A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Cdr
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mike Richter & smh



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old November 28th 04, 06:45 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

' --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Richard Loeb (Pipsqueak) moaned:
snip moaning


Stop that moaning, sicko!

Did you get ecstatic seeing these Mikey's spew, sicko?

================================================== =====
Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin ****) splattered (7/16/04):

Note that results so far suggest that DVD-RW and DVD+RW are
no more reliable than CD-RW.


Thus, DVD-+RW is unreliable, I presume?

Anyhow, what results are those? What's the source? Did you just
dig that out of your ass?

Is CD-RW unreliable, Mikey?

Once upon a time the supposedly inherently flaky, fragile,
forgetful, unreliable CD-RW media was good enough for BACKUP,
of all things, even when combined with the supposedly inherently
flaky, fragile, faulty, unreliable packet "format" -- according to
none other than Mikey:

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Acraptec Shill)
Date: 9/1/99

You may back up...to a DCD-formatted erasable.
=====================

I strongly recommend using write-once discs if
jetjock hopes to have the backup readable later.


Why is that Mikey? Have you established that DVD-+RW are
unreliable? All you presented -- without substantiation,
only on your say so -- is that DVD-+RW are no more reliable
than CD-RW.

If DVD-+RW are indeed unreliable --as you slimily intimate here--
why don't you dig it out of your ass and explicitly say so?
================================================== =========

-------------------------
What a Slimy Friggin SOB!
-------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
  #122  
Old November 30th 04, 12:12 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Richard Loeb (Pipsqueak) moaned:
snip moaning


Stop that moaning, sicko!


Are you coming, sicko?


Did you get ecstatic seeing these Mikey's spew, sicko?

================================================== =====
Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin ****) splattered (7/16/04):

Note that results so far suggest that DVD-RW and DVD+RW are
no more reliable than CD-RW.


Thus, DVD-+RW is unreliable, I presume?

Anyhow, what results are those? What's the source? Did you just
dig that out of your ass?

Is CD-RW unreliable, Mikey?

Once upon a time the supposedly inherently flaky, fragile,
forgetful, unreliable CD-RW media was good enough for BACKUP,
of all things, even when combined with the supposedly inherently
flaky, fragile, faulty, unreliable packet "format" -- according to
none other than Mikey:

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Acraptec Shill)
Date: 9/1/99

You may back up...to a DCD-formatted erasable.
=====================

I strongly recommend using write-once discs if
jetjock hopes to have the backup readable later.


Why is that Mikey? Have you established that DVD-+RW are
unreliable? All you presented -- without substantiation,
only on your say so -- is that DVD-+RW are no more reliable
than CD-RW.

If DVD-+RW are indeed unreliable --as you slimily intimate here--
why don't you dig it out of your ass and explicitly say so?
================================================== =========

-------------------------
What a Slimy Friggin SOB!
-------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

  #123  
Old December 9th 04, 06:36 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Richard Loeb (Pipsqueak) moaned:
snip moaning


Stop that moaning, sicko!


Are you coming, sicko?


Not in a public newsgroup, sicko!


Did you get ecstatic seeing these Mikey's spew, sicko?

================================================== =====
Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin ****) splattered (7/16/04):

Note that results so far suggest that DVD-RW and DVD+RW are
no more reliable than CD-RW.


Thus, DVD-+RW is unreliable, I presume?

Anyhow, what results are those? What's the source? Did you just
dig that out of your ass?

Is CD-RW unreliable, Mikey?

Once upon a time the supposedly inherently flaky, fragile,
forgetful, unreliable CD-RW media was good enough for BACKUP,
of all things, even when combined with the supposedly inherently
flaky, fragile, faulty, unreliable packet "format" -- according to
none other than Mikey:

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Acraptec Shill)
Date: 9/1/99

You may back up...to a DCD-formatted erasable.
=====================

I strongly recommend using write-once discs if
jetjock hopes to have the backup readable later.


Why is that Mikey? Have you established that DVD-+RW are
unreliable? All you presented -- without substantiation,
only on your say so -- is that DVD-+RW are no more reliable
than CD-RW.

