A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Cdr
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is InCD totally without hope on Win98SE?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 1st 04, 06:05 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is InCD totally without hope on Win98SE?

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

Howard Kaikow wrote:
Clive (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Why the hell cant anyone produce reliable packet writing software (and I
dont mean the flaws in the format) but the software itself?


The problem is not the format, it is the inept implementation of the
standards.


=========================================
Mike Richter on Packet Writing Format (v)
=========================================

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"

=================================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 2/5/02

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.
=================================================


After blaming all the DirectCD bugs on the faulty "format" like the
above, the Slimy Scum spewed these:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' ****)
Subject: Keeping Old Data Disks Readable
Date: 2/28/04

Fixed-length packets create the least reliable, most fragile
format available for writing CDs.

However, they can still be read
if written to the standard (as DCD always has).
======================

The faulty "format" is no problem after all! Beyond me then why the
Slimeball keeps on harping about the faulty format.

---------------------------
Wow! What a Friggin' ****!
---------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)
  #2  
Old April 2nd 04, 08:18 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

Howard Kaikow wrote:
Clive (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Why the hell cant anyone produce reliable packet writing software (and I
dont mean the flaws in the format) but the software itself?


The problem is not the format, it is the inept implementation of the
standards.


=========================================
Mike Richter on Packet Writing Format (v)
=========================================

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"

=================================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 2/5/02

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.
=================================================


After blaming all the DirectCD bugs on the faulty "format" like the
above, the Slimy Scum spewed these:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' ****)
Subject: Keeping Old Data Disks Readable
Date: 2/28/04

Fixed-length packets create the least reliable, most fragile
format available for writing CDs.

However, they can still be read
if written to the standard (as DCD always has).
======================

---------------------------
Wow! What a Friggin' ****!
---------------------------

The faulty "format" is no problem after all! Beyond me then why the
Slimeball keeps on harping about the faulty format.

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)
  #3  
Old April 2nd 04, 10:50 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

Howard Kaikow wrote:
Clive (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Why the hell cant anyone produce reliable packet writing software
(and I dont mean the flaws in the format) but the software itself?

The problem is not the format, it is the inept implementation of the
standards.


=========================================
Mike Richter on Packet Writing Format (v)
=========================================

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"

( An MS MVP not only swallowed the above cockamamie hook, )
( line and sinker, but actively spreads the garbage! )

=================================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 2/5/02

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.
=================================================


After blaming all the DirectCD bugs on the faulty "format" like the
above, the Slimy Scum spewed these:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' ****)
Date: 2/28/04

Fixed-length packets create the least reliable, most fragile
format available for writing CDs.

However, they can still be read
if written to the standard (as DCD always has).
======================

The faulty "format" is no problem after all! Beyond me then why the
Slimeball keeps on harping about the faulty format.


======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 3/29/04

Fixed-length packets are the least reliable and most fragile
format for writing to CD-R.

Use that mode at your own substantial risk.
======================

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)
  #4  
Old April 3rd 04, 01:01 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Howard Kaikow wrote:
Clive (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Why the hell cant anyone produce reliable packet writing software
(and I dont mean the flaws in the format) but the software itself?

The problem is not the format, it is the inept implementation of the
standards.


=========================================
Mike Richter on Packet Writing Format (v)
=========================================

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"

( An MS MVP not only swallowed the above cockamamie hook, )
( line and sinker, but actively spreads the garbage! )

=================================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' ****)
Date: 2/5/02

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.
=================================================


After blaming all the DirectCD bugs on the faulty "format" like the
above, the Slimy Scum spewed these:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 2/28/04

Fixed-length packets create the least reliable, most fragile
format available for writing CDs.

However, they can still be read
if written to the standard (as DCD always has).
======================

---------------------------
Wow! What a Friggin' ****!
---------------------------

The faulty "format" is no problem after all! Beyond me then why the
Slimeball keeps on harping about the faulty format.


Wonder whatever happened to all those DirectCD bugs Mikey weaseled out
with "the least reliable and most fragile format" cockamamie, like this
one:

(Wonder why the disappeared data could not be read then ???!!!)

==============================
From: Mike Richter
Date: 12/15/01
Subject: Files Disappeared From CDRW DIsc.......

Suddenly i find myself among those who are having BIG problems
with Roxios crappy software, after a reasonable amount of small
problems with it, i insert a cdrw with files on it (jpegs) and
tried to burn a few more onto it only to find Roxio software
thinks it is either, corrupted, unrecognized data or need
formatting(?)

only one file remains on the disc, the others are GONE.


My guess is that you used DCD and you have now joined
the crowd of users who have learned that

fixed-length packets are the least reliable and
most fragile format you can write to CD.

