If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Duplicating files on another hard drive
I have 2 hard drives--the main one and the backup. My music is stored on a
large file on my main HD (about 50GB). This file changes frequently as I add and subtract music. What I would like to do is arrange so that the file on the back up HD tracks the main one; every time I change the main file, it automatically changes the one on the backup HD, so that they always remain identical. Currently, I simply wait for about 6 months, then erase the backup HD and copy the file from the main HD. Trouble is, I don't know when the main drive is going to fail, so my backup files increasingly differ from the main file as time goes on. What can I do to make the back up HD track the main HD file continuously? Thanks, Norm Strong |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:10:15 -0700, wrote:
What can I do to make the back up HD track the main HD file continuously? Look into some freeware folder-synchronizing utilities. A couple of good freeware collections are SnapFiles, FreewareHome, or All4You. Also, I use (freeware) Cobian Backup with built-in automatic scheduling. I think it can do what I believe you want. Enjoy! Dan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with "Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face? -------------------------------------- wrote: I have 2 hard drives--the main one and the backup. My music is stored on a large file on my main HD (about 50GB). This file changes frequently as I add and subtract music. What I would like to do is arrange so that the file on the back up HD tracks the main one; every time I change the main file, it automatically changes the one on the backup HD, so that they always remain identical. Currently, I simply wait for about 6 months, then erase the backup HD and copy the file from the main HD. Trouble is, I don't know when the main drive is going to fail, so my backup files increasingly differ from the main file as time goes on. What can I do to make the back up HD track the main HD file continuously? Check out Karen Kenworthy's "Replicator": http://www.karenware.com/powertools/ptreplicator.asp |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Just replicating may not be good enough, as any problem developed on
the source files duplicates to the replicated drive. Look at DataMills Relative Rev Backup, a program that will managed multiple backup versions that goes days and weeks back, so you have enough time to recognize that a problem has developed, and yet have a backup copy that is free from that problem. Do not worry about the backup space; every backup version consumes the space that equals to the change from the previous one. http://www.datamills.com Joe |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... I have 2 hard drives--the main one and the backup. My music is stored on a large file on my main HD (about 50GB). This file changes frequently as I add and subtract music. What I would like to do is arrange so that the file on the back up HD tracks the main one; every time I change the main file, it automatically changes the one on the backup HD, so that they always remain identical. Currently, I simply wait for about 6 months, then erase the backup HD and copy the file from the main HD. Trouble is, I don't know when the main drive is going to fail, so my backup files increasingly differ from the main file as time goes on. What can I do to make the back up HD track the main HD file continuously? Thanks, Norm Strong Micky Soft have a new Power toy "Sync" for that you might like to look at http://snipurl.com/hjyu |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Mike seems to be a lot brighter than you dickwad.
Karen Kenworthy's "Replicator" does NOT synchronize two Directorys. SMH is incorrect. You specifically asked for a program that will track when you "add and subtract music" Karen's Replicator will NOT do that. It only accounts for any files added, not taken away. What you want is a program that will synchronize two directorys, when adding and deleting files. This will do it: http://www.alwaysync.com/ Hey SMH, you are a real idiot eh? Vomitiing all over people becuase you feel they make a mistake, then you go ahead and make a real moron of a mistake. Don't give out advice if you do not know what you are talking about. You now have NO credibility. *Plonk* Bond. . -------------------------------------- Mike Richter, were you born with "Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face? -------------------------------------- wrote: I have 2 hard drives--the main one and the backup. My music is stored on a large file on my main HD (about 50GB). This file changes frequently as I add and subtract music. What I would like to do is arrange so that the file on the back up HD tracks the main one; every time I change the main file, it automatically changes the one on the backup HD, so that they always remain identical. Currently, I simply wait for about 6 months, then erase the backup HD and copy the file from the main HD. Trouble is, I don't know when the main drive is going to fail, so my backup files increasingly differ from the main file as time goes on. What can I do to make the back up HD track the main HD file continuously? Check out Karen Kenworthy's "Replicator": http://www.karenware.com/powertools/ptreplicator.asp |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
