If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Which CPU/Mainboard, of these two old systems?
I've got a friend who's computer is quite old - still running Windows 98.
She's just recieved a computer for free and I'm trying to build the best system from what I have. PC #1: - Seanix Columbia III mainboard (BX chipset) - USB ports MAY be broken. - Intel Celeron 1Ghz @ 100Mhz bus (Socket 370 in a slotkey adapter) - 3x128meg = 384meg of SDRAM (the supposed max on this mainboard) - nVidia MX400 AGP video card - 60gig IDE HDD - 40x IDE CDrom - Currently running Windows 98 PC #2: - ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset) - AMD K7 @ 850Mhz - 2x256meg = 512meg of SDRAM (Also has 2xDDR slots available) - ATI Radeon 7000 **PCI** video card - 2x 80gig IDE HDDs - LiteOn 1637S IDE DVDRW drive - PCI 2x USB card - Currently running Windows XP Home - This machine had random reboot problems, but since the reinstall of XP it *seems* stable. So, looking at the two systems, what is the best way to go with this? PC#1 has the faster CPU (any features that the K7 is missing?) but it has an OLD mainboard. It also has memory limitations (I haven't tried the 2x256 in this board). Being a Slot1 mainboard, upgrades are limited. PC#2 has the newer mainboard but the slower CPU. Some stuff won't install here, like DirectX 9 or SilverLight. Being Socket A, I could get a faster CPU, but what about the media features needed by DirectX or SilverLight, etc? Finally, which is the better video card. The AGP nVidia MX400 or the PCI ATI Radeon 7000? Thanks for any advice!!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Which CPU/Mainboard, of these two old systems?
Calab wrote:
I've got a friend who's computer is quite old - still running Windows 98. She's just recieved a computer for free and I'm trying to build the best system from what I have. PC #1: - Seanix Columbia III mainboard (BX chipset) - USB ports MAY be broken. - Intel Celeron 1Ghz @ 100Mhz bus (Socket 370 in a slotkey adapter) - 3x128meg = 384meg of SDRAM (the supposed max on this mainboard) - nVidia MX400 AGP video card - 60gig IDE HDD - 40x IDE CDrom - Currently running Windows 98 PC #2: - ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset) - AMD K7 @ 850Mhz - 2x256meg = 512meg of SDRAM (Also has 2xDDR slots available) - ATI Radeon 7000 **PCI** video card - 2x 80gig IDE HDDs - LiteOn 1637S IDE DVDRW drive - PCI 2x USB card - Currently running Windows XP Home - This machine had random reboot problems, but since the reinstall of XP it *seems* stable. So, looking at the two systems, what is the best way to go with this? PC#1 has the faster CPU (any features that the K7 is missing?) but it has an OLD mainboard. It also has memory limitations (I haven't tried the 2x256 in this board). Being a Slot1 mainboard, upgrades are limited. PC#2 has the newer mainboard but the slower CPU. Some stuff won't install here, like DirectX 9 or SilverLight. Being Socket A, I could get a faster CPU, but what about the media features needed by DirectX or SilverLight, etc? I would go with motherboard #2. Don't sweat the processor--clock speed isn't everything. Celerons from that era, if I remember correctly, were pretty stunted so the Athlon may well just out perform it. Finally, which is the better video card. The AGP nVidia MX400 or the PCI ATI Radeon 7000? They're pretty close to each other. I would probably benchmark both cards in motherboard #2. I've never had a problem with an ECS board, but then again, I've never owned one. I know there were some problems a few years ago with bad capacitors, or something, that's embittered some consumers. Keep motherboard #1 in a box incase motherboard #2 goes belly up, and send me the old case--I have a craptastic motherboard (currently in a box) that needs a home. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Which CPU/Mainboard, of these two old systems?
