If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
You really aren't much of a business person, are you?
Looking at the way you compose your posts, I don't know why that would surprise me, though. "Christopher Muto" wrote in message ... no, silly, the customer just walks out the door and comes back again... with the rebate they control how many units are sold to an individual at the after rebate price (they just don't pay the claim on the extra rebates to the same address). of course you can get people that try to send rebates to their home, office, friends house, etc.. but it would certainly curb a business from the practice of buying deeply discounted items and reselling them. have you seen the many products on ebay that are 'brand new, factory sealed, with upc bar code removed from package'? people actually buy products, claim the rebates, and then resell them... profiting from some of the incredible discounts offered by rebates... if they get paid that is. unreputable vendors like pny only pay about 60% of the time and other vendors simply go out of business before the rebates are paid (cyndyne is a recent example of this). "Irene" wrote in message ... Just how is some one supposed to make sense out of this: i think you the point he was making was this: with a rebate program a store can advertise a product at a very low after rebate price yet limit the number purchased by an individual at the low after rebate price per the terms of a rebate. if they just lowered the price without the use of a rebate then any individual could buy out the entire stock at the reduced price. And now I will ask you the same question that I asked the other guy. Doesn't placing a limit of one per customer on a sale item accomplish the same thing without the hassle of a mail in rebate? I repeat the actual reasons for rebates were very accurately posted by some one else to this thread: .......... People are attracted to what they perceive as a bargain. Sellers rely on many buyers not bothering to redeem coupons or jump through the hoops required to claim the rebate. Sellers also benefit from the float (time value of money) between the purchase and cashing the rebate check. It's that simple. "Christopher Muto" wrote in message ... wow, i am beginning to understand why you don't understand my postings... i did not interpret what you wrote the first time in the way that you have just explained it here the second time. the reverse is probably the case for your interpretations of my posts. i think you the point he was making was this: with a rebate program a store can advertise a product at a very low after rebate price yet limit the number purchased by an individual at the low after rebate price per the terms of a rebate. if they just lowered the price without the use of a rebate then any individual could buy out the entire stock at the reduced price. "Irene" wrote in message ... You guys are missing the point. A rebate also performs a function similar to the coupon (limit one) you use at the grocery store. It limits your greed. If Maxtor lowered the price of their disk drives by $80, then your local conglomerate could order a thousand at that price. By offering the rebate, they can still get full price from business users while they get the marketing buzz and extra volume from non-business buyers. Also prevents ebay entrepreneurs from buying a zillion and reselling them. My response was: That flies in the face of reality. Did you ever see a sign in a store saying "limit ONE at this price" ? In other words, as if an explanation should be needed. That is exactly what I am saying. Discounted prices can be limited to one item. That would preclude some company or individual from buying 300 or a "zillion"(what ever that is) at the discounted price. The argument for the rebate(unless I completely mis-read it) was that the Rebate was used, rather than a discounted price to control the number sold, by household, business, etc, to one per entity. The true reason for rebates, as was posted by some one else to this same thread is: .......... People are attracted to what they perceive as a bargain. Sellers rely on many buyers not bothering to redeem coupons or jump through the hoops required to claim the rebate. Sellers also benefit from the float (time value of money) between the purchase and cashing the rebate check. And if you can't understand that, then I would not like to have you as a business partner. g "mike" wrote in message ... Irene wrote: That flies in the face of reality. Did you ever see a sign in a store saying "limit ONE at this price" ? If you mean in the last two minutes, the answer is YES! You'd have to be living under a rock to avoid seeing dozens of them every week. Here's an example: http://nm7u.tripod.com/homepage/coupon.jpg This one happens to be limit two, but I can find a limit one if your reality won't stretch that far. Somewhere I think I have a coupon for some bug spray to get the files off your reality. mike "mike" wrote in message ... James Nipper wrote: HillBilly Buddhist, your message demonstrates beyond debate that the rebate scam is a scam. A scam is a scam is a scam........... Now, I am glad that we have settled this debate.......... Thanks Guys !! --James-- ------------------------------- HillBilly Buddhist wrote: The idea behind managing cash is simple, speed it up coming in, slow it down going out. You know how sometimes people write a check to somebody when they haven't got any money in their checking account, then rush to the bank the next morning to put some money in before the check clears? Same idea. You can call it a "scheme" but it is s.o.p. in business. I don't deny that they factor in a percentage of rebates that will never be paid because of improper or untimely requests and those checks that will not be cashed before they expire or those that will be mishandled due to human error. With the exception of mishandled claims these are all on the head of the consumer, who mind you was never forced to buy based on after rebate prices. I don't consider it a scam because I am a willing participant and I have never NOT gotten a rebate. (I shop rebate deals at CompUSA, Office Max, Staples et. al.. almost weekly for "office consumables" and have purchased computer systems with rebates) I have no problem with a few "hoops" if it saves me some money. I suppose if you've been denied a properly requested rebate you could view them as scams. You could equally say that in any program that handles thousands (sometimes millions) of paper claims by hand some people are going to get the short end of the stick. You guys are missing the point. A rebate also performs a function similar to the coupon (limit one) you use at the grocery store. It limits your greed. If Maxtor lowered the price of their disk drives by $80, then your local conglomerate could order a thousand at that price. By offering the rebate, they can still get full price from business users while they get the marketing buzz and extra volume from non-business buyers. Also prevents ebay entrepreneurs from buying a zillion and reselling them. And yes, they do hope you don't send in the rebate. It's not their fault that you're lazy. And yes, they do get the float. Occasionally, a company will use rebates to rip the last dollar out of a business as they're filing chapter 11. As a percentage, that's not high. It's my choice to take advantage of rebates. You may choose not to. Everybody wins. mike -- Bunch of stuff For Sale and Wanted at the link below. laptops and parts Test Equipment Honda CB-125S TEK Sampling Sweep Plugin and RM564 Tek 2465 $800, ham radio, 30pS pulser Tektronix Concept Books, spot welding head... http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/4710/ -- Bunch of stuff For Sale and Wanted at the link below. laptops and parts Test Equipment Honda CB-125S TEK Sampling Sweep Plugin and RM564 Tek 2465 $800, ham radio, 30pS pulser Tektronix Concept Books, spot welding head... http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/4710/ |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
your pattern of giving up on a discussions and turning to insults is
becoming consistent and is disappointing. try again, or don't, but be aware that the insults are just an affirmation of the other persons position. "Irene" wrote in message ... You really aren't much of a business person, are you? Looking at the way you compose your posts, I don't know why that would surprise me, though. "Christopher Muto" wrote in message ... no, silly, the customer just walks out the door and comes back again... with the rebate they control how many units are sold to an individual at the after rebate price (they just don't pay the claim on the extra rebates to the same address). of course you can get people that try to send rebates to their home, office, friends house, etc.. but it would certainly curb a business from the practice of buying deeply discounted items and reselling them. have you seen the many products on ebay that are 'brand new, factory sealed, with upc bar code removed from package'? people actually buy products, claim the rebates, and then resell them... profiting from some of the incredible discounts offered by rebates... if they get paid that is. unreputable vendors like pny only pay about 60% of the time and other vendors simply go out of business before the rebates are paid (cyndyne is a recent example of this). "Irene" wrote in message ... Just how is some one supposed to make sense out of this: i think you the point he was making was this: with a rebate program a store can advertise a product at a very low after rebate price yet limit the number purchased by an individual at the low after rebate price per the terms of a rebate. if they just lowered the price without the use of a rebate then any individual could buy out the entire stock at the reduced price. And now I will ask you the same question that I asked the other guy. Doesn't placing a limit of one per customer on a sale item accomplish the same thing without the hassle of a mail in rebate? I repeat the actual reasons for rebates were very accurately posted by some one else to this thread: .......... People are attracted to what they perceive as a bargain. Sellers rely on many buyers not bothering to redeem coupons or jump through the hoops required to claim the rebate. Sellers also benefit from the float (time value of money) between the purchase and cashing the rebate check. It's that