Don't listen to SMH, he is a dickwad, and a bully to boot. Karen Kenworthy's "Replicator" does NOT synchronize two Directorys. SMH is incorrect. You specifically asked for a program that will track when you "add and subtract music" Karen's Replicator will NOT do that. It only accounts for any files added, not taken away. What you want is a program that will synchronize two directorys, when adding and deleting files. Here is something that might help you. Good luck. http://www.alwaysync.com/ Hey SMH, you are a real idiot eh? Vomitiing all over people becuase you feel they make a mistake, then you go ahead and make a real moron of a mistake. Don't give out advice if you do not know what you are talking about. You now have NO credibility. *Plonk* Bond. On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:10:15 -0700, wrote: I have 2 hard drives--the main one and the backup. My music is stored on a large file on my main HD (about 50GB). This file changes frequently as I add and subtract music. What I would like to do is arrange so that the file on the back up HD tracks the main one; every time I change the main file, it automatically changes the one on the backup HD, so that they always remain identical. Currently, I simply wait for about 6 months, then erase the backup HD and copy the file from the main HD. Trouble is, I don't know when the main drive is going to fail, so my backup files increasingly differ from the main file as time goes on. What can I do to make the back up HD track the main HD file continuously? Thanks, Norm Strong |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Joe,
I never thought of that. The program looks pretty neat. How does it do with large directorys? 180 gig and above? Bond. On 7 Sep 2005 23:05:57 -0700, "Joe Rom King" wrote: Just replicating may not be good enough, as any problem developed on the source files duplicates to the replicated drive. Look at DataMills Relative Rev Backup, a program that will managed multiple backup versions that goes days and weeks back, so you have enough time to recognize that a problem has developed, and yet have a backup copy that is free from that problem. Do not worry about the backup space; every backup version consumes the space that equals to the change from the previous one. http://www.datamills.com Joe |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with "Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face? -------------------------------------- http://tinyurl.com/6eldj (No Mikey S-lickers have been able to prove ANY of the above is a LIBEL) ( -- despite Mikey claimed to have proof of misquotes !! ) Bond (Mikey S-licker) screamed: snip screaming Stop that screaming, sicko! Are you coming, sicko? Did you get ectatic with this Mikey's spew? --------------------------------------------- Mike Richter, where's the Beef (Error Rates)? --------------------------------------------- ====================== From: Mike Richter (Slimy Frggin Asshole) Date: 11/2/01 Brendan R. Wehrung (Schmuck) squeaked: the 200 pack Prime Paripherals blanks...wasn't bad. Obviously, YMMV, but after I got my rebate and the discs were essentially free, I determined that they're not worth the price. Given the high error rates those discs delivered on each of my drives They are marginal if you burn no more than 60 minutes per disc - or if you just don't care about the error rates. ====================== Did you indeed get high error rates with your drives, not dug out of your assholes? And Mikey cares about the error rates! But see below. ====================== From: RK Date: 11/3/01 Just wondering if something is wrong with your burner as i have burned over 400 of them and they are one of the best disks i ever used so far. Never had a single error on even one disk ====================== ====================== From: Mike Richter (Slimy Frggin Asshole) Date: 11/3/01 There are three burners on which I've tried them with equivalent results. All are Plextor SCSI and all deliver excellent results on good media: 1210, 820 and 412. ====================== There's no way you could have gotten the error rates with those drives. Why not? Because those drives do not report C1 errors, despite they are Plextors and SCSI. Are you sure you did not dig them out of your assholes? ====================== From: Mike Richter (Slimy Frggin Asshole) Date: 11/3/01 I burned a PP 80 in my Ricoh 6201s at its maximum write speed - 2x. The result is much the same as it was at higher speeds and I've posted the report of a quick scan (sufficient in this case) The software is CD-R Inspector, big brother to CD-R Diagnostic ====================== Guess you had no choice but to burn at 2x, that being the max speed, isn't that right, Slimey? But why didn't you use Plextor 1210 and burn at 12x? After all you were supposed to have gotten the high error rates with Plextors, not Ricoh. And much the same result at 2x and 12x? Doesn't it then give one more reason why you should have posted the result of Plextor 12x? Maybe this post of yours has something to do with why you used Ricoh 2x instead of Plextor 12x? Couldn't even get soft/hard errors with Plextor 12x? ---------------------- From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB) Date: 10/9/03 There is an optimum burn speed for any medium in any writer. In general, a rating for a higher speed is optimized for higher-speed writers. For example, 12x media seldom write well below 4x. ---------------------- Did the Quick scan report the error rates? No? Would the Complete scan have reported the error rates? No? No report of error rates, but sufficient? Didn't you care about the error rates??!! Wonder who's the asshole that spewed this? "if you just don't care about the error rates" Anyhow, how did you get the error rates when the Plextors did not report C1 errors and CD-R Inspector/Diagnostic never supported error rates? Did you dig them out of your assholes? ' ------------------------------- Wow! What a slimy friggin SOB! ------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Mikey, you are the Slimiest Friggin SOB! ---------------------------------------- Mike Richter, were you born with "Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face? -------------------------------------- (Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seagate 7200.8 133GB per disc? | Andreas Wohlfeld | Storage (alternative) | 11 | February 19th 05 11:35 AM |
how to test psu and reset to cmos to default | Tanya | General | 23 | February 7th 05 09:56 AM |
Help needed: problem installing XP on new system | GJ | General | 26 | March 1st 04 10:04 PM |
Mysterious Hard Drive Problem | Bill Anderson | General | 4 | January 18th 04 03:43 AM |