"Calab" wrote in message ... I've got a friend who's computer is quite old - still running Windows 98. She's just recieved a computer for free and I'm trying to build the best system from what I have. PC #1: - Seanix Columbia III mainboard (BX chipset) - USB ports MAY be broken. - Intel Celeron 1Ghz @ 100Mhz bus (Socket 370 in a slotkey adapter) - 3x128meg = 384meg of SDRAM (the supposed max on this mainboard) - nVidia MX400 AGP video card - 60gig IDE HDD - 40x IDE CDrom - Currently running Windows 98 PC #2: - ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset) - AMD K7 @ 850Mhz - 2x256meg = 512meg of SDRAM (Also has 2xDDR slots available) - ATI Radeon 7000 **PCI** video card - 2x 80gig IDE HDDs - LiteOn 1637S IDE DVDRW drive - PCI 2x USB card - Currently running Windows XP Home - This machine had random reboot problems, but since the reinstall of XP it *seems* stable. So, looking at the two systems, what is the best way to go with this? PC#1 has the faster CPU (any features that the K7 is missing?) but it has an OLD mainboard. It also has memory limitations (I haven't tried the 2x256 in this board). Being a Slot1 mainboard, upgrades are limited. PC#2 has the newer mainboard but the slower CPU. Some stuff won't install here, like DirectX 9 or SilverLight. Being Socket A, I could get a faster CPU, but what about the media features needed by DirectX or SilverLight, etc? Finally, which is the better video card. The AGP nVidia MX400 or the PCI ATI Radeon 7000? Thanks for any advice!!! I'd say the MX400 http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/vga-ch...iew-604-3.html is marginally quicker but for some applications its closer than a snail is to the ground (compare the benchmark relevant to you) The difference between the processors is also pretty marginal as the K7 performs better at given clockspeeds than the Celerons. I think on the whole I'd prefer a newer board the BX was good in its day but more memory is a big big plus in Windows and old K7's are as cheap as chips so you have the chance to add a bit more speed the only thing that niggles me is the relationship between ECS and Pcchips (same company) Derek |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Which CPU/Mainboard, of these two old systems?
Calab wrote:
I've got a friend who's computer is quite old - still running Windows 98. She's just recieved a computer for free and I'm trying to build the best system from what I have. PC #1: - Seanix Columbia III mainboard (BX chipset) - USB ports MAY be broken. - Intel Celeron 1Ghz @ 100Mhz bus (Socket 370 in a slotkey adapter) - 3x128meg = 384meg of SDRAM (the supposed max on this mainboard) - nVidia MX400 AGP video card - 60gig IDE HDD - 40x IDE CDrom - Currently running Windows 98 PC #2: - ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset) - AMD K7 @ 850Mhz - 2x256meg = 512meg of SDRAM (Also has 2xDDR slots available) - ATI Radeon 7000 **PCI** video card - 2x 80gig IDE HDDs - LiteOn 1637S IDE DVDRW drive - PCI 2x USB card - Currently running Windows XP Home - This machine had random reboot problems, but since the reinstall of XP it *seems* stable. So, looking at the two systems, what is the best way to go with this? PC#1 has the faster CPU (any features that the K7 is missing?) but it has an OLD mainboard. It also has memory limitations (I haven't tried the 2x256 in this board). Being a Slot1 mainboard, upgrades are limited. PC#2 has the newer mainboard but the slower CPU. Some stuff won't install here, like DirectX 9 or SilverLight. Being Socket A, I could get a faster CPU, but what about the media features needed by DirectX or SilverLight, etc? Finally, which is the better video card. The AGP nVidia MX400 or the PCI ATI Radeon 7000? Thanks for any advice!!! If it won't boot stable, what would be the point building a computer with computer #2 ? If your friend is not computer literate, or handy with a screwdriver, then stability should be your first concern. Otherwise, you'll be called over to fix computer #2, over and over again. To me, it looks like moving the PCI USB card from computer #2 to computer #1, solves all the problems. If you're going to try installing WinXP on computer #1, I'd use the install CD that came with computer #2. I would disconnect the original Win98 OS boot hard drive, and connect a clean drive to computer #1, then install WinXP. If the installation experiment is a failure for some reason, you can always connect the original OS boot disk, back to the 440BX motherboard. Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Which CPU/Mainboard, of these two old systems?