Incidentally, the fault is not with the software but with
the format and the medium.
==============================

-------------------------------
Mikey, you are a Friggin' ****!
-------------------------------
  #5  
Old April 3rd 04, 07:50 PM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Howard Kaikow wrote:
Clive (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Why the hell cant anyone produce reliable packet writing software
(and I dont mean the flaws in the format) but the software itself?

The problem is not the format, it is the inept implementation of the
standards.


=========================================
Mike Richter on Packet Writing Format (v)
=========================================

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"

( An MS MVP not only swallowed the above cockamamie hook, )
( line and sinker, but actively spreads the garbage! )

=================================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' ****)
Date: 2/5/02

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.
=================================================


After blaming all the DirectCD bugs on the faulty "format" like the
above, the Slimy Scum spewed these:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 2/28/04

Fixed-length packets create the least reliable, most fragile
format available for writing CDs.

However, they can still be read
if written to the standard (as DCD always has).
======================

---------------------------
Wow! What a Friggin' ****!
---------------------------

The faulty "format" is no problem after all!


Wonder whatever happened to all those DirectCD bugs Mikey weaseled out
with "the least reliable and most fragile format" cockamamie, like this
one:

======================
From: Mike Richter
Subject: Recover files from a CDRW disc?
Date: 10/27/00

I burned a CDRW using DirectCD, everything burned without any
errors and i erased the files from my computer, then i tried
to read some of the files but about 80% of the files cannot be
read


2. Fixed-length packet writing is the least reliable format
available.
======================

-------------------------------
Mikey, you are a Friggin' ****!
-------------------------------
  #6  
Old April 5th 04, 04:42 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Howard Kaikow wrote:
Clive (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Why the hell cant anyone produce reliable packet writing software
(and I dont mean the flaws in the format) but the software itself?

The problem is not the format, it is the inept implementation of the
standards.


=========================================
Mike Richter on Packet Writing Format (v)
=========================================

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"

( An MS MVP not only swallowed the above cockamamie hook, )
( line and sinker, but actively spreads the garbage! )

=================================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' ****)
Date: 2/5/02

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.
=================================================


After blaming all the DirectCD bugs on the faulty "format" like the
above, the Slimy Scum spewed these:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 2/28/04

Fixed-length packets create the least reliable, most fragile
format available for writing CDs.

However, they can still be read
if written to the standard (as DCD always has).
======================

---------------------------
Wow! What a Friggin' ****!
---------------------------

The faulty "format" is no problem after all!


Wonder whatever happened to all those DirectCD bugs Mikey weaseled out
with "the least reliable and most fragile format" cockamamie, like this
one:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Subject: Direct Cd problem
Date: 7/3/02

I was using Direct Cd to load files on a cd when it burped.
Now the cd can't be read by the program or windows.


My guess is that you were writing fixed-length packets

That is the least reliable and most fragile format available
for CD writing.
======================

-------------------------------
Mikey, you are a Friggin' ****!
-------------------------------
  #7  
Old April 5th 04, 10:32 PM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Howard Kaikow wrote:
Clive (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Why the hell cant anyone produce reliable packet writing software
(and I dont mean the flaws in the format) but the software itself?

The problem is not the format, it is the inept implementation of the
standards.


=========================================
Mike Richter on Packet Writing Format (v)
=========================================

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"

( An MS MVP not only swallowed the above cockamamie hook, )
( line and sinker, but actively spreads the garbage! )

=================================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' ****)
Date: 2/5/02

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.
=================================================


After blaming all the DirectCD bugs on the faulty "format" like the
above, the Slimy Scum spewed these:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 2/28/04

Fixed-length packets create the least reliable, most fragile
format available for writing CDs.

However, they can still be read
if written to the standard (as DCD always has).
======================

---------------------------
Wow! What a Friggin' ****!
---------------------------

The faulty "format" is no problem after all!


Wonder whatever happened to all those DirectCD bugs Mikey weaseled out
with "the least reliable and most fragile format" cockamamie, like this
one:

======================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 5/7/03

I have been a user of Dell computers and Roxio Direct CD
In all fairness to Dell, I believe the main culprit here is Roxio.

5. I put in a previously formatted cd to be written on, one that
has previously written data, and the Direct CD sreen comes on,
saying the cd is blank.


You appear to be writing fixed-length packets, recognized to be
by far the least reliable and most fragile format available for CD.

I use erasable media only for test; they tend to be forgetful.

However, written in packets they're worse than merely unreliable
for some files; they are likely to cost you the whole disc.

The issue is not the software but the format.
============================================

-------------------------------
Mikey, you are a Friggin' ****!
-------------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)
  #8  
Old April 6th 04, 11:03 PM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Howard Kaikow wrote:
Clive (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Why the hell cant anyone produce reliable packet writing software
(and I dont mean the flaws in the format) but the software itself?