If DVD-+RW are indeed unreliable --as you slimily intimate here--
why don't you dig it out of your ass and explicitly say so?
================================================== =========

-------------------------
What a Slimy Friggin SOB!
-------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

  #124  
Old December 17th 04, 09:12 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

' --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Richard Loeb (Pipsqueak) moaned:
snip moaning


Stop that moaning, sicko!

Did you get ecstatic seeing these Mikey's spew, sicko?

----------------------------------------------------
Mike Richter (Roxio ****) on Packet Writing "Format"
----------------------------------------------------

The issue is not the software but the format.

The fault is not with the software but with the format

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.

The format is fragile; the fault is not in the software per se.


Now get a load of the slimeball Mikey cock-a-doodle-doo about the
compliance to the faulty, fragile "format":

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB)
Subject: Incd or DirectCD
Date: 3/11/03

The consensus is that DCD, which is the more capable,
is the more compliant with the standard.
=====================

Won't that make DirectCD more faulty and fragile, Mikey?

-----------------------------------
Mikey, you are a Slimy Friggin SOB!
-----------------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
  #125  
Old December 24th 04, 05:11 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Richard Loeb (Pipsqueak) moaned:
snip moaning


Stop that moaning, sicko!


Are you coming, sicko?


Did you get ecstatic seeing these Mikey's spew, sicko?

----------------------------------------------------
Mike Richter (Roxio ****) on Packet Writing "Format"
----------------------------------------------------

The issue is not the software but the format.

The fault is not with the software but with the format

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.

The format is fragile; the fault is not in the software per se.

Now get a load of the slimeball Mikey cock-a-doodle-doo about the
compliance to the faulty, fragile "format":

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB)
Subject: Incd or DirectCD
Date: 3/11/03

The consensus is that DCD, which is the more capable,
is the more compliant with the standard.
=====================

Won't that make DirectCD more faulty and fragile, Mikey?

----------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
  #126  
Old December 24th 04, 06:42 PM
Me
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB)
Subject: Incd or DirectCD
Date: 3/11/03

The consensus is that DCD, which is the more capable,
is the more compliant with the standard.
=====================

Won't that make DirectCD more faulty and fragile, Mikey?

----------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------


Ya know....

SOB is actually a derogatory comment made to an innocent third
party...Namely the recipient's mother....

Truly shows the caliber of the person using it....Someone who will go
to any means, involving innocent people....

THAT...in my opinion....Shows a much GREATER character flaw in a person
than someone who supposedly is giving false information...

Carry on....

  #127  
Old December 27th 04, 09:24 PM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Me (Hoity-toity Schmuck) squeaked:

Ya know....

SOB is actually a derogatory comment made to an innocent third
party...Namely the recipient's mother....

Truly shows the caliber of the person using it....Someone who will go
to any means, involving innocent people....

THAT...in my opinion....Shows a much GREATER character flaw in a person
than someone who supposedly is giving false information...

Carry on....


"Supposedly" give false information? Don't you even realize Mikey is
taking you for a schmuck with this:

"The fault is not with the software but with the format"

Don't you know that the format is specified by the standard, that is,
the format is the standard? Do you think the UDF standard is faulty?
This is why Mike Richter is the slimiest ****ing SOB for spewing such a
crock of ****.

Another reason why Mike Richter is the slimiest ****ing SOB is that
Mikey blames the DirectCD bugs on the supposedly faulty and fragile
format, yet Mikey cock-a-doodles how well DirectCD complies with the
standard!

Note that there are two formats:

the format as specified by the standard, and
the format as implemented by DirectCD

Now re-read the below Mikey's cockamamies and see if you can realize
whether Mikey took you for a schmuck.

----------------------------------------------------
Mike Richter (Roxio ****) on Packet Writing "Format"
----------------------------------------------------

The issue is not the software but the format.

The fault is not with the software but with the format

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.

The format is fragile; the fault is not in the software per se.

Now get a load of the slimeball Mikey cock-a-doodle-doo about the
compliance to the faulty, fragile "format":

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB)
Subject: Incd or DirectCD
Date: 3/11/03

The consensus is that DCD, which is the more capable,
is the more compliant with the standard.
=====================

Won't that make DirectCD more faulty and fragile, Mikey?