Derek wrote:
"Calab" wrote in message ... I've got a friend who's computer is quite old - still running Windows 98. She's just recieved a computer for free and I'm trying to build the best system from what I have. PC #1: - Seanix Columbia III mainboard (BX chipset) - USB ports MAY be broken. - Intel Celeron 1Ghz @ 100Mhz bus (Socket 370 in a slotkey adapter) - 3x128meg = 384meg of SDRAM (the supposed max on this mainboard) - nVidia MX400 AGP video card - 60gig IDE HDD - 40x IDE CDrom - Currently running Windows 98 PC #2: - ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset) - AMD K7 @ 850Mhz - 2x256meg = 512meg of SDRAM (Also has 2xDDR slots available) - ATI Radeon 7000 **PCI** video card - 2x 80gig IDE HDDs - LiteOn 1637S IDE DVDRW drive - PCI 2x USB card - Currently running Windows XP Home - This machine had random reboot problems, but since the reinstall of XP it *seems* stable. So, looking at the two systems, what is the best way to go with this? PC#1 has the faster CPU (any features that the K7 is missing?) but it has an OLD mainboard. It also has memory limitations (I haven't tried the 2x256 in this board). Being a Slot1 mainboard, upgrades are limited. PC#2 has the newer mainboard but the slower CPU. Some stuff won't install here, like DirectX 9 or SilverLight. Being Socket A, I could get a faster CPU, but what about the media features needed by DirectX or SilverLight, etc? Finally, which is the better video card. The AGP nVidia MX400 or the PCI ATI Radeon 7000? Thanks for any advice!!! I'd say the MX400 http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/vga-ch...iew-604-3.html is marginally quicker but for some applications its closer than a snail is to the ground (compare the benchmark relevant to you) The difference between the processors is also pretty marginal as the K7 performs better at given clockspeeds than the Celerons. I think on the whole I'd prefer a newer board the BX was good in its day but more memory is a big big plus in Windows and old K7's are as cheap as chips so you have the chance to add a bit more speed the only thing that niggles me is the relationship between ECS and Pcchips (same company) I did not know that. Ok, Calab, that's a point against ECS as I have had experience with a PCChips board and would not hasten to recommend it. That said, though, you already have the ECS board, and it does outperform (on paper at least) your other choice. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Which CPU/Mainboard, of these two old systems?
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:09:51 -0600, "Calab"
wrote: I've got a friend who's computer is quite old - still running Windows 98. She's just recieved a computer for free and I'm trying to build the best system from what I have. PC #1: - Seanix Columbia III mainboard (BX chipset) - USB ports MAY be broken. - Intel Celeron 1Ghz @ 100Mhz bus (Socket 370 in a slotkey adapter) - 3x128meg = 384meg of SDRAM (the supposed max on this mainboard) - nVidia MX400 AGP video card - 60gig IDE HDD - 40x IDE CDrom - Currently running Windows 98 PC #2: - ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset) - AMD K7 @ 850Mhz - 2x256meg = 512meg of SDRAM (Also has 2xDDR slots available) - ATI Radeon 7000 **PCI** video card - 2x 80gig IDE HDDs - LiteOn 1637S IDE DVDRW drive - PCI 2x USB card - Currently running Windows XP Home - This machine had random reboot problems, but since the reinstall of XP it *seems* stable. So, looking at the two systems, what is the best way to go with this? PC#1 has the faster CPU (any features that the K7 is missing?) Can't remember, but maybe early K7 didn't have SSE instruction support? Then again, it has a faster floating point IIRC, so overall it's a wash. ... but it has an OLD mainboard. It also has memory limitations (I haven't tried the 2x256 in this board). Being a Slot1 mainboard, upgrades are limited. PC #1 will consume less power and thus, not need as powerful of a PSU. PC #2 has a motherboard known to have bad capacitors (though PC #1 might also, but it is not "known" yet to have them, at least not by me and probably not by most people since it's a generic brand). PC #2 has more of an upgrade potential, and yet running such a slow socket A CPU might be why it's still working at all since faster CPU use more current, wearing out the capacitors all that much faster. Regardless, PC #2 has the potential to run a roughly 2GHz Athlon XP, perhaps even higher if it has multiplier adjustments in the bios and/or you hack the pinout so it senses a higher multiplier. Google should have info about the specifics of doing that. PC #1 can run up to 768MB of memory as 3 x 256MB _low_ density modules (typically referred to as PC100). PC #2 I forget, but perhaps 512MB per slot, maybe 1GB per slot. PC #2 probably has high density memory as PC133, so swapping them into PC1 would probably