If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Value of transition from 2.4 to 2.8 to 3.0 @ 800-FSB
Am going to be building my own system for the first time and have chosen the 875PBZ. I'm going to be using it for gaming and video editing with Vegas or Premiere Pro. Tough call is the price differences for the three 800mhz FBS chips: 2.4CGHz @ $171 2.8CGHz @ $265 3.0CGHz @ $389 Liking the $171.. Looking for a link or expert opinoin that explains the differences in these 800FSB chips for 3D gaming or video rendering.. Keep in mind I am coming from a Dell P3-800 with 384mb of cheap ram.. and I plan on getting a gig of PC3200 DDR400 with the new machine, along with a radeon 9800 pro. Perhaps the difference in these chips is not worth the extra $200 so long as I have a top notch gfx card and plenty of ram..?? Lastly, the main reason I would want to save money is the potential to upgrade.. The new Prescott chips I hear about, will those work with the 875PBZ? That may sway my decision. If not, I'll go for the higher clock speed and 3-4 years from now get the latest technology. Thx in advance for any input |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Mac" wrote in message ... 2.4CGHz @ $171 2.8CGHz @ $265 3.0CGHz @ $389 Liking the $171.. Looking for a link or expert opinoin that explains the differences in these 800FSB chips for 3D gaming or video rendering. If you assume that everything is purely CPU-limited, you're looking at a 25% performance difference. Realistically, it'll probably be more like 10-15%. For a 125% price difference, it's pretty much a no-brainer unless you're machine is top-of-the-line everyplace else. If you're skimping on RAM or hard drive space, put the money into those things instead. Unless you really need the maximum possible performance now and money is no object, you should aim for the sweet spot in the price/performance curve. For the processor line you're looking at, 2.4Ghz is the sweet spot. The 2.4Ghz 800FSB P4 is probably about the best Intel CPU for a desktop right now. DS |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I gotan 875PBZ and running a 2,26 GHz on it. Until now everything is nice
and I have no Problems at gaming.. I.e. I fly Falcon 4 but I am not a "hardgamer". Just for the question of the upcoming PRESCOTT, I am also interested wheather those new CPUs will work with the 875PBZ ? So, if you get an answer on this question, would you please be so kind and send me a msg ? Thanks Peter "Mac" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Am going to be building my own system for the first time and have chosen the 875PBZ. I'm going to be using it for gaming and video editing with Vegas or Premiere Pro. Tough call is the price differences for the three 800mhz FBS chips: 2.4CGHz @ $171 2.8CGHz @ $265 3.0CGHz @ $389 Liking the $171.. Looking for a link or expert opinoin that explains the differences in these 800FSB chips for 3D gaming or video rendering.. Keep in mind I am coming from a Dell P3-800 with 384mb of cheap ram.. and I plan on getting a gig of PC3200 DDR400 with the new machine, along with a radeon 9800 pro. Perhaps the difference in these chips is not worth the extra $200 so long as I have a top notch gfx card and plenty of ram..?? Lastly, the main reason I would want to save money is the potential to upgrade.. The new Prescott chips I hear about, will those work with the 875PBZ? That may sway my decision. If not, I'll go for the higher clock speed and 3-4 years from now get the latest technology. Thx in advance for any input |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mac wrote:
Am going to be building my own system for the first time and have chosen the 875PBZ. I'm going to be using it for gaming and video editing with Vegas or Premiere Pro. Tough call is the price differences for the three 800mhz FBS chips: 2.4CGHz @ $171 2.8CGHz @ $265 3.0CGHz @ $389 Definitely go for the 800MHz front side bus over the 533. Pentium chips' performance is highly influenced by the fsb speed. The extra money the 3GHz P4 costs over the 2.8GHz P4 isn't worth it. It is very doubtful you'd notice any difference. You could probably overclock it to 3GHz without problems, and receive far more benefit from the increased AGP bus speed. And as history has proven time and time again over the last ten years, do not ever rely on Intel for a CPU upgrade route. Intel is constantly making changes to sockets, fsb speeds (which matter because Intel CPUs can not be unlocked) & voltages which force you to buy a new motherboard when you want a faster CPU. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cat 4.11 cures the transition crash problem in KOTOR! | James A. Cooley | Ati Videocards | 2 | November 20th 04 06:27 AM |
Silent Running: Stress test transition: L0 -> L0 : wtf does this mean? | Predator | Nvidia Videocards | 0 | October 12th 04 01:10 AM |
ATI Technologies' CEO Talks About Transition to 0.11 Micron | Radeon350 | Ati Videocards | 4 | October 1st 03 09:34 PM |
ATI Technologies' CEO Talks About Transition to 0.11 Micron | Radeon350 | Nvidia Videocards | 4 | October 1st 03 09:34 PM |
How many seconds for a basic transition? | Fogar | Asus Motherboards | 0 | July 11th 03 11:18 AM |