simple. "Christopher Muto" wrote in message ... wow, i am beginning to understand why you don't understand my postings... i did not interpret what you wrote the first time in the way that you have just explained it here the second time. the reverse is probably the case for your interpretations of my posts. i think you the point he was making was this: with a rebate program a store can advertise a product at a very low after rebate price yet limit the number purchased by an individual at the low after rebate price per the terms of a rebate. if they just lowered the price without the use of a rebate then any individual could buy out the entire stock at the reduced price. "Irene" wrote in message ... You guys are missing the point. A rebate also performs a function similar to the coupon (limit one) you use at the grocery store. It limits your greed. If Maxtor lowered the price of their disk drives by $80, then your local conglomerate could order a thousand at that price. By offering the rebate, they can still get full price from business users while they get the marketing buzz and extra volume from non-business buyers. Also prevents ebay entrepreneurs from buying a zillion and reselling them. My response was: That flies in the face of reality. Did you ever see a sign in a store saying "limit ONE at this price" ? In other words, as if an explanation should be needed. That is exactly what I am saying. Discounted prices can be limited to one item. That would preclude some company or individual from buying 300 or a "zillion"(what ever that is) at the discounted price. The argument for the rebate(unless I completely mis-read it) was that the Rebate was used, rather than a discounted price to control the number sold, by household, business, etc, to one per entity. The true reason for rebates, as was posted by some one else to this same thread is: .......... People are attracted to what they perceive as a bargain. Sellers rely on many buyers not bothering to redeem coupons or jump through the hoops required to claim the rebate. Sellers also benefit from the float (time value of money) between the purchase and cashing the rebate check. And if you can't understand that, then I would not like to have you as a business partner. g "mike" wrote in message ... Irene wrote: That flies in the face of reality. Did you ever see a sign in a store saying "limit ONE at this price" ? If you mean in the last two minutes, the answer is YES! You'd have to be living under a rock to avoid seeing dozens of them every week. Here's an example: http://nm7u.tripod.com/homepage/coupon.jpg This one happens to be limit two, but I can find a limit one if your reality won't stretch that far. Somewhere I think I have a coupon for some bug spray to get the files off your reality. mike "mike" wrote in message ... James Nipper wrote: HillBilly Buddhist, your message demonstrates beyond debate that the rebate scam is a scam. A scam is a scam is a scam........... Now, I am glad that we have settled this debate.......... Thanks Guys !! --James-- ------------------------------- HillBilly Buddhist wrote: The idea behind managing cash is simple, speed it up coming in, slow it down going out. You know how sometimes people write a check to somebody when they haven't got any money in their checking account, then rush to the bank the next morning to put some money in before the check clears? Same idea. You can call it a "scheme" but it is s.o.p. in business. I don't deny that they factor in a percentage of rebates that will never be paid because of improper or untimely requests and those checks that will not be cashed before they expire or those that will be mishandled due to human error. With the exception of mishandled claims these are all on the head of the consumer, who mind you was never forced to buy based on after rebate prices. I don't consider it a scam because I am a willing participant and I have never NOT gotten a rebate. (I shop rebate deals at CompUSA, Office Max, Staples et. al.. almost weekly for "office consumables" and have purchased computer systems with rebates) I have no problem with a few "hoops" if it saves me some money. I suppose if you've been denied a properly requested rebate you could view them as scams. You could equally say that in any program that handles thousands (sometimes millions) of paper claims by hand some people are going to get the short end of the stick. You guys are missing the point. A rebate also performs a function similar to the coupon (limit one) you use at the grocery store. It limits your greed. If Maxtor lowered the price of their disk drives by $80, then your local conglomerate could order a thousand at that price. By offering the rebate, they can still get full price from business users while they get the marketing buzz and extra volume from non-business buyers. Also prevents ebay entrepreneurs from buying a zillion and reselling them. And yes, they do hope you don't send in the rebate. It's not their fault that you're lazy. And yes, they do get the float. Occasionally, a company will use rebates to rip the last dollar out of a business as they're filing chapter 11. As a percentage, that's not high. It's my choice to take advantage of rebates. You may choose not to. Everybody wins. mike -- Bunch of stuff For Sale and Wanted at the link below. laptops and parts Test Equipment Honda CB-125S TEK Sampling Sweep Plugin and RM564 Tek 2465 $800, ham radio, 30pS pulser Tektronix Concept Books, spot welding head... http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/4710/ -- Bunch of stuff For Sale and Wanted at the link below. laptops and parts Test Equipment Honda CB-125S TEK Sampling Sweep Plugin and RM564 Tek 2465 $800, ham radio, 30pS pulser Tektronix Concept Books, spot welding head... http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/4710/ |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Exactly Irene. I actually purchased about 10 systems from dell last year