result in either no post, or seeing only half the capacity of each module. I vaguely recall that some early revisions of PC #2's motherboard can't even run a pair of memory modules very stabily, but I can't recall the specifics like what bus speed, what timings, or even if it's using the PC133 or DDR slots. PC#2 has the newer mainboard but the slower CPU. There's not much difference between a 1GHz Celeron and a 850MHz Athlon, it should be the least of your concerns from a performance standpoint, but the Celeron probably uses less power at idle due to an enabled ACPI power management feature (often disabled on early socket A boards, although it's possible a later bios for PC2 might enable that, or a chipset register hack might, and then again PC#1 may need a newer bios to support these features as well if running a bios older than roughly year 2000, and being generic it may not even have a newer bios available). Some stuff won't install here, like DirectX 9 or SilverLight. Being Socket A, I could get a faster CPU, but what about the media features needed by DirectX or SilverLight, etc? You're getting a bit ahead of the reasonable capabilities of these systems, no need to make it "Modern" when it's going to struggle at doing anything modern. DX9 shouldn't be needed, neither are going to be any good at games that need DX9. Silverlight? Why? Even a current version of acrobat is excessive, use foxit PDF reader. Finally, which is the better video card. The AGP nVidia MX400 or the PCI ATI Radeon 7000? Thanks for any advice!!! It won't make much difference for the practical applications these two systems could run, but by using the AGP card you free up the PCI bus so that is a better alternative. If it's a choice of one or the other as-is, the one with XP and 512MB memory wins by virtue of being more capable of supporting a few newer technologies, but check it for failing capacitors and if it keeps rebooting then consider swapping the PSU from the other system. I hate to write it, but both of these systems are old enough that a redeployment at this point may not provide much use, and what "much" is could be anyone's guess. Maybe a day, maybe 6 years, probably somewhere closer to 1-2 years before either the mobo, PSU, or a hard drive fails. Maybe something has on PC2 already, you need to stress test it some to see if the problems it had formerly are resolved or just haven't resurfaced yet. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Which CPU/Mainboard, of these two old systems?
"Calab" wrote in message ... I've got a friend who's computer is quite old - still running Windows 98. She's just recieved a computer for free and I'm trying to build the best system from what I have. PC #1: - Seanix Columbia III mainboard (BX chipset) - USB ports MAY be broken. - Intel Celeron 1Ghz @ 100Mhz bus (Socket 370 in a slotkey adapter) - 3x128meg = 384meg of SDRAM (the supposed max on this mainboard) - nVidia MX400 AGP video card - 60gig IDE HDD - 40x IDE CDrom - Currently running Windows 98 PC #2: - ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset) - AMD K7 @ 850Mhz - 2x256meg = 512meg of SDRAM (Also has 2xDDR slots available) - ATI Radeon 7000 **PCI** video card - 2x 80gig IDE HDDs - LiteOn 1637S IDE DVDRW drive - PCI 2x USB card - Currently running Windows XP Home - This machine had random reboot problems, but since the reinstall of XP it *seems* stable. So, looking at the two systems, what is the best way to go with this? PC#1 has the faster CPU (any features that the K7 is missing?) but it has an OLD mainboard. It also has memory limitations (I haven't tried the 2x256 in this board). Being a Slot1 mainboard, upgrades are limited. PC#2 has the newer mainboard but the slower CPU. Some stuff won't install here, like DirectX 9 or SilverLight. Being Socket A, I could get a faster CPU, but what about the media features needed by DirectX or SilverLight, etc? Finally, which is the better video card. The AGP nVidia MX400 or the PCI ATI Radeon 7000? Thanks for any advice!!! Heck , if the 2nd machine has a working installation of XP on it... I'd go with that one. (Providing it stays stable) XP is way better than win98, plus it has two HD's Though the 850 mhz AMD cpu is a bit slower in "mhz" it's a better CPU than the Celeron so should be as good or better. If the 2nd board has any empty ram slots you may be able to use some from the other machine. BTW: ECS is not always considered the best mobo, but I had one once and it only had one minor glitch: In the winter, it was pretty prone to static discharge and I had to make sure I had grounded myself prior to plugging in a USB device. If I shuffled across the carpet and plugged in a USB device without first grounding myself, the machine would sometimes reboot! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Which CPU/Mainboard, of these two old systems?