The problem is not the format, it is the inept implementation of the
standards.


=========================================
Mike Richter on Packet Writing Format (v)
=========================================

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"

( An MS MVP not only swallowed the above cockamamie hook, )
( line and sinker, but actively spreads the garbage! )

=================================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' ****)
Date: 2/5/02

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.
=================================================


After blaming all the DirectCD bugs on the faulty "format" like the
above, the Slimy Scum spewed these:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 2/28/04

Fixed-length packets create the least reliable, most fragile
format available for writing CDs.

However, they can still be read
if written to the standard (as DCD always has).
======================

---------------------------
Wow! What a Friggin' ****!
---------------------------

The faulty "format" is no problem after all!


Wonder whatever happened to all those DirectCD bugs Mikey weaseled out
with "the least reliable and most fragile format" cockamamie, like this
one:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 5/22/01

I have about 500Mb of data on a CD-RW. I access almost all of
the data daily, but last week I accessed the disc through my
HP 8250i and DirectCD 2.5, and 0 objects were visible.


Fixed-length packets are the least reliable format for CD-R.
======================

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)
  #9  
Old April 7th 04, 08:42 PM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Howard Kaikow wrote:
Clive (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Why the hell cant anyone produce reliable packet writing software
(and I dont mean the flaws in the format) but the software itself?

The problem is not the format, it is the inept implementation of the
standards.


=========================================
Mike Richter on Packet Writing Format (v)
=========================================

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"

( An MS MVP not only swallowed the above cockamamie hook, )
( line and sinker, but actively spreads the garbage! )

=================================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' ****)
Date: 2/5/02

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.
=================================================


After blaming all the DirectCD bugs on the faulty "format" like the
above, the Slimy Scum spewed these:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 2/28/04

Fixed-length packets create the least reliable, most fragile
format available for writing CDs.

However, they can still be read
if written to the standard (as DCD always has).
======================

---------------------------
Wow! What a Friggin' ****!
---------------------------

The faulty "format" is no problem after all!


Wonder whatever happened to all those DirectCD bugs Mikey weaseled out
with "the least reliable and most fragile format" cockamamie, like this
one:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 9/26/01

I have EZCDC 5.02b... I burned a 10X CDRW with 5 small sessions
over a period of a few weeks just for small file ... transfer
to another computer. I went to burn another to it and found
I could not read it at all.

Is this a known bug with creator or the drive?


Neither. My guess is that you mean the DCD component of ECDC
and that you wrote fixed-length packets.

That is the least reliable format available and you seem to have
suffered from it.
======================

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)
  #10  
Old April 8th 04, 08:26 PM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Howard Kaikow wrote:
Clive (Pipsqueak) squeaked:

Why the hell cant anyone produce reliable packet writing software
(and I dont mean the flaws in the format) but the software itself?

The problem is not the format, it is the inept implementation of the
standards.


=========================================
Mike Richter on Packet Writing Format (v)
=========================================

"the fault is not with the software but with the format"

( An MS MVP not only swallowed the above cockamamie hook, )
( line and sinker, but actively spreads the garbage! )

=================================================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' ****)
Date: 2/5/02

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.
=================================================


After blaming all the DirectCD bugs on the faulty "format" like the
above, the Slimy Scum spewed these:

======================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Date: 2/28/04

Fixed-length packets create the least reliable, most fragile
format available for writing CDs.

However, they can still be read
if written to the standard (as DCD always has).
======================

---------------------------
Wow! What a Friggin' ****!
---------------------------

The faulty "format" is no problem after all!


Wonder whatever happened to all those DirectCD bugs Mikey weaseled out
with "the least reliable and most fragile format" cockamamie, like this
one:

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Friggin' Scum)
Subject: File Integrity Errors
Date: 10/12/01

I am using Easy CD Creator 5 Platinum on a Windows Me computer.
I ran scandisk on a CDRW disk and it came back with a file
integrity error.

formatted a brand new blank CDRW and copied the files onto the
new disk After running scandisk again I received the same
error messages.

What could be causing these errors


You are using the least reliable and most fragile format
available for storage on CD.
=====================

-------------------------------
Mikey, you are a Friggin' ****!
-------------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
InCD Error: Cannot connect to file system Howard Kaikow Cdr 3 January 10th 04 04:00 PM
InCD v4.1 kills my sound system? Matt Alanzo Cdr 1 January 5th 04 02:35 AM
InCD 4.072 bsods Win98SE R.V. Gronoff Cdr 1 November 25th 03 08:26 AM
Warning: Latest Norton Auntie Virus update breaks InCD Howard Kaikow Cdr 17 October 15th 03 02:11 PM
INCD & WIN98SE Ardna Cdr 1 July 7th 03 01:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.