because I help people buy computers. I tutor one-on-one, repair computers, have built them, etc. Dell is floating the money and not delivering on some of them without MAJOR hassles. It has been 3 and 1/2 months and I still don't have $100. In my case, I will never buy another dell. This plus the drop in their support to Gateway levels has done it for me. That's it. No more. "Irene" wrote in message ... It depends on the company involved. Some are prompt some aren't. Dell is one that we have had such problems with, that IF we ever buy another Dell(and with the current condition of their Home PC Tech Support, that is very unlikely) it will not be one that involves a coupon rebate. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Denzelpuppy" wrote in message ... think about it just for 1 moment do you really think Dell would male out dud cheques???? It looks like a duck and walks like a duck, I begin to think it is a duck. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
But there is no evidence to support any conspiracy on Dell's part to
withhold money. The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". Have you emailed customer care? Tom "Jenny" wrote in message ... "Denzelpuppy" wrote in message ... think about it just for 1 moment do you really think Dell would male out dud cheques???? It looks like a duck and walks like a duck, I begin to think it is a duck. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been
when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". What do you do, intentionally ignore any such post that just might imply something else. g "Tom Scales" wrote in message ... But there is no evidence to support any conspiracy on Dell's part to withhold money. The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". Have you emailed customer care? Tom "Jenny" wrote in message ... "Denzelpuppy" wrote in message ... think about it just for 1 moment do you really think Dell would male out dud cheques???? It looks like a duck and walks like a duck, I begin to think it is a duck. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
BTW, I just did a quick Google search of this news group for the subject of
"rebate". I had no trouble finding several that said nothing about late or improper submission. Some were really bad. Instances where even Dell representatives admitted the customer was correct. But the rebate was still not received by the customer. Seems to put some ones voracity into question, doesn't it? "Irene" wrote in message ... The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". What do you do, intentionally ignore any such post that just might imply something else. g "Tom Scales" wrote in message ... But there is no evidence to support any conspiracy on Dell's part to withhold money. The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". Have you emailed customer care? Tom "Jenny" wrote in message ... "Denzelpuppy" wrote in message ... think about it just for 1 moment do you really think Dell would male out dud cheques???? It looks like a duck and walks like a duck, I begin to think it is a duck. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
I see the same rebate problems using Google Groups with Gateway, HP/Compaq,
Acer, Micron, Packard Bell and I betcha if I checked other companies and stores that have rebates, that they will have the same problems too. "Irene" wrote in message ... BTW, I just did a quick Google search of this news group for the subject of "rebate". I had no trouble finding several that said nothing about late or improper submission. Some were really bad. Instances where even Dell representatives admitted the customer was correct. But the rebate was still not received by the customer. Seems to put some ones voracity into question, doesn't it? "Irene" wrote in message ... The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". What do you do, intentionally ignore any such post that just might imply something else. g "Tom Scales" wrote in message ... But there is no evidence to support any conspiracy on Dell's part to withhold money. The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". Have you emailed customer care? Tom "Jenny" wrote in message ... "Denzelpuppy" wrote in message ... think about it just for 1 moment do you really think Dell would male out dud cheques???? It looks like a duck and walks like a duck, I begin to think it is a duck. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
That would seem to backup the earlier claim that rebates are scams.
