!
-------------------------------

----------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

It deals with backup packs. It can have many packs (hundreds), each
looking after up to 500,000 files.

So if your average file is 500KB, then each pack take care for 250GB in
each pack and in all packs many TBs.


Joe