----------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
  #128  
Old December 27th 04, 09:24 PM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Me (Hoity-toity Schmuck) squeaked:

Ya know....

SOB is actually a derogatory comment made to an innocent third
party...Namely the recipient's mother....

Truly shows the caliber of the person using it....Someone who will go
to any means, involving innocent people....

THAT...in my opinion....Shows a much GREATER character flaw in a person
than someone who supposedly is giving false information...

Carry on....


"Supposedly" give false information? Don't you even realize Mikey is
taking you for a schmuck with this:

"The fault is not with the software but with the format"

Don't you know that the format is specified by the standard, that is,
the format is the standard? Do you think the UDF standard is faulty?
This is why Mike Richter is the slimiest ****ing SOB for spewing such a
crock of ****.

Another reason why Mike Richter is the slimiest ****ing SOB is that
Mikey blames the DirectCD bugs on the supposedly faulty and fragile
format, yet Mikey cock-a-doodles how well DirectCD complies with the
standard!

Note that there are two formats:

the format as specified by the standard, and
the format as implemented by DirectCD

Now re-read the below Mikey's cockamamies and see if you can realize
whether Mikey took you for a schmuck.

----------------------------------------------------
Mike Richter (Roxio ****) on Packet Writing "Format"
----------------------------------------------------

The issue is not the software but the format.

The fault is not with the software but with the format

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.

The format is fragile; the fault is not in the software per se.

Now get a load of the slimeball Mikey cock-a-doodle-doo about the
compliance to the faulty, fragile "format":

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB)
Subject: Incd or DirectCD
Date: 3/11/03

The consensus is that DCD, which is the more capable,
is the more compliant with the standard.
=====================

Won't that make DirectCD more faulty and fragile, Mikey?

----------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
  #129  
Old December 29th 04, 10:59 AM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

' --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Richard Loeb (Pipsqueak) moaned:
snip moaning


Stop that moaning, sicko!

Did you get ecstatic seeing these Mikey's spew, sicko?

----------------------------------------------------
Mike Richter (Roxio ****) on Packet Writing "Format"
----------------------------------------------------

The issue is not the software but the format.

The fault is not with the software but with the format

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.

The format is fragile; the fault is not in the software per se.


Now get a load of the slimeball Mikey cock-a-doodle-doo about the
compliance to the faulty, fragile "format":

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB)
Date: 4/17/03

Roxio's has been the most compliant with the standard
=====================

Won't that make DirectCD the most faulty and fragile, Mikey?

----------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
  #130  
Old December 30th 04, 01:42 PM
smh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

Richard Loeb (Pipsqueak) moaned:
snip moaning


Stop that moaning, sicko!


Are you coming, sicko?


Did you get ecstatic seeing these Mikey's spew, sicko?

----------------------------------------------------
Mike Richter (Roxio ****) on Packet Writing "Format"
----------------------------------------------------

The issue is not the software but the format.

The fault is not with the software but with the format

The faults of fixed-length packets are in the format,
not in the specific software which implements UDF.

The format is fragile; the fault is not in the software per se.

Now get a load of the slimeball Mikey cock-a-doodle-doo about the
compliance to the faulty, fragile "format":

=====================
From: Mike Richter (Slimy Friggin SOB)
Date: 4/17/03

Roxio's has been the most compliant with the standard
=====================

Won't that make DirectCD the most faulty and fragile, Mikey?

----------------------------------------
Mikey, you are the Slimiest Friggin SOB!
----------------------------------------

--------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange Error Behavior LiteON LTR5237S mike Cdr 6 December 30th 03 08:11 AM
Can't copy Microsoft CDs but I've done it before with Plex and ECDC?Using Liteon and Nero smh Cdr 15 December 8th 03 11:24 PM
Q: How to burn multiple CD bin's to 1 DVD ? Coolasblu Cdr 8 November 17th 03 10:27 PM
How well does DLA work? Louise Cdr 4 November 14th 03 10:40 PM
(OT) Software Customer Bill of Rights smh Cdr 5 September 4th 03 09:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.