Processing a rebate isn't rocket science. Hard to imagine why there are so many problems with them. "Dan Sgambelluri" wrote in message news:zjVwb.495667$6C4.114500@pd7tw1no... I see the same rebate problems using Google Groups with Gateway, HP/Compaq, Acer, Micron, Packard Bell and I betcha if I checked other companies and stores that have rebates, that they will have the same problems too. "Irene" wrote in message ... BTW, I just did a quick Google search of this news group for the subject of "rebate". I had no trouble finding several that said nothing about late or improper submission. Some were really bad. Instances where even Dell representatives admitted the customer was correct. But the rebate was still not received by the customer. Seems to put some ones voracity into question, doesn't it? "Irene" wrote in message ... The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". What do you do, intentionally ignore any such post that just might imply something else. g "Tom Scales" wrote in message ... But there is no evidence to support any conspiracy on Dell's part to withhold money. The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". Have you emailed customer care? Tom "Jenny" wrote in message ... "Denzelpuppy" wrote in message ... think about it just for 1 moment do you really think Dell would male out dud cheques???? It looks like a duck and walks like a duck, I begin to think it is a duck. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
I agree, Dell isn't as bad as some. I've received five Dell rebates over the
years without a problem. I can't say the same about two other computer vendors that I had to make multiple calls regarding the status--after 3-5 months. They all should take a lesson from Symantec's new rebate processor. I purchased three Norton products at different time intervals recently, and the rebates landed in my mailbox in 8, 11 and 12 days. They E-Mail you as soon as they receive your paperwork, about three days after I mailed them. Now Checker Auto Parts rebate is in it's fourth month, I'll wait another two before I contact them. That seems to be the norm with the Arizona firm they use. Ken "Dan Sgambelluri" wrote in message news:zjVwb.495667$6C4.114500@pd7tw1no... I see the same rebate problems using Google Groups with Gateway, HP/Compaq, Acer, Micron, Packard Bell and I betcha if I checked other companies and stores that have rebates, that they will have the same problems too. "Irene" wrote in message ... BTW, I just did a quick Google search of this news group for the subject of "rebate". I had no trouble finding several that said nothing about late or improper submission. Some were really bad. Instances where even Dell representatives admitted the customer was correct. But the rebate was still not received by the customer. Seems to put some ones voracity into question, doesn't it? "Irene" wrote in message ... The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". What do you do, intentionally ignore any such post that just might imply something else. g "Tom Scales" wrote in message ... But there is no evidence to support any conspiracy on Dell's part to withhold money. The only cases I've seen here of Dell not paying has been when the posts start with things like "I was only three days late sending it in". Have you emailed customer care? Tom "Jenny" wrote in message ... "Denzelpuppy" wrote in message ... think about it just for 1 moment do you really think Dell would male out dud cheques???? It looks like a duck and walks like a duck, I begin to think it is a duck. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
nvidia display issues | news.socket.net | Nvidia Videocards | 1 | March 17th 05 11:57 PM |
Asus A7N8X-X and AMD Athlon XP 3200+ | Information Scavenger | Asus Motherboards | 30 | November 9th 04 09:30 PM |
Update on Athlon 2600 XP problem | David Simmons | Asus Motherboards | 3 | August 27th 04 03:52 AM |
MMC 9.0 "upgrade" | Alan Olson | Ati Videocards | 18 | April 27th 04 10:17 PM |
LINUX 53.28 BAD Performance? | Gizmo | Nvidia Videocards | 7 | December 31st 03 07:40 PM |