philo wrote:
"Calab" wrote in message ... I've got a friend who's computer is quite old - still running Windows 98. She's just recieved a computer for free and I'm trying to build the best system from what I have. PC #1: - Seanix Columbia III mainboard (BX chipset) - USB ports MAY be broken. - Intel Celeron 1Ghz @ 100Mhz bus (Socket 370 in a slotkey adapter) - 3x128meg = 384meg of SDRAM (the supposed max on this mainboard) - nVidia MX400 AGP video card - 60gig IDE HDD - 40x IDE CDrom - Currently running Windows 98 PC #2: - ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset) - AMD K7 @ 850Mhz - 2x256meg = 512meg of SDRAM (Also has 2xDDR slots available) - ATI Radeon 7000 **PCI** video card - 2x 80gig IDE HDDs - LiteOn 1637S IDE DVDRW drive - PCI 2x USB card - Currently running Windows XP Home - This machine had random reboot problems, but since the reinstall of XP it *seems* stable. So, looking at the two systems, what is the best way to go with this? PC#1 has the faster CPU (any features that the K7 is missing?) but it has an OLD mainboard. It also has memory limitations (I haven't tried the 2x256 in this board). Being a Slot1 mainboard, upgrades are limited. PC#2 has the newer mainboard but the slower CPU. Some stuff won't install here, like DirectX 9 or SilverLight. Being Socket A, I could get a faster CPU, but what about the media features needed by DirectX or SilverLight, etc? Finally, which is the better video card. The AGP nVidia MX400 or the PCI ATI Radeon 7000? Thanks for any advice!!! Heck , if the 2nd machine has a working installation of XP on it... I'd go with that one. (Providing it stays stable) XP is way better than win98, plus it has two HD's Though the 850 mhz AMD cpu is a bit slower in "mhz" it's a better CPU than the Celeron so should be as good or better. If the 2nd board has any empty ram slots you may be able to use some from the other machine. BTW: ECS is not always considered the best mobo, but I had one once and it only had one minor glitch: In the winter, it was pretty prone to static discharge and I had to make sure I had grounded myself prior to plugging in a USB device. If I shuffled across the carpet and plugged in a USB device without first grounding myself, the machine would sometimes reboot! Shuffling and "rebooting" is a sign of old age--are you sure it wasn't just "operator error?" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Which CPU/Mainboard, of these two old systems?
I won't pick PC #2:with ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset).
I have three different versions of ECS K7S5A; version1 , ver3.1 and ver3.1B. All three have bad caps. They use either G-luzon(green) or OST(purple). OST seems to last longer,but it will be matter of time before any G-luzon or OST become bad. The ECS K7S5A is notoriously for bad design, losing cmos data, draining out battery in short time(3-6 days), won't boot after reset. I recap all three versions and all still have the cold boot and losing cmos issue. On Nov 1, 12:09*pm, "Calab" wrote: I've got a friend who's computer is quite old - still running Windows 98. She's just recieved a computer for free and I'm trying to build the best system from what I have. PC #1: *- Seanix Columbia III mainboard (BX chipset) * *- USB ports MAY be broken. *- Intel Celeron 1Ghz @ 100Mhz bus (Socket 370 in a slotkey adapter) *- 3x128meg = 384meg of SDRAM (the supposed max on this mainboard) *- nVidia MX400 AGP video card *- 60gig IDE HDD *- 40x IDE CDrom *- Currently running Windows 98 PC #2: *- ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset) *- AMD K7 @ 850Mhz *- 2x256meg = 512meg of SDRAM (Also has 2xDDR slots available) *- ATI Radeon 7000 **PCI** video card *- 2x 80gig IDE HDDs *- LiteOn 1637S IDE DVDRW drive *- PCI 2x USB card *- Currently running Windows XP Home *- This machine had random reboot problems, but since the reinstall of XP it *seems* stable. So, looking at the two systems, what is the best way to go with this? PC#1 has the faster CPU (any features that the K7 is missing?) but it has an OLD mainboard. *It also has memory limitations (I haven't tried the 2x256 in this board). Being a Slot1 mainboard, upgrades are limited. PC#2 has the newer mainboard but the slower CPU. Some stuff won't install here, like DirectX 9 or SilverLight. Being Socket A, I could get a faster CPU, but what about the media features needed by DirectX or SilverLight, etc? Finally, which is the better video card. The AGP nVidia MX400 or the PCI ATI Radeon 7000? Thanks for any advice!!! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Which CPU/Mainboard, of these two old systems?
