A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » AMD x86-64 Processors
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Intel are whores



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 11th 06, 12:35 AM posted to alt.comp.hardware.amd.x86-64
Rich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Intel are whores

Whores to Dell, now themselves. All to hurt AMD. A similar situation
was seen in the
1970s when the Mafia took over Laidlaw Waste Disposal and tried to
drive smaller firms into
bankruptcy using massive price cuts.

How come the Justice Dept gets all upset at China for "dumping" but not
an odious company
like Intel?

Intel Corp.'s attempt to stanch the loss of market share to Advanced
Micro Devices Inc., its smaller rival in the computer microprocessor
business, appears to be working and may allow it to gain lost ground
over the next six months, analysts said Friday.

AMD on late Thursday warned second-quarter revenue would be about $1.22
billion (euro0.95 billion), or about 9 percent below the previous
period. In April, the Sunnyvale-based company had forecast revenue that
would be flat or slightly below first-quarter sales of $1.33 billion
(euro1.04 billion). It pinned the lower estimate on declining sales of
processors for desktop and notebook PCs.

The disclosure came as an abrupt reversal for AMD, which over the past
year has picked up about 5 points of market share, mostly at the
expense of Intel, according to Mercury Research. With AMD's share
hovering around 21 percent, company executives last month said they
were preparing to supply 30 percent of the market's needs by 2008.

Steep price cuts from Intel, the world's biggest chip maker, appear to
be throwing a fork in those plans, analysts said. Over the past few
months, Intel, head quartered in Santa Clara, has slashed prices for
its PC processors by as much as 30 percent.

Intel, whose processors have been largely outgunned by
higher-performing chips from AMD, also has been talking up future price
cuts that are to coincide with the release of three new products, due
by midsummer, it says will put the company back in the technological
lead.

Intel's product and pricing forecasts caused people to delay buying
computers over the quarter, some analysts said.

"In the years that we've been covering Intel we can't recall another
time that the company has been so willing to talk about price cuts,
simply because that tends to damage demand for the near term," Merrill
Lynch analyst Joe Osha wrote in a report. "At this point, though,
pushing demand as far out as possible has made sense for Intel given
Intel's own problems and planned product launches for Q3."

Bank of America analyst Sumit Dhanda agreed that Intel's cuts hurt
sales of AMD's PC processors, adding that in some cases the larger
company's prices were lower than comparable products offered by AMD.
AMD made cuts of its own, but they came later in the quarter. They also
ranged from 8 percent to 10 percent -- smaller than Intel's reductions,
he said.

"Intel has been a share gainer in the desktop and notebook segments
throughout the June quarter, thanks to aggressive pricing incentives,"
Dhanda wrote. The cuts, "although not enough to mitigate the weak PC
demand, helped stimulate demand for Intel parts vs. AMD's."

He predicted the pattern would continue as Intel introduces a desktop
chip code-named Conroe later this month and a notebook processor
code-named Merom in August.

Spokesmen for Intel and AMD declined to comment ahead of conference
calls to discuss quarterly earnings both companies have scheduled for
later this month.

Analysts also attributed AMD's miss to flagging PC demand. Merrill
Lynch's Osha said the two companies' combined second-quarter revenue
fell 14 percent from the previous period, while units declined 10
percent. That is "a lot worse" than is typical for this time of year.

"It looks to us like Intel's attempts to freeze demand by talking up Q3
price cuts are at least partially responsible for the poor Q2
environment," Osha wrote.

Citigroup analyst Glen Young wrote in a report that the chances of
Intel missing its forecast have decreased, but have not been
eliminated, since the quarter ended in June.

The analyst speculated revenue, which in April Intel forecast would be
from $8 billion (euro6.26 billion) to $8.6 billion (euro6.73 billion),
has been steadied by sales to Apple Computer Inc., which recently began
using Intel processors in many of the machines it sells.

AMD shares fell 27 cents, or 1.1 percent, to close at $23.56 in
afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Intel lost 29 cents,
or 1.5 percent, to $18.56 on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

By DAN GOODIN, AP Technology Writer

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anandtech's Conroe vs. FX60 Yousuf Khan General 58 April 1st 06 05:19 AM
Amd-Intel cathy General 1 June 27th 05 01:44 PM
Gigabyte GA-8IDML with mobile CPU? Cuzman Overclocking 1 December 8th 04 08:20 PM
GA-8IDML and Mobile CPU compatibility Cuzman Gigabyte Motherboards 0 December 8th 04 01:29 PM
Intel vs. AMD: Best bang for buck, at the moment Dave C. Homebuilt PC's 40 September 27th 04 07:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.