"Calab" wrote in message ... I've got a friend who's computer is quite old - still running Windows 98. She's just recieved a computer for free and I'm trying to build the best system from what I have. Thanks for all the input folks! Some replies, in no particular order... I honestly had no idea what kind of performance the Radeon 7000 had, especially being PCI. I guessed that they were pretty close, but wanted some verification. I considered PC#2, even though it was unstable, because it could be memory or video card, which could be switched out. It also had the ability to use a faster CPU when I found one. I've had a few ECS and PCChips mainboards. They're cheap and will do in a pinch. In the end it all became moot. I found a working 1.3Ghz AMD machine for $40. It was complete except for a hard drive. Even had 6800GT video card. The system is up and running beautifully. Now I'm harvesting PC #2 for parts to add to PC #1. 2x256meg work. Got the DVDRW and ATI video card as well as the PCI USB card. The only issue I see is that it appears that the 1Ghz CPU is only running at 500Mhz (highest the MB can do). Plenty fast for Win98SE with 512meg of memory and only used for internet stuff. PC #1: - Seanix Columbia III mainboard (BX chipset) - USB ports MAY be broken. - Intel Celeron 1Ghz @ 100Mhz bus (Socket 370 in a slotkey adapter) - 3x128meg = 384meg of SDRAM (the supposed max on this mainboard) - nVidia MX400 AGP video card - 60gig IDE HDD - 40x IDE CDrom - Currently running Windows 98 PC #2: - ECS K7S5A v1 mainboard (SiS chipset) - AMD K7 @ 850Mhz - 2x256meg = 512meg of SDRAM (Also has 2xDDR slots available) - ATI Radeon 7000 **PCI** video card - 2x 80gig IDE HDDs - LiteOn 1637S IDE DVDRW drive - PCI 2x USB card - Currently running Windows XP Home - This machine had random reboot problems, but since the reinstall of XP it *seems* stable. So, looking at the two systems, what is the best way to go with this? PC#1 has the faster CPU (any features that the K7 is missing?) but it has an OLD mainboard. It also has memory limitations (I haven't tried the 2x256 in this board). Being a Slot1 mainboard, upgrades are limited. PC#2 has the newer mainboard but the slower CPU. Some stuff won't install here, like DirectX 9 or SilverLight. Being Socket A, I could get a faster CPU, but what about the media features needed by DirectX or SilverLight, etc? Finally, which is the better video card. The AGP nVidia MX400 or the PCI ATI Radeon 7000? Thanks for any advice!!! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Systems Availability of Systems Using Via Isaiah CN chip | [email protected] | AMD x86-64 Processors | 0 | February 8th 08 08:38 PM |
XPS Systems | Andy | Dell Computers | 7 | February 24th 05 04:55 PM |
--> AMAZING! Free Ipods, Laptops, PC's, Game Systems, Car Gear, Computer Parts, TV's, Home Theater Systems, Bose iPod Sound Dock, + Much Much More! Check It OUT! <-- | GuitarMan | Nvidia Videocards | 0 | January 24th 05 08:59 PM |
New 8400, XPS gen 3 systems - can your systems play current games (Far Cry...)? | scooby | Dell Computers | 3 | August 7th 04 05:57 PM |
systems | Larry S | General Hardware | 4 | January 4th 04